Conditioned opponent processes in the development of tolerance to psychoactive drugs
1. 1. Tolerance may involve classical conditioning processes. A conditioned drugopponent response is thought to increase with drug exposures and summate with the unconditioned response to the drug — resulting in tolerance. 2. 2. Support for this theory comes from reports that tolerance exhibits many...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry 1990, Vol.14 (5), p.675-688 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 688 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 675 |
container_title | Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Goudie, Andrew J |
description | 1.
1. Tolerance may involve classical conditioning processes. A conditioned drugopponent response is thought to increase with drug exposures and summate with the unconditioned response to the drug — resulting in tolerance.
2.
2. Support for this theory comes from reports that tolerance exhibits many basic features of classical conditioning phenomena.
3.
3. Problems for this account of tolerance arise from the fact that some, but not all, empirical attempts to demonstrate conditioned opponent responses have failed.
4.
4. It has consequently been suggested that tolerance might best be conceptualised in terms of theories of habituation, which do not involve opponent processes.
5.
5. The controversy over the role of opponent processes is theoretically important, because conditioned opponent processes are believed to be involved in dependence. Resolution of the controversy requires that parametric studies are conducted, in which the optimal conditions for obtaining conditioned tolerance are defined, and an efficient “model system” developed for analysis of the possible role of opponent processes in tolerance.
6.
6. Research in this area highlights the importance of interdisciplinary studies of tolerance and dependence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0278-5846(90)90038-I |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80278154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>027858469090038I</els_id><sourcerecordid>80278154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-7baab4a69db69c443c19fd4970bda966737d3ac8ffd24634a8bde011b9f386b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcJeFD2sJps0m1wEKX4UCl56D9lk1ka2mzXZFvrvzdqiN08T8j4zzDwIXRJ8TzDhD7goRT4VjN9KfCcxpiKfH6ExEembFYQfo_EvcorOYvzEGBOK6QiNikLSgokxWs58a13vfAs2812XattnXfAGYoSYuTbrV5BZ2ELju_UQ-jrrfQNBtwbSK-vizqy8Nr3bJjBsPuI5Oql1E-HiUCdo-fK8nL3li_fX-expkRtGeJ-XldYV01zaikvDGDVE1pbJEldWS85LWlqqjahrWzBOmRaVBUxIJWsqeEUn6GY_Nq37tYHYq7WLBppGt-A3UYnhfDJlCWR70AQfY4BadcGtddgpgtXgUg2kGkQpidWPSzVPbVeH-ZtqDfa36SAv5deHXEejm3ow4uLf7ESVw-IT9LjnILnYOggqGgfJnnUBTK-sd_8v8g0lNpHx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80278154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conditioned opponent processes in the development of tolerance to psychoactive drugs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Goudie, Andrew J</creator><creatorcontrib>Goudie, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><description>1.
1. Tolerance may involve classical conditioning processes. A conditioned drugopponent response is thought to increase with drug exposures and summate with the unconditioned response to the drug — resulting in tolerance.
2.
2. Support for this theory comes from reports that tolerance exhibits many basic features of classical conditioning phenomena.
3.
3. Problems for this account of tolerance arise from the fact that some, but not all, empirical attempts to demonstrate conditioned opponent responses have failed.
4.
4. It has consequently been suggested that tolerance might best be conceptualised in terms of theories of habituation, which do not involve opponent processes.
5.
5. The controversy over the role of opponent processes is theoretically important, because conditioned opponent processes are believed to be involved in dependence. Resolution of the controversy requires that parametric studies are conducted, in which the optimal conditions for obtaining conditioned tolerance are defined, and an efficient “model system” developed for analysis of the possible role of opponent processes in tolerance.
6.
6. Research in this area highlights the importance of interdisciplinary studies of tolerance and dependence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-5846</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0278-5846(90)90038-I</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2293248</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PNPPD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; classical conditioning ; Conditioning, Classical ; dependence ; Drug Tolerance ; habituation ; Habituation, Psychophysiologic ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Models, Psychological ; Neuropharmacology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Psychotropic Drugs ; tolerance</subject><ispartof>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 1990, Vol.14 (5), p.675-688</ispartof><rights>1990</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-7baab4a69db69c443c19fd4970bda966737d3ac8ffd24634a8bde011b9f386b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-7baab4a69db69c443c19fd4970bda966737d3ac8ffd24634a8bde011b9f386b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027858469090038I$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,4010,4036,4037,23909,23910,25118,27900,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19327246$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2293248$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goudie, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><title>Conditioned opponent processes in the development of tolerance to psychoactive drugs</title><title>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry</title><addtitle>Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><description>1.
1. Tolerance may involve classical conditioning processes. A conditioned drugopponent response is thought to increase with drug exposures and summate with the unconditioned response to the drug — resulting in tolerance.
2.
2. Support for this theory comes from reports that tolerance exhibits many basic features of classical conditioning phenomena.
3.
3. Problems for this account of tolerance arise from the fact that some, but not all, empirical attempts to demonstrate conditioned opponent responses have failed.
4.
4. It has consequently been suggested that tolerance might best be conceptualised in terms of theories of habituation, which do not involve opponent processes.
5.
5. The controversy over the role of opponent processes is theoretically important, because conditioned opponent processes are believed to be involved in dependence. Resolution of the controversy requires that parametric studies are conducted, in which the optimal conditions for obtaining conditioned tolerance are defined, and an efficient “model system” developed for analysis of the possible role of opponent processes in tolerance.
6.
6. Research in this area highlights the importance of interdisciplinary studies of tolerance and dependence.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>classical conditioning</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical</subject><subject>dependence</subject><subject>Drug Tolerance</subject><subject>habituation</subject><subject>Habituation, Psychophysiologic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Psychotropic Drugs</subject><subject>tolerance</subject><issn>0278-5846</issn><issn>1878-4216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcJeFD2sJps0m1wEKX4UCl56D9lk1ka2mzXZFvrvzdqiN08T8j4zzDwIXRJ8TzDhD7goRT4VjN9KfCcxpiKfH6ExEembFYQfo_EvcorOYvzEGBOK6QiNikLSgokxWs58a13vfAs2812XattnXfAGYoSYuTbrV5BZ2ELju_UQ-jrrfQNBtwbSK-vizqy8Nr3bJjBsPuI5Oql1E-HiUCdo-fK8nL3li_fX-expkRtGeJ-XldYV01zaikvDGDVE1pbJEldWS85LWlqqjahrWzBOmRaVBUxIJWsqeEUn6GY_Nq37tYHYq7WLBppGt-A3UYnhfDJlCWR70AQfY4BadcGtddgpgtXgUg2kGkQpidWPSzVPbVeH-ZtqDfa36SAv5deHXEejm3ow4uLf7ESVw-IT9LjnILnYOggqGgfJnnUBTK-sd_8v8g0lNpHx</recordid><startdate>1990</startdate><enddate>1990</enddate><creator>Goudie, Andrew J</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1990</creationdate><title>Conditioned opponent processes in the development of tolerance to psychoactive drugs</title><author>Goudie, Andrew J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-7baab4a69db69c443c19fd4970bda966737d3ac8ffd24634a8bde011b9f386b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>classical conditioning</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical</topic><topic>dependence</topic><topic>Drug Tolerance</topic><topic>habituation</topic><topic>Habituation, Psychophysiologic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Psychotropic Drugs</topic><topic>tolerance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goudie, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goudie, Andrew J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conditioned opponent processes in the development of tolerance to psychoactive drugs</atitle><jtitle>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><date>1990</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>675</spage><epage>688</epage><pages>675-688</pages><issn>0278-5846</issn><eissn>1878-4216</eissn><coden>PNPPD7</coden><abstract>1.
1. Tolerance may involve classical conditioning processes. A conditioned drugopponent response is thought to increase with drug exposures and summate with the unconditioned response to the drug — resulting in tolerance.
2.
2. Support for this theory comes from reports that tolerance exhibits many basic features of classical conditioning phenomena.
3.
3. Problems for this account of tolerance arise from the fact that some, but not all, empirical attempts to demonstrate conditioned opponent responses have failed.
4.
4. It has consequently been suggested that tolerance might best be conceptualised in terms of theories of habituation, which do not involve opponent processes.
5.
5. The controversy over the role of opponent processes is theoretically important, because conditioned opponent processes are believed to be involved in dependence. Resolution of the controversy requires that parametric studies are conducted, in which the optimal conditions for obtaining conditioned tolerance are defined, and an efficient “model system” developed for analysis of the possible role of opponent processes in tolerance.
6.
6. Research in this area highlights the importance of interdisciplinary studies of tolerance and dependence.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2293248</pmid><doi>10.1016/0278-5846(90)90038-I</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-5846 |
ispartof | Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 1990, Vol.14 (5), p.675-688 |
issn | 0278-5846 1878-4216 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80278154 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences classical conditioning Conditioning, Classical dependence Drug Tolerance habituation Habituation, Psychophysiologic Humans Medical sciences Miscellaneous Models, Psychological Neuropharmacology Pharmacology. Drug treatments Psychotropic Drugs tolerance |
title | Conditioned opponent processes in the development of tolerance to psychoactive drugs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T11%3A33%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conditioned%20opponent%20processes%20in%20the%20development%20of%20tolerance%20to%20psychoactive%20drugs&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20neuro-psychopharmacology%20&%20biological%20psychiatry&rft.au=Goudie,%20Andrew%20J&rft.date=1990&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=675&rft.epage=688&rft.pages=675-688&rft.issn=0278-5846&rft.eissn=1878-4216&rft.coden=PNPPD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0278-5846(90)90038-I&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80278154%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80278154&rft_id=info:pmid/2293248&rft_els_id=027858469090038I&rfr_iscdi=true |