What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction?
Death during the first year after myocardial infarction is most commonly due to spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). The purpose of this study was to compare, in a single cohort of patients, the values of inducible VT, delayed ventricular activation, low left ventricular ej...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1991-03, Vol.83 (3), p.756-763 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 763 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 756 |
container_title | Circulation (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Richards, D A Byth, K Ross, D L Uther, J B |
description | Death during the first year after myocardial infarction is most commonly due to spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). The purpose of this study was to compare, in a single cohort of patients, the values of inducible VT, delayed ventricular activation, low left ventricular ejection fraction, high-grade ventricular ectopy, and ST segment displacement on exercise in predicting electrical events (witnessed instantaneous death and spontaneous VT or VF) during the first year after myocardial infarction.
Three hundred sixty one patients aged less than 71 years underwent electrophysiological study, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, gated blood-pool scan, 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, and exercise testing 1-2 weeks after myocardial infarction and were then followed up for at least 1 year. There were 34 deaths (eight witnessed instantaneous, 26 other), and nine patients survived one or more episodes of spontaneous VF or VT. Patients with inducible VT were 15.2 times more likely to suffer electrical events than patients without inducible VT. No proportional-hazards model excluding inducible VT was as good a predictor of electrical events as was inducible VT alone.
Inducible VT at electrophysiological study was the single best predictor of spontaneous VT and sudden death after myocardial infarction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/01.cir.83.3.756 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80457674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80457674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-9bf2c8e91ae4bfc4046e30f6a28f759f9148eb55946d554e04c18d102fd0499c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LxDAURYMo4zi6diVk5a41aZK2WYkMfgwIgiguQ5q8MJFOMyapMP_eSgVXjwfnXrgHoUtKSkprekNoaXwsW1ayshH1EVpSUfGCCyaP0ZIQIouGVdUpOkvpc3pr1ogFWlApJanqJQofW52xTzhvAXeQMt5HsN7kEHFwOO3DkPUAYUz4G4YcvRl7HXHWZnswOlqvsR4sTqO1MGALOm-xdhki3h3CDPTYD05Hk30Ybs_RidN9gou_u0LvD_dv66fi-eVxs757LgxvRS5k5yrTgqQaeOcMJ7wGRlytq9Y1QjpJeQudEJLXVggOhBvaWkoqZwmX0rAVup579zF8jdMutfPJQN_PY1RLuGjqhk_gzQyaGFKK4NQ--p2OB0WJ-lWsCFXrzatqmWJqUjwlrv6qx24H9p-fnbIfw3d5VA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80457674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Richards, D A ; Byth, K ; Ross, D L ; Uther, J B</creator><creatorcontrib>Richards, D A ; Byth, K ; Ross, D L ; Uther, J B</creatorcontrib><description>Death during the first year after myocardial infarction is most commonly due to spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). The purpose of this study was to compare, in a single cohort of patients, the values of inducible VT, delayed ventricular activation, low left ventricular ejection fraction, high-grade ventricular ectopy, and ST segment displacement on exercise in predicting electrical events (witnessed instantaneous death and spontaneous VT or VF) during the first year after myocardial infarction.
Three hundred sixty one patients aged less than 71 years underwent electrophysiological study, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, gated blood-pool scan, 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, and exercise testing 1-2 weeks after myocardial infarction and were then followed up for at least 1 year. There were 34 deaths (eight witnessed instantaneous, 26 other), and nine patients survived one or more episodes of spontaneous VF or VT. Patients with inducible VT were 15.2 times more likely to suffer electrical events than patients without inducible VT. No proportional-hazards model excluding inducible VT was as good a predictor of electrical events as was inducible VT alone.
Inducible VT at electrophysiological study was the single best predictor of spontaneous VT and sudden death after myocardial infarction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.83.3.756</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1999026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial ; Cohort Studies ; Death, Sudden - epidemiology ; Electrophysiology ; Heart Function Tests ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction - complications ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Tachycardia - epidemiology ; Tachycardia - etiology ; Ventricular Fibrillation - epidemiology ; Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1991-03, Vol.83 (3), p.756-763</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-9bf2c8e91ae4bfc4046e30f6a28f759f9148eb55946d554e04c18d102fd0499c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3685,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1999026$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richards, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byth, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, D L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uther, J B</creatorcontrib><title>What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction?</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>Death during the first year after myocardial infarction is most commonly due to spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). The purpose of this study was to compare, in a single cohort of patients, the values of inducible VT, delayed ventricular activation, low left ventricular ejection fraction, high-grade ventricular ectopy, and ST segment displacement on exercise in predicting electrical events (witnessed instantaneous death and spontaneous VT or VF) during the first year after myocardial infarction.
Three hundred sixty one patients aged less than 71 years underwent electrophysiological study, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, gated blood-pool scan, 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, and exercise testing 1-2 weeks after myocardial infarction and were then followed up for at least 1 year. There were 34 deaths (eight witnessed instantaneous, 26 other), and nine patients survived one or more episodes of spontaneous VF or VT. Patients with inducible VT were 15.2 times more likely to suffer electrical events than patients without inducible VT. No proportional-hazards model excluding inducible VT was as good a predictor of electrical events as was inducible VT alone.
Inducible VT at electrophysiological study was the single best predictor of spontaneous VT and sudden death after myocardial infarction.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Death, Sudden - epidemiology</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Heart Function Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - complications</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Tachycardia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Tachycardia - etiology</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1LxDAURYMo4zi6diVk5a41aZK2WYkMfgwIgiguQ5q8MJFOMyapMP_eSgVXjwfnXrgHoUtKSkprekNoaXwsW1ayshH1EVpSUfGCCyaP0ZIQIouGVdUpOkvpc3pr1ogFWlApJanqJQofW52xTzhvAXeQMt5HsN7kEHFwOO3DkPUAYUz4G4YcvRl7HXHWZnswOlqvsR4sTqO1MGALOm-xdhki3h3CDPTYD05Hk30Ybs_RidN9gou_u0LvD_dv66fi-eVxs757LgxvRS5k5yrTgqQaeOcMJ7wGRlytq9Y1QjpJeQudEJLXVggOhBvaWkoqZwmX0rAVup579zF8jdMutfPJQN_PY1RLuGjqhk_gzQyaGFKK4NQ--p2OB0WJ-lWsCFXrzatqmWJqUjwlrv6qx24H9p-fnbIfw3d5VA</recordid><startdate>19910301</startdate><enddate>19910301</enddate><creator>Richards, D A</creator><creator>Byth, K</creator><creator>Ross, D L</creator><creator>Uther, J B</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910301</creationdate><title>What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction?</title><author>Richards, D A ; Byth, K ; Ross, D L ; Uther, J B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-9bf2c8e91ae4bfc4046e30f6a28f759f9148eb55946d554e04c18d102fd0499c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Death, Sudden - epidemiology</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Heart Function Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - complications</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Tachycardia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Tachycardia - etiology</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richards, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byth, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, D L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uther, J B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richards, D A</au><au>Byth, K</au><au>Ross, D L</au><au>Uther, J B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction?</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>1991-03-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>756</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>756-763</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><abstract>Death during the first year after myocardial infarction is most commonly due to spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). The purpose of this study was to compare, in a single cohort of patients, the values of inducible VT, delayed ventricular activation, low left ventricular ejection fraction, high-grade ventricular ectopy, and ST segment displacement on exercise in predicting electrical events (witnessed instantaneous death and spontaneous VT or VF) during the first year after myocardial infarction.
Three hundred sixty one patients aged less than 71 years underwent electrophysiological study, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, gated blood-pool scan, 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, and exercise testing 1-2 weeks after myocardial infarction and were then followed up for at least 1 year. There were 34 deaths (eight witnessed instantaneous, 26 other), and nine patients survived one or more episodes of spontaneous VF or VT. Patients with inducible VT were 15.2 times more likely to suffer electrical events than patients without inducible VT. No proportional-hazards model excluding inducible VT was as good a predictor of electrical events as was inducible VT alone.
Inducible VT at electrophysiological study was the single best predictor of spontaneous VT and sudden death after myocardial infarction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>1999026</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.cir.83.3.756</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-7322 |
ispartof | Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1991-03, Vol.83 (3), p.756-763 |
issn | 0009-7322 1524-4539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80457674 |
source | MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Aged Cardiac Pacing, Artificial Cohort Studies Death, Sudden - epidemiology Electrophysiology Heart Function Tests Humans Middle Aged Myocardial Infarction - complications Predictive Value of Tests Prognosis Tachycardia - epidemiology Tachycardia - etiology Ventricular Fibrillation - epidemiology Ventricular Function, Left - physiology |
title | What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T15%3A49%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20the%20best%20predictor%20of%20spontaneous%20ventricular%20tachycardia%20and%20sudden%20death%20after%20myocardial%20infarction?&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Richards,%20D%20A&rft.date=1991-03-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=756&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=756-763&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.cir.83.3.756&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80457674%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80457674&rft_id=info:pmid/1999026&rfr_iscdi=true |