Evaluating FACES III and the Circumplex Model: 2,440 Families
Previous evaluations of the Circumplex Model's curvilinear hypothesis using FACES instruments have yielded conflicting results. A review of the different research procedures and samples used in those investigations revealed that none of the studies had samples large and/or heterogenous enough t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Family process 1991-03, Vol.30 (1), p.55-73 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 73 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 55 |
| container_title | Family process |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | GREEN, ROBERT G. HARRIS, ROBERT N. FORTE, JAMES A. ROBINSON, MARGARET |
| description | Previous evaluations of the Circumplex Model's curvilinear hypothesis using FACES instruments have yielded conflicting results. A review of the different research procedures and samples used in those investigations revealed that none of the studies had samples large and/or heterogenous enough to test the curvilinear hypothesis adequately. The present study evaluates the curvilinear hypothesis of family functioning and the concurrent validity of FACES III with a sample of optimal size (N = 2,440 families) and diversity. The lack of support for the curvilinear hypothesis in this “greenhouse” sample is explained by different findings for the two FACES III subscales. There was no relationship between the study's measures of well‐being and the adaptability subscale and a linear relationship between these measures and the cohesion subscale. Implications of these findings for the continuing use of the FACES III and for the Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1991.00055.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80597748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1297764297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5565-6130207e43442256517fd6930f504a738eda94dbc887410b4641b75024d8f93a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2LEzEUhoO4rLX6E4SAuFdOPZl8juhFqe1uYasLu-JlSGcympqZ6SYd7f57M7ZU8EZDSOCc5z2HvCcIYQITktabzYRwxjNOIQWKgkwAgPPJ_hEanRKP0QiAsExSCU_Q0xg3CWKFkufoPAfGJCcj9H7-w_je7Fz7FS-ms_ktXi6X2LQV3n2zeOZC2Tdbb_d41VXWv8X5a8YAL0zjvLPxGTqrjY_2-fEeo8-L-d3sKrv-dLmcTa-zknPBM0Eo5CAto4zleYoQWVeioFBzYEZSZStTsGpdKiUZgTUTjKwlh5xVqi6ooWN0cai7Dd19b-NONy6W1nvT2q6PWgEvpGTqn6AguQCa9hi9_AvcdH1o0yM0yVMtwdKZKHWgytDFGGytt8E1JjxoAnoYhN7owW89-K2HQejfg9D7JH1xbNCvG1udhEfnU_7VMW9iaXwdTFu6-Kd-kTzgYuDeHbifztuH_-6vF9PVDedJnh3kLu7s_iQ34bsW6WNw_eXjpVY3Hwi5U7d6RX8BSLGr6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297764297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating FACES III and the Circumplex Model: 2,440 Families</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>GREEN, ROBERT G. ; HARRIS, ROBERT N. ; FORTE, JAMES A. ; ROBINSON, MARGARET</creator><creatorcontrib>GREEN, ROBERT G. ; HARRIS, ROBERT N. ; FORTE, JAMES A. ; ROBINSON, MARGARET</creatorcontrib><description>Previous evaluations of the Circumplex Model's curvilinear hypothesis using FACES instruments have yielded conflicting results. A review of the different research procedures and samples used in those investigations revealed that none of the studies had samples large and/or heterogenous enough to test the curvilinear hypothesis adequately. The present study evaluates the curvilinear hypothesis of family functioning and the concurrent validity of FACES III with a sample of optimal size (N = 2,440 families) and diversity. The lack of support for the curvilinear hypothesis in this “greenhouse” sample is explained by different findings for the two FACES III subscales. There was no relationship between the study's measures of well‐being and the adaptability subscale and a linear relationship between these measures and the cohesion subscale. Implications of these findings for the continuing use of the FACES III and for the Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-7370</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-5300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1991.00055.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2044751</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FAPRDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Family - psychology ; Family Relations ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Husbands ; Male ; Males ; Marriage - psychology ; Methodological Problems ; Middle Aged ; Military Personnel ; Models, Psychological ; Psychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Scales ; Social psychology ; Virginia</subject><ispartof>Family process, 1991-03, Vol.30 (1), p.55-73</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5565-6130207e43442256517fd6930f504a738eda94dbc887410b4641b75024d8f93a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5565-6130207e43442256517fd6930f504a738eda94dbc887410b4641b75024d8f93a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1545-5300.1991.00055.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1545-5300.1991.00055.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27848,27903,27904,33754,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19641561$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2044751$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GREEN, ROBERT G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRIS, ROBERT N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORTE, JAMES A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, MARGARET</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating FACES III and the Circumplex Model: 2,440 Families</title><title>Family process</title><addtitle>Fam Process</addtitle><description>Previous evaluations of the Circumplex Model's curvilinear hypothesis using FACES instruments have yielded conflicting results. A review of the different research procedures and samples used in those investigations revealed that none of the studies had samples large and/or heterogenous enough to test the curvilinear hypothesis adequately. The present study evaluates the curvilinear hypothesis of family functioning and the concurrent validity of FACES III with a sample of optimal size (N = 2,440 families) and diversity. The lack of support for the curvilinear hypothesis in this “greenhouse” sample is explained by different findings for the two FACES III subscales. There was no relationship between the study's measures of well‐being and the adaptability subscale and a linear relationship between these measures and the cohesion subscale. Implications of these findings for the continuing use of the FACES III and for the Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems are discussed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Family Relations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Marriage - psychology</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Scales</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Virginia</subject><issn>0014-7370</issn><issn>1545-5300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2LEzEUhoO4rLX6E4SAuFdOPZl8juhFqe1uYasLu-JlSGcympqZ6SYd7f57M7ZU8EZDSOCc5z2HvCcIYQITktabzYRwxjNOIQWKgkwAgPPJ_hEanRKP0QiAsExSCU_Q0xg3CWKFkufoPAfGJCcj9H7-w_je7Fz7FS-ms_ktXi6X2LQV3n2zeOZC2Tdbb_d41VXWv8X5a8YAL0zjvLPxGTqrjY_2-fEeo8-L-d3sKrv-dLmcTa-zknPBM0Eo5CAto4zleYoQWVeioFBzYEZSZStTsGpdKiUZgTUTjKwlh5xVqi6ooWN0cai7Dd19b-NONy6W1nvT2q6PWgEvpGTqn6AguQCa9hi9_AvcdH1o0yM0yVMtwdKZKHWgytDFGGytt8E1JjxoAnoYhN7owW89-K2HQejfg9D7JH1xbNCvG1udhEfnU_7VMW9iaXwdTFu6-Kd-kTzgYuDeHbifztuH_-6vF9PVDedJnh3kLu7s_iQ34bsW6WNw_eXjpVY3Hwi5U7d6RX8BSLGr6w</recordid><startdate>199103</startdate><enddate>199103</enddate><creator>GREEN, ROBERT G.</creator><creator>HARRIS, ROBERT N.</creator><creator>FORTE, JAMES A.</creator><creator>ROBINSON, MARGARET</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Family Process [etc.]</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199103</creationdate><title>Evaluating FACES III and the Circumplex Model: 2,440 Families</title><author>GREEN, ROBERT G. ; HARRIS, ROBERT N. ; FORTE, JAMES A. ; ROBINSON, MARGARET</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5565-6130207e43442256517fd6930f504a738eda94dbc887410b4641b75024d8f93a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Family Relations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Marriage - psychology</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Scales</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Virginia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GREEN, ROBERT G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRIS, ROBERT N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORTE, JAMES A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, MARGARET</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Family process</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GREEN, ROBERT G.</au><au>HARRIS, ROBERT N.</au><au>FORTE, JAMES A.</au><au>ROBINSON, MARGARET</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating FACES III and the Circumplex Model: 2,440 Families</atitle><jtitle>Family process</jtitle><addtitle>Fam Process</addtitle><date>1991-03</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>55-73</pages><issn>0014-7370</issn><eissn>1545-5300</eissn><coden>FAPRDG</coden><abstract>Previous evaluations of the Circumplex Model's curvilinear hypothesis using FACES instruments have yielded conflicting results. A review of the different research procedures and samples used in those investigations revealed that none of the studies had samples large and/or heterogenous enough to test the curvilinear hypothesis adequately. The present study evaluates the curvilinear hypothesis of family functioning and the concurrent validity of FACES III with a sample of optimal size (N = 2,440 families) and diversity. The lack of support for the curvilinear hypothesis in this “greenhouse” sample is explained by different findings for the two FACES III subscales. There was no relationship between the study's measures of well‐being and the adaptability subscale and a linear relationship between these measures and the cohesion subscale. Implications of these findings for the continuing use of the FACES III and for the Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems are discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>2044751</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1545-5300.1991.00055.x</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0014-7370 |
| ispartof | Family process, 1991-03, Vol.30 (1), p.55-73 |
| issn | 0014-7370 1545-5300 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80597748 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Family - psychology Family Relations Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Husbands Male Males Marriage - psychology Methodological Problems Middle Aged Military Personnel Models, Psychological Psychological Tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Scales Social psychology Virginia |
| title | Evaluating FACES III and the Circumplex Model: 2,440 Families |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A34%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20FACES%20III%20and%20the%20Circumplex%20Model:%202,440%20Families&rft.jtitle=Family%20process&rft.au=GREEN,%20ROBERT%20G.&rft.date=1991-03&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=55-73&rft.issn=0014-7370&rft.eissn=1545-5300&rft.coden=FAPRDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1991.00055.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1297764297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297764297&rft_id=info:pmid/2044751&rfr_iscdi=true |