Conditioned opponent processes in the development of tolerance to psychoactive drugs

1. 1. Tolerance may involve classical conditioning processes. A conditioned drugopponent response is thought to increase with drug exposures and summate with the unconditioned response to the drug — resulting in tolerance. 2. 2. Support for this theory comes from reports that tolerance exhibits many...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry 1990, Vol.14 (5), p.675-688
1. Verfasser: Goudie, Andrew J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 688
container_issue 5
container_start_page 675
container_title Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry
container_volume 14
creator Goudie, Andrew J
description 1. 1. Tolerance may involve classical conditioning processes. A conditioned drugopponent response is thought to increase with drug exposures and summate with the unconditioned response to the drug — resulting in tolerance. 2. 2. Support for this theory comes from reports that tolerance exhibits many basic features of classical conditioning phenomena. 3. 3. Problems for this account of tolerance arise from the fact that some, but not all, empirical attempts to demonstrate conditioned opponent responses have failed. 4. 4. It has consequently been suggested that tolerance might best be conceptualised in terms of theories of habituation, which do not involve opponent processes. 5. 5. The controversy over the role of opponent processes is theoretically important, because conditioned opponent processes are believed to be involved in dependence. Resolution of the controversy requires that parametric studies are conducted, in which the optimal conditions for obtaining conditioned tolerance are defined, and an efficient “model system” developed for analysis of the possible role of opponent processes in tolerance. 6. 6. Research in this area highlights the importance of interdisciplinary studies of tolerance and dependence.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0278-5846(90)90038-I
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80278154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>027858469090038I</els_id><sourcerecordid>80278154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-7baab4a69db69c443c19fd4970bda966737d3ac8ffd24634a8bde011b9f386b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcJeFD2sJps0m1wEKX4UCl56D9lk1ka2mzXZFvrvzdqiN08T8j4zzDwIXRJ8TzDhD7goRT4VjN9KfCcxpiKfH6ExEembFYQfo_EvcorOYvzEGBOK6QiNikLSgokxWs58a13vfAs2812XattnXfAGYoSYuTbrV5BZ2ELju_UQ-jrrfQNBtwbSK-vizqy8Nr3bJjBsPuI5Oql1E-HiUCdo-fK8nL3li_fX-expkRtGeJ-XldYV01zaikvDGDVE1pbJEldWS85LWlqqjahrWzBOmRaVBUxIJWsqeEUn6GY_Nq37tYHYq7WLBppGt-A3UYnhfDJlCWR70AQfY4BadcGtddgpgtXgUg2kGkQpidWPSzVPbVeH-ZtqDfa36SAv5deHXEejm3ow4uLf7ESVw-IT9LjnILnYOggqGgfJnnUBTK-sd_8v8g0lNpHx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80278154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conditioned opponent processes in the development of tolerance to psychoactive drugs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Goudie, Andrew J</creator><creatorcontrib>Goudie, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><description>1. 1. Tolerance may involve classical conditioning processes. A conditioned drugopponent response is thought to increase with drug exposures and summate with the unconditioned response to the drug — resulting in tolerance. 2. 2. Support for this theory comes from reports that tolerance exhibits many basic features of classical conditioning phenomena. 3. 3. Problems for this account of tolerance arise from the fact that some, but not all, empirical attempts to demonstrate conditioned opponent responses have failed. 4. 4. It has consequently been suggested that tolerance might best be conceptualised in terms of theories of habituation, which do not involve opponent processes. 5. 5. The controversy over the role of opponent processes is theoretically important, because conditioned opponent processes are believed to be involved in dependence. Resolution of the controversy requires that parametric studies are conducted, in which the optimal conditions for obtaining conditioned tolerance are defined, and an efficient “model system” developed for analysis of the possible role of opponent processes in tolerance. 6. 6. Research in this area highlights the importance of interdisciplinary studies of tolerance and dependence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-5846</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0278-5846(90)90038-I</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2293248</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PNPPD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; classical conditioning ; Conditioning, Classical ; dependence ; Drug Tolerance ; habituation ; Habituation, Psychophysiologic ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Models, Psychological ; Neuropharmacology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Psychotropic Drugs ; tolerance</subject><ispartof>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology &amp; biological psychiatry, 1990, Vol.14 (5), p.675-688</ispartof><rights>1990</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-7baab4a69db69c443c19fd4970bda966737d3ac8ffd24634a8bde011b9f386b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-7baab4a69db69c443c19fd4970bda966737d3ac8ffd24634a8bde011b9f386b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027858469090038I$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,4010,4036,4037,23909,23910,25118,27900,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19327246$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2293248$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goudie, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><title>Conditioned opponent processes in the development of tolerance to psychoactive drugs</title><title>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology &amp; biological psychiatry</title><addtitle>Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><description>1. 1. Tolerance may involve classical conditioning processes. A conditioned drugopponent response is thought to increase with drug exposures and summate with the unconditioned response to the drug — resulting in tolerance. 2. 2. Support for this theory comes from reports that tolerance exhibits many basic features of classical conditioning phenomena. 3. 3. Problems for this account of tolerance arise from the fact that some, but not all, empirical attempts to demonstrate conditioned opponent responses have failed. 4. 4. It has consequently been suggested that tolerance might best be conceptualised in terms of theories of habituation, which do not involve opponent processes. 5. 5. The controversy over the role of opponent processes is theoretically important, because conditioned opponent processes are believed to be involved in dependence. Resolution of the controversy requires that parametric studies are conducted, in which the optimal conditions for obtaining conditioned tolerance are defined, and an efficient “model system” developed for analysis of the possible role of opponent processes in tolerance. 6. 6. Research in this area highlights the importance of interdisciplinary studies of tolerance and dependence.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>classical conditioning</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical</subject><subject>dependence</subject><subject>Drug Tolerance</subject><subject>habituation</subject><subject>Habituation, Psychophysiologic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Psychotropic Drugs</subject><subject>tolerance</subject><issn>0278-5846</issn><issn>1878-4216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcJeFD2sJps0m1wEKX4UCl56D9lk1ka2mzXZFvrvzdqiN08T8j4zzDwIXRJ8TzDhD7goRT4VjN9KfCcxpiKfH6ExEembFYQfo_EvcorOYvzEGBOK6QiNikLSgokxWs58a13vfAs2812XattnXfAGYoSYuTbrV5BZ2ELju_UQ-jrrfQNBtwbSK-vizqy8Nr3bJjBsPuI5Oql1E-HiUCdo-fK8nL3li_fX-expkRtGeJ-XldYV01zaikvDGDVE1pbJEldWS85LWlqqjahrWzBOmRaVBUxIJWsqeEUn6GY_Nq37tYHYq7WLBppGt-A3UYnhfDJlCWR70AQfY4BadcGtddgpgtXgUg2kGkQpidWPSzVPbVeH-ZtqDfa36SAv5deHXEejm3ow4uLf7ESVw-IT9LjnILnYOggqGgfJnnUBTK-sd_8v8g0lNpHx</recordid><startdate>1990</startdate><enddate>1990</enddate><creator>Goudie, Andrew J</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1990</creationdate><title>Conditioned opponent processes in the development of tolerance to psychoactive drugs</title><author>Goudie, Andrew J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-7baab4a69db69c443c19fd4970bda966737d3ac8ffd24634a8bde011b9f386b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>classical conditioning</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical</topic><topic>dependence</topic><topic>Drug Tolerance</topic><topic>habituation</topic><topic>Habituation, Psychophysiologic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Psychotropic Drugs</topic><topic>tolerance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goudie, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology &amp; biological psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goudie, Andrew J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conditioned opponent processes in the development of tolerance to psychoactive drugs</atitle><jtitle>Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology &amp; biological psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><date>1990</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>675</spage><epage>688</epage><pages>675-688</pages><issn>0278-5846</issn><eissn>1878-4216</eissn><coden>PNPPD7</coden><abstract>1. 1. Tolerance may involve classical conditioning processes. A conditioned drugopponent response is thought to increase with drug exposures and summate with the unconditioned response to the drug — resulting in tolerance. 2. 2. Support for this theory comes from reports that tolerance exhibits many basic features of classical conditioning phenomena. 3. 3. Problems for this account of tolerance arise from the fact that some, but not all, empirical attempts to demonstrate conditioned opponent responses have failed. 4. 4. It has consequently been suggested that tolerance might best be conceptualised in terms of theories of habituation, which do not involve opponent processes. 5. 5. The controversy over the role of opponent processes is theoretically important, because conditioned opponent processes are believed to be involved in dependence. Resolution of the controversy requires that parametric studies are conducted, in which the optimal conditions for obtaining conditioned tolerance are defined, and an efficient “model system” developed for analysis of the possible role of opponent processes in tolerance. 6. 6. Research in this area highlights the importance of interdisciplinary studies of tolerance and dependence.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2293248</pmid><doi>10.1016/0278-5846(90)90038-I</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-5846
ispartof Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 1990, Vol.14 (5), p.675-688
issn 0278-5846
1878-4216
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80278154
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
classical conditioning
Conditioning, Classical
dependence
Drug Tolerance
habituation
Habituation, Psychophysiologic
Humans
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Models, Psychological
Neuropharmacology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Psychotropic Drugs
tolerance
title Conditioned opponent processes in the development of tolerance to psychoactive drugs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T11%3A33%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conditioned%20opponent%20processes%20in%20the%20development%20of%20tolerance%20to%20psychoactive%20drugs&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20neuro-psychopharmacology%20&%20biological%20psychiatry&rft.au=Goudie,%20Andrew%20J&rft.date=1990&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=675&rft.epage=688&rft.pages=675-688&rft.issn=0278-5846&rft.eissn=1878-4216&rft.coden=PNPPD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0278-5846(90)90038-I&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80278154%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80278154&rft_id=info:pmid/2293248&rft_els_id=027858469090038I&rfr_iscdi=true