Correlation between response to chemotherapy of human tumors in patients and in nude mice

Human tumors serially heterotransplanted in nude mice have been tested for their response to chemotherapeutic agents. Fourteen melanomas, 14 colorectal carcinomas, and 14 breast carcinomas have been used. Each tumor originated in a different patient. The tumors were maintained by serial subcutaneous...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 1983-10, Vol.52 (7), p.1146-1152
Hauptverfasser: Giovanella, Beppino C., Stehlin, John S., Shepard, Randall C., Williams, Leo J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1152
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1146
container_title Cancer
container_volume 52
creator Giovanella, Beppino C.
Stehlin, John S.
Shepard, Randall C.
Williams, Leo J.
description Human tumors serially heterotransplanted in nude mice have been tested for their response to chemotherapeutic agents. Fourteen melanomas, 14 colorectal carcinomas, and 14 breast carcinomas have been used. Each tumor originated in a different patient. The tumors were maintained by serial subcutaneous transplantation in nude mice. For the experiments in this study, each neoplasm was transplanted under the kidney capsule of 60 to 100 adult nude mice. The areas of the individual tumor implants were precisely measured immediately after insertion using a stereo microscope equipped with a micrometric ocular. The animals were then divided into groups of six to ten animals each. One group was injected daily with saline and served as controls. The mice in the remaining groups were injected daily for eight days with one of the following chemotherapeutic agents—Adriamycin (doxorubicin), 5‐fluorouracil, methotrexate, Cytoxan (cyclophosphamide), Alkeran (melphalan), vincristine, vinblastine, methyl‐CCNU, or BCNU—at optimum doses (the maximum dose tolerated that causes less than 10% weight loss). Treatment was initiated when the implants were well established, having roughly doubled their initial mass. The animals were then sacrificed and the tumors measured again. A drug was rated effective only if it inhibited growth of the tumor by 99% or more. The results so obtained were compared with the published results of various clinical trials. When the sensitivity of the human tumors in the mice was compared with the sensitivity of tumors of the same type that had been treated in human patients, a close correlation was found. The panel study detected nine of ten effective drugs, giving only two false‐positive results. Our data strongly support the validity of heterotransplants of human tumors in the nude mouse as a predictive system for testing new anticancer agents and in determining optimal treatment schedules and combinations of known drugs.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1097-0142(19831001)52:7<1146::AID-CNCR2820520704>3.0.CO;2-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80610446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80610446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4984-e281b699563004d1543cbb73dffb5b7945da17e5b4c4684a510c085a8b4187e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkFuL1EAQhYMo67j6E4R-ENGHjNW3dGcUYYm3hcUBUVB8aDqdChNJusfuhGX-vQkzDuiD4FNRdU4dDl-WVRTWFIC9oFCqHKhgz2ip-XyizyXbqFeUimKzubp-k1cfq09MM5AMFIjXfA3ravuS5cWdbHX-vputAEDnUvCv97MHKf2YV8Ukv8guCq0503yVfatCjNjbsQue1DjeInoSMe2DT0jGQNwOhzDuMNr9gYSW7KbBejJOQ4iJdJ7s51f0YyLWN8vupwbJ0Dl8mN1rbZ_w0WleZl_evf1cfchvtu-vq6ub3IlSixyZpnVRlrLgAKKhc1tX14o3bVvLWpVCNpYqlLVwotDCSgoOtLS6FlQrLPhl9vSYu4_h54RpNEOXHPa99RimZDQUFIRYjN-PRhdDShFbs4_dYOPBUDALeLOgMws68xu8kcwos4A3ZgZv_gRvuAFTbQ0zS_rjU42pHrA5Z59Iz_qTk26Ts30brXddOttKwVWp2Wxrj7bbrsfD_zX8Z8G_FP4L-7qskQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80610446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation between response to chemotherapy of human tumors in patients and in nude mice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Giovanella, Beppino C. ; Stehlin, John S. ; Shepard, Randall C. ; Williams, Leo J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Giovanella, Beppino C. ; Stehlin, John S. ; Shepard, Randall C. ; Williams, Leo J.</creatorcontrib><description>Human tumors serially heterotransplanted in nude mice have been tested for their response to chemotherapeutic agents. Fourteen melanomas, 14 colorectal carcinomas, and 14 breast carcinomas have been used. Each tumor originated in a different patient. The tumors were maintained by serial subcutaneous transplantation in nude mice. For the experiments in this study, each neoplasm was transplanted under the kidney capsule of 60 to 100 adult nude mice. The areas of the individual tumor implants were precisely measured immediately after insertion using a stereo microscope equipped with a micrometric ocular. The animals were then divided into groups of six to ten animals each. One group was injected daily with saline and served as controls. The mice in the remaining groups were injected daily for eight days with one of the following chemotherapeutic agents—Adriamycin (doxorubicin), 5‐fluorouracil, methotrexate, Cytoxan (cyclophosphamide), Alkeran (melphalan), vincristine, vinblastine, methyl‐CCNU, or BCNU—at optimum doses (the maximum dose tolerated that causes less than 10% weight loss). Treatment was initiated when the implants were well established, having roughly doubled their initial mass. The animals were then sacrificed and the tumors measured again. A drug was rated effective only if it inhibited growth of the tumor by 99% or more. The results so obtained were compared with the published results of various clinical trials. When the sensitivity of the human tumors in the mice was compared with the sensitivity of tumors of the same type that had been treated in human patients, a close correlation was found. The panel study detected nine of ten effective drugs, giving only two false‐positive results. Our data strongly support the validity of heterotransplants of human tumors in the nude mouse as a predictive system for testing new anticancer agents and in determining optimal treatment schedules and combinations of known drugs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831001)52:7&lt;1146::AID-CNCR2820520704&gt;3.0.CO;2-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6883283</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antineoplastic agents ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical ; General aspects ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Melanoma - drug therapy ; Mice ; Mice, Nude ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Transplantation ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Transplantation, Heterologous</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 1983-10, Vol.52 (7), p.1146-1152</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1983 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>1984 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4984-e281b699563004d1543cbb73dffb5b7945da17e5b4c4684a510c085a8b4187e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=9437982$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6883283$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giovanella, Beppino C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stehlin, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepard, Randall C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Leo J.</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation between response to chemotherapy of human tumors in patients and in nude mice</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Human tumors serially heterotransplanted in nude mice have been tested for their response to chemotherapeutic agents. Fourteen melanomas, 14 colorectal carcinomas, and 14 breast carcinomas have been used. Each tumor originated in a different patient. The tumors were maintained by serial subcutaneous transplantation in nude mice. For the experiments in this study, each neoplasm was transplanted under the kidney capsule of 60 to 100 adult nude mice. The areas of the individual tumor implants were precisely measured immediately after insertion using a stereo microscope equipped with a micrometric ocular. The animals were then divided into groups of six to ten animals each. One group was injected daily with saline and served as controls. The mice in the remaining groups were injected daily for eight days with one of the following chemotherapeutic agents—Adriamycin (doxorubicin), 5‐fluorouracil, methotrexate, Cytoxan (cyclophosphamide), Alkeran (melphalan), vincristine, vinblastine, methyl‐CCNU, or BCNU—at optimum doses (the maximum dose tolerated that causes less than 10% weight loss). Treatment was initiated when the implants were well established, having roughly doubled their initial mass. The animals were then sacrificed and the tumors measured again. A drug was rated effective only if it inhibited growth of the tumor by 99% or more. The results so obtained were compared with the published results of various clinical trials. When the sensitivity of the human tumors in the mice was compared with the sensitivity of tumors of the same type that had been treated in human patients, a close correlation was found. The panel study detected nine of ten effective drugs, giving only two false‐positive results. Our data strongly support the validity of heterotransplants of human tumors in the nude mouse as a predictive system for testing new anticancer agents and in determining optimal treatment schedules and combinations of known drugs.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Melanoma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Nude</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Neoplasm Transplantation</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterologous</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkFuL1EAQhYMo67j6E4R-ENGHjNW3dGcUYYm3hcUBUVB8aDqdChNJusfuhGX-vQkzDuiD4FNRdU4dDl-WVRTWFIC9oFCqHKhgz2ip-XyizyXbqFeUimKzubp-k1cfq09MM5AMFIjXfA3ravuS5cWdbHX-vputAEDnUvCv97MHKf2YV8Ukv8guCq0503yVfatCjNjbsQue1DjeInoSMe2DT0jGQNwOhzDuMNr9gYSW7KbBejJOQ4iJdJ7s51f0YyLWN8vupwbJ0Dl8mN1rbZ_w0WleZl_evf1cfchvtu-vq6ub3IlSixyZpnVRlrLgAKKhc1tX14o3bVvLWpVCNpYqlLVwotDCSgoOtLS6FlQrLPhl9vSYu4_h54RpNEOXHPa99RimZDQUFIRYjN-PRhdDShFbs4_dYOPBUDALeLOgMws68xu8kcwos4A3ZgZv_gRvuAFTbQ0zS_rjU42pHrA5Z59Iz_qTk26Ts30brXddOttKwVWp2Wxrj7bbrsfD_zX8Z8G_FP4L-7qskQ</recordid><startdate>19831001</startdate><enddate>19831001</enddate><creator>Giovanella, Beppino C.</creator><creator>Stehlin, John S.</creator><creator>Shepard, Randall C.</creator><creator>Williams, Leo J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19831001</creationdate><title>Correlation between response to chemotherapy of human tumors in patients and in nude mice</title><author>Giovanella, Beppino C. ; Stehlin, John S. ; Shepard, Randall C. ; Williams, Leo J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4984-e281b699563004d1543cbb73dffb5b7945da17e5b4c4684a510c085a8b4187e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Melanoma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Nude</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Neoplasm Transplantation</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterologous</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giovanella, Beppino C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stehlin, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepard, Randall C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Leo J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giovanella, Beppino C.</au><au>Stehlin, John S.</au><au>Shepard, Randall C.</au><au>Williams, Leo J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation between response to chemotherapy of human tumors in patients and in nude mice</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>1983-10-01</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1146</spage><epage>1152</epage><pages>1146-1152</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>Human tumors serially heterotransplanted in nude mice have been tested for their response to chemotherapeutic agents. Fourteen melanomas, 14 colorectal carcinomas, and 14 breast carcinomas have been used. Each tumor originated in a different patient. The tumors were maintained by serial subcutaneous transplantation in nude mice. For the experiments in this study, each neoplasm was transplanted under the kidney capsule of 60 to 100 adult nude mice. The areas of the individual tumor implants were precisely measured immediately after insertion using a stereo microscope equipped with a micrometric ocular. The animals were then divided into groups of six to ten animals each. One group was injected daily with saline and served as controls. The mice in the remaining groups were injected daily for eight days with one of the following chemotherapeutic agents—Adriamycin (doxorubicin), 5‐fluorouracil, methotrexate, Cytoxan (cyclophosphamide), Alkeran (melphalan), vincristine, vinblastine, methyl‐CCNU, or BCNU—at optimum doses (the maximum dose tolerated that causes less than 10% weight loss). Treatment was initiated when the implants were well established, having roughly doubled their initial mass. The animals were then sacrificed and the tumors measured again. A drug was rated effective only if it inhibited growth of the tumor by 99% or more. The results so obtained were compared with the published results of various clinical trials. When the sensitivity of the human tumors in the mice was compared with the sensitivity of tumors of the same type that had been treated in human patients, a close correlation was found. The panel study detected nine of ten effective drugs, giving only two false‐positive results. Our data strongly support the validity of heterotransplants of human tumors in the nude mouse as a predictive system for testing new anticancer agents and in determining optimal treatment schedules and combinations of known drugs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>6883283</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-0142(19831001)52:7&lt;1146::AID-CNCR2820520704&gt;3.0.CO;2-6</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 1983-10, Vol.52 (7), p.1146-1152
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80610446
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Antineoplastic agents
Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
General aspects
Humans
Medical sciences
Melanoma - drug therapy
Mice
Mice, Nude
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neoplasm Transplantation
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy
Transplantation, Heterologous
title Correlation between response to chemotherapy of human tumors in patients and in nude mice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T12%3A14%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20between%20response%20to%20chemotherapy%20of%20human%20tumors%20in%20patients%20and%20in%20nude%20mice&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Giovanella,%20Beppino%20C.&rft.date=1983-10-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1146&rft.epage=1152&rft.pages=1146-1152&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19831001)52:7%3C1146::AID-CNCR2820520704%3E3.0.CO;2-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80610446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80610446&rft_id=info:pmid/6883283&rfr_iscdi=true