Nitrogen utilization in growing lambs: effects of grain (starch) and protein sources with various rates of ruminal degradation

The potential interaction between grain (starch) and protein sources with varying ruminal degradation rates on N utilization in growing lambs was evaluated. Three grain sources with varying ruminal degradation rates, (barley greater than steam-flaked sorghum [SFSG] greater than dry-rolled sorghum [D...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 1991-01, Vol.69 (1), p.339-347
Hauptverfasser: Matras, J. (Texas Tech University, Lubbock), Bartle, S.J, Preston, R.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 347
container_issue 1
container_start_page 339
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 69
creator Matras, J. (Texas Tech University, Lubbock)
Bartle, S.J
Preston, R.L
description The potential interaction between grain (starch) and protein sources with varying ruminal degradation rates on N utilization in growing lambs was evaluated. Three grain sources with varying ruminal degradation rates, (barley greater than steam-flaked sorghum [SFSG] greater than dry-rolled sorghum [DRSG]) and three protein sources (urea greater than a 50:25:25 mixture of urea: blood meal:corn gluten meal [N basis, U/BC] greater than 50:50 mixture of meal:corn gluten meal [N basis, BC]), were evaluated in a 3 x 3 factorial arrangement. Supplemental protein sources provided 33% of dietary N (CP = 11.0%). For each grain-protein combination, a 3 x 3 Latin square metabolism trial was conducted using two sets of three lambs and three periods. Within-square treatments were 1.4, 1.7 and 2.0 times maintenance intake levels. No interactions were observed (P greater than .2) between dietary treatments and intake level. Grain sources did not differ (P greater than .2) in N balance or the proportion of N retained. Lambs fed urea diets retained less N (3.6 vs 4.2 and 4.1 g/d for urea vs U/BC and BC, respectively; linear, P = .07; quadratic, P = .12) and utilized N less efficiently (43.1 vs 51.9 and 52.5%, respectively; linear, P less than .001; quadratic, P = .10) than lambs fed BC diets. The grain x protein interaction was significant for most variables. Nitrogen utilization was most efficient (24 to 27% of N intake retained) when rapidly degraded sources (barley and urea) and slowly degraded sources (sorghum and BC) were fed together or when U/BC was the supplemental protein source (interaction P less than .08). An advantage was found for selection of starch and protein sources with similar ruminal degradation rates.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/1991.691339x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80482071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80482071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-27bb13689a687badba7e0d877ca0bc771338d51a91f9d90b705d04799e4460f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1v1DAURS0EKsPAjhUSkheAQCLFz4njmF1V8SVVsICurRfHybhK4tZ2GGDR346nE3Vlyff4vOdLyHNgp1xw-QGUgtNaQVmqPw_IBgQXRQl1-ZBsGONQNA3wx-RJjFeMARdKnJATzphgXG7I7XeXgh_sTJfkRvcPk_MzdTMdgt-7eaAjTm38SG3fW5Mi9X1OMOdvY8Jgdu8ozh29Dj7ZfBn9EoyNdO_Sjv7G4PwSacBk7x6GZXIzjrSzWdHdTXpKHvU4RvtsPbfk8vOnX-dfi4sfX76dn10UpqyrVHDZtlDWjcK6kS12LUrLukZKg6w1Uua_N50AVNCrTrFWMtGxSiplq6pmfV1uyZujN296s9iY9OSiseOIs8076oZVDWfZsyXvj6AJPsZge30d3IThrwamD3XrQ916rTvjL1fv0k62u4fXfnP-as0xGhz7gLNx8R6rVF0BHLDXR2znht3eBavjhOOYpaCvMNZKg87zMvfiyPXoNQ4hqy5_KgAhoSr_A0vyna8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80482071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nitrogen utilization in growing lambs: effects of grain (starch) and protein sources with various rates of ruminal degradation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Matras, J. (Texas Tech University, Lubbock) ; Bartle, S.J ; Preston, R.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Matras, J. (Texas Tech University, Lubbock) ; Bartle, S.J ; Preston, R.L</creatorcontrib><description>The potential interaction between grain (starch) and protein sources with varying ruminal degradation rates on N utilization in growing lambs was evaluated. Three grain sources with varying ruminal degradation rates, (barley greater than steam-flaked sorghum [SFSG] greater than dry-rolled sorghum [DRSG]) and three protein sources (urea greater than a 50:25:25 mixture of urea: blood meal:corn gluten meal [N basis, U/BC] greater than 50:50 mixture of meal:corn gluten meal [N basis, BC]), were evaluated in a 3 x 3 factorial arrangement. Supplemental protein sources provided 33% of dietary N (CP = 11.0%). For each grain-protein combination, a 3 x 3 Latin square metabolism trial was conducted using two sets of three lambs and three periods. Within-square treatments were 1.4, 1.7 and 2.0 times maintenance intake levels. No interactions were observed (P greater than .2) between dietary treatments and intake level. Grain sources did not differ (P greater than .2) in N balance or the proportion of N retained. Lambs fed urea diets retained less N (3.6 vs 4.2 and 4.1 g/d for urea vs U/BC and BC, respectively; linear, P = .07; quadratic, P = .12) and utilized N less efficiently (43.1 vs 51.9 and 52.5%, respectively; linear, P less than .001; quadratic, P = .10) than lambs fed BC diets. The grain x protein interaction was significant for most variables. Nitrogen utilization was most efficient (24 to 27% of N intake retained) when rapidly degraded sources (barley and urea) and slowly degraded sources (sorghum and BC) were fed together or when U/BC was the supplemental protein source (interaction P less than .08). An advantage was found for selection of starch and protein sources with similar ruminal degradation rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/1991.691339x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2005027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>AGNEAU ; Allantoin - urine ; ALMIDON ; AMIDON ; Animal Feed ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; CORDERO ; Dietary Carbohydrates - metabolism ; Dietary Proteins - metabolism ; DIGESTION ; Edible Grain ; FOURRAGE GRAIN ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; GRAIN FEED ; GRANOS PIENSO ; Hordeum ; LAMBS ; Male ; METABOLISM ; METABOLISME ; METABOLISME DE L'AZOTE ; METABOLISMO ; METABOLISMO DEL NITROGENO ; NITROGEN METABOLISM ; NITROGEN RETENTION ; NUTRIENTES ; NUTRIENTS ; OVIN ; OVINOS ; PROTEINAS ; PROTEINE ; PROTEINS ; Random Allocation ; RETENCION NITROGENADA ; RETENTION AZOTEE ; RUMEN ; Rumen - metabolism ; RUMIACION ; RUMINATION ; SHEEP ; Sheep - metabolism ; STARCH ; Starch - metabolism ; SUBSTANCE NUTRITIVE ; Urea - metabolism ; Vertebrates: digestive system ; Weight Gain</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 1991-01, Vol.69 (1), p.339-347</ispartof><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-27bb13689a687badba7e0d877ca0bc771338d51a91f9d90b705d04799e4460f63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4964117$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2005027$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matras, J. (Texas Tech University, Lubbock)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartle, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, R.L</creatorcontrib><title>Nitrogen utilization in growing lambs: effects of grain (starch) and protein sources with various rates of ruminal degradation</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>The potential interaction between grain (starch) and protein sources with varying ruminal degradation rates on N utilization in growing lambs was evaluated. Three grain sources with varying ruminal degradation rates, (barley greater than steam-flaked sorghum [SFSG] greater than dry-rolled sorghum [DRSG]) and three protein sources (urea greater than a 50:25:25 mixture of urea: blood meal:corn gluten meal [N basis, U/BC] greater than 50:50 mixture of meal:corn gluten meal [N basis, BC]), were evaluated in a 3 x 3 factorial arrangement. Supplemental protein sources provided 33% of dietary N (CP = 11.0%). For each grain-protein combination, a 3 x 3 Latin square metabolism trial was conducted using two sets of three lambs and three periods. Within-square treatments were 1.4, 1.7 and 2.0 times maintenance intake levels. No interactions were observed (P greater than .2) between dietary treatments and intake level. Grain sources did not differ (P greater than .2) in N balance or the proportion of N retained. Lambs fed urea diets retained less N (3.6 vs 4.2 and 4.1 g/d for urea vs U/BC and BC, respectively; linear, P = .07; quadratic, P = .12) and utilized N less efficiently (43.1 vs 51.9 and 52.5%, respectively; linear, P less than .001; quadratic, P = .10) than lambs fed BC diets. The grain x protein interaction was significant for most variables. Nitrogen utilization was most efficient (24 to 27% of N intake retained) when rapidly degraded sources (barley and urea) and slowly degraded sources (sorghum and BC) were fed together or when U/BC was the supplemental protein source (interaction P less than .08). An advantage was found for selection of starch and protein sources with similar ruminal degradation rates.</description><subject>AGNEAU</subject><subject>Allantoin - urine</subject><subject>ALMIDON</subject><subject>AMIDON</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>CORDERO</subject><subject>Dietary Carbohydrates - metabolism</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>DIGESTION</subject><subject>Edible Grain</subject><subject>FOURRAGE GRAIN</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>GRAIN FEED</subject><subject>GRANOS PIENSO</subject><subject>Hordeum</subject><subject>LAMBS</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>METABOLISM</subject><subject>METABOLISME</subject><subject>METABOLISME DE L'AZOTE</subject><subject>METABOLISMO</subject><subject>METABOLISMO DEL NITROGENO</subject><subject>NITROGEN METABOLISM</subject><subject>NITROGEN RETENTION</subject><subject>NUTRIENTES</subject><subject>NUTRIENTS</subject><subject>OVIN</subject><subject>OVINOS</subject><subject>PROTEINAS</subject><subject>PROTEINE</subject><subject>PROTEINS</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>RETENCION NITROGENADA</subject><subject>RETENTION AZOTEE</subject><subject>RUMEN</subject><subject>Rumen - metabolism</subject><subject>RUMIACION</subject><subject>RUMINATION</subject><subject>SHEEP</subject><subject>Sheep - metabolism</subject><subject>STARCH</subject><subject>Starch - metabolism</subject><subject>SUBSTANCE NUTRITIVE</subject><subject>Urea - metabolism</subject><subject>Vertebrates: digestive system</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><issn>0021-8812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1v1DAURS0EKsPAjhUSkheAQCLFz4njmF1V8SVVsICurRfHybhK4tZ2GGDR346nE3Vlyff4vOdLyHNgp1xw-QGUgtNaQVmqPw_IBgQXRQl1-ZBsGONQNA3wx-RJjFeMARdKnJATzphgXG7I7XeXgh_sTJfkRvcPk_MzdTMdgt-7eaAjTm38SG3fW5Mi9X1OMOdvY8Jgdu8ozh29Dj7ZfBn9EoyNdO_Sjv7G4PwSacBk7x6GZXIzjrSzWdHdTXpKHvU4RvtsPbfk8vOnX-dfi4sfX76dn10UpqyrVHDZtlDWjcK6kS12LUrLukZKg6w1Uua_N50AVNCrTrFWMtGxSiplq6pmfV1uyZujN296s9iY9OSiseOIs8076oZVDWfZsyXvj6AJPsZge30d3IThrwamD3XrQ916rTvjL1fv0k62u4fXfnP-as0xGhz7gLNx8R6rVF0BHLDXR2znht3eBavjhOOYpaCvMNZKg87zMvfiyPXoNQ4hqy5_KgAhoSr_A0vyna8</recordid><startdate>199101</startdate><enddate>199101</enddate><creator>Matras, J. (Texas Tech University, Lubbock)</creator><creator>Bartle, S.J</creator><creator>Preston, R.L</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199101</creationdate><title>Nitrogen utilization in growing lambs: effects of grain (starch) and protein sources with various rates of ruminal degradation</title><author>Matras, J. (Texas Tech University, Lubbock) ; Bartle, S.J ; Preston, R.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-27bb13689a687badba7e0d877ca0bc771338d51a91f9d90b705d04799e4460f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>AGNEAU</topic><topic>Allantoin - urine</topic><topic>ALMIDON</topic><topic>AMIDON</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>CORDERO</topic><topic>Dietary Carbohydrates - metabolism</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>DIGESTION</topic><topic>Edible Grain</topic><topic>FOURRAGE GRAIN</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>GRAIN FEED</topic><topic>GRANOS PIENSO</topic><topic>Hordeum</topic><topic>LAMBS</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>METABOLISM</topic><topic>METABOLISME</topic><topic>METABOLISME DE L'AZOTE</topic><topic>METABOLISMO</topic><topic>METABOLISMO DEL NITROGENO</topic><topic>NITROGEN METABOLISM</topic><topic>NITROGEN RETENTION</topic><topic>NUTRIENTES</topic><topic>NUTRIENTS</topic><topic>OVIN</topic><topic>OVINOS</topic><topic>PROTEINAS</topic><topic>PROTEINE</topic><topic>PROTEINS</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>RETENCION NITROGENADA</topic><topic>RETENTION AZOTEE</topic><topic>RUMEN</topic><topic>Rumen - metabolism</topic><topic>RUMIACION</topic><topic>RUMINATION</topic><topic>SHEEP</topic><topic>Sheep - metabolism</topic><topic>STARCH</topic><topic>Starch - metabolism</topic><topic>SUBSTANCE NUTRITIVE</topic><topic>Urea - metabolism</topic><topic>Vertebrates: digestive system</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matras, J. (Texas Tech University, Lubbock)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartle, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, R.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matras, J. (Texas Tech University, Lubbock)</au><au>Bartle, S.J</au><au>Preston, R.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nitrogen utilization in growing lambs: effects of grain (starch) and protein sources with various rates of ruminal degradation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>1991-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>339-347</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><eissn>0021-8812</eissn><abstract>The potential interaction between grain (starch) and protein sources with varying ruminal degradation rates on N utilization in growing lambs was evaluated. Three grain sources with varying ruminal degradation rates, (barley greater than steam-flaked sorghum [SFSG] greater than dry-rolled sorghum [DRSG]) and three protein sources (urea greater than a 50:25:25 mixture of urea: blood meal:corn gluten meal [N basis, U/BC] greater than 50:50 mixture of meal:corn gluten meal [N basis, BC]), were evaluated in a 3 x 3 factorial arrangement. Supplemental protein sources provided 33% of dietary N (CP = 11.0%). For each grain-protein combination, a 3 x 3 Latin square metabolism trial was conducted using two sets of three lambs and three periods. Within-square treatments were 1.4, 1.7 and 2.0 times maintenance intake levels. No interactions were observed (P greater than .2) between dietary treatments and intake level. Grain sources did not differ (P greater than .2) in N balance or the proportion of N retained. Lambs fed urea diets retained less N (3.6 vs 4.2 and 4.1 g/d for urea vs U/BC and BC, respectively; linear, P = .07; quadratic, P = .12) and utilized N less efficiently (43.1 vs 51.9 and 52.5%, respectively; linear, P less than .001; quadratic, P = .10) than lambs fed BC diets. The grain x protein interaction was significant for most variables. Nitrogen utilization was most efficient (24 to 27% of N intake retained) when rapidly degraded sources (barley and urea) and slowly degraded sources (sorghum and BC) were fed together or when U/BC was the supplemental protein source (interaction P less than .08). An advantage was found for selection of starch and protein sources with similar ruminal degradation rates.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>2005027</pmid><doi>10.2527/1991.691339x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 1991-01, Vol.69 (1), p.339-347
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
0021-8812
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80482071
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects AGNEAU
Allantoin - urine
ALMIDON
AMIDON
Animal Feed
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
CORDERO
Dietary Carbohydrates - metabolism
Dietary Proteins - metabolism
DIGESTION
Edible Grain
FOURRAGE GRAIN
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
GRAIN FEED
GRANOS PIENSO
Hordeum
LAMBS
Male
METABOLISM
METABOLISME
METABOLISME DE L'AZOTE
METABOLISMO
METABOLISMO DEL NITROGENO
NITROGEN METABOLISM
NITROGEN RETENTION
NUTRIENTES
NUTRIENTS
OVIN
OVINOS
PROTEINAS
PROTEINE
PROTEINS
Random Allocation
RETENCION NITROGENADA
RETENTION AZOTEE
RUMEN
Rumen - metabolism
RUMIACION
RUMINATION
SHEEP
Sheep - metabolism
STARCH
Starch - metabolism
SUBSTANCE NUTRITIVE
Urea - metabolism
Vertebrates: digestive system
Weight Gain
title Nitrogen utilization in growing lambs: effects of grain (starch) and protein sources with various rates of ruminal degradation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T17%3A01%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nitrogen%20utilization%20in%20growing%20lambs:%20effects%20of%20grain%20(starch)%20and%20protein%20sources%20with%20various%20rates%20of%20ruminal%20degradation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Matras,%20J.%20(Texas%20Tech%20University,%20Lubbock)&rft.date=1991-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=339-347&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/1991.691339x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80482071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80482071&rft_id=info:pmid/2005027&rfr_iscdi=true