Pregnancy diagnosis in the ewe [Rectal-abdominal palpation, doppler, ultrasonic scanning]

A total of 378 ewe lambs were evaluated for signs of pregnancy using five methods of detection. The methods used were breeding mark, rectal-abdominal palpation, an intrarectal Doppler instrument and two ultrasonic devices, the Scanoprobe and Scanopreg (Model 738) for sheep. Accuracies of pregnancy d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 1983-07, Vol.57 (1), p.1-5
Hauptverfasser: Trapp, M. J, Slyter, A. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 57
creator Trapp, M. J
Slyter, A. L
description A total of 378 ewe lambs were evaluated for signs of pregnancy using five methods of detection. The methods used were breeding mark, rectal-abdominal palpation, an intrarectal Doppler instrument and two ultrasonic devices, the Scanoprobe and Scanopreg (Model 738) for sheep. Accuracies of pregnancy diagnosis based on grease marks at mating vs lambing results were 65.7% in 1976 and 75.5% in 1977 (P less than .05). Accuracy of diagnosis using the rectal-abdominal palpation technique was 62.7%. The overall accuracy on the same ewes using the intrarectal Doppler device was 72.7%. The ewes were examined when they were from 60 to 96 d of gestation using the two rectal probes. Seven ewes died from peritonitis and six aborted following pregnancy detection using the rectal instruments. Accuracy using the Scanoprobe device was 89.1% for ewe lambs that ranged from 69 to 103 d pregnant. The total accuracy achieved when the same ewes were evaluated at 78 to 112 d of gestation using the Scanopreg device was 94.8%.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/jas1983.5711
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80622952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80622952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-48ebf2b6a73dc791e630aaf57e0af9ae58c75cbb3e84aac4c01277ad3cbaf76f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM9rFTEUhYNY6rO6c6sECq7e1PyYTDJLKVULBUXtQkTCncydeSmZZEzmUfrfO4_3cHUX5-Mc7kfIG86uhBL6wwMU3hp5pTTnz8iGK6EqyRv5nGwYE7wyhosX5GUpD4xxoVp1Ts4bY1Sj-Ib8-pZxjBDdE-09jDEVX6iPdNkhxUekv7-jWyBU0PVp8hECnSHMsPgUt7RP8xwwb-k-LBlKit7R4iBGH8c_r8jZAKHg69O9IPefbn5ef6nuvn6-vf54Vzkp9VLVBrtBdA1o2TvdcmwkAxiURgZDC6iM08p1nURTA7jarT9oDb10HQy6GeQFeX_snXP6u8ey2MkXhyFAxLQv1rBGiFaJFdweQZdTKRkHO2c_QX6ynNmDSXsyaQ8mV_ztqXffTdj_h0_q1vzymO_8uHv0GW2ZIISV5ocipS23B-rdkRogWRizL_b-xzpSM854bYT8B794hjY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80622952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pregnancy diagnosis in the ewe [Rectal-abdominal palpation, doppler, ultrasonic scanning]</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Trapp, M. J ; Slyter, A. L</creator><creatorcontrib>Trapp, M. J ; Slyter, A. L ; B"lgarska Akademiya na Naukite, Sofia (Bulgaria)</creatorcontrib><description>A total of 378 ewe lambs were evaluated for signs of pregnancy using five methods of detection. The methods used were breeding mark, rectal-abdominal palpation, an intrarectal Doppler instrument and two ultrasonic devices, the Scanoprobe and Scanopreg (Model 738) for sheep. Accuracies of pregnancy diagnosis based on grease marks at mating vs lambing results were 65.7% in 1976 and 75.5% in 1977 (P less than .05). Accuracy of diagnosis using the rectal-abdominal palpation technique was 62.7%. The overall accuracy on the same ewes using the intrarectal Doppler device was 72.7%. The ewes were examined when they were from 60 to 96 d of gestation using the two rectal probes. Seven ewes died from peritonitis and six aborted following pregnancy detection using the rectal instruments. Accuracy using the Scanoprobe device was 89.1% for ewe lambs that ranged from 69 to 103 d pregnant. The total accuracy achieved when the same ewes were evaluated at 78 to 112 d of gestation using the Scanopreg device was 94.8%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas1983.5711</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6885651</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>Animals ; Female ; Paint ; Palpation - veterinary ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Tests - methods ; Pregnancy Tests - veterinary ; Sheep - physiology ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 1983-07, Vol.57 (1), p.1-5</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-48ebf2b6a73dc791e630aaf57e0af9ae58c75cbb3e84aac4c01277ad3cbaf76f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6885651$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trapp, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slyter, A. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>B"lgarska Akademiya na Naukite, Sofia (Bulgaria)</creatorcontrib><title>Pregnancy diagnosis in the ewe [Rectal-abdominal palpation, doppler, ultrasonic scanning]</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>A total of 378 ewe lambs were evaluated for signs of pregnancy using five methods of detection. The methods used were breeding mark, rectal-abdominal palpation, an intrarectal Doppler instrument and two ultrasonic devices, the Scanoprobe and Scanopreg (Model 738) for sheep. Accuracies of pregnancy diagnosis based on grease marks at mating vs lambing results were 65.7% in 1976 and 75.5% in 1977 (P less than .05). Accuracy of diagnosis using the rectal-abdominal palpation technique was 62.7%. The overall accuracy on the same ewes using the intrarectal Doppler device was 72.7%. The ewes were examined when they were from 60 to 96 d of gestation using the two rectal probes. Seven ewes died from peritonitis and six aborted following pregnancy detection using the rectal instruments. Accuracy using the Scanoprobe device was 89.1% for ewe lambs that ranged from 69 to 103 d pregnant. The total accuracy achieved when the same ewes were evaluated at 78 to 112 d of gestation using the Scanopreg device was 94.8%.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Paint</subject><subject>Palpation - veterinary</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Tests - methods</subject><subject>Pregnancy Tests - veterinary</subject><subject>Sheep - physiology</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM9rFTEUhYNY6rO6c6sECq7e1PyYTDJLKVULBUXtQkTCncydeSmZZEzmUfrfO4_3cHUX5-Mc7kfIG86uhBL6wwMU3hp5pTTnz8iGK6EqyRv5nGwYE7wyhosX5GUpD4xxoVp1Ts4bY1Sj-Ib8-pZxjBDdE-09jDEVX6iPdNkhxUekv7-jWyBU0PVp8hECnSHMsPgUt7RP8xwwb-k-LBlKit7R4iBGH8c_r8jZAKHg69O9IPefbn5ef6nuvn6-vf54Vzkp9VLVBrtBdA1o2TvdcmwkAxiURgZDC6iM08p1nURTA7jarT9oDb10HQy6GeQFeX_snXP6u8ey2MkXhyFAxLQv1rBGiFaJFdweQZdTKRkHO2c_QX6ynNmDSXsyaQ8mV_ztqXffTdj_h0_q1vzymO_8uHv0GW2ZIISV5ocipS23B-rdkRogWRizL_b-xzpSM854bYT8B794hjY</recordid><startdate>198307</startdate><enddate>198307</enddate><creator>Trapp, M. J</creator><creator>Slyter, A. L</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198307</creationdate><title>Pregnancy diagnosis in the ewe [Rectal-abdominal palpation, doppler, ultrasonic scanning]</title><author>Trapp, M. J ; Slyter, A. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-48ebf2b6a73dc791e630aaf57e0af9ae58c75cbb3e84aac4c01277ad3cbaf76f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Paint</topic><topic>Palpation - veterinary</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Tests - methods</topic><topic>Pregnancy Tests - veterinary</topic><topic>Sheep - physiology</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trapp, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slyter, A. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>B"lgarska Akademiya na Naukite, Sofia (Bulgaria)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trapp, M. J</au><au>Slyter, A. L</au><aucorp>B"lgarska Akademiya na Naukite, Sofia (Bulgaria)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pregnancy diagnosis in the ewe [Rectal-abdominal palpation, doppler, ultrasonic scanning]</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>1983-07</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>1-5</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>A total of 378 ewe lambs were evaluated for signs of pregnancy using five methods of detection. The methods used were breeding mark, rectal-abdominal palpation, an intrarectal Doppler instrument and two ultrasonic devices, the Scanoprobe and Scanopreg (Model 738) for sheep. Accuracies of pregnancy diagnosis based on grease marks at mating vs lambing results were 65.7% in 1976 and 75.5% in 1977 (P less than .05). Accuracy of diagnosis using the rectal-abdominal palpation technique was 62.7%. The overall accuracy on the same ewes using the intrarectal Doppler device was 72.7%. The ewes were examined when they were from 60 to 96 d of gestation using the two rectal probes. Seven ewes died from peritonitis and six aborted following pregnancy detection using the rectal instruments. Accuracy using the Scanoprobe device was 89.1% for ewe lambs that ranged from 69 to 103 d pregnant. The total accuracy achieved when the same ewes were evaluated at 78 to 112 d of gestation using the Scanopreg device was 94.8%.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>6885651</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas1983.5711</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 1983-07, Vol.57 (1), p.1-5
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80622952
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Female
Paint
Palpation - veterinary
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Tests - methods
Pregnancy Tests - veterinary
Sheep - physiology
Ultrasonography
title Pregnancy diagnosis in the ewe [Rectal-abdominal palpation, doppler, ultrasonic scanning]
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A30%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pregnancy%20diagnosis%20in%20the%20ewe%20%5BRectal-abdominal%20palpation,%20doppler,%20ultrasonic%20scanning%5D&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Trapp,%20M.%20J&rft.aucorp=B%22lgarska%20Akademiya%20na%20Naukite,%20Sofia%20(Bulgaria)&rft.date=1983-07&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=1-5&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas1983.5711&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80622952%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80622952&rft_id=info:pmid/6885651&rfr_iscdi=true