Experience with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

A Medtronic 7216A pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted in 16 patients (mean age 56 years) with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and organic heart disease with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 33%. Endocardial and epicardial defibrillat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 1991-06, Vol.67 (16), p.1375-1384
Hauptverfasser: Saksena, Sanjeev, Mehta, Davendra, Krol, Ryszard B., Tullo, Nicholas G., Saxena, Amarkanth, Kaushik, Raj, Neglia, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1384
container_issue 16
container_start_page 1375
container_title The American journal of cardiology
container_volume 67
creator Saksena, Sanjeev
Mehta, Davendra
Krol, Ryszard B.
Tullo, Nicholas G.
Saxena, Amarkanth
Kaushik, Raj
Neglia, John
description A Medtronic 7216A pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted in 16 patients (mean age 56 years) with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and organic heart disease with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 33%. Endocardial and epicardial defibrillation shock efficacy was evaluated before or at implant using 1 to 3 shock patterns, i.e., monophasic single, sequential or simultaneous shocks with dual and triple electrode configurations. Endocardial leads used a common right ventricular cathode and dual anodes, whereas epicardial leads used 2 or 3 helical coil patches. VT termination was evaluated using pacing or shock therapy, or both, whereas only shocks were used in VF. Programmable bradycardia pacing, individual zones for VT and VF detection and individualized pacing and shock therapy for VT and VF were used. Monophasic shocks had epicardial defibrillation thresholds ranging from 3 to 18 (mean 10) J and were comparable for sequential and simultaneous shocks (p > 0.2). VT detection rates ranged from 340 to 470 ms and VF detection rates from 270 to 330 ms. VT or VF induction, or both, was performed noninvasively in 13 patients after implant and was reproducibly terminated by rapid pacing alone (5 patients), low-energy shocks (2 patients), high-energy shocks (3 patients) and combined therapy (3 patients). Intermediate or highenergy shocks terminated all induced VF episodes. During follow-up (2 to 12 months), there have been 2 noncardiac deaths. Electrical therapy was delivered in 7 patients, for VT (3 patients), VT and VF (3 patients) and indeterminate tachyarrhythmia (1 patient). All sol VT VF episodes were successfully terminated, with 78 of 96 (81%) spontaneous VT episodes terminated by pacing. Follow-up reprogramming was required n 5 patients. It is concluded that successful application of individualized electrical therapy prescriptions in patients with VT/VF is feasible. Pacing therapies, which are effective for induced VT, can be reliably used for effective long-term spontaneous VT termination in conjunction with shock therapy and can permit reduced patient exposure to shock therapy. Thus, a programmable hybrid pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator system provides nonthoracotomy implantation, effective sol VT VF termination, demand ventricular pacing and noninvasive modes for arrhythmia induction, event monitoring and clinical troubleshooting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90468-Z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80592274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>000291499190468Z</els_id><sourcerecordid>80592274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc3a315a9d517d742da28104f11b3acf0dbe9fb0ebd68d3b3528f4f563b00a243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRaq3-A4VcFD1E9yNJsxdBStVCwYteeln2Y9aupEnd3Vb99yZtqTcvMwzzzMvwIHRO8C3BpLjDGNOUk4xfc3LDcVaU6ewA9Uk55CnhhB2i_h45RichfLQjIXnRQz2KM5oXZR9Nxt9L8A5qDcmXi_NEJnHuvEnfoQYvo2vqxC2WlayjVBUkWnrjmjX4CD41YJ3yrqpkbPwpOrKyCnC26wP09jh-HT2n05enyehhmmqGaUyNZpKRXHKTk6EZZtRIWhKcWUIUk9pio4BbhUGZojRMsZyWNrN5wRTGkmZsgK62uUvffK4gRLFwQUP7RA3NKogS55zSYQdmW1D7JgQPViy9W0j_IwgWnUHR6RGdnraIjUExa88udvkrtQCzP9opa_eXu70MWlbWy1q78JfNy5xyTFvufstBK2PtwIugN56N86CjMI37_5FfGLmN9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80592274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experience with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Saksena, Sanjeev ; Mehta, Davendra ; Krol, Ryszard B. ; Tullo, Nicholas G. ; Saxena, Amarkanth ; Kaushik, Raj ; Neglia, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Saksena, Sanjeev ; Mehta, Davendra ; Krol, Ryszard B. ; Tullo, Nicholas G. ; Saxena, Amarkanth ; Kaushik, Raj ; Neglia, John</creatorcontrib><description>A Medtronic 7216A pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted in 16 patients (mean age 56 years) with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and organic heart disease with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 33%. Endocardial and epicardial defibrillation shock efficacy was evaluated before or at implant using 1 to 3 shock patterns, i.e., monophasic single, sequential or simultaneous shocks with dual and triple electrode configurations. Endocardial leads used a common right ventricular cathode and dual anodes, whereas epicardial leads used 2 or 3 helical coil patches. VT termination was evaluated using pacing or shock therapy, or both, whereas only shocks were used in VF. Programmable bradycardia pacing, individual zones for VT and VF detection and individualized pacing and shock therapy for VT and VF were used. Monophasic shocks had epicardial defibrillation thresholds ranging from 3 to 18 (mean 10) J and were comparable for sequential and simultaneous shocks (p &gt; 0.2). VT detection rates ranged from 340 to 470 ms and VF detection rates from 270 to 330 ms. VT or VF induction, or both, was performed noninvasively in 13 patients after implant and was reproducibly terminated by rapid pacing alone (5 patients), low-energy shocks (2 patients), high-energy shocks (3 patients) and combined therapy (3 patients). Intermediate or highenergy shocks terminated all induced VF episodes. During follow-up (2 to 12 months), there have been 2 noncardiac deaths. Electrical therapy was delivered in 7 patients, for VT (3 patients), VT and VF (3 patients) and indeterminate tachyarrhythmia (1 patient). All sol VT VF episodes were successfully terminated, with 78 of 96 (81%) spontaneous VT episodes terminated by pacing. Follow-up reprogramming was required n 5 patients. It is concluded that successful application of individualized electrical therapy prescriptions in patients with VT/VF is feasible. Pacing therapies, which are effective for induced VT, can be reliably used for effective long-term spontaneous VT termination in conjunction with shock therapy and can permit reduced patient exposure to shock therapy. Thus, a programmable hybrid pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator system provides nonthoracotomy implantation, effective sol VT VF termination, demand ventricular pacing and noninvasive modes for arrhythmia induction, event monitoring and clinical troubleshooting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90468-Z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2042568</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCDAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac dysrhythmias ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Electric Countershock ; Electrophysiology ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; Postoperative Complications ; Prognosis ; Prostheses and Implants ; Tachycardia - physiopathology ; Tachycardia - therapy</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 1991-06, Vol.67 (16), p.1375-1384</ispartof><rights>1991</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc3a315a9d517d742da28104f11b3acf0dbe9fb0ebd68d3b3528f4f563b00a243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc3a315a9d517d742da28104f11b3acf0dbe9fb0ebd68d3b3528f4f563b00a243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(91)90468-Z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19852902$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2042568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saksena, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Davendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krol, Ryszard B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullo, Nicholas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Amarkanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushik, Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neglia, John</creatorcontrib><title>Experience with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>A Medtronic 7216A pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted in 16 patients (mean age 56 years) with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and organic heart disease with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 33%. Endocardial and epicardial defibrillation shock efficacy was evaluated before or at implant using 1 to 3 shock patterns, i.e., monophasic single, sequential or simultaneous shocks with dual and triple electrode configurations. Endocardial leads used a common right ventricular cathode and dual anodes, whereas epicardial leads used 2 or 3 helical coil patches. VT termination was evaluated using pacing or shock therapy, or both, whereas only shocks were used in VF. Programmable bradycardia pacing, individual zones for VT and VF detection and individualized pacing and shock therapy for VT and VF were used. Monophasic shocks had epicardial defibrillation thresholds ranging from 3 to 18 (mean 10) J and were comparable for sequential and simultaneous shocks (p &gt; 0.2). VT detection rates ranged from 340 to 470 ms and VF detection rates from 270 to 330 ms. VT or VF induction, or both, was performed noninvasively in 13 patients after implant and was reproducibly terminated by rapid pacing alone (5 patients), low-energy shocks (2 patients), high-energy shocks (3 patients) and combined therapy (3 patients). Intermediate or highenergy shocks terminated all induced VF episodes. During follow-up (2 to 12 months), there have been 2 noncardiac deaths. Electrical therapy was delivered in 7 patients, for VT (3 patients), VT and VF (3 patients) and indeterminate tachyarrhythmia (1 patient). All sol VT VF episodes were successfully terminated, with 78 of 96 (81%) spontaneous VT episodes terminated by pacing. Follow-up reprogramming was required n 5 patients. It is concluded that successful application of individualized electrical therapy prescriptions in patients with VT/VF is feasible. Pacing therapies, which are effective for induced VT, can be reliably used for effective long-term spontaneous VT termination in conjunction with shock therapy and can permit reduced patient exposure to shock therapy. Thus, a programmable hybrid pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator system provides nonthoracotomy implantation, effective sol VT VF termination, demand ventricular pacing and noninvasive modes for arrhythmia induction, event monitoring and clinical troubleshooting.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac dysrhythmias</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Electric Countershock</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Tachycardia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tachycardia - therapy</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRaq3-A4VcFD1E9yNJsxdBStVCwYteeln2Y9aupEnd3Vb99yZtqTcvMwzzzMvwIHRO8C3BpLjDGNOUk4xfc3LDcVaU6ewA9Uk55CnhhB2i_h45RichfLQjIXnRQz2KM5oXZR9Nxt9L8A5qDcmXi_NEJnHuvEnfoQYvo2vqxC2WlayjVBUkWnrjmjX4CD41YJ3yrqpkbPwpOrKyCnC26wP09jh-HT2n05enyehhmmqGaUyNZpKRXHKTk6EZZtRIWhKcWUIUk9pio4BbhUGZojRMsZyWNrN5wRTGkmZsgK62uUvffK4gRLFwQUP7RA3NKogS55zSYQdmW1D7JgQPViy9W0j_IwgWnUHR6RGdnraIjUExa88udvkrtQCzP9opa_eXu70MWlbWy1q78JfNy5xyTFvufstBK2PtwIugN56N86CjMI37_5FfGLmN9w</recordid><startdate>19910615</startdate><enddate>19910615</enddate><creator>Saksena, Sanjeev</creator><creator>Mehta, Davendra</creator><creator>Krol, Ryszard B.</creator><creator>Tullo, Nicholas G.</creator><creator>Saxena, Amarkanth</creator><creator>Kaushik, Raj</creator><creator>Neglia, John</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910615</creationdate><title>Experience with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator</title><author>Saksena, Sanjeev ; Mehta, Davendra ; Krol, Ryszard B. ; Tullo, Nicholas G. ; Saxena, Amarkanth ; Kaushik, Raj ; Neglia, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-dc3a315a9d517d742da28104f11b3acf0dbe9fb0ebd68d3b3528f4f563b00a243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac dysrhythmias</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Electric Countershock</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Tachycardia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tachycardia - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saksena, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Davendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krol, Ryszard B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullo, Nicholas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Amarkanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushik, Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neglia, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saksena, Sanjeev</au><au>Mehta, Davendra</au><au>Krol, Ryszard B.</au><au>Tullo, Nicholas G.</au><au>Saxena, Amarkanth</au><au>Kaushik, Raj</au><au>Neglia, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experience with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>1991-06-15</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>1375</spage><epage>1384</epage><pages>1375-1384</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><coden>AJCDAG</coden><abstract>A Medtronic 7216A pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted in 16 patients (mean age 56 years) with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and organic heart disease with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 33%. Endocardial and epicardial defibrillation shock efficacy was evaluated before or at implant using 1 to 3 shock patterns, i.e., monophasic single, sequential or simultaneous shocks with dual and triple electrode configurations. Endocardial leads used a common right ventricular cathode and dual anodes, whereas epicardial leads used 2 or 3 helical coil patches. VT termination was evaluated using pacing or shock therapy, or both, whereas only shocks were used in VF. Programmable bradycardia pacing, individual zones for VT and VF detection and individualized pacing and shock therapy for VT and VF were used. Monophasic shocks had epicardial defibrillation thresholds ranging from 3 to 18 (mean 10) J and were comparable for sequential and simultaneous shocks (p &gt; 0.2). VT detection rates ranged from 340 to 470 ms and VF detection rates from 270 to 330 ms. VT or VF induction, or both, was performed noninvasively in 13 patients after implant and was reproducibly terminated by rapid pacing alone (5 patients), low-energy shocks (2 patients), high-energy shocks (3 patients) and combined therapy (3 patients). Intermediate or highenergy shocks terminated all induced VF episodes. During follow-up (2 to 12 months), there have been 2 noncardiac deaths. Electrical therapy was delivered in 7 patients, for VT (3 patients), VT and VF (3 patients) and indeterminate tachyarrhythmia (1 patient). All sol VT VF episodes were successfully terminated, with 78 of 96 (81%) spontaneous VT episodes terminated by pacing. Follow-up reprogramming was required n 5 patients. It is concluded that successful application of individualized electrical therapy prescriptions in patients with VT/VF is feasible. Pacing therapies, which are effective for induced VT, can be reliably used for effective long-term spontaneous VT termination in conjunction with shock therapy and can permit reduced patient exposure to shock therapy. Thus, a programmable hybrid pacemaker cardioverter-defibrillator system provides nonthoracotomy implantation, effective sol VT VF termination, demand ventricular pacing and noninvasive modes for arrhythmia induction, event monitoring and clinical troubleshooting.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2042568</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9149(91)90468-Z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9149
ispartof The American journal of cardiology, 1991-06, Vol.67 (16), p.1375-1384
issn 0002-9149
1879-1913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80592274
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac dysrhythmias
Cardiology. Vascular system
Electric Countershock
Electrophysiology
Equipment Design
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pacemaker, Artificial
Postoperative Complications
Prognosis
Prostheses and Implants
Tachycardia - physiopathology
Tachycardia - therapy
title Experience with a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A15%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experience%20with%20a%20third-generation%20implantable%20cardioverter-defibrillator&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Saksena,%20Sanjeev&rft.date=1991-06-15&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=1375&rft.epage=1384&rft.pages=1375-1384&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft.coden=AJCDAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9149(91)90468-Z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80592274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80592274&rft_id=info:pmid/2042568&rft_els_id=000291499190468Z&rfr_iscdi=true