Contribution of Perceptual Fluency to Recognition Judgments

Following a shallow (count vowels) or deep (read) study task, old and new words were tested for both fluency of perception and recognition memory. Subjects first identified a test word as it came gradually into view and then judged it as old or new. Old words were identified faster than new words, i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 1991-03, Vol.17 (2), p.210-223
Hauptverfasser: Johnston, William A, Hawley, Kevin J, Elliott, John M. G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 223
container_issue 2
container_start_page 210
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 17
creator Johnston, William A
Hawley, Kevin J
Elliott, John M. G
description Following a shallow (count vowels) or deep (read) study task, old and new words were tested for both fluency of perception and recognition memory. Subjects first identified a test word as it came gradually into view and then judged it as old or new. Old words were identified faster than new words, indicating implicit, perceptual memory for old words. Independently of this effect, words judged old were identified faster than words judged new, especially after shallow study. Eight experiments examined the possible causal relationship between perceptual fluency and recognition judgments. Experiments 1 to 4 showed that fast identifications per se do not promote old judgments. Accelerating the identification of test items by semantically priming them or making them come more quickly into view did not affect recognition judgments. Experiment 5 showed that the usual association of fast identifications with old judgments is not an artifact of item selection because the association disappeared when the identifications and judgments were segregated into different phases of the test task. Experiments 6 and 7 showed that the likelihood of old judgments increases directly with the pretested perceptibility of test words, but only after shallow study. Experiment 8 showed that the dependency of recognition judgments on perceptual fluency continues to hold when the requirement to identify the words before judging them is eliminated. We conclude that fluency of perception contributes to recognition judgments, but only when the fluency is produced naturally (e.g., through perceptual memory) and explicit memory is minimal.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.210
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80574771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1839873322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-b76183d73c0a42a40cbae2d66d2c44ae231589414aad7609e08aa0b703df42e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtLwzAYhoMoc07_gCAUFe9ac1qT4JUM54GBIrsPaZqNjrapSQvu35va4UDQ3Hwh7_O9-Q4AnCOYIEjYLcSMx4wIkiCW4AQjeADGSBARI8ynh2D8AxyDE-83sD-Ej8AI8aBgMQZ3M1u3rsi6trB1ZFfRm3HaNG2nymhedqbW26i10bvRdl0X39BLl68rU7f-FBytVOnN2S5OwHL-sJw9xYvXx-fZ_SJWFIo2zliKOMkZ0VBRHN50pgzO0zTHmtJwJWjKBUVUqZylUBjIlYIZgyRfUWzIBNwMto2zH53xrawKr01ZqtrYzksOp4wyhgJ4-Qvc2M7VoTSZIkpC7wz_B-EAMS4wDdDVX1BoRXBGCO6t8EBpZ713ZiUbV1TKbSWCsl-Q7Ocv-_lLxCQOH8CQdLGz7rLK5PuUYSNBvx501SjZ-K1Wri10abz8LKu9zRcukZT-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614300072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contribution of Perceptual Fluency to Recognition Judgments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Johnston, William A ; Hawley, Kevin J ; Elliott, John M. G</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William A ; Hawley, Kevin J ; Elliott, John M. G</creatorcontrib><description>Following a shallow (count vowels) or deep (read) study task, old and new words were tested for both fluency of perception and recognition memory. Subjects first identified a test word as it came gradually into view and then judged it as old or new. Old words were identified faster than new words, indicating implicit, perceptual memory for old words. Independently of this effect, words judged old were identified faster than words judged new, especially after shallow study. Eight experiments examined the possible causal relationship between perceptual fluency and recognition judgments. Experiments 1 to 4 showed that fast identifications per se do not promote old judgments. Accelerating the identification of test items by semantically priming them or making them come more quickly into view did not affect recognition judgments. Experiment 5 showed that the usual association of fast identifications with old judgments is not an artifact of item selection because the association disappeared when the identifications and judgments were segregated into different phases of the test task. Experiments 6 and 7 showed that the likelihood of old judgments increases directly with the pretested perceptibility of test words, but only after shallow study. Experiment 8 showed that the dependency of recognition judgments on perceptual fluency continues to hold when the requirement to identify the words before judging them is eliminated. We conclude that fluency of perception contributes to recognition judgments, but only when the fluency is produced naturally (e.g., through perceptual memory) and explicit memory is minimal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1827829</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Judgment ; Male ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perceptions ; Reaction Time ; Reading ; Recognition (Learning) ; Semantics ; Sensory Thresholds ; Social research ; Verbal Learning ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 1991-03, Vol.17 (2), p.210-223</ispartof><rights>1991 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 1991</rights><rights>1991, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-b76183d73c0a42a40cbae2d66d2c44ae231589414aad7609e08aa0b703df42e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1827829$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawley, Kevin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, John M. G</creatorcontrib><title>Contribution of Perceptual Fluency to Recognition Judgments</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Following a shallow (count vowels) or deep (read) study task, old and new words were tested for both fluency of perception and recognition memory. Subjects first identified a test word as it came gradually into view and then judged it as old or new. Old words were identified faster than new words, indicating implicit, perceptual memory for old words. Independently of this effect, words judged old were identified faster than words judged new, especially after shallow study. Eight experiments examined the possible causal relationship between perceptual fluency and recognition judgments. Experiments 1 to 4 showed that fast identifications per se do not promote old judgments. Accelerating the identification of test items by semantically priming them or making them come more quickly into view did not affect recognition judgments. Experiment 5 showed that the usual association of fast identifications with old judgments is not an artifact of item selection because the association disappeared when the identifications and judgments were segregated into different phases of the test task. Experiments 6 and 7 showed that the likelihood of old judgments increases directly with the pretested perceptibility of test words, but only after shallow study. Experiment 8 showed that the dependency of recognition judgments on perceptual fluency continues to hold when the requirement to identify the words before judging them is eliminated. We conclude that fluency of perception contributes to recognition judgments, but only when the fluency is produced naturally (e.g., through perceptual memory) and explicit memory is minimal.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Recognition (Learning)</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVtLwzAYhoMoc07_gCAUFe9ac1qT4JUM54GBIrsPaZqNjrapSQvu35va4UDQ3Hwh7_O9-Q4AnCOYIEjYLcSMx4wIkiCW4AQjeADGSBARI8ynh2D8AxyDE-83sD-Ej8AI8aBgMQZ3M1u3rsi6trB1ZFfRm3HaNG2nymhedqbW26i10bvRdl0X39BLl68rU7f-FBytVOnN2S5OwHL-sJw9xYvXx-fZ_SJWFIo2zliKOMkZ0VBRHN50pgzO0zTHmtJwJWjKBUVUqZylUBjIlYIZgyRfUWzIBNwMto2zH53xrawKr01ZqtrYzksOp4wyhgJ4-Qvc2M7VoTSZIkpC7wz_B-EAMS4wDdDVX1BoRXBGCO6t8EBpZ713ZiUbV1TKbSWCsl-Q7Ocv-_lLxCQOH8CQdLGz7rLK5PuUYSNBvx501SjZ-K1Wri10abz8LKu9zRcukZT-</recordid><startdate>19910301</startdate><enddate>19910301</enddate><creator>Johnston, William A</creator><creator>Hawley, Kevin J</creator><creator>Elliott, John M. G</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910301</creationdate><title>Contribution of Perceptual Fluency to Recognition Judgments</title><author>Johnston, William A ; Hawley, Kevin J ; Elliott, John M. G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-b76183d73c0a42a40cbae2d66d2c44ae231589414aad7609e08aa0b703df42e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Recognition (Learning)</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawley, Kevin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, John M. G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnston, William A</au><au>Hawley, Kevin J</au><au>Elliott, John M. G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contribution of Perceptual Fluency to Recognition Judgments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>1991-03-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>210</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>210-223</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Following a shallow (count vowels) or deep (read) study task, old and new words were tested for both fluency of perception and recognition memory. Subjects first identified a test word as it came gradually into view and then judged it as old or new. Old words were identified faster than new words, indicating implicit, perceptual memory for old words. Independently of this effect, words judged old were identified faster than words judged new, especially after shallow study. Eight experiments examined the possible causal relationship between perceptual fluency and recognition judgments. Experiments 1 to 4 showed that fast identifications per se do not promote old judgments. Accelerating the identification of test items by semantically priming them or making them come more quickly into view did not affect recognition judgments. Experiment 5 showed that the usual association of fast identifications with old judgments is not an artifact of item selection because the association disappeared when the identifications and judgments were segregated into different phases of the test task. Experiments 6 and 7 showed that the likelihood of old judgments increases directly with the pretested perceptibility of test words, but only after shallow study. Experiment 8 showed that the dependency of recognition judgments on perceptual fluency continues to hold when the requirement to identify the words before judging them is eliminated. We conclude that fluency of perception contributes to recognition judgments, but only when the fluency is produced naturally (e.g., through perceptual memory) and explicit memory is minimal.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>1827829</pmid><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.210</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 1991-03, Vol.17 (2), p.210-223
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80574771
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Adult
Attention
Cognition & reasoning
Female
Human
Humans
Judgment
Male
Memory
Mental Recall
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Perceptions
Reaction Time
Reading
Recognition (Learning)
Semantics
Sensory Thresholds
Social research
Verbal Learning
Word Recognition
title Contribution of Perceptual Fluency to Recognition Judgments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T21%3A19%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contribution%20of%20Perceptual%20Fluency%20to%20Recognition%20Judgments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Johnston,%20William%20A&rft.date=1991-03-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=210&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=210-223&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.210&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1839873322%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614300072&rft_id=info:pmid/1827829&rfr_iscdi=true