MR imaging of the knee: Clarification of its role
In an attempt to further delineate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating knee pathology, a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent MR scanning before arthroscopy was undertaken. For medial meniscus tears, the sensitivity of MR imaging was 97% whereas its specificity was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arthroscopy 1991, Vol.7 (1), p.78-85 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 85 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 78 |
container_title | Arthroscopy |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Kelly, Michael A. Flock, Timothy J. Kimmel, Jay A. Kiernan, Howard A. Singson, Rolando S. Starron, Ronald B. Feldman, Frieda |
description | In an attempt to further delineate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating knee pathology, a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent MR scanning before arthroscopy was undertaken. For medial meniscus tears, the sensitivity of MR imaging was 97% whereas its specificity was 77%. For lateral meniscus tears, MR imaging was 90% sensitive and 87% specific. The positive predictive value of MR imaging was 85% for medial meniscus tears and only 79% for lateral meniscus tears. The negative predictive value was 95% for the medial meniscus and 94% for the lateral meniscus. MR imaging had an accuracy of 93% in assessing anterior cruciate ligament pathology also. These results begin to clarify the role of MR imaging in evaluating intraarticular knee pathology. Grade III signals represented tears at arthroscopy more than 90% of the time. False-positive results occurred more frequently than false negative results did. The high negative predictive value of MR imaging indicates that with a negative MR image, the orthopaedist can reliably conclude that no meniscal pathology is present. MR imaging is a useful diagnostic tool; however, it should be used selectively and in conjunction with the clinical examination in evaluating internal derangements of the knee. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0749-8063(91)90083-A |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80491673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>074980639190083A</els_id><sourcerecordid>80491673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-9d8d6332355abf8683e1f114ae2665b90600aab231ab10192e22dd25de3053623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIeRPSwOkmadONBKMUvqAii55DNztbodrcmW8F_b9YuPXqaw_vMy8xDyDGFSwpUXsFkrNIMJD9X9EIBZDyd7pAhFUymnHG6S4ZbZJ8chPABAJxnfEAGDEBRJoaEPr0kbmkWrl4kTZm075h81ojXyawy3pXOmtY1dRe5NiS-qfCQ7JWmCnjUzxF5u7t9nT2k8-f7x9l0nloOtE1VkRWSxzuEMHmZyYwjLSkdG2RSilyBBDAmj3eaPL6jGDJWFEwUyEFwyfiInG16V775WmNo9dIFi1VlamzWQWcwVlROeATHG9D6JgSPpV75-JL_0RR0Z0p3GnSnQSuq_0zpaVw76fvX-RKL7VKvJuanfW6CNVXpTW1d2GIi1kQqYjcbDKOLb4deB-uwtlg4j7bVReP-v-MX4MKBJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80491673</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MR imaging of the knee: Clarification of its role</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kelly, Michael A. ; Flock, Timothy J. ; Kimmel, Jay A. ; Kiernan, Howard A. ; Singson, Rolando S. ; Starron, Ronald B. ; Feldman, Frieda</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michael A. ; Flock, Timothy J. ; Kimmel, Jay A. ; Kiernan, Howard A. ; Singson, Rolando S. ; Starron, Ronald B. ; Feldman, Frieda</creatorcontrib><description>In an attempt to further delineate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating knee pathology, a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent MR scanning before arthroscopy was undertaken. For medial meniscus tears, the sensitivity of MR imaging was 97% whereas its specificity was 77%. For lateral meniscus tears, MR imaging was 90% sensitive and 87% specific. The positive predictive value of MR imaging was 85% for medial meniscus tears and only 79% for lateral meniscus tears. The negative predictive value was 95% for the medial meniscus and 94% for the lateral meniscus. MR imaging had an accuracy of 93% in assessing anterior cruciate ligament pathology also. These results begin to clarify the role of MR imaging in evaluating intraarticular knee pathology. Grade III signals represented tears at arthroscopy more than 90% of the time. False-positive results occurred more frequently than false negative results did. The high negative predictive value of MR imaging indicates that with a negative MR image, the orthopaedist can reliably conclude that no meniscal pathology is present. MR imaging is a useful diagnostic tool; however, it should be used selectively and in conjunction with the clinical examination in evaluating internal derangements of the knee.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0749-8063(91)90083-A</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2009125</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARTHE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anterior cruciate ligament ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries ; Arthroscopy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Knee ; Knee - pathology ; Knee Injuries - diagnosis ; Knee Injuries - epidemiology ; Knee Joint - pathology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Meniscus ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tibial Meniscus Injuries</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 1991, Vol.7 (1), p.78-85</ispartof><rights>1991 Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-9d8d6332355abf8683e1f114ae2665b90600aab231ab10192e22dd25de3053623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-9d8d6332355abf8683e1f114ae2665b90600aab231ab10192e22dd25de3053623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-8063(91)90083-A$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5008253$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2009125$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flock, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimmel, Jay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiernan, Howard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singson, Rolando S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starron, Ronald B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Frieda</creatorcontrib><title>MR imaging of the knee: Clarification of its role</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>In an attempt to further delineate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating knee pathology, a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent MR scanning before arthroscopy was undertaken. For medial meniscus tears, the sensitivity of MR imaging was 97% whereas its specificity was 77%. For lateral meniscus tears, MR imaging was 90% sensitive and 87% specific. The positive predictive value of MR imaging was 85% for medial meniscus tears and only 79% for lateral meniscus tears. The negative predictive value was 95% for the medial meniscus and 94% for the lateral meniscus. MR imaging had an accuracy of 93% in assessing anterior cruciate ligament pathology also. These results begin to clarify the role of MR imaging in evaluating intraarticular knee pathology. Grade III signals represented tears at arthroscopy more than 90% of the time. False-positive results occurred more frequently than false negative results did. The high negative predictive value of MR imaging indicates that with a negative MR image, the orthopaedist can reliably conclude that no meniscal pathology is present. MR imaging is a useful diagnostic tool; however, it should be used selectively and in conjunction with the clinical examination in evaluating internal derangements of the knee.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anterior cruciate ligament</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries</subject><subject>Arthroscopy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee - pathology</subject><subject>Knee Injuries - diagnosis</subject><subject>Knee Injuries - epidemiology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - pathology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meniscus</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tibial Meniscus Injuries</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIeRPSwOkmadONBKMUvqAii55DNztbodrcmW8F_b9YuPXqaw_vMy8xDyDGFSwpUXsFkrNIMJD9X9EIBZDyd7pAhFUymnHG6S4ZbZJ8chPABAJxnfEAGDEBRJoaEPr0kbmkWrl4kTZm075h81ojXyawy3pXOmtY1dRe5NiS-qfCQ7JWmCnjUzxF5u7t9nT2k8-f7x9l0nloOtE1VkRWSxzuEMHmZyYwjLSkdG2RSilyBBDAmj3eaPL6jGDJWFEwUyEFwyfiInG16V775WmNo9dIFi1VlamzWQWcwVlROeATHG9D6JgSPpV75-JL_0RR0Z0p3GnSnQSuq_0zpaVw76fvX-RKL7VKvJuanfW6CNVXpTW1d2GIi1kQqYjcbDKOLb4deB-uwtlg4j7bVReP-v-MX4MKBJA</recordid><startdate>1991</startdate><enddate>1991</enddate><creator>Kelly, Michael A.</creator><creator>Flock, Timothy J.</creator><creator>Kimmel, Jay A.</creator><creator>Kiernan, Howard A.</creator><creator>Singson, Rolando S.</creator><creator>Starron, Ronald B.</creator><creator>Feldman, Frieda</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1991</creationdate><title>MR imaging of the knee: Clarification of its role</title><author>Kelly, Michael A. ; Flock, Timothy J. ; Kimmel, Jay A. ; Kiernan, Howard A. ; Singson, Rolando S. ; Starron, Ronald B. ; Feldman, Frieda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-9d8d6332355abf8683e1f114ae2665b90600aab231ab10192e22dd25de3053623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anterior cruciate ligament</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries</topic><topic>Arthroscopy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee - pathology</topic><topic>Knee Injuries - diagnosis</topic><topic>Knee Injuries - epidemiology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - pathology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meniscus</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tibial Meniscus Injuries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flock, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimmel, Jay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiernan, Howard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singson, Rolando S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starron, Ronald B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Frieda</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelly, Michael A.</au><au>Flock, Timothy J.</au><au>Kimmel, Jay A.</au><au>Kiernan, Howard A.</au><au>Singson, Rolando S.</au><au>Starron, Ronald B.</au><au>Feldman, Frieda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MR imaging of the knee: Clarification of its role</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>1991</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>78-85</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><coden>ARTHE3</coden><abstract>In an attempt to further delineate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating knee pathology, a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent MR scanning before arthroscopy was undertaken. For medial meniscus tears, the sensitivity of MR imaging was 97% whereas its specificity was 77%. For lateral meniscus tears, MR imaging was 90% sensitive and 87% specific. The positive predictive value of MR imaging was 85% for medial meniscus tears and only 79% for lateral meniscus tears. The negative predictive value was 95% for the medial meniscus and 94% for the lateral meniscus. MR imaging had an accuracy of 93% in assessing anterior cruciate ligament pathology also. These results begin to clarify the role of MR imaging in evaluating intraarticular knee pathology. Grade III signals represented tears at arthroscopy more than 90% of the time. False-positive results occurred more frequently than false negative results did. The high negative predictive value of MR imaging indicates that with a negative MR image, the orthopaedist can reliably conclude that no meniscal pathology is present. MR imaging is a useful diagnostic tool; however, it should be used selectively and in conjunction with the clinical examination in evaluating internal derangements of the knee.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2009125</pmid><doi>10.1016/0749-8063(91)90083-A</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-8063 |
ispartof | Arthroscopy, 1991, Vol.7 (1), p.78-85 |
issn | 0749-8063 1526-3231 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80491673 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Anterior cruciate ligament Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Arthroscopy Biological and medical sciences Female Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Knee Knee - pathology Knee Injuries - diagnosis Knee Injuries - epidemiology Knee Joint - pathology Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Medical sciences Meniscus Predictive Value of Tests Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Tibial Meniscus Injuries |
title | MR imaging of the knee: Clarification of its role |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A27%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MR%20imaging%20of%20the%20knee:%20Clarification%20of%20its%20role&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Kelly,%20Michael%20A.&rft.date=1991&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=78-85&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft.coden=ARTHE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0749-8063(91)90083-A&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80491673%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80491673&rft_id=info:pmid/2009125&rft_els_id=074980639190083A&rfr_iscdi=true |