MR imaging of the knee: Clarification of its role

In an attempt to further delineate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating knee pathology, a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent MR scanning before arthroscopy was undertaken. For medial meniscus tears, the sensitivity of MR imaging was 97% whereas its specificity was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 1991, Vol.7 (1), p.78-85
Hauptverfasser: Kelly, Michael A., Flock, Timothy J., Kimmel, Jay A., Kiernan, Howard A., Singson, Rolando S., Starron, Ronald B., Feldman, Frieda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 85
container_issue 1
container_start_page 78
container_title Arthroscopy
container_volume 7
creator Kelly, Michael A.
Flock, Timothy J.
Kimmel, Jay A.
Kiernan, Howard A.
Singson, Rolando S.
Starron, Ronald B.
Feldman, Frieda
description In an attempt to further delineate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating knee pathology, a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent MR scanning before arthroscopy was undertaken. For medial meniscus tears, the sensitivity of MR imaging was 97% whereas its specificity was 77%. For lateral meniscus tears, MR imaging was 90% sensitive and 87% specific. The positive predictive value of MR imaging was 85% for medial meniscus tears and only 79% for lateral meniscus tears. The negative predictive value was 95% for the medial meniscus and 94% for the lateral meniscus. MR imaging had an accuracy of 93% in assessing anterior cruciate ligament pathology also. These results begin to clarify the role of MR imaging in evaluating intraarticular knee pathology. Grade III signals represented tears at arthroscopy more than 90% of the time. False-positive results occurred more frequently than false negative results did. The high negative predictive value of MR imaging indicates that with a negative MR image, the orthopaedist can reliably conclude that no meniscal pathology is present. MR imaging is a useful diagnostic tool; however, it should be used selectively and in conjunction with the clinical examination in evaluating internal derangements of the knee.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0749-8063(91)90083-A
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80491673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>074980639190083A</els_id><sourcerecordid>80491673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-9d8d6332355abf8683e1f114ae2665b90600aab231ab10192e22dd25de3053623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIeRPSwOkmadONBKMUvqAii55DNztbodrcmW8F_b9YuPXqaw_vMy8xDyDGFSwpUXsFkrNIMJD9X9EIBZDyd7pAhFUymnHG6S4ZbZJ8chPABAJxnfEAGDEBRJoaEPr0kbmkWrl4kTZm075h81ojXyawy3pXOmtY1dRe5NiS-qfCQ7JWmCnjUzxF5u7t9nT2k8-f7x9l0nloOtE1VkRWSxzuEMHmZyYwjLSkdG2RSilyBBDAmj3eaPL6jGDJWFEwUyEFwyfiInG16V775WmNo9dIFi1VlamzWQWcwVlROeATHG9D6JgSPpV75-JL_0RR0Z0p3GnSnQSuq_0zpaVw76fvX-RKL7VKvJuanfW6CNVXpTW1d2GIi1kQqYjcbDKOLb4deB-uwtlg4j7bVReP-v-MX4MKBJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80491673</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MR imaging of the knee: Clarification of its role</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kelly, Michael A. ; Flock, Timothy J. ; Kimmel, Jay A. ; Kiernan, Howard A. ; Singson, Rolando S. ; Starron, Ronald B. ; Feldman, Frieda</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michael A. ; Flock, Timothy J. ; Kimmel, Jay A. ; Kiernan, Howard A. ; Singson, Rolando S. ; Starron, Ronald B. ; Feldman, Frieda</creatorcontrib><description>In an attempt to further delineate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating knee pathology, a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent MR scanning before arthroscopy was undertaken. For medial meniscus tears, the sensitivity of MR imaging was 97% whereas its specificity was 77%. For lateral meniscus tears, MR imaging was 90% sensitive and 87% specific. The positive predictive value of MR imaging was 85% for medial meniscus tears and only 79% for lateral meniscus tears. The negative predictive value was 95% for the medial meniscus and 94% for the lateral meniscus. MR imaging had an accuracy of 93% in assessing anterior cruciate ligament pathology also. These results begin to clarify the role of MR imaging in evaluating intraarticular knee pathology. Grade III signals represented tears at arthroscopy more than 90% of the time. False-positive results occurred more frequently than false negative results did. The high negative predictive value of MR imaging indicates that with a negative MR image, the orthopaedist can reliably conclude that no meniscal pathology is present. MR imaging is a useful diagnostic tool; however, it should be used selectively and in conjunction with the clinical examination in evaluating internal derangements of the knee.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0749-8063(91)90083-A</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2009125</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARTHE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anterior cruciate ligament ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries ; Arthroscopy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Knee ; Knee - pathology ; Knee Injuries - diagnosis ; Knee Injuries - epidemiology ; Knee Joint - pathology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Meniscus ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tibial Meniscus Injuries</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 1991, Vol.7 (1), p.78-85</ispartof><rights>1991 Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-9d8d6332355abf8683e1f114ae2665b90600aab231ab10192e22dd25de3053623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-9d8d6332355abf8683e1f114ae2665b90600aab231ab10192e22dd25de3053623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-8063(91)90083-A$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5008253$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2009125$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flock, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimmel, Jay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiernan, Howard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singson, Rolando S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starron, Ronald B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Frieda</creatorcontrib><title>MR imaging of the knee: Clarification of its role</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>In an attempt to further delineate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating knee pathology, a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent MR scanning before arthroscopy was undertaken. For medial meniscus tears, the sensitivity of MR imaging was 97% whereas its specificity was 77%. For lateral meniscus tears, MR imaging was 90% sensitive and 87% specific. The positive predictive value of MR imaging was 85% for medial meniscus tears and only 79% for lateral meniscus tears. The negative predictive value was 95% for the medial meniscus and 94% for the lateral meniscus. MR imaging had an accuracy of 93% in assessing anterior cruciate ligament pathology also. These results begin to clarify the role of MR imaging in evaluating intraarticular knee pathology. Grade III signals represented tears at arthroscopy more than 90% of the time. False-positive results occurred more frequently than false negative results did. The high negative predictive value of MR imaging indicates that with a negative MR image, the orthopaedist can reliably conclude that no meniscal pathology is present. MR imaging is a useful diagnostic tool; however, it should be used selectively and in conjunction with the clinical examination in evaluating internal derangements of the knee.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anterior cruciate ligament</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries</subject><subject>Arthroscopy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee - pathology</subject><subject>Knee Injuries - diagnosis</subject><subject>Knee Injuries - epidemiology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - pathology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meniscus</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tibial Meniscus Injuries</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIeRPSwOkmadONBKMUvqAii55DNztbodrcmW8F_b9YuPXqaw_vMy8xDyDGFSwpUXsFkrNIMJD9X9EIBZDyd7pAhFUymnHG6S4ZbZJ8chPABAJxnfEAGDEBRJoaEPr0kbmkWrl4kTZm075h81ojXyawy3pXOmtY1dRe5NiS-qfCQ7JWmCnjUzxF5u7t9nT2k8-f7x9l0nloOtE1VkRWSxzuEMHmZyYwjLSkdG2RSilyBBDAmj3eaPL6jGDJWFEwUyEFwyfiInG16V775WmNo9dIFi1VlamzWQWcwVlROeATHG9D6JgSPpV75-JL_0RR0Z0p3GnSnQSuq_0zpaVw76fvX-RKL7VKvJuanfW6CNVXpTW1d2GIi1kQqYjcbDKOLb4deB-uwtlg4j7bVReP-v-MX4MKBJA</recordid><startdate>1991</startdate><enddate>1991</enddate><creator>Kelly, Michael A.</creator><creator>Flock, Timothy J.</creator><creator>Kimmel, Jay A.</creator><creator>Kiernan, Howard A.</creator><creator>Singson, Rolando S.</creator><creator>Starron, Ronald B.</creator><creator>Feldman, Frieda</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1991</creationdate><title>MR imaging of the knee: Clarification of its role</title><author>Kelly, Michael A. ; Flock, Timothy J. ; Kimmel, Jay A. ; Kiernan, Howard A. ; Singson, Rolando S. ; Starron, Ronald B. ; Feldman, Frieda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-9d8d6332355abf8683e1f114ae2665b90600aab231ab10192e22dd25de3053623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anterior cruciate ligament</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries</topic><topic>Arthroscopy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee - pathology</topic><topic>Knee Injuries - diagnosis</topic><topic>Knee Injuries - epidemiology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - pathology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meniscus</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tibial Meniscus Injuries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flock, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimmel, Jay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiernan, Howard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singson, Rolando S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starron, Ronald B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Frieda</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelly, Michael A.</au><au>Flock, Timothy J.</au><au>Kimmel, Jay A.</au><au>Kiernan, Howard A.</au><au>Singson, Rolando S.</au><au>Starron, Ronald B.</au><au>Feldman, Frieda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MR imaging of the knee: Clarification of its role</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>1991</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>78-85</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><coden>ARTHE3</coden><abstract>In an attempt to further delineate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating knee pathology, a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent MR scanning before arthroscopy was undertaken. For medial meniscus tears, the sensitivity of MR imaging was 97% whereas its specificity was 77%. For lateral meniscus tears, MR imaging was 90% sensitive and 87% specific. The positive predictive value of MR imaging was 85% for medial meniscus tears and only 79% for lateral meniscus tears. The negative predictive value was 95% for the medial meniscus and 94% for the lateral meniscus. MR imaging had an accuracy of 93% in assessing anterior cruciate ligament pathology also. These results begin to clarify the role of MR imaging in evaluating intraarticular knee pathology. Grade III signals represented tears at arthroscopy more than 90% of the time. False-positive results occurred more frequently than false negative results did. The high negative predictive value of MR imaging indicates that with a negative MR image, the orthopaedist can reliably conclude that no meniscal pathology is present. MR imaging is a useful diagnostic tool; however, it should be used selectively and in conjunction with the clinical examination in evaluating internal derangements of the knee.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2009125</pmid><doi>10.1016/0749-8063(91)90083-A</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8063
ispartof Arthroscopy, 1991, Vol.7 (1), p.78-85
issn 0749-8063
1526-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80491673
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Anterior cruciate ligament
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Arthroscopy
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Knee
Knee - pathology
Knee Injuries - diagnosis
Knee Injuries - epidemiology
Knee Joint - pathology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Medical sciences
Meniscus
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tibial Meniscus Injuries
title MR imaging of the knee: Clarification of its role
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A27%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MR%20imaging%20of%20the%20knee:%20Clarification%20of%20its%20role&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Kelly,%20Michael%20A.&rft.date=1991&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=78-85&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft.coden=ARTHE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0749-8063(91)90083-A&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80491673%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80491673&rft_id=info:pmid/2009125&rft_els_id=074980639190083A&rfr_iscdi=true