Assessing simulated patients in an educational setting: the MaSP (Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients)
Context For more than two decades the Medical School in Maastricht, the Netherlands, has used simulated patients (SPs) to provide students with opportunities to practise their skills in communication and physical examination. In this educational setting a student meets a SP in a videotaped session....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical education 2004-01, Vol.38 (1), p.39-44 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 44 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 39 |
container_title | Medical education |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Wind, Lidewij A Van Dalen, Jan Muijtjens, Arno M M Rethans, Jan-Joost |
description | Context For more than two decades the Medical School in Maastricht, the Netherlands, has used simulated patients (SPs) to provide students with opportunities to practise their skills in communication and physical examination. In this educational setting a student meets a SP in a videotaped session. Feedback by the SP to the student at the end of the session is considered an important educational feature. We found no instruments to assess individual SP performance during those sessions.
Objective To develop a valid, reliable and feasible instrument to evaluate the performance of SPs.
Methods The content of the instrument was validated through interviews with students, teachers and experts who are involved with SPs. They were asked to indicate key features of good SP performance. Based on the interviews, a written checklist was developed to measure individual SP performance. The instrument was evaluated in a regular SP session at the medical school, involving 152 students and their teachers.
Main outcomes All interviewees considered the scale to be satisfactory and the instrument to be valid. The feasibility and reliability of the checklists were investigated using the data of 398 returned checklists. Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.73. Generalizability analysis showed that 12 completed checklists were required to obtain a reliable assessment of one SP.
Conclusions The Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients (MaSP) appears to be a valid, reliable and feasible tool to assess the performance of SPs in an educational setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01686.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80159688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80159688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5776-43e1cd6cd7f766bd9a94d268525cc15139fc891e633ef54e48ffc111f3ef3a953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURi0EokPhLyALCVQWCXYcOzYLpLaUgjQDI00LS8t1bJppHkOuI6b_HodEU4kV3vh17pF9P4QwJSmN4902pUzwJFMZSzNC8pRQIUW6f4QWh4vHaEEYkQmhlByhZwBbQkjBc_kUHdFciYxkfIHaUwAHULU_MVTNUJvgSrwzoXJtAFy12LTYlYONJ11ragwuhAi_x-HW4ZXZrPHJyhgIfWVvA55kTazFncebg3A9C98-R0-8qcG9mOdjdP3p4ur8c7L8dvnl_HSZWF4UIsmZo7YUtix8IcRNqYzKy0xInnFrKadMeSsVdYIx53nucum9jY3xccuM4uwYvZm8u777NTgIuqnAuro2resG0JJQroSUEXz1D7jthj7-FHRskGLxNXmE5ATZvgPonde7vmpMf68p0WMgeqvHvuux73oMRP8NRO9j6cvZP9w0rnwonBOIwOsZMGBN7XvT2goeOC5iiFxF7sPE_a5qd__fD9Cri4_X4zIKkklQQXD7g8D0d1oUrOD6x9dLvf4ui7PN-kov2R84zrYy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202937764</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing simulated patients in an educational setting: the MaSP (Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Wind, Lidewij A ; Van Dalen, Jan ; Muijtjens, Arno M M ; Rethans, Jan-Joost</creator><creatorcontrib>Wind, Lidewij A ; Van Dalen, Jan ; Muijtjens, Arno M M ; Rethans, Jan-Joost</creatorcontrib><description>Context For more than two decades the Medical School in Maastricht, the Netherlands, has used simulated patients (SPs) to provide students with opportunities to practise their skills in communication and physical examination. In this educational setting a student meets a SP in a videotaped session. Feedback by the SP to the student at the end of the session is considered an important educational feature. We found no instruments to assess individual SP performance during those sessions.
Objective To develop a valid, reliable and feasible instrument to evaluate the performance of SPs.
Methods The content of the instrument was validated through interviews with students, teachers and experts who are involved with SPs. They were asked to indicate key features of good SP performance. Based on the interviews, a written checklist was developed to measure individual SP performance. The instrument was evaluated in a regular SP session at the medical school, involving 152 students and their teachers.
Main outcomes All interviewees considered the scale to be satisfactory and the instrument to be valid. The feasibility and reliability of the checklists were investigated using the data of 398 returned checklists. Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.73. Generalizability analysis showed that 12 completed checklists were required to obtain a reliable assessment of one SP.
Conclusions The Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients (MaSP) appears to be a valid, reliable and feasible tool to assess the performance of SPs in an educational setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01686.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14962025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Clinical Competence - standards ; communication ; Curriculum ; Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods ; education ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods ; educational measurement ; Educational sciences ; Humans ; medical ; Medical and paramedical education ; Netherlands ; Patient Simulation ; physical examination ; Reproducibility of Results ; Role Playing ; Teaching methods ; the Netherlands ; undergraduate/methods</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 2004-01, Vol.38 (1), p.39-44</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd. Jan 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5776-43e1cd6cd7f766bd9a94d268525cc15139fc891e633ef54e48ffc111f3ef3a953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5776-43e1cd6cd7f766bd9a94d268525cc15139fc891e633ef54e48ffc111f3ef3a953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2923.2004.01686.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2923.2004.01686.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,4021,27921,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15630859$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14962025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wind, Lidewij A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dalen, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muijtjens, Arno M M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rethans, Jan-Joost</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing simulated patients in an educational setting: the MaSP (Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients)</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>Context For more than two decades the Medical School in Maastricht, the Netherlands, has used simulated patients (SPs) to provide students with opportunities to practise their skills in communication and physical examination. In this educational setting a student meets a SP in a videotaped session. Feedback by the SP to the student at the end of the session is considered an important educational feature. We found no instruments to assess individual SP performance during those sessions.
Objective To develop a valid, reliable and feasible instrument to evaluate the performance of SPs.
Methods The content of the instrument was validated through interviews with students, teachers and experts who are involved with SPs. They were asked to indicate key features of good SP performance. Based on the interviews, a written checklist was developed to measure individual SP performance. The instrument was evaluated in a regular SP session at the medical school, involving 152 students and their teachers.
Main outcomes All interviewees considered the scale to be satisfactory and the instrument to be valid. The feasibility and reliability of the checklists were investigated using the data of 398 returned checklists. Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.73. Generalizability analysis showed that 12 completed checklists were required to obtain a reliable assessment of one SP.
Conclusions The Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients (MaSP) appears to be a valid, reliable and feasible tool to assess the performance of SPs in an educational setting.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>communication</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods</subject><subject>educational measurement</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>medical</subject><subject>Medical and paramedical education</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Patient Simulation</subject><subject>physical examination</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Role Playing</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>the Netherlands</subject><subject>undergraduate/methods</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURi0EokPhLyALCVQWCXYcOzYLpLaUgjQDI00LS8t1bJppHkOuI6b_HodEU4kV3vh17pF9P4QwJSmN4902pUzwJFMZSzNC8pRQIUW6f4QWh4vHaEEYkQmhlByhZwBbQkjBc_kUHdFciYxkfIHaUwAHULU_MVTNUJvgSrwzoXJtAFy12LTYlYONJ11ragwuhAi_x-HW4ZXZrPHJyhgIfWVvA55kTazFncebg3A9C98-R0-8qcG9mOdjdP3p4ur8c7L8dvnl_HSZWF4UIsmZo7YUtix8IcRNqYzKy0xInnFrKadMeSsVdYIx53nucum9jY3xccuM4uwYvZm8u777NTgIuqnAuro2resG0JJQroSUEXz1D7jthj7-FHRskGLxNXmE5ATZvgPonde7vmpMf68p0WMgeqvHvuux73oMRP8NRO9j6cvZP9w0rnwonBOIwOsZMGBN7XvT2goeOC5iiFxF7sPE_a5qd__fD9Cri4_X4zIKkklQQXD7g8D0d1oUrOD6x9dLvf4ui7PN-kov2R84zrYy</recordid><startdate>200401</startdate><enddate>200401</enddate><creator>Wind, Lidewij A</creator><creator>Van Dalen, Jan</creator><creator>Muijtjens, Arno M M</creator><creator>Rethans, Jan-Joost</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200401</creationdate><title>Assessing simulated patients in an educational setting: the MaSP (Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients)</title><author>Wind, Lidewij A ; Van Dalen, Jan ; Muijtjens, Arno M M ; Rethans, Jan-Joost</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5776-43e1cd6cd7f766bd9a94d268525cc15139fc891e633ef54e48ffc111f3ef3a953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>communication</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods</topic><topic>educational measurement</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>medical</topic><topic>Medical and paramedical education</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Patient Simulation</topic><topic>physical examination</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Role Playing</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>the Netherlands</topic><topic>undergraduate/methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wind, Lidewij A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dalen, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muijtjens, Arno M M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rethans, Jan-Joost</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wind, Lidewij A</au><au>Van Dalen, Jan</au><au>Muijtjens, Arno M M</au><au>Rethans, Jan-Joost</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing simulated patients in an educational setting: the MaSP (Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients)</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>2004-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>39-44</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>Context For more than two decades the Medical School in Maastricht, the Netherlands, has used simulated patients (SPs) to provide students with opportunities to practise their skills in communication and physical examination. In this educational setting a student meets a SP in a videotaped session. Feedback by the SP to the student at the end of the session is considered an important educational feature. We found no instruments to assess individual SP performance during those sessions.
Objective To develop a valid, reliable and feasible instrument to evaluate the performance of SPs.
Methods The content of the instrument was validated through interviews with students, teachers and experts who are involved with SPs. They were asked to indicate key features of good SP performance. Based on the interviews, a written checklist was developed to measure individual SP performance. The instrument was evaluated in a regular SP session at the medical school, involving 152 students and their teachers.
Main outcomes All interviewees considered the scale to be satisfactory and the instrument to be valid. The feasibility and reliability of the checklists were investigated using the data of 398 returned checklists. Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.73. Generalizability analysis showed that 12 completed checklists were required to obtain a reliable assessment of one SP.
Conclusions The Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients (MaSP) appears to be a valid, reliable and feasible tool to assess the performance of SPs in an educational setting.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>14962025</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01686.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-0110 |
ispartof | Medical education, 2004-01, Vol.38 (1), p.39-44 |
issn | 0308-0110 1365-2923 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80159688 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Education Source; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Clinical Competence - standards communication Curriculum Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods education Education, Medical, Undergraduate - methods educational measurement Educational sciences Humans medical Medical and paramedical education Netherlands Patient Simulation physical examination Reproducibility of Results Role Playing Teaching methods the Netherlands undergraduate/methods |
title | Assessing simulated patients in an educational setting: the MaSP (Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A16%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20simulated%20patients%20in%20an%20educational%20setting:%20the%20MaSP%20(Maastricht%20Assessment%20of%20Simulated%20Patients)&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=Wind,%20Lidewij%20A&rft.date=2004-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=39-44&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01686.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80159688%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202937764&rft_id=info:pmid/14962025&rfr_iscdi=true |