Surgical residency evaluation by residents

Surgical residency evaluation by residents

A multiple-choice questionnaire was designed so that surgical residents could evaluate their residency program. It was answered anonymously by 344 residents, four times during a 2-year period, at different stages of training. The answers were analysed, comparing individual hospitals and individual p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of surgery 1983-01, Vol.26 (1), p.75-78
Hauptverfasser: Beauchamp, G, Des Marchais, J E, Dulude, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Canada
Evaluation Studies as Topic
General Surgery - education
Humans
Internship and Residency
Surveys and Questionnaires
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 78
container_issue 1
container_start_page 75
container_title Canadian journal of surgery
container_volume 26
creator Beauchamp, G
Des Marchais, J E
Dulude, J
description A multiple-choice questionnaire was designed so that surgical residents could evaluate their residency program. It was answered anonymously by 344 residents, four times during a 2-year period, at different stages of training. The answers were analysed, comparing individual hospitals and individual programs within the department. The weaknesses and strengths of the department could be identified by the residents. This identification of problems has brought about major changes in the attitudes of staff surgeons towards teaching. The authors believe that the residents' opinions are essential to amend and improve the quality of postgraduate education.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80353962</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80353962</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p206t-cd9585e313e3065c31b27fa783bcf53b4f581cdfde745d904495c931b83d99c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1z0tLxDAUBeAslHEc_QlCVy6Ewm1ukiZLGXzBgAtn4a7kcSuVvmwaof_eATurA4ePA-eCbQFA54Lrzyt2HeM3QAEozIZtlOZFqfSWPXyk6avxts0mik2g3i8Z_do22bkZ-swt536ON-yytm2k2zV37Pj8dNy_5of3l7f94yEfOag598FILQkLJAQlPRaOl7UtNTpfS3SilrrwoQ5UChkMCGGkNyelMRjjccfu_2fHafhJFOeqa6KntrU9DSlWGlCiUfwE71aYXEehGqems9NSrd_wD0ZgST0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80353962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical residency evaluation by residents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Beauchamp, G ; Des Marchais, J E ; Dulude, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Beauchamp, G ; Des Marchais, J E ; Dulude, J</creatorcontrib><description>A multiple-choice questionnaire was designed so that surgical residents could evaluate their residency program. It was answered anonymously by 344 residents, four times during a 2-year period, at different stages of training. The answers were analysed, comparing individual hospitals and individual programs within the department. The weaknesses and strengths of the department could be identified by the residents. This identification of problems has brought about major changes in the attitudes of staff surgeons towards teaching. The authors believe that the residents' opinions are essential to amend and improve the quality of postgraduate education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-428X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6821768</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada</publisher><subject>Canada ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; General Surgery - education ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of surgery, 1983-01, Vol.26 (1), p.75-78</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6821768$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beauchamp, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Des Marchais, J E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dulude, J</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical residency evaluation by residents</title><title>Canadian journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Can J Surg</addtitle><description>A multiple-choice questionnaire was designed so that surgical residents could evaluate their residency program. It was answered anonymously by 344 residents, four times during a 2-year period, at different stages of training. The answers were analysed, comparing individual hospitals and individual programs within the department. The weaknesses and strengths of the department could be identified by the residents. This identification of problems has brought about major changes in the attitudes of staff surgeons towards teaching. The authors believe that the residents' opinions are essential to amend and improve the quality of postgraduate education.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0008-428X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1z0tLxDAUBeAslHEc_QlCVy6Ewm1ukiZLGXzBgAtn4a7kcSuVvmwaof_eATurA4ePA-eCbQFA54Lrzyt2HeM3QAEozIZtlOZFqfSWPXyk6avxts0mik2g3i8Z_do22bkZ-swt536ON-yytm2k2zV37Pj8dNy_5of3l7f94yEfOag598FILQkLJAQlPRaOl7UtNTpfS3SilrrwoQ5UChkMCGGkNyelMRjjccfu_2fHafhJFOeqa6KntrU9DSlWGlCiUfwE71aYXEehGqems9NSrd_wD0ZgST0</recordid><startdate>198301</startdate><enddate>198301</enddate><creator>Beauchamp, G</creator><creator>Des Marchais, J E</creator><creator>Dulude, J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198301</creationdate><title>Surgical residency evaluation by residents</title><author>Beauchamp, G ; Des Marchais, J E ; Dulude, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p206t-cd9585e313e3065c31b27fa783bcf53b4f581cdfde745d904495c931b83d99c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beauchamp, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Des Marchais, J E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dulude, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beauchamp, G</au><au>Des Marchais, J E</au><au>Dulude, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical residency evaluation by residents</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Surg</addtitle><date>1983-01</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>75-78</pages><issn>0008-428X</issn><abstract>A multiple-choice questionnaire was designed so that surgical residents could evaluate their residency program. It was answered anonymously by 344 residents, four times during a 2-year period, at different stages of training. The answers were analysed, comparing individual hospitals and individual programs within the department. The weaknesses and strengths of the department could be identified by the residents. This identification of problems has brought about major changes in the attitudes of staff surgeons towards teaching. The authors believe that the residents' opinions are essential to amend and improve the quality of postgraduate education.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pmid>6821768</pmid><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-428X
ispartof Canadian journal of surgery, 1983-01, Vol.26 (1), p.75-78
issn 0008-428X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80353962
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Canada
Evaluation Studies as Topic
General Surgery - education
Humans
Internship and Residency
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Surgical residency evaluation by residents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A59%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20residency%20evaluation%20by%20residents&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Beauchamp,%20G&rft.date=1983-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=75-78&rft.issn=0008-428X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E80353962%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80353962&rft_id=info:pmid/6821768&rfr_iscdi=true