The stability of double jaw surgery: A comparison of rigid versus wire fixation

The subjects of this study were 35 patients who underwent simultaneous surgery for superior repositioning of the maxilla and advancement of the mandible. They were studied cephalometrically for a comparison of the postsurgical stability of two commonly used fixation techniques: (1) rigid fixation wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 1991-06, Vol.99 (6), p.550-563
Hauptverfasser: Satrom, Kirk D., Sinclair, Peter M., Wolford, Larry M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 563
container_issue 6
container_start_page 550
container_title American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics
container_volume 99
creator Satrom, Kirk D.
Sinclair, Peter M.
Wolford, Larry M.
description The subjects of this study were 35 patients who underwent simultaneous surgery for superior repositioning of the maxilla and advancement of the mandible. They were studied cephalometrically for a comparison of the postsurgical stability of two commonly used fixation techniques: (1) rigid fixation with bone plates and (2) skeletal-wire fixation. One surgeon performed the operations on all 35 patients, and both groups were studied for an average of 15 months after surgery. Results showed that, although the maxilla remained relatively stable after surgery with both fixation techniques, rigid fixation tended to improve stability, primarily by eliminating relapse in excess of 2 mm. Mandibular stability was much greater with rigid fixation: the amount of relapse of the horizontal projection of B point with this method was 6%, while in the skeletal-wire sample it was 26%. Increased rotational stability between the proximal and distal segments of the mandible appeared to be a major factor in the improved overall stability of the rigid-fixation sample. The amount of mandibular relapse was found to be correlated to the amount of advancement in the wire-fixation sample, but not in the rigid-fixation sample.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81632-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80579331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889540605816324</els_id><sourcerecordid>80579331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-686e509379382b80fe40d83b18bfa4b7f26b8609daf9c3ebf380336af590d7b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtOwzAUhi0EglJ4hEqeEAyBkzh2bBaEEDcJiQGYLTs5BldpXewE6NuT0qor0xn-m85HyCSH8xxycfECUqqMlyBOgZ_JXLAiK3fIKAdVZaLixS4ZbS0H5DClKQCosoB9sl8Ak6riI_L8-oE0dcb61ndLGhxtQm9bpFPzTVMf3zEuL-k1rcNsYaJPYb7yRP_uG_qFMfWJfvuI1Pkf0_kwPyJ7zrQJjzd3TN7ubl9vHrKn5_vHm-unrGYCukxIgRwUqxSThZXgsIRGMptL60xpK1cIKwWoxjhVM7SOSWBMGMcVNJVVbExO1r2LGD57TJ2e-VRj25o5hj5pCXzoZvlg5GtjHUNKEZ1eRD8zcalz0CuQ-g-kXlHSwPUfSF0OuclmoLczbLapDblBv1rrOHz55THqVHuc19gMOOpON8H_s_AL5vWCjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80579331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The stability of double jaw surgery: A comparison of rigid versus wire fixation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Satrom, Kirk D. ; Sinclair, Peter M. ; Wolford, Larry M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Satrom, Kirk D. ; Sinclair, Peter M. ; Wolford, Larry M.</creatorcontrib><description>The subjects of this study were 35 patients who underwent simultaneous surgery for superior repositioning of the maxilla and advancement of the mandible. They were studied cephalometrically for a comparison of the postsurgical stability of two commonly used fixation techniques: (1) rigid fixation with bone plates and (2) skeletal-wire fixation. One surgeon performed the operations on all 35 patients, and both groups were studied for an average of 15 months after surgery. Results showed that, although the maxilla remained relatively stable after surgery with both fixation techniques, rigid fixation tended to improve stability, primarily by eliminating relapse in excess of 2 mm. Mandibular stability was much greater with rigid fixation: the amount of relapse of the horizontal projection of B point with this method was 6%, while in the skeletal-wire sample it was 26%. Increased rotational stability between the proximal and distal segments of the mandible appeared to be a major factor in the improved overall stability of the rigid-fixation sample. The amount of mandibular relapse was found to be correlated to the amount of advancement in the wire-fixation sample, but not in the rigid-fixation sample.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81632-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2038975</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bone Plates ; Bone Wires ; Cephalometry ; Dentistry ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Incisor - pathology ; Malocclusion - pathology ; Malocclusion - surgery ; Mandible - pathology ; Mandible - surgery ; Maxilla - pathology ; Maxilla - surgery ; Osteotomy - instrumentation ; Osteotomy - methods ; Recurrence ; Time Factors ; Vertical Dimension</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 1991-06, Vol.99 (6), p.550-563</ispartof><rights>1991 The American Association of Orthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-686e509379382b80fe40d83b18bfa4b7f26b8609daf9c3ebf380336af590d7b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-686e509379382b80fe40d83b18bfa4b7f26b8609daf9c3ebf380336af590d7b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540605816324$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2038975$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Satrom, Kirk D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolford, Larry M.</creatorcontrib><title>The stability of double jaw surgery: A comparison of rigid versus wire fixation</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>The subjects of this study were 35 patients who underwent simultaneous surgery for superior repositioning of the maxilla and advancement of the mandible. They were studied cephalometrically for a comparison of the postsurgical stability of two commonly used fixation techniques: (1) rigid fixation with bone plates and (2) skeletal-wire fixation. One surgeon performed the operations on all 35 patients, and both groups were studied for an average of 15 months after surgery. Results showed that, although the maxilla remained relatively stable after surgery with both fixation techniques, rigid fixation tended to improve stability, primarily by eliminating relapse in excess of 2 mm. Mandibular stability was much greater with rigid fixation: the amount of relapse of the horizontal projection of B point with this method was 6%, while in the skeletal-wire sample it was 26%. Increased rotational stability between the proximal and distal segments of the mandible appeared to be a major factor in the improved overall stability of the rigid-fixation sample. The amount of mandibular relapse was found to be correlated to the amount of advancement in the wire-fixation sample, but not in the rigid-fixation sample.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Wires</subject><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incisor - pathology</subject><subject>Malocclusion - pathology</subject><subject>Malocclusion - surgery</subject><subject>Mandible - pathology</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Maxilla - pathology</subject><subject>Maxilla - surgery</subject><subject>Osteotomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Osteotomy - methods</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vertical Dimension</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLtOwzAUhi0EglJ4hEqeEAyBkzh2bBaEEDcJiQGYLTs5BldpXewE6NuT0qor0xn-m85HyCSH8xxycfECUqqMlyBOgZ_JXLAiK3fIKAdVZaLixS4ZbS0H5DClKQCosoB9sl8Ak6riI_L8-oE0dcb61ndLGhxtQm9bpFPzTVMf3zEuL-k1rcNsYaJPYb7yRP_uG_qFMfWJfvuI1Pkf0_kwPyJ7zrQJjzd3TN7ubl9vHrKn5_vHm-unrGYCukxIgRwUqxSThZXgsIRGMptL60xpK1cIKwWoxjhVM7SOSWBMGMcVNJVVbExO1r2LGD57TJ2e-VRj25o5hj5pCXzoZvlg5GtjHUNKEZ1eRD8zcalz0CuQ-g-kXlHSwPUfSF0OuclmoLczbLapDblBv1rrOHz55THqVHuc19gMOOpON8H_s_AL5vWCjA</recordid><startdate>19910601</startdate><enddate>19910601</enddate><creator>Satrom, Kirk D.</creator><creator>Sinclair, Peter M.</creator><creator>Wolford, Larry M.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910601</creationdate><title>The stability of double jaw surgery: A comparison of rigid versus wire fixation</title><author>Satrom, Kirk D. ; Sinclair, Peter M. ; Wolford, Larry M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-686e509379382b80fe40d83b18bfa4b7f26b8609daf9c3ebf380336af590d7b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Wires</topic><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incisor - pathology</topic><topic>Malocclusion - pathology</topic><topic>Malocclusion - surgery</topic><topic>Mandible - pathology</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Maxilla - pathology</topic><topic>Maxilla - surgery</topic><topic>Osteotomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Osteotomy - methods</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vertical Dimension</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Satrom, Kirk D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolford, Larry M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Satrom, Kirk D.</au><au>Sinclair, Peter M.</au><au>Wolford, Larry M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The stability of double jaw surgery: A comparison of rigid versus wire fixation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>1991-06-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>550</spage><epage>563</epage><pages>550-563</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>The subjects of this study were 35 patients who underwent simultaneous surgery for superior repositioning of the maxilla and advancement of the mandible. They were studied cephalometrically for a comparison of the postsurgical stability of two commonly used fixation techniques: (1) rigid fixation with bone plates and (2) skeletal-wire fixation. One surgeon performed the operations on all 35 patients, and both groups were studied for an average of 15 months after surgery. Results showed that, although the maxilla remained relatively stable after surgery with both fixation techniques, rigid fixation tended to improve stability, primarily by eliminating relapse in excess of 2 mm. Mandibular stability was much greater with rigid fixation: the amount of relapse of the horizontal projection of B point with this method was 6%, while in the skeletal-wire sample it was 26%. Increased rotational stability between the proximal and distal segments of the mandible appeared to be a major factor in the improved overall stability of the rigid-fixation sample. The amount of mandibular relapse was found to be correlated to the amount of advancement in the wire-fixation sample, but not in the rigid-fixation sample.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>2038975</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81632-4</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-5406
ispartof American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 1991-06, Vol.99 (6), p.550-563
issn 0889-5406
1097-6752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80579331
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Bone Plates
Bone Wires
Cephalometry
Dentistry
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incisor - pathology
Malocclusion - pathology
Malocclusion - surgery
Mandible - pathology
Mandible - surgery
Maxilla - pathology
Maxilla - surgery
Osteotomy - instrumentation
Osteotomy - methods
Recurrence
Time Factors
Vertical Dimension
title The stability of double jaw surgery: A comparison of rigid versus wire fixation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A12%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20stability%20of%20double%20jaw%20surgery:%20A%20comparison%20of%20rigid%20versus%20wire%20fixation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Satrom,%20Kirk%20D.&rft.date=1991-06-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=550&rft.epage=563&rft.pages=550-563&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81632-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80579331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80579331&rft_id=info:pmid/2038975&rft_els_id=S0889540605816324&rfr_iscdi=true