Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility
Empirical therapy for subfertility using assisted reproductive technologies recently has gained popularity; however, the cost-effectiveness of these therapies, compared with an untreated control group, has not been established. Similarly, there has been no comparative cost analysis of the utility of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 1991-03, Vol.55 (3), p.457-467 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 467 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 457 |
container_title | Fertility and sterility |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Dodson, William C. Haney, A.F. |
description | Empirical therapy for subfertility using assisted reproductive technologies recently has gained popularity; however, the cost-effectiveness of these therapies, compared with an untreated control group, has not been established. Similarly, there has been no comparative cost analysis of the utility of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI in the management of the same condition. Significant PRs in untreated couples with subfertility mandate the design and execution of controlled trials to ascertain the role of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI in infertility therapy. Various disorders of subfertility have been treated with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI. The rationale for this therapy is the increase in gamete density at the site of fertilization, as with GIFT and IVF when used for management of the same problems. The live birth rate per initiated cycle and risk of complications are similar to results recently reported for GIFT and IVF. The utility of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI still remains controversial. When the relatively low direct and indirect costs of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI are considered, acknowledging the lack of prospective, controlled studies, this procedure appears to be at least as cost-effective as GIFT and IVF. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54168-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80467440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028216541685</els_id><sourcerecordid>80467440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-5e8eb3dab20322bd35f2398cc17be2fe86db4107d8a0d491392e8ca57e4e1da93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1q3DAURkVJSCfTPELAm4Zm4VSSJVlehTC0SWCgi7bbCFm6piq2NJXkwLx9NfGQLLO6XL5zfzgIXRJ8QzARX39iTHiNqaRfiLjmjAhZ8w9oRTgXNRe8OUGrV-QjOk_pL8ZYkJaeoTNakpbJFXraBJ9jGEewVXjW0Wlf_dnvIKbspnnU2QVfaW8rVzA9Z4jOQ2kSTM4v6RBilSPoPIHPVRhKOkDMbnR5_wmdDnpMcHGsa_T7-7dfm4d6--P-cXO3rQ3jItccJPSN1T3FDaW9bfhAm04aQ9oe6ABS2J4R3FqpsWUdaToK0mjeAgNiddes0dWydxfDvxlSVpNLBsZRewhzUhIz0TKGC8gX0MSQUoRB7aKbdNwrgtXBq3rxqg7SVOlevCpe5i6PB-Z-Avs6dRRZ8s_HXCejxyFqb1x6W961rGvwgbtdOCg2nh1ElYwDb8C6CCYrG9w7n_wHEI-XMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80467440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dodson, William C. ; Haney, A.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dodson, William C. ; Haney, A.F.</creatorcontrib><description>Empirical therapy for subfertility using assisted reproductive technologies recently has gained popularity; however, the cost-effectiveness of these therapies, compared with an untreated control group, has not been established. Similarly, there has been no comparative cost analysis of the utility of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI in the management of the same condition. Significant PRs in untreated couples with subfertility mandate the design and execution of controlled trials to ascertain the role of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI in infertility therapy. Various disorders of subfertility have been treated with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI. The rationale for this therapy is the increase in gamete density at the site of fertilization, as with GIFT and IVF when used for management of the same problems. The live birth rate per initiated cycle and risk of complications are similar to results recently reported for GIFT and IVF. The utility of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI still remains controversial. When the relatively low direct and indirect costs of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI are considered, acknowledging the lack of prospective, controlled studies, this procedure appears to be at least as cost-effective as GIFT and IVF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54168-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2001748</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Infertility - therapy ; Insemination, Artificial - adverse effects ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Ovulation Induction ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; Superovulation</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 1991-03, Vol.55 (3), p.457-467</ispartof><rights>1991 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-5e8eb3dab20322bd35f2398cc17be2fe86db4107d8a0d491392e8ca57e4e1da93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-5e8eb3dab20322bd35f2398cc17be2fe86db4107d8a0d491392e8ca57e4e1da93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028216541685$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19749308$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2001748$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dodson, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haney, A.F.</creatorcontrib><title>Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Empirical therapy for subfertility using assisted reproductive technologies recently has gained popularity; however, the cost-effectiveness of these therapies, compared with an untreated control group, has not been established. Similarly, there has been no comparative cost analysis of the utility of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI in the management of the same condition. Significant PRs in untreated couples with subfertility mandate the design and execution of controlled trials to ascertain the role of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI in infertility therapy. Various disorders of subfertility have been treated with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI. The rationale for this therapy is the increase in gamete density at the site of fertilization, as with GIFT and IVF when used for management of the same problems. The live birth rate per initiated cycle and risk of complications are similar to results recently reported for GIFT and IVF. The utility of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI still remains controversial. When the relatively low direct and indirect costs of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI are considered, acknowledging the lack of prospective, controlled studies, this procedure appears to be at least as cost-effective as GIFT and IVF.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility - therapy</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>Superovulation</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1q3DAURkVJSCfTPELAm4Zm4VSSJVlehTC0SWCgi7bbCFm6piq2NJXkwLx9NfGQLLO6XL5zfzgIXRJ8QzARX39iTHiNqaRfiLjmjAhZ8w9oRTgXNRe8OUGrV-QjOk_pL8ZYkJaeoTNakpbJFXraBJ9jGEewVXjW0Wlf_dnvIKbspnnU2QVfaW8rVzA9Z4jOQ2kSTM4v6RBilSPoPIHPVRhKOkDMbnR5_wmdDnpMcHGsa_T7-7dfm4d6--P-cXO3rQ3jItccJPSN1T3FDaW9bfhAm04aQ9oe6ABS2J4R3FqpsWUdaToK0mjeAgNiddes0dWydxfDvxlSVpNLBsZRewhzUhIz0TKGC8gX0MSQUoRB7aKbdNwrgtXBq3rxqg7SVOlevCpe5i6PB-Z-Avs6dRRZ8s_HXCejxyFqb1x6W961rGvwgbtdOCg2nh1ElYwDb8C6CCYrG9w7n_wHEI-XMg</recordid><startdate>19910301</startdate><enddate>19910301</enddate><creator>Dodson, William C.</creator><creator>Haney, A.F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910301</creationdate><title>Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility</title><author>Dodson, William C. ; Haney, A.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-5e8eb3dab20322bd35f2398cc17be2fe86db4107d8a0d491392e8ca57e4e1da93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility - therapy</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>Superovulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dodson, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haney, A.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dodson, William C.</au><au>Haney, A.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>1991-03-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>457</spage><epage>467</epage><pages>457-467</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Empirical therapy for subfertility using assisted reproductive technologies recently has gained popularity; however, the cost-effectiveness of these therapies, compared with an untreated control group, has not been established. Similarly, there has been no comparative cost analysis of the utility of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI in the management of the same condition. Significant PRs in untreated couples with subfertility mandate the design and execution of controlled trials to ascertain the role of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI in infertility therapy. Various disorders of subfertility have been treated with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI. The rationale for this therapy is the increase in gamete density at the site of fertilization, as with GIFT and IVF when used for management of the same problems. The live birth rate per initiated cycle and risk of complications are similar to results recently reported for GIFT and IVF. The utility of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI still remains controversial. When the relatively low direct and indirect costs of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IUI are considered, acknowledging the lack of prospective, controlled studies, this procedure appears to be at least as cost-effective as GIFT and IVF.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2001748</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54168-5</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-0282 |
ispartof | Fertility and sterility, 1991-03, Vol.55 (3), p.457-467 |
issn | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80467440 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Birth control Female Fertilization in Vitro Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Infertility - therapy Insemination, Artificial - adverse effects Male Medical sciences Ovulation Induction Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Sterility. Assisted procreation Superovulation |
title | Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A47%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Controlled%20ovarian%20hyperstimulation%20and%20intrauterine%20insemination%20for%20treatment%20of%20infertility&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Dodson,%20William%20C.&rft.date=1991-03-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=457&rft.epage=467&rft.pages=457-467&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54168-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80467440%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80467440&rft_id=info:pmid/2001748&rft_els_id=S0015028216541685&rfr_iscdi=true |