Correlation of standardized serum protein determinations with calculated and measured colloid osmotic pressure
The colloid osmotic pressure (COP) was measured on the serum of 250 individuals (healthy persons and patients) using a commercial oncometer. The total serum protein concentrations were measured by five methods, and the serum albumin concentrations were measured by four methods. The protein determina...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of clinical pathology 1983-08, Vol.80 (2), p.170-175 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The colloid osmotic pressure (COP) was measured on the serum of 250 individuals (healthy persons and patients) using a commercial oncometer. The total serum protein concentrations were measured by five methods, and the serum albumin concentrations were measured by four methods. The protein determinations were standardized as recommended by the Study Group on Proteins of the AACC Committee on Standards. The measured COP (mCOP) was correlated with each of the nine analytically determined protein concentrations. The mCOP also was correlated with a COP calculated (cCOP) from the Landis-Pappenheimer equation: cCOP = 2.1 (total protein [TP]) + 0.16 (TP)2 + 0.009 (TP)3. The authors found excellent linear correlations between mCOP and total protein concentration, and between mCOP and albumin concentration, when the protein determinations were standardized properly. The correlation between mCOP and protein concentrations was as good as the correlation between mCOP and cCOP in all cases. The serum albumin as determined by the DuPont ACA and mCOP gave the best linear relationship (r = 0.940) of the methods tested. Using the linear regression equation of albumin (ACA) versus mCOP, we were able to predict a cCOP to within +/- 3 mmHg for more than 95% of all samples tested. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9173 1943-7722 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ajcp/80.2.170 |