What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction?

Death during the first year after myocardial infarction is most commonly due to spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). The purpose of this study was to compare, in a single cohort of patients, the values of inducible VT, delayed ventricular activation, low left ventricular ej...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1991-03, Vol.83 (3), p.756-763
Hauptverfasser: Richards, D A, Byth, K, Ross, D L, Uther, J B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 763
container_issue 3
container_start_page 756
container_title Circulation (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 83
creator Richards, D A
Byth, K
Ross, D L
Uther, J B
description Death during the first year after myocardial infarction is most commonly due to spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). The purpose of this study was to compare, in a single cohort of patients, the values of inducible VT, delayed ventricular activation, low left ventricular ejection fraction, high-grade ventricular ectopy, and ST segment displacement on exercise in predicting electrical events (witnessed instantaneous death and spontaneous VT or VF) during the first year after myocardial infarction. Three hundred sixty one patients aged less than 71 years underwent electrophysiological study, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, gated blood-pool scan, 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, and exercise testing 1-2 weeks after myocardial infarction and were then followed up for at least 1 year. There were 34 deaths (eight witnessed instantaneous, 26 other), and nine patients survived one or more episodes of spontaneous VF or VT. Patients with inducible VT were 15.2 times more likely to suffer electrical events than patients without inducible VT. No proportional-hazards model excluding inducible VT was as good a predictor of electrical events as was inducible VT alone. Inducible VT at electrophysiological study was the single best predictor of spontaneous VT and sudden death after myocardial infarction.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/01.cir.83.3.756
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80457674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80457674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-9bf2c8e91ae4bfc4046e30f6a28f759f9148eb55946d554e04c18d102fd0499c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LxDAURYMo4zi6diVk5a41aZK2WYkMfgwIgiguQ5q8MJFOMyapMP_eSgVXjwfnXrgHoUtKSkprekNoaXwsW1ayshH1EVpSUfGCCyaP0ZIQIouGVdUpOkvpc3pr1ogFWlApJanqJQofW52xTzhvAXeQMt5HsN7kEHFwOO3DkPUAYUz4G4YcvRl7HXHWZnswOlqvsR4sTqO1MGALOm-xdhki3h3CDPTYD05Hk30Ybs_RidN9gou_u0LvD_dv66fi-eVxs757LgxvRS5k5yrTgqQaeOcMJ7wGRlytq9Y1QjpJeQudEJLXVggOhBvaWkoqZwmX0rAVup579zF8jdMutfPJQN_PY1RLuGjqhk_gzQyaGFKK4NQ--p2OB0WJ-lWsCFXrzatqmWJqUjwlrv6qx24H9p-fnbIfw3d5VA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80457674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Richards, D A ; Byth, K ; Ross, D L ; Uther, J B</creator><creatorcontrib>Richards, D A ; Byth, K ; Ross, D L ; Uther, J B</creatorcontrib><description>Death during the first year after myocardial infarction is most commonly due to spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). The purpose of this study was to compare, in a single cohort of patients, the values of inducible VT, delayed ventricular activation, low left ventricular ejection fraction, high-grade ventricular ectopy, and ST segment displacement on exercise in predicting electrical events (witnessed instantaneous death and spontaneous VT or VF) during the first year after myocardial infarction. Three hundred sixty one patients aged less than 71 years underwent electrophysiological study, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, gated blood-pool scan, 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, and exercise testing 1-2 weeks after myocardial infarction and were then followed up for at least 1 year. There were 34 deaths (eight witnessed instantaneous, 26 other), and nine patients survived one or more episodes of spontaneous VF or VT. Patients with inducible VT were 15.2 times more likely to suffer electrical events than patients without inducible VT. No proportional-hazards model excluding inducible VT was as good a predictor of electrical events as was inducible VT alone. Inducible VT at electrophysiological study was the single best predictor of spontaneous VT and sudden death after myocardial infarction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.83.3.756</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1999026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial ; Cohort Studies ; Death, Sudden - epidemiology ; Electrophysiology ; Heart Function Tests ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction - complications ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Tachycardia - epidemiology ; Tachycardia - etiology ; Ventricular Fibrillation - epidemiology ; Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1991-03, Vol.83 (3), p.756-763</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-9bf2c8e91ae4bfc4046e30f6a28f759f9148eb55946d554e04c18d102fd0499c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3685,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1999026$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richards, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byth, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, D L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uther, J B</creatorcontrib><title>What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction?</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>Death during the first year after myocardial infarction is most commonly due to spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). The purpose of this study was to compare, in a single cohort of patients, the values of inducible VT, delayed ventricular activation, low left ventricular ejection fraction, high-grade ventricular ectopy, and ST segment displacement on exercise in predicting electrical events (witnessed instantaneous death and spontaneous VT or VF) during the first year after myocardial infarction. Three hundred sixty one patients aged less than 71 years underwent electrophysiological study, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, gated blood-pool scan, 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, and exercise testing 1-2 weeks after myocardial infarction and were then followed up for at least 1 year. There were 34 deaths (eight witnessed instantaneous, 26 other), and nine patients survived one or more episodes of spontaneous VF or VT. Patients with inducible VT were 15.2 times more likely to suffer electrical events than patients without inducible VT. No proportional-hazards model excluding inducible VT was as good a predictor of electrical events as was inducible VT alone. Inducible VT at electrophysiological study was the single best predictor of spontaneous VT and sudden death after myocardial infarction.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Death, Sudden - epidemiology</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Heart Function Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - complications</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Tachycardia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Tachycardia - etiology</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1LxDAURYMo4zi6diVk5a41aZK2WYkMfgwIgiguQ5q8MJFOMyapMP_eSgVXjwfnXrgHoUtKSkprekNoaXwsW1ayshH1EVpSUfGCCyaP0ZIQIouGVdUpOkvpc3pr1ogFWlApJanqJQofW52xTzhvAXeQMt5HsN7kEHFwOO3DkPUAYUz4G4YcvRl7HXHWZnswOlqvsR4sTqO1MGALOm-xdhki3h3CDPTYD05Hk30Ybs_RidN9gou_u0LvD_dv66fi-eVxs757LgxvRS5k5yrTgqQaeOcMJ7wGRlytq9Y1QjpJeQudEJLXVggOhBvaWkoqZwmX0rAVup579zF8jdMutfPJQN_PY1RLuGjqhk_gzQyaGFKK4NQ--p2OB0WJ-lWsCFXrzatqmWJqUjwlrv6qx24H9p-fnbIfw3d5VA</recordid><startdate>19910301</startdate><enddate>19910301</enddate><creator>Richards, D A</creator><creator>Byth, K</creator><creator>Ross, D L</creator><creator>Uther, J B</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910301</creationdate><title>What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction?</title><author>Richards, D A ; Byth, K ; Ross, D L ; Uther, J B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-9bf2c8e91ae4bfc4046e30f6a28f759f9148eb55946d554e04c18d102fd0499c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Death, Sudden - epidemiology</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Heart Function Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - complications</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Tachycardia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Tachycardia - etiology</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richards, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byth, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, D L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uther, J B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richards, D A</au><au>Byth, K</au><au>Ross, D L</au><au>Uther, J B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction?</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>1991-03-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>756</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>756-763</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><abstract>Death during the first year after myocardial infarction is most commonly due to spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). The purpose of this study was to compare, in a single cohort of patients, the values of inducible VT, delayed ventricular activation, low left ventricular ejection fraction, high-grade ventricular ectopy, and ST segment displacement on exercise in predicting electrical events (witnessed instantaneous death and spontaneous VT or VF) during the first year after myocardial infarction. Three hundred sixty one patients aged less than 71 years underwent electrophysiological study, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, gated blood-pool scan, 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, and exercise testing 1-2 weeks after myocardial infarction and were then followed up for at least 1 year. There were 34 deaths (eight witnessed instantaneous, 26 other), and nine patients survived one or more episodes of spontaneous VF or VT. Patients with inducible VT were 15.2 times more likely to suffer electrical events than patients without inducible VT. No proportional-hazards model excluding inducible VT was as good a predictor of electrical events as was inducible VT alone. Inducible VT at electrophysiological study was the single best predictor of spontaneous VT and sudden death after myocardial infarction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>1999026</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.cir.83.3.756</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7322
ispartof Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1991-03, Vol.83 (3), p.756-763
issn 0009-7322
1524-4539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80457674
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
Cohort Studies
Death, Sudden - epidemiology
Electrophysiology
Heart Function Tests
Humans
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction - complications
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Tachycardia - epidemiology
Tachycardia - etiology
Ventricular Fibrillation - epidemiology
Ventricular Function, Left - physiology
title What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T15%3A49%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20the%20best%20predictor%20of%20spontaneous%20ventricular%20tachycardia%20and%20sudden%20death%20after%20myocardial%20infarction?&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Richards,%20D%20A&rft.date=1991-03-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=756&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=756-763&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.cir.83.3.756&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80457674%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80457674&rft_id=info:pmid/1999026&rfr_iscdi=true