Pregnancy diagnosis in the ewe [Rectal-abdominal palpation, doppler, ultrasonic scanning]
A total of 378 ewe lambs were evaluated for signs of pregnancy using five methods of detection. The methods used were breeding mark, rectal-abdominal palpation, an intrarectal Doppler instrument and two ultrasonic devices, the Scanoprobe and Scanopreg (Model 738) for sheep. Accuracies of pregnancy d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 1983-07, Vol.57 (1), p.1-5 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Trapp, M. J Slyter, A. L |
description | A total of 378 ewe lambs were evaluated for signs of pregnancy using five methods of detection. The methods used were breeding mark, rectal-abdominal palpation, an intrarectal Doppler instrument and two ultrasonic devices, the Scanoprobe and Scanopreg (Model 738) for sheep. Accuracies of pregnancy diagnosis based on grease marks at mating vs lambing results were 65.7% in 1976 and 75.5% in 1977 (P less than .05). Accuracy of diagnosis using the rectal-abdominal palpation technique was 62.7%. The overall accuracy on the same ewes using the intrarectal Doppler device was 72.7%. The ewes were examined when they were from 60 to 96 d of gestation using the two rectal probes. Seven ewes died from peritonitis and six aborted following pregnancy detection using the rectal instruments. Accuracy using the Scanoprobe device was 89.1% for ewe lambs that ranged from 69 to 103 d pregnant. The total accuracy achieved when the same ewes were evaluated at 78 to 112 d of gestation using the Scanopreg device was 94.8%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas1983.5711 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80622952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80622952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-48ebf2b6a73dc791e630aaf57e0af9ae58c75cbb3e84aac4c01277ad3cbaf76f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM9rFTEUhYNY6rO6c6sECq7e1PyYTDJLKVULBUXtQkTCncydeSmZZEzmUfrfO4_3cHUX5-Mc7kfIG86uhBL6wwMU3hp5pTTnz8iGK6EqyRv5nGwYE7wyhosX5GUpD4xxoVp1Ts4bY1Sj-Ib8-pZxjBDdE-09jDEVX6iPdNkhxUekv7-jWyBU0PVp8hECnSHMsPgUt7RP8xwwb-k-LBlKit7R4iBGH8c_r8jZAKHg69O9IPefbn5ef6nuvn6-vf54Vzkp9VLVBrtBdA1o2TvdcmwkAxiURgZDC6iM08p1nURTA7jarT9oDb10HQy6GeQFeX_snXP6u8ey2MkXhyFAxLQv1rBGiFaJFdweQZdTKRkHO2c_QX6ynNmDSXsyaQ8mV_ztqXffTdj_h0_q1vzymO_8uHv0GW2ZIISV5ocipS23B-rdkRogWRizL_b-xzpSM854bYT8B794hjY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80622952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pregnancy diagnosis in the ewe [Rectal-abdominal palpation, doppler, ultrasonic scanning]</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Trapp, M. J ; Slyter, A. L</creator><creatorcontrib>Trapp, M. J ; Slyter, A. L ; B"lgarska Akademiya na Naukite, Sofia (Bulgaria)</creatorcontrib><description>A total of 378 ewe lambs were evaluated for signs of pregnancy using five methods of detection. The methods used were breeding mark, rectal-abdominal palpation, an intrarectal Doppler instrument and two ultrasonic devices, the Scanoprobe and Scanopreg (Model 738) for sheep. Accuracies of pregnancy diagnosis based on grease marks at mating vs lambing results were 65.7% in 1976 and 75.5% in 1977 (P less than .05). Accuracy of diagnosis using the rectal-abdominal palpation technique was 62.7%. The overall accuracy on the same ewes using the intrarectal Doppler device was 72.7%. The ewes were examined when they were from 60 to 96 d of gestation using the two rectal probes. Seven ewes died from peritonitis and six aborted following pregnancy detection using the rectal instruments. Accuracy using the Scanoprobe device was 89.1% for ewe lambs that ranged from 69 to 103 d pregnant. The total accuracy achieved when the same ewes were evaluated at 78 to 112 d of gestation using the Scanopreg device was 94.8%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas1983.5711</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6885651</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>Animals ; Female ; Paint ; Palpation - veterinary ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Tests - methods ; Pregnancy Tests - veterinary ; Sheep - physiology ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 1983-07, Vol.57 (1), p.1-5</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-48ebf2b6a73dc791e630aaf57e0af9ae58c75cbb3e84aac4c01277ad3cbaf76f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6885651$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trapp, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slyter, A. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>B"lgarska Akademiya na Naukite, Sofia (Bulgaria)</creatorcontrib><title>Pregnancy diagnosis in the ewe [Rectal-abdominal palpation, doppler, ultrasonic scanning]</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>A total of 378 ewe lambs were evaluated for signs of pregnancy using five methods of detection. The methods used were breeding mark, rectal-abdominal palpation, an intrarectal Doppler instrument and two ultrasonic devices, the Scanoprobe and Scanopreg (Model 738) for sheep. Accuracies of pregnancy diagnosis based on grease marks at mating vs lambing results were 65.7% in 1976 and 75.5% in 1977 (P less than .05). Accuracy of diagnosis using the rectal-abdominal palpation technique was 62.7%. The overall accuracy on the same ewes using the intrarectal Doppler device was 72.7%. The ewes were examined when they were from 60 to 96 d of gestation using the two rectal probes. Seven ewes died from peritonitis and six aborted following pregnancy detection using the rectal instruments. Accuracy using the Scanoprobe device was 89.1% for ewe lambs that ranged from 69 to 103 d pregnant. The total accuracy achieved when the same ewes were evaluated at 78 to 112 d of gestation using the Scanopreg device was 94.8%.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Paint</subject><subject>Palpation - veterinary</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Tests - methods</subject><subject>Pregnancy Tests - veterinary</subject><subject>Sheep - physiology</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM9rFTEUhYNY6rO6c6sECq7e1PyYTDJLKVULBUXtQkTCncydeSmZZEzmUfrfO4_3cHUX5-Mc7kfIG86uhBL6wwMU3hp5pTTnz8iGK6EqyRv5nGwYE7wyhosX5GUpD4xxoVp1Ts4bY1Sj-Ib8-pZxjBDdE-09jDEVX6iPdNkhxUekv7-jWyBU0PVp8hECnSHMsPgUt7RP8xwwb-k-LBlKit7R4iBGH8c_r8jZAKHg69O9IPefbn5ef6nuvn6-vf54Vzkp9VLVBrtBdA1o2TvdcmwkAxiURgZDC6iM08p1nURTA7jarT9oDb10HQy6GeQFeX_snXP6u8ey2MkXhyFAxLQv1rBGiFaJFdweQZdTKRkHO2c_QX6ynNmDSXsyaQ8mV_ztqXffTdj_h0_q1vzymO_8uHv0GW2ZIISV5ocipS23B-rdkRogWRizL_b-xzpSM854bYT8B794hjY</recordid><startdate>198307</startdate><enddate>198307</enddate><creator>Trapp, M. J</creator><creator>Slyter, A. L</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198307</creationdate><title>Pregnancy diagnosis in the ewe [Rectal-abdominal palpation, doppler, ultrasonic scanning]</title><author>Trapp, M. J ; Slyter, A. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-48ebf2b6a73dc791e630aaf57e0af9ae58c75cbb3e84aac4c01277ad3cbaf76f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Paint</topic><topic>Palpation - veterinary</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Tests - methods</topic><topic>Pregnancy Tests - veterinary</topic><topic>Sheep - physiology</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trapp, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slyter, A. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>B"lgarska Akademiya na Naukite, Sofia (Bulgaria)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trapp, M. J</au><au>Slyter, A. L</au><aucorp>B"lgarska Akademiya na Naukite, Sofia (Bulgaria)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pregnancy diagnosis in the ewe [Rectal-abdominal palpation, doppler, ultrasonic scanning]</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>1983-07</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>1-5</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>A total of 378 ewe lambs were evaluated for signs of pregnancy using five methods of detection. The methods used were breeding mark, rectal-abdominal palpation, an intrarectal Doppler instrument and two ultrasonic devices, the Scanoprobe and Scanopreg (Model 738) for sheep. Accuracies of pregnancy diagnosis based on grease marks at mating vs lambing results were 65.7% in 1976 and 75.5% in 1977 (P less than .05). Accuracy of diagnosis using the rectal-abdominal palpation technique was 62.7%. The overall accuracy on the same ewes using the intrarectal Doppler device was 72.7%. The ewes were examined when they were from 60 to 96 d of gestation using the two rectal probes. Seven ewes died from peritonitis and six aborted following pregnancy detection using the rectal instruments. Accuracy using the Scanoprobe device was 89.1% for ewe lambs that ranged from 69 to 103 d pregnant. The total accuracy achieved when the same ewes were evaluated at 78 to 112 d of gestation using the Scanopreg device was 94.8%.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>6885651</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas1983.5711</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 1983-07, Vol.57 (1), p.1-5 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80622952 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Female Paint Palpation - veterinary Pregnancy Pregnancy Tests - methods Pregnancy Tests - veterinary Sheep - physiology Ultrasonography |
title | Pregnancy diagnosis in the ewe [Rectal-abdominal palpation, doppler, ultrasonic scanning] |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A30%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pregnancy%20diagnosis%20in%20the%20ewe%20%5BRectal-abdominal%20palpation,%20doppler,%20ultrasonic%20scanning%5D&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Trapp,%20M.%20J&rft.aucorp=B%22lgarska%20Akademiya%20na%20Naukite,%20Sofia%20(Bulgaria)&rft.date=1983-07&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=1-5&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas1983.5711&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80622952%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80622952&rft_id=info:pmid/6885651&rfr_iscdi=true |