Long-term follow-up of patients with sacral anterior root stimulator implants

The first 50 patients to receive a sacral anterior root stimulator for bladder control were reviewed by questionnaire in mid-1989. At that time, the follow-up period varied from 5 to 11 years, and 48 of the group were alive; 2 had died from unrelated causes. Forty-one used their implants regularly f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Paraplegia 1990-10, Vol.28 (8), p.469-475
Hauptverfasser: BRINDLEY, G. S, RUSHTON, D. N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 475
container_issue 8
container_start_page 469
container_title Paraplegia
container_volume 28
creator BRINDLEY, G. S
RUSHTON, D. N
description The first 50 patients to receive a sacral anterior root stimulator for bladder control were reviewed by questionnaire in mid-1989. At that time, the follow-up period varied from 5 to 11 years, and 48 of the group were alive; 2 had died from unrelated causes. Forty-one used their implants regularly for micturition and of these, 37 were always or usually continent. Twenty-nine reported no symptomatic urinary infections in the previous year, and only 4 had 3 infections or more. Twenty-seven used their implant to assist defaecation, and 13 of 32 male users reported full implant-driven erections. Side effects are minor, except for stimulus evoked pain sensation, which prevents use of the implant in 3 of the 7 non-users. Two of the other non-users were awaiting repair of their implant faults.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/sc.1990.63
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80184555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80184555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-1ee7c36a91e0925e082b3321c032e88467b6879bcc1506f3f0517ffc729253c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLAzEURoMotdRu3AvZ6EKYmsfkMUspvqDiRtchExONzDRjkqH4703poHdzuZzDx-UD4ByjFUZU3iSzwk2DVpwegTmuBa8YJ_UxmCNEcYUFk6dgmdIXKsMZIkTOwIwQTmtE5-B5E7YfVbaxhy50XdhV4wCDg4PO3m5zgjufP2HSJuoO6m0RfYgwhpBhyr4fO53L7fuhKzCdgROnu2SX016At_u71_VjtXl5eFrfbipDa5krbK0wlOsGW9QQZpEkLaUEG0SJlbLmouVSNK0xmCHuqEMMC-eMIMWmRtAFuDrkDjF8jzZl1ftkbFeesGFMSiIsa8ZYEa8PookhpWidGqLvdfxRGKl9fSoZta9PcVrkiyl1bHv7_qdOZRV-OXGdjO5c1Fvj039iUzNMqKC_DAt2tQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80184555</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term follow-up of patients with sacral anterior root stimulator implants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>BRINDLEY, G. S ; RUSHTON, D. N</creator><creatorcontrib>BRINDLEY, G. S ; RUSHTON, D. N</creatorcontrib><description>The first 50 patients to receive a sacral anterior root stimulator for bladder control were reviewed by questionnaire in mid-1989. At that time, the follow-up period varied from 5 to 11 years, and 48 of the group were alive; 2 had died from unrelated causes. Forty-one used their implants regularly for micturition and of these, 37 were always or usually continent. Twenty-nine reported no symptomatic urinary infections in the previous year, and only 4 had 3 infections or more. Twenty-seven used their implant to assist defaecation, and 13 of 32 male users reported full implant-driven erections. Side effects are minor, except for stimulus evoked pain sensation, which prevents use of the implant in 3 of the 7 non-users. Two of the other non-users were awaiting repair of their implant faults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-1758</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1362-4393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sc.1990.63</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2263403</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PRPLBL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basingstoke: Macmillan</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Defecation ; Diseases of the nervous system ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - adverse effects ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - instrumentation ; Equipment Failure ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lumbosacral Region ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Penile Erection ; Prostheses and Implants ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Spinal Nerve Roots - physiopathology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology ; Urinary Incontinence - therapy ; Urinary Tract - pathology ; Urinary Tract Infections - etiology</subject><ispartof>Paraplegia, 1990-10, Vol.28 (8), p.469-475</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-1ee7c36a91e0925e082b3321c032e88467b6879bcc1506f3f0517ffc729253c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-1ee7c36a91e0925e082b3321c032e88467b6879bcc1506f3f0517ffc729253c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19451237$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2263403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRINDLEY, G. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUSHTON, D. N</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term follow-up of patients with sacral anterior root stimulator implants</title><title>Paraplegia</title><addtitle>Paraplegia</addtitle><description>The first 50 patients to receive a sacral anterior root stimulator for bladder control were reviewed by questionnaire in mid-1989. At that time, the follow-up period varied from 5 to 11 years, and 48 of the group were alive; 2 had died from unrelated causes. Forty-one used their implants regularly for micturition and of these, 37 were always or usually continent. Twenty-nine reported no symptomatic urinary infections in the previous year, and only 4 had 3 infections or more. Twenty-seven used their implant to assist defaecation, and 13 of 32 male users reported full implant-driven erections. Side effects are minor, except for stimulus evoked pain sensation, which prevents use of the implant in 3 of the 7 non-users. Two of the other non-users were awaiting repair of their implant faults.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Defecation</subject><subject>Diseases of the nervous system</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Penile Erection</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Spinal Nerve Roots - physiopathology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - therapy</subject><subject>Urinary Tract - pathology</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - etiology</subject><issn>0031-1758</issn><issn>1362-4393</issn><issn>1476-5624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtLAzEURoMotdRu3AvZ6EKYmsfkMUspvqDiRtchExONzDRjkqH4703poHdzuZzDx-UD4ByjFUZU3iSzwk2DVpwegTmuBa8YJ_UxmCNEcYUFk6dgmdIXKsMZIkTOwIwQTmtE5-B5E7YfVbaxhy50XdhV4wCDg4PO3m5zgjufP2HSJuoO6m0RfYgwhpBhyr4fO53L7fuhKzCdgROnu2SX016At_u71_VjtXl5eFrfbipDa5krbK0wlOsGW9QQZpEkLaUEG0SJlbLmouVSNK0xmCHuqEMMC-eMIMWmRtAFuDrkDjF8jzZl1ftkbFeesGFMSiIsa8ZYEa8PookhpWidGqLvdfxRGKl9fSoZta9PcVrkiyl1bHv7_qdOZRV-OXGdjO5c1Fvj039iUzNMqKC_DAt2tQ</recordid><startdate>19901001</startdate><enddate>19901001</enddate><creator>BRINDLEY, G. S</creator><creator>RUSHTON, D. N</creator><general>Macmillan</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901001</creationdate><title>Long-term follow-up of patients with sacral anterior root stimulator implants</title><author>BRINDLEY, G. S ; RUSHTON, D. N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-1ee7c36a91e0925e082b3321c032e88467b6879bcc1506f3f0517ffc729253c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Defecation</topic><topic>Diseases of the nervous system</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Penile Erection</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Spinal Nerve Roots - physiopathology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - therapy</topic><topic>Urinary Tract - pathology</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRINDLEY, G. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUSHTON, D. N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Paraplegia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRINDLEY, G. S</au><au>RUSHTON, D. N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term follow-up of patients with sacral anterior root stimulator implants</atitle><jtitle>Paraplegia</jtitle><addtitle>Paraplegia</addtitle><date>1990-10-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>469</spage><epage>475</epage><pages>469-475</pages><issn>0031-1758</issn><issn>1362-4393</issn><eissn>1476-5624</eissn><coden>PRPLBL</coden><abstract>The first 50 patients to receive a sacral anterior root stimulator for bladder control were reviewed by questionnaire in mid-1989. At that time, the follow-up period varied from 5 to 11 years, and 48 of the group were alive; 2 had died from unrelated causes. Forty-one used their implants regularly for micturition and of these, 37 were always or usually continent. Twenty-nine reported no symptomatic urinary infections in the previous year, and only 4 had 3 infections or more. Twenty-seven used their implant to assist defaecation, and 13 of 32 male users reported full implant-driven erections. Side effects are minor, except for stimulus evoked pain sensation, which prevents use of the implant in 3 of the 7 non-users. Two of the other non-users were awaiting repair of their implant faults.</abstract><cop>Basingstoke</cop><pub>Macmillan</pub><pmid>2263403</pmid><doi>10.1038/sc.1990.63</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-1758
ispartof Paraplegia, 1990-10, Vol.28 (8), p.469-475
issn 0031-1758
1362-4393
1476-5624
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80184555
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Defecation
Diseases of the nervous system
Electric Stimulation Therapy - adverse effects
Electric Stimulation Therapy - instrumentation
Equipment Failure
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lumbosacral Region
Male
Medical sciences
Penile Erection
Prostheses and Implants
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Spinal Nerve Roots - physiopathology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology
Urinary Incontinence - therapy
Urinary Tract - pathology
Urinary Tract Infections - etiology
title Long-term follow-up of patients with sacral anterior root stimulator implants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A47%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20follow-up%20of%20patients%20with%20sacral%20anterior%20root%20stimulator%20implants&rft.jtitle=Paraplegia&rft.au=BRINDLEY,%20G.%20S&rft.date=1990-10-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=469&rft.epage=475&rft.pages=469-475&rft.issn=0031-1758&rft.eissn=1476-5624&rft.coden=PRPLBL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sc.1990.63&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80184555%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80184555&rft_id=info:pmid/2263403&rfr_iscdi=true