Influence of Test Method on Failure Stress of Brittle Dental Materials

A bi-axial flexure test (piston-on-three-balls), a four-point flexure test, and a diametral tensile test were used to measure the failure stress of four brittle dental materials: zinc phosphate cement, body porcelain, opaque porcelain, and visible light-cured resin composite. Furthermore, the fractu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dental research 1990-12, Vol.69 (12), p.1791-1799
Hauptverfasser: Ban, S., Anusavice, K.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1799
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1791
container_title Journal of dental research
container_volume 69
creator Ban, S.
Anusavice, K.J.
description A bi-axial flexure test (piston-on-three-balls), a four-point flexure test, and a diametral tensile test were used to measure the failure stress of four brittle dental materials: zinc phosphate cement, body porcelain, opaque porcelain, and visible light-cured resin composite. Furthermore, the fracture probability of the bi-axial test specimens was predicted from the results of the four-point flexure test, with use of statistical fracture theory. Bi-axial failure stresses calculated from an equation developed by Marshall (1980) exhibited no significant difference for zinc phosphate cement as a function of piston size, specimen thickness, presence or absence of a stress-distributing film, and loading rate. The four-point flexure strength values of zinc phosphate cement and opaque porcelain were significantly lower (p0.05) than the corresponding mean bi-axial strength values. The diametral tensile strength of all materials was significantly lower than the bi-axial flexure strength. The mean bi-axial flexure strengths of zinc phosphate cement and opaque porcelain were much higher than the theoretical values predicted from surface flaw theory, while the strength values for body porcelain and resin composite were comparable with those determined from the four-point flexure test. These results demonstrate that the strength of zinc phosphate cement depends not only upon the geometric factors, but also upon sample preparation conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00220345900690120201
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80154161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00220345900690120201</sage_id><sourcerecordid>16139769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-3c91756c5c78d272b17e80c06abda9125dc88cdfd5a3325bdac06681f562167b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EKuXxByBlxS4w48SvJRQKlVqxoKwj13EgVZoU21nw9zhqxQrR1Uhzz1zNzCXkCuEWUYg7AEohy5kC4AqQAgU8ImNkeZ4CU3hMxgOSDswpOfN-DYCKymxERpQyAJmNyXTWVk1vW2OTrkqW1odkYcNnVyZdm0x13fTOJm_BWe8H4MHVITQ2ebRt0E2y0MG6Wjf-gpxUsdjLfT0n79On5eQlnb8-zyb389TkgoY0MwoF44YZIUsq6AqFlWCA61WpFVJWGilNWZVMZxllsRk1LrFinCIXq-yc3Ox8t6776uO2xab2xjaNbm3X-0JCPB85HgQpE5wxIQ-Cg5kSXEUw34HGdd47WxVbV2-0-y4QiiGQ4q9A4tj13r9fbWz5O7RPIOq4073-sMW6610bH_i_5w-wEJFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16139769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Test Method on Failure Stress of Brittle Dental Materials</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Ban, S. ; Anusavice, K.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ban, S. ; Anusavice, K.J.</creatorcontrib><description>A bi-axial flexure test (piston-on-three-balls), a four-point flexure test, and a diametral tensile test were used to measure the failure stress of four brittle dental materials: zinc phosphate cement, body porcelain, opaque porcelain, and visible light-cured resin composite. Furthermore, the fracture probability of the bi-axial test specimens was predicted from the results of the four-point flexure test, with use of statistical fracture theory. Bi-axial failure stresses calculated from an equation developed by Marshall (1980) exhibited no significant difference for zinc phosphate cement as a function of piston size, specimen thickness, presence or absence of a stress-distributing film, and loading rate. The four-point flexure strength values of zinc phosphate cement and opaque porcelain were significantly lower (p&lt;0.05) than the corresponding mean biaxial strength values, while the mean four-point flexure strength values of body porcelain and resin composite were not significantly lower (p&gt;0.05) than the corresponding mean bi-axial strength values. The diametral tensile strength of all materials was significantly lower than the bi-axial flexure strength. The mean bi-axial flexure strengths of zinc phosphate cement and opaque porcelain were much higher than the theoretical values predicted from surface flaw theory, while the strength values for body porcelain and resin composite were comparable with those determined from the four-point flexure test. These results demonstrate that the strength of zinc phosphate cement depends not only upon the geometric factors, but also upon sample preparation conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-0591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00220345900690120201</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2250083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental Porcelain - chemistry ; Dental Stress Analysis - instrumentation ; Dental Stress Analysis - methods ; Dentistry ; Equipment Failure - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Materials Testing - instrumentation ; Materials Testing - methods ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Probability ; Surface Properties ; Tensile Strength ; Zinc Phosphate Cement - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of dental research, 1990-12, Vol.69 (12), p.1791-1799</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-3c91756c5c78d272b17e80c06abda9125dc88cdfd5a3325bdac06681f562167b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-3c91756c5c78d272b17e80c06abda9125dc88cdfd5a3325bdac06681f562167b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00220345900690120201$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00220345900690120201$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,21828,27933,27934,43630,43631</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2250083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ban, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anusavice, K.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Test Method on Failure Stress of Brittle Dental Materials</title><title>Journal of dental research</title><addtitle>J Dent Res</addtitle><description>A bi-axial flexure test (piston-on-three-balls), a four-point flexure test, and a diametral tensile test were used to measure the failure stress of four brittle dental materials: zinc phosphate cement, body porcelain, opaque porcelain, and visible light-cured resin composite. Furthermore, the fracture probability of the bi-axial test specimens was predicted from the results of the four-point flexure test, with use of statistical fracture theory. Bi-axial failure stresses calculated from an equation developed by Marshall (1980) exhibited no significant difference for zinc phosphate cement as a function of piston size, specimen thickness, presence or absence of a stress-distributing film, and loading rate. The four-point flexure strength values of zinc phosphate cement and opaque porcelain were significantly lower (p&lt;0.05) than the corresponding mean biaxial strength values, while the mean four-point flexure strength values of body porcelain and resin composite were not significantly lower (p&gt;0.05) than the corresponding mean bi-axial strength values. The diametral tensile strength of all materials was significantly lower than the bi-axial flexure strength. The mean bi-axial flexure strengths of zinc phosphate cement and opaque porcelain were much higher than the theoretical values predicted from surface flaw theory, while the strength values for body porcelain and resin composite were comparable with those determined from the four-point flexure test. These results demonstrate that the strength of zinc phosphate cement depends not only upon the geometric factors, but also upon sample preparation conditions.</description><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Porcelain - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Equipment Failure - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Materials Testing - instrumentation</subject><subject>Materials Testing - methods</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><subject>Zinc Phosphate Cement - chemistry</subject><issn>0022-0345</issn><issn>1544-0591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctOwzAQRS0EKuXxByBlxS4w48SvJRQKlVqxoKwj13EgVZoU21nw9zhqxQrR1Uhzz1zNzCXkCuEWUYg7AEohy5kC4AqQAgU8ImNkeZ4CU3hMxgOSDswpOfN-DYCKymxERpQyAJmNyXTWVk1vW2OTrkqW1odkYcNnVyZdm0x13fTOJm_BWe8H4MHVITQ2ebRt0E2y0MG6Wjf-gpxUsdjLfT0n79On5eQlnb8-zyb389TkgoY0MwoF44YZIUsq6AqFlWCA61WpFVJWGilNWZVMZxllsRk1LrFinCIXq-yc3Ox8t6776uO2xab2xjaNbm3X-0JCPB85HgQpE5wxIQ-Cg5kSXEUw34HGdd47WxVbV2-0-y4QiiGQ4q9A4tj13r9fbWz5O7RPIOq4073-sMW6610bH_i_5w-wEJFA</recordid><startdate>19901201</startdate><enddate>19901201</enddate><creator>Ban, S.</creator><creator>Anusavice, K.J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901201</creationdate><title>Influence of Test Method on Failure Stress of Brittle Dental Materials</title><author>Ban, S. ; Anusavice, K.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-3c91756c5c78d272b17e80c06abda9125dc88cdfd5a3325bdac06681f562167b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Porcelain - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Equipment Failure - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Materials Testing - instrumentation</topic><topic>Materials Testing - methods</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><topic>Zinc Phosphate Cement - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ban, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anusavice, K.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ban, S.</au><au>Anusavice, K.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Test Method on Failure Stress of Brittle Dental Materials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dental research</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent Res</addtitle><date>1990-12-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1791</spage><epage>1799</epage><pages>1791-1799</pages><issn>0022-0345</issn><eissn>1544-0591</eissn><abstract>A bi-axial flexure test (piston-on-three-balls), a four-point flexure test, and a diametral tensile test were used to measure the failure stress of four brittle dental materials: zinc phosphate cement, body porcelain, opaque porcelain, and visible light-cured resin composite. Furthermore, the fracture probability of the bi-axial test specimens was predicted from the results of the four-point flexure test, with use of statistical fracture theory. Bi-axial failure stresses calculated from an equation developed by Marshall (1980) exhibited no significant difference for zinc phosphate cement as a function of piston size, specimen thickness, presence or absence of a stress-distributing film, and loading rate. The four-point flexure strength values of zinc phosphate cement and opaque porcelain were significantly lower (p&lt;0.05) than the corresponding mean biaxial strength values, while the mean four-point flexure strength values of body porcelain and resin composite were not significantly lower (p&gt;0.05) than the corresponding mean bi-axial strength values. The diametral tensile strength of all materials was significantly lower than the bi-axial flexure strength. The mean bi-axial flexure strengths of zinc phosphate cement and opaque porcelain were much higher than the theoretical values predicted from surface flaw theory, while the strength values for body porcelain and resin composite were comparable with those determined from the four-point flexure test. These results demonstrate that the strength of zinc phosphate cement depends not only upon the geometric factors, but also upon sample preparation conditions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>2250083</pmid><doi>10.1177/00220345900690120201</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0345
ispartof Journal of dental research, 1990-12, Vol.69 (12), p.1791-1799
issn 0022-0345
1544-0591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80154161
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE
subjects Composite Resins - chemistry
Dental Porcelain - chemistry
Dental Stress Analysis - instrumentation
Dental Stress Analysis - methods
Dentistry
Equipment Failure - statistics & numerical data
Materials Testing - instrumentation
Materials Testing - methods
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Probability
Surface Properties
Tensile Strength
Zinc Phosphate Cement - chemistry
title Influence of Test Method on Failure Stress of Brittle Dental Materials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T06%3A43%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Test%20Method%20on%20Failure%20Stress%20of%20Brittle%20Dental%20Materials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dental%20research&rft.au=Ban,%20S.&rft.date=1990-12-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1791&rft.epage=1799&rft.pages=1791-1799&rft.issn=0022-0345&rft.eissn=1544-0591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00220345900690120201&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16139769%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16139769&rft_id=info:pmid/2250083&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00220345900690120201&rfr_iscdi=true