Experience with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
A Medtronic 7216A pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted in 16 patients (mean age 56 years) with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and organic heart disease with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 33%. Endocardial and epicardial defibrillat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of cardiology 1991-06, Vol.67 (16), p.1375-1384 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1384 |
---|---|
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 1375 |
container_title | The American journal of cardiology |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Saksena, Sanjeev Mehta, Davendra Krol, Ryszard B. Tullo, Nicholas G. Saxena, Amarkanth Kaushik, Raj Neglia, John |
description | A Medtronic 7216A pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted in 16 patients (mean age 56 years) with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and organic heart disease with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 33%. Endocardial and epicardial defibrillation shock efficacy was evaluated before or at implant using 1 to 3 shock patterns, i.e., monophasic single, sequential or simultaneous shocks with dual and triple electrode configurations. Endocardial leads used a common right ventricular cathode and dual anodes, whereas epicardial leads used 2 or 3 helical coil patches. VT termination was evaluated using pacing or shock therapy, or both, whereas only shocks were used in VF. Programmable bradycardia pacing, individual zones for VT and VF detection and individualized pacing and shock therapy for VT and VF were used. Monophasic shocks had epicardial defibrillation thresholds ranging from 3 to 18 (mean 10) J and were comparable for sequential and simultaneous shocks (p > 0.2). VT detection rates ranged from 340 to 470 ms and VF detection rates from 270 to 330 ms. VT or VF induction, or both, was performed noninvasively in 13 patients after implant and was reproducibly terminated by rapid pacing alone (5 patients), low-energy shocks (2 patients), high-energy shocks (3 patients) and combined therapy (3 patients). Intermediate or highenergy shocks terminated all induced VF episodes. During follow-up (2 to 12 months), there have been 2 noncardiac deaths. Electrical therapy was delivered in 7 patients, for VT (3 patients), VT and VF (3 patients) and indeterminate tachyarrhythmia (1 patient). All
sol
VT
VF
episodes were successfully terminated, with 78 of 96 (81%) spontaneous VT episodes terminated by pacing. Follow-up reprogramming was required n 5 patients. It is concluded that successful application of individualized electrical therapy prescriptions in patients with VT/VF is feasible. Pacing therapies, which are effective for induced VT, can be reliably used for effective long-term spontaneous VT termination in conjunction with shock therapy and can permit reduced patient exposure to shock therapy. Thus, a programmable hybrid pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator system provides nonthoracotomy implantation, effective
sol
VT
VF
termination, demand ventricular pacing and noninvasive modes for arrhythmia induction, event monitoring and clinical troubleshooting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90468-Z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80592274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>000291499190468Z</els_id><sourcerecordid>80592274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc3a315a9d517d742da28104f11b3acf0dbe9fb0ebd68d3b3528f4f563b00a243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRaq3-A4VcFD1E9yNJsxdBStVCwYteeln2Y9aupEnd3Vb99yZtqTcvMwzzzMvwIHRO8C3BpLjDGNOUk4xfc3LDcVaU6ewA9Uk55CnhhB2i_h45RichfLQjIXnRQz2KM5oXZR9Nxt9L8A5qDcmXi_NEJnHuvEnfoQYvo2vqxC2WlayjVBUkWnrjmjX4CD41YJ3yrqpkbPwpOrKyCnC26wP09jh-HT2n05enyehhmmqGaUyNZpKRXHKTk6EZZtRIWhKcWUIUk9pio4BbhUGZojRMsZyWNrN5wRTGkmZsgK62uUvffK4gRLFwQUP7RA3NKogS55zSYQdmW1D7JgQPViy9W0j_IwgWnUHR6RGdnraIjUExa88udvkrtQCzP9opa_eXu70MWlbWy1q78JfNy5xyTFvufstBK2PtwIugN56N86CjMI37_5FfGLmN9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80592274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experience with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Saksena, Sanjeev ; Mehta, Davendra ; Krol, Ryszard B. ; Tullo, Nicholas G. ; Saxena, Amarkanth ; Kaushik, Raj ; Neglia, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Saksena, Sanjeev ; Mehta, Davendra ; Krol, Ryszard B. ; Tullo, Nicholas G. ; Saxena, Amarkanth ; Kaushik, Raj ; Neglia, John</creatorcontrib><description>A Medtronic 7216A pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted in 16 patients (mean age 56 years) with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and organic heart disease with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 33%. Endocardial and epicardial defibrillation shock efficacy was evaluated before or at implant using 1 to 3 shock patterns, i.e., monophasic single, sequential or simultaneous shocks with dual and triple electrode configurations. Endocardial leads used a common right ventricular cathode and dual anodes, whereas epicardial leads used 2 or 3 helical coil patches. VT termination was evaluated using pacing or shock therapy, or both, whereas only shocks were used in VF. Programmable bradycardia pacing, individual zones for VT and VF detection and individualized pacing and shock therapy for VT and VF were used. Monophasic shocks had epicardial defibrillation thresholds ranging from 3 to 18 (mean 10) J and were comparable for sequential and simultaneous shocks (p > 0.2). VT detection rates ranged from 340 to 470 ms and VF detection rates from 270 to 330 ms. VT or VF induction, or both, was performed noninvasively in 13 patients after implant and was reproducibly terminated by rapid pacing alone (5 patients), low-energy shocks (2 patients), high-energy shocks (3 patients) and combined therapy (3 patients). Intermediate or highenergy shocks terminated all induced VF episodes. During follow-up (2 to 12 months), there have been 2 noncardiac deaths. Electrical therapy was delivered in 7 patients, for VT (3 patients), VT and VF (3 patients) and indeterminate tachyarrhythmia (1 patient). All
sol
VT
VF
episodes were successfully terminated, with 78 of 96 (81%) spontaneous VT episodes terminated by pacing. Follow-up reprogramming was required n 5 patients. It is concluded that successful application of individualized electrical therapy prescriptions in patients with VT/VF is feasible. Pacing therapies, which are effective for induced VT, can be reliably used for effective long-term spontaneous VT termination in conjunction with shock therapy and can permit reduced patient exposure to shock therapy. Thus, a programmable hybrid pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator system provides nonthoracotomy implantation, effective
sol
VT
VF
termination, demand ventricular pacing and noninvasive modes for arrhythmia induction, event monitoring and clinical troubleshooting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90468-Z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2042568</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCDAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac dysrhythmias ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Electric Countershock ; Electrophysiology ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; Postoperative Complications ; Prognosis ; Prostheses and Implants ; Tachycardia - physiopathology ; Tachycardia - therapy</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 1991-06, Vol.67 (16), p.1375-1384</ispartof><rights>1991</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc3a315a9d517d742da28104f11b3acf0dbe9fb0ebd68d3b3528f4f563b00a243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc3a315a9d517d742da28104f11b3acf0dbe9fb0ebd68d3b3528f4f563b00a243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(91)90468-Z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19852902$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2042568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saksena, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Davendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krol, Ryszard B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullo, Nicholas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Amarkanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushik, Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neglia, John</creatorcontrib><title>Experience with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>A Medtronic 7216A pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted in 16 patients (mean age 56 years) with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and organic heart disease with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 33%. Endocardial and epicardial defibrillation shock efficacy was evaluated before or at implant using 1 to 3 shock patterns, i.e., monophasic single, sequential or simultaneous shocks with dual and triple electrode configurations. Endocardial leads used a common right ventricular cathode and dual anodes, whereas epicardial leads used 2 or 3 helical coil patches. VT termination was evaluated using pacing or shock therapy, or both, whereas only shocks were used in VF. Programmable bradycardia pacing, individual zones for VT and VF detection and individualized pacing and shock therapy for VT and VF were used. Monophasic shocks had epicardial defibrillation thresholds ranging from 3 to 18 (mean 10) J and were comparable for sequential and simultaneous shocks (p > 0.2). VT detection rates ranged from 340 to 470 ms and VF detection rates from 270 to 330 ms. VT or VF induction, or both, was performed noninvasively in 13 patients after implant and was reproducibly terminated by rapid pacing alone (5 patients), low-energy shocks (2 patients), high-energy shocks (3 patients) and combined therapy (3 patients). Intermediate or highenergy shocks terminated all induced VF episodes. During follow-up (2 to 12 months), there have been 2 noncardiac deaths. Electrical therapy was delivered in 7 patients, for VT (3 patients), VT and VF (3 patients) and indeterminate tachyarrhythmia (1 patient). All
sol
VT
VF
episodes were successfully terminated, with 78 of 96 (81%) spontaneous VT episodes terminated by pacing. Follow-up reprogramming was required n 5 patients. It is concluded that successful application of individualized electrical therapy prescriptions in patients with VT/VF is feasible. Pacing therapies, which are effective for induced VT, can be reliably used for effective long-term spontaneous VT termination in conjunction with shock therapy and can permit reduced patient exposure to shock therapy. Thus, a programmable hybrid pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator system provides nonthoracotomy implantation, effective
sol
VT
VF
termination, demand ventricular pacing and noninvasive modes for arrhythmia induction, event monitoring and clinical troubleshooting.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac dysrhythmias</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Electric Countershock</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Tachycardia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tachycardia - therapy</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRaq3-A4VcFD1E9yNJsxdBStVCwYteeln2Y9aupEnd3Vb99yZtqTcvMwzzzMvwIHRO8C3BpLjDGNOUk4xfc3LDcVaU6ewA9Uk55CnhhB2i_h45RichfLQjIXnRQz2KM5oXZR9Nxt9L8A5qDcmXi_NEJnHuvEnfoQYvo2vqxC2WlayjVBUkWnrjmjX4CD41YJ3yrqpkbPwpOrKyCnC26wP09jh-HT2n05enyehhmmqGaUyNZpKRXHKTk6EZZtRIWhKcWUIUk9pio4BbhUGZojRMsZyWNrN5wRTGkmZsgK62uUvffK4gRLFwQUP7RA3NKogS55zSYQdmW1D7JgQPViy9W0j_IwgWnUHR6RGdnraIjUExa88udvkrtQCzP9opa_eXu70MWlbWy1q78JfNy5xyTFvufstBK2PtwIugN56N86CjMI37_5FfGLmN9w</recordid><startdate>19910615</startdate><enddate>19910615</enddate><creator>Saksena, Sanjeev</creator><creator>Mehta, Davendra</creator><creator>Krol, Ryszard B.</creator><creator>Tullo, Nicholas G.</creator><creator>Saxena, Amarkanth</creator><creator>Kaushik, Raj</creator><creator>Neglia, John</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910615</creationdate><title>Experience with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator</title><author>Saksena, Sanjeev ; Mehta, Davendra ; Krol, Ryszard B. ; Tullo, Nicholas G. ; Saxena, Amarkanth ; Kaushik, Raj ; Neglia, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc3a315a9d517d742da28104f11b3acf0dbe9fb0ebd68d3b3528f4f563b00a243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac dysrhythmias</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Electric Countershock</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Tachycardia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tachycardia - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saksena, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Davendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krol, Ryszard B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullo, Nicholas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Amarkanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushik, Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neglia, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saksena, Sanjeev</au><au>Mehta, Davendra</au><au>Krol, Ryszard B.</au><au>Tullo, Nicholas G.</au><au>Saxena, Amarkanth</au><au>Kaushik, Raj</au><au>Neglia, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experience with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>1991-06-15</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>1375</spage><epage>1384</epage><pages>1375-1384</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><coden>AJCDAG</coden><abstract>A Medtronic 7216A pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted in 16 patients (mean age 56 years) with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and organic heart disease with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 33%. Endocardial and epicardial defibrillation shock efficacy was evaluated before or at implant using 1 to 3 shock patterns, i.e., monophasic single, sequential or simultaneous shocks with dual and triple electrode configurations. Endocardial leads used a common right ventricular cathode and dual anodes, whereas epicardial leads used 2 or 3 helical coil patches. VT termination was evaluated using pacing or shock therapy, or both, whereas only shocks were used in VF. Programmable bradycardia pacing, individual zones for VT and VF detection and individualized pacing and shock therapy for VT and VF were used. Monophasic shocks had epicardial defibrillation thresholds ranging from 3 to 18 (mean 10) J and were comparable for sequential and simultaneous shocks (p > 0.2). VT detection rates ranged from 340 to 470 ms and VF detection rates from 270 to 330 ms. VT or VF induction, or both, was performed noninvasively in 13 patients after implant and was reproducibly terminated by rapid pacing alone (5 patients), low-energy shocks (2 patients), high-energy shocks (3 patients) and combined therapy (3 patients). Intermediate or highenergy shocks terminated all induced VF episodes. During follow-up (2 to 12 months), there have been 2 noncardiac deaths. Electrical therapy was delivered in 7 patients, for VT (3 patients), VT and VF (3 patients) and indeterminate tachyarrhythmia (1 patient). All
sol
VT
VF
episodes were successfully terminated, with 78 of 96 (81%) spontaneous VT episodes terminated by pacing. Follow-up reprogramming was required n 5 patients. It is concluded that successful application of individualized electrical therapy prescriptions in patients with VT/VF is feasible. Pacing therapies, which are effective for induced VT, can be reliably used for effective long-term spontaneous VT termination in conjunction with shock therapy and can permit reduced patient exposure to shock therapy. Thus, a programmable hybrid pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator system provides nonthoracotomy implantation, effective
sol
VT
VF
termination, demand ventricular pacing and noninvasive modes for arrhythmia induction, event monitoring and clinical troubleshooting.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2042568</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9149(91)90468-Z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9149 |
ispartof | The American journal of cardiology, 1991-06, Vol.67 (16), p.1375-1384 |
issn | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80592274 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Cardiac dysrhythmias Cardiology. Vascular system Electric Countershock Electrophysiology Equipment Design Female Follow-Up Studies Heart Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Pacemaker, Artificial Postoperative Complications Prognosis Prostheses and Implants Tachycardia - physiopathology Tachycardia - therapy |
title | Experience with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A15%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experience%20with%20a%20third-generation%20implantable%20cardioverter-defibrillator&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Saksena,%20Sanjeev&rft.date=1991-06-15&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=1375&rft.epage=1384&rft.pages=1375-1384&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft.coden=AJCDAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9149(91)90468-Z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80592274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80592274&rft_id=info:pmid/2042568&rft_els_id=000291499190468Z&rfr_iscdi=true |