Abduction, adduction and hand differences in simple and serial movements

Abductive or adductive movements were made either towards single targets left or right of “home”, or sequentially from target to target with various levels of advance information. In the former situation the preferred hand completed responses (movement time, MT) faster than the non-preferred, while...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychologia 1990, Vol.28 (9), p.917-931
Hauptverfasser: Bradshaw, John L., Bradshaw, Judy A., Nettleton, Norman C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 931
container_issue 9
container_start_page 917
container_title Neuropsychologia
container_volume 28
creator Bradshaw, John L.
Bradshaw, Judy A.
Nettleton, Norman C.
description Abductive or adductive movements were made either towards single targets left or right of “home”, or sequentially from target to target with various levels of advance information. In the former situation the preferred hand completed responses (movement time, MT) faster than the non-preferred, while the non-preferred hand initiated them faster (reaction time, RT); these effects were in both cases stronger with harder (knob turn) than with easier (touch) responses. Abductive responses (MTs, not RTs) were faster than adductive, especially with the preferred right hand. However in the sequential task adductive responses were the faster, consistently so by MTs, while with respect to time spent motionless at each target (down time, DT) more so with the non-preferred hand, and under conditions of maximal advance information. Findings were discussed in the contexts of movement complexity, hemispatial representation, and how advance information may be utilized in the resolution of directional uncertainty. There may be an evolutionary advantage in making complex manipulative responses adductively, close to the body, while reaches are usually made abductively, to the periphery of circumcorporeal space.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90108-Z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80177093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>002839329090108Z</els_id><sourcerecordid>80177093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-9ea680136283f3157d6936ba8f3a941d13ba55d1f30317a68beb6e25ba5a117f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4Moc06_gUJPomD1SdK0zUUYQ50w8KKXXULaPMFIX2bSDvz2ttvw6CUJz__lIT9CLincU6DpAwDLYy45u5FwK4FCHq-PyJTmGY-5oMkxmf5ZTslZCF8AkAiWT8iEMSETlkzJcl6Yvuxc29xF2hyekW5M9DkexlmLHpsSQ-SaKLh6U-FODuidrqK63WKNTRfOyYnVVcCLwz0jH89P74tlvHp7eV3MV3HJRdbFEnWaA-Upy7nlVGQmlTwtdG65lgk1lBdaCEMtB06zwVtgkSITw1RTmlk-I9f73o1vv3sMnapdKLGqdINtH9RQnmUg-WBM9sbStyF4tGrjXa39j6KgRoBqpKNGOkqC2gFU6yF2dejvixrNX-hAbNAf9zoOn9w69CqUbgRknMeyU6Z1_y_4BeKmftg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80177093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abduction, adduction and hand differences in simple and serial movements</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bradshaw, John L. ; Bradshaw, Judy A. ; Nettleton, Norman C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, John L. ; Bradshaw, Judy A. ; Nettleton, Norman C.</creatorcontrib><description>Abductive or adductive movements were made either towards single targets left or right of “home”, or sequentially from target to target with various levels of advance information. In the former situation the preferred hand completed responses (movement time, MT) faster than the non-preferred, while the non-preferred hand initiated them faster (reaction time, RT); these effects were in both cases stronger with harder (knob turn) than with easier (touch) responses. Abductive responses (MTs, not RTs) were faster than adductive, especially with the preferred right hand. However in the sequential task adductive responses were the faster, consistently so by MTs, while with respect to time spent motionless at each target (down time, DT) more so with the non-preferred hand, and under conditions of maximal advance information. Findings were discussed in the contexts of movement complexity, hemispatial representation, and how advance information may be utilized in the resolution of directional uncertainty. There may be an evolutionary advantage in making complex manipulative responses adductively, close to the body, while reaches are usually made abductively, to the periphery of circumcorporeal space.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90108-Z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2259424</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention ; Dominance, Cerebral ; Feedback ; Female ; Functional Laterality ; Humans ; Kinesthesis ; Male ; Motor Skills ; Orientation ; Proprioception ; Psychomotor Performance ; Serial Learning ; Space life sciences</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 1990, Vol.28 (9), p.917-931</ispartof><rights>1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-9ea680136283f3157d6936ba8f3a941d13ba55d1f30317a68beb6e25ba5a117f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-9ea680136283f3157d6936ba8f3a941d13ba55d1f30317a68beb6e25ba5a117f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002839329090108Z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,4009,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2259424$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, Judy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nettleton, Norman C.</creatorcontrib><title>Abduction, adduction and hand differences in simple and serial movements</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>Abductive or adductive movements were made either towards single targets left or right of “home”, or sequentially from target to target with various levels of advance information. In the former situation the preferred hand completed responses (movement time, MT) faster than the non-preferred, while the non-preferred hand initiated them faster (reaction time, RT); these effects were in both cases stronger with harder (knob turn) than with easier (touch) responses. Abductive responses (MTs, not RTs) were faster than adductive, especially with the preferred right hand. However in the sequential task adductive responses were the faster, consistently so by MTs, while with respect to time spent motionless at each target (down time, DT) more so with the non-preferred hand, and under conditions of maximal advance information. Findings were discussed in the contexts of movement complexity, hemispatial representation, and how advance information may be utilized in the resolution of directional uncertainty. There may be an evolutionary advantage in making complex manipulative responses adductively, close to the body, while reaches are usually made abductively, to the periphery of circumcorporeal space.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Dominance, Cerebral</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional Laterality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinesthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor Skills</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Proprioception</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Serial Learning</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4Moc06_gUJPomD1SdK0zUUYQ50w8KKXXULaPMFIX2bSDvz2ttvw6CUJz__lIT9CLincU6DpAwDLYy45u5FwK4FCHq-PyJTmGY-5oMkxmf5ZTslZCF8AkAiWT8iEMSETlkzJcl6Yvuxc29xF2hyekW5M9DkexlmLHpsSQ-SaKLh6U-FODuidrqK63WKNTRfOyYnVVcCLwz0jH89P74tlvHp7eV3MV3HJRdbFEnWaA-Upy7nlVGQmlTwtdG65lgk1lBdaCEMtB06zwVtgkSITw1RTmlk-I9f73o1vv3sMnapdKLGqdINtH9RQnmUg-WBM9sbStyF4tGrjXa39j6KgRoBqpKNGOkqC2gFU6yF2dejvixrNX-hAbNAf9zoOn9w69CqUbgRknMeyU6Z1_y_4BeKmftg</recordid><startdate>1990</startdate><enddate>1990</enddate><creator>Bradshaw, John L.</creator><creator>Bradshaw, Judy A.</creator><creator>Nettleton, Norman C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1990</creationdate><title>Abduction, adduction and hand differences in simple and serial movements</title><author>Bradshaw, John L. ; Bradshaw, Judy A. ; Nettleton, Norman C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-9ea680136283f3157d6936ba8f3a941d13ba55d1f30317a68beb6e25ba5a117f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Dominance, Cerebral</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional Laterality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinesthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor Skills</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Proprioception</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Serial Learning</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, Judy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nettleton, Norman C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradshaw, John L.</au><au>Bradshaw, Judy A.</au><au>Nettleton, Norman C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abduction, adduction and hand differences in simple and serial movements</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>1990</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>917</spage><epage>931</epage><pages>917-931</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><abstract>Abductive or adductive movements were made either towards single targets left or right of “home”, or sequentially from target to target with various levels of advance information. In the former situation the preferred hand completed responses (movement time, MT) faster than the non-preferred, while the non-preferred hand initiated them faster (reaction time, RT); these effects were in both cases stronger with harder (knob turn) than with easier (touch) responses. Abductive responses (MTs, not RTs) were faster than adductive, especially with the preferred right hand. However in the sequential task adductive responses were the faster, consistently so by MTs, while with respect to time spent motionless at each target (down time, DT) more so with the non-preferred hand, and under conditions of maximal advance information. Findings were discussed in the contexts of movement complexity, hemispatial representation, and how advance information may be utilized in the resolution of directional uncertainty. There may be an evolutionary advantage in making complex manipulative responses adductively, close to the body, while reaches are usually made abductively, to the periphery of circumcorporeal space.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>2259424</pmid><doi>10.1016/0028-3932(90)90108-Z</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3932
ispartof Neuropsychologia, 1990, Vol.28 (9), p.917-931
issn 0028-3932
1873-3514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80177093
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Attention
Dominance, Cerebral
Feedback
Female
Functional Laterality
Humans
Kinesthesis
Male
Motor Skills
Orientation
Proprioception
Psychomotor Performance
Serial Learning
Space life sciences
title Abduction, adduction and hand differences in simple and serial movements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T21%3A45%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abduction,%20adduction%20and%20hand%20differences%20in%20simple%20and%20serial%20movements&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Bradshaw,%20John%20L.&rft.date=1990&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=917&rft.epage=931&rft.pages=917-931&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0028-3932(90)90108-Z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80177093%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80177093&rft_id=info:pmid/2259424&rft_els_id=002839329090108Z&rfr_iscdi=true