Probability and the patient state space

This paper describes work to develop a model-based system to support clinical decision-making. In previous articles, we have developed (from 695 measurement sets obtained from 148 patients) a physiologic state classification based on a set of 11 cardiovascular and metabolic measurements. There is an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of clinical monitoring and computing 1990-01, Vol.7 (4), p.201-215
Hauptverfasser: COLEMAN, W. P, SIEGEL, J. H, GIOVANNINI, I, DE GAETANO, A, GOODARZI, S, TACCHINO, R. M, SGANGA, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 215
container_issue 4
container_start_page 201
container_title International journal of clinical monitoring and computing
container_volume 7
creator COLEMAN, W. P
SIEGEL, J. H
GIOVANNINI, I
DE GAETANO, A
GOODARZI, S
TACCHINO, R. M
SGANGA, G
description This paper describes work to develop a model-based system to support clinical decision-making. In previous articles, we have developed (from 695 measurement sets obtained from 148 patients) a physiologic state classification based on a set of 11 cardiovascular and metabolic measurements. There is an R or reference state, for stable ICU patients. Patients under (operative, traumatic, or compensated septic) stress, or with (septic or hepatic) metabolic, respiratory, or cardiac insufficiency are in the A, B, C, or D states, respectively. We wished to make the state easier to measure and eventually available continuously, automatically, and noninvasively, as well as reflecting a wider group of bodily systems. The 5 centers define a 4 dimensional affine subspace, designated the cardiovascular state space. Using eigenvector analysis, we have found four new derived physiologic variables CV1, CV2, CV3, and CV4 that span the state space. We have fit sets of linear regression equations that allow the patient's position in the state space, and therefore his state, to be determined from more easily obtainable sets of measurements. Further, we selected 1966 measurement sets from 512 patients at two hospitals. We used the data from 250 of these patients to define 13 prototypical types, namely survivors and deaths from various combinations of sepsis, cardiogenic decompensation, cirrhosis, and pneumonitis, following trauma or general surgery. For any future patient, the statistical theory of Bayesian inference allows one to infer back from the measurements observed to the probability of his being of any of these types and of surviving or dying. We used this method to predict the outcome of the other 262 patients, prospectively. Statistically, the predictions of survival or death were not significantly different from the actual. For individual patients, the method predicts a clinical course that closely follows the actual episodes in their history. These results confirm and explain the validity of the concept of the patient state and make the state easier to compute. The patient state and the probability plot together help to stage, select, and evaluate therapy. They do not replace the clinician's judgement, but rather are tools that help the clinician to exercise judgement.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02919382
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80373268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80373268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b6c977f0c0c1cdd813f5853d6b8805a2fffe2b6409f02f4ec3a4ae08e8115ae13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkLFOwzAURT2ASiks7EgZEEhIgWc7TuwRKgpIlWCAOXpxnkVQmgTbHfr3BDUq0x3u0RkOYxcc7jhAcf-4AmG4kVocsTnwvEiNydQJOw3hG0BwKPSMzQQYY3IzZzfvvq-watom7hLs6iR-UTJgbKiLSYgYKQkDWjpjxw7bQOfTLtjn6ulj-ZKu355flw_r1ErOY1rl1hSFAwuW27rWXDqllazzSmtQKJxzJKo8A-NAuIysxAwJNGnOFRKXC3a99w6-_9lSiOWmCZbaFjvqt6HUIAspcj2Ct3vQ-j4ET64cfLNBvys5lH8lyv8SI3w5WbfVhuoDOmUY_6vpx2CxdR4724QDphQHo7T8BT2DZc4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80373268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Probability and the patient state space</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>COLEMAN, W. P ; SIEGEL, J. H ; GIOVANNINI, I ; DE GAETANO, A ; GOODARZI, S ; TACCHINO, R. M ; SGANGA, G</creator><creatorcontrib>COLEMAN, W. P ; SIEGEL, J. H ; GIOVANNINI, I ; DE GAETANO, A ; GOODARZI, S ; TACCHINO, R. M ; SGANGA, G</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes work to develop a model-based system to support clinical decision-making. In previous articles, we have developed (from 695 measurement sets obtained from 148 patients) a physiologic state classification based on a set of 11 cardiovascular and metabolic measurements. There is an R or reference state, for stable ICU patients. Patients under (operative, traumatic, or compensated septic) stress, or with (septic or hepatic) metabolic, respiratory, or cardiac insufficiency are in the A, B, C, or D states, respectively. We wished to make the state easier to measure and eventually available continuously, automatically, and noninvasively, as well as reflecting a wider group of bodily systems. The 5 centers define a 4 dimensional affine subspace, designated the cardiovascular state space. Using eigenvector analysis, we have found four new derived physiologic variables CV1, CV2, CV3, and CV4 that span the state space. We have fit sets of linear regression equations that allow the patient's position in the state space, and therefore his state, to be determined from more easily obtainable sets of measurements. Further, we selected 1966 measurement sets from 512 patients at two hospitals. We used the data from 250 of these patients to define 13 prototypical types, namely survivors and deaths from various combinations of sepsis, cardiogenic decompensation, cirrhosis, and pneumonitis, following trauma or general surgery. For any future patient, the statistical theory of Bayesian inference allows one to infer back from the measurements observed to the probability of his being of any of these types and of surviving or dying. We used this method to predict the outcome of the other 262 patients, prospectively. Statistically, the predictions of survival or death were not significantly different from the actual. For individual patients, the method predicts a clinical course that closely follows the actual episodes in their history. These results confirm and explain the validity of the concept of the patient state and make the state easier to compute. The patient state and the probability plot together help to stage, select, and evaluate therapy. They do not replace the clinician's judgement, but rather are tools that help the clinician to exercise judgement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-9945</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02919382</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2099969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Kluwer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Artificial Intelligence ; Bayes Theorem ; Biological and medical sciences ; Computerized, statistical medical data processing and models in biomedicine ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Models, Biological ; Monitoring, Physiologic ; Prospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - complications ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnosis ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - mortality</subject><ispartof>International journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 1990-01, Vol.7 (4), p.201-215</ispartof><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b6c977f0c0c1cdd813f5853d6b8805a2fffe2b6409f02f4ec3a4ae08e8115ae13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b6c977f0c0c1cdd813f5853d6b8805a2fffe2b6409f02f4ec3a4ae08e8115ae13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5510958$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2099969$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>COLEMAN, W. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIEGEL, J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIOVANNINI, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE GAETANO, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOODARZI, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TACCHINO, R. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SGANGA, G</creatorcontrib><title>Probability and the patient state space</title><title>International journal of clinical monitoring and computing</title><addtitle>Int J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><description>This paper describes work to develop a model-based system to support clinical decision-making. In previous articles, we have developed (from 695 measurement sets obtained from 148 patients) a physiologic state classification based on a set of 11 cardiovascular and metabolic measurements. There is an R or reference state, for stable ICU patients. Patients under (operative, traumatic, or compensated septic) stress, or with (septic or hepatic) metabolic, respiratory, or cardiac insufficiency are in the A, B, C, or D states, respectively. We wished to make the state easier to measure and eventually available continuously, automatically, and noninvasively, as well as reflecting a wider group of bodily systems. The 5 centers define a 4 dimensional affine subspace, designated the cardiovascular state space. Using eigenvector analysis, we have found four new derived physiologic variables CV1, CV2, CV3, and CV4 that span the state space. We have fit sets of linear regression equations that allow the patient's position in the state space, and therefore his state, to be determined from more easily obtainable sets of measurements. Further, we selected 1966 measurement sets from 512 patients at two hospitals. We used the data from 250 of these patients to define 13 prototypical types, namely survivors and deaths from various combinations of sepsis, cardiogenic decompensation, cirrhosis, and pneumonitis, following trauma or general surgery. For any future patient, the statistical theory of Bayesian inference allows one to infer back from the measurements observed to the probability of his being of any of these types and of surviving or dying. We used this method to predict the outcome of the other 262 patients, prospectively. Statistically, the predictions of survival or death were not significantly different from the actual. For individual patients, the method predicts a clinical course that closely follows the actual episodes in their history. These results confirm and explain the validity of the concept of the patient state and make the state easier to compute. The patient state and the probability plot together help to stage, select, and evaluate therapy. They do not replace the clinician's judgement, but rather are tools that help the clinician to exercise judgement.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computerized, statistical medical data processing and models in biomedicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - complications</subject><subject>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnosis</subject><subject>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - mortality</subject><issn>0167-9945</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkLFOwzAURT2ASiks7EgZEEhIgWc7TuwRKgpIlWCAOXpxnkVQmgTbHfr3BDUq0x3u0RkOYxcc7jhAcf-4AmG4kVocsTnwvEiNydQJOw3hG0BwKPSMzQQYY3IzZzfvvq-watom7hLs6iR-UTJgbKiLSYgYKQkDWjpjxw7bQOfTLtjn6ulj-ZKu355flw_r1ErOY1rl1hSFAwuW27rWXDqllazzSmtQKJxzJKo8A-NAuIysxAwJNGnOFRKXC3a99w6-_9lSiOWmCZbaFjvqt6HUIAspcj2Ct3vQ-j4ET64cfLNBvys5lH8lyv8SI3w5WbfVhuoDOmUY_6vpx2CxdR4724QDphQHo7T8BT2DZc4</recordid><startdate>19900101</startdate><enddate>19900101</enddate><creator>COLEMAN, W. P</creator><creator>SIEGEL, J. H</creator><creator>GIOVANNINI, I</creator><creator>DE GAETANO, A</creator><creator>GOODARZI, S</creator><creator>TACCHINO, R. M</creator><creator>SGANGA, G</creator><general>Kluwer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900101</creationdate><title>Probability and the patient state space</title><author>COLEMAN, W. P ; SIEGEL, J. H ; GIOVANNINI, I ; DE GAETANO, A ; GOODARZI, S ; TACCHINO, R. M ; SGANGA, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-b6c977f0c0c1cdd813f5853d6b8805a2fffe2b6409f02f4ec3a4ae08e8115ae13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computerized, statistical medical data processing and models in biomedicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - complications</topic><topic>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnosis</topic><topic>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - mortality</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>COLEMAN, W. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIEGEL, J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIOVANNINI, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE GAETANO, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOODARZI, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TACCHINO, R. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SGANGA, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>COLEMAN, W. P</au><au>SIEGEL, J. H</au><au>GIOVANNINI, I</au><au>DE GAETANO, A</au><au>GOODARZI, S</au><au>TACCHINO, R. M</au><au>SGANGA, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Probability and the patient state space</atitle><jtitle>International journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><date>1990-01-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>201-215</pages><issn>0167-9945</issn><abstract>This paper describes work to develop a model-based system to support clinical decision-making. In previous articles, we have developed (from 695 measurement sets obtained from 148 patients) a physiologic state classification based on a set of 11 cardiovascular and metabolic measurements. There is an R or reference state, for stable ICU patients. Patients under (operative, traumatic, or compensated septic) stress, or with (septic or hepatic) metabolic, respiratory, or cardiac insufficiency are in the A, B, C, or D states, respectively. We wished to make the state easier to measure and eventually available continuously, automatically, and noninvasively, as well as reflecting a wider group of bodily systems. The 5 centers define a 4 dimensional affine subspace, designated the cardiovascular state space. Using eigenvector analysis, we have found four new derived physiologic variables CV1, CV2, CV3, and CV4 that span the state space. We have fit sets of linear regression equations that allow the patient's position in the state space, and therefore his state, to be determined from more easily obtainable sets of measurements. Further, we selected 1966 measurement sets from 512 patients at two hospitals. We used the data from 250 of these patients to define 13 prototypical types, namely survivors and deaths from various combinations of sepsis, cardiogenic decompensation, cirrhosis, and pneumonitis, following trauma or general surgery. For any future patient, the statistical theory of Bayesian inference allows one to infer back from the measurements observed to the probability of his being of any of these types and of surviving or dying. We used this method to predict the outcome of the other 262 patients, prospectively. Statistically, the predictions of survival or death were not significantly different from the actual. For individual patients, the method predicts a clinical course that closely follows the actual episodes in their history. These results confirm and explain the validity of the concept of the patient state and make the state easier to compute. The patient state and the probability plot together help to stage, select, and evaluate therapy. They do not replace the clinician's judgement, but rather are tools that help the clinician to exercise judgement.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Kluwer</pub><pmid>2099969</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02919382</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-9945
ispartof International journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 1990-01, Vol.7 (4), p.201-215
issn 0167-9945
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80373268
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Artificial Intelligence
Bayes Theorem
Biological and medical sciences
Computerized, statistical medical data processing and models in biomedicine
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Models, Biological
Monitoring, Physiologic
Prospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Wounds, Nonpenetrating - complications
Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnosis
Wounds, Nonpenetrating - mortality
title Probability and the patient state space
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T09%3A26%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Probability%20and%20the%20patient%20state%20space&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20clinical%20monitoring%20and%20computing&rft.au=COLEMAN,%20W.%20P&rft.date=1990-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=201-215&rft.issn=0167-9945&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02919382&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80373268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80373268&rft_id=info:pmid/2099969&rfr_iscdi=true