Mixed Methods, Mixed Methodology Health Services Research in Practice
Mixed methods, mixed methodology research is a little documented but increasingly accepted approach employed to investigate organizational phenomena. The author presents a synthesis of literature that informed the decision to adopt a mixed methods, mixed methodology, dominantly naturalistic study ap...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Qualitative health research 2004-02, Vol.14 (2), p.259-271 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 271 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 259 |
container_title | Qualitative health research |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Johnstone, P. Lynne |
description | Mixed methods, mixed methodology research is a little documented but increasingly accepted approach employed to investigate organizational phenomena. The author presents a synthesis of literature that informed the decision to adopt a mixed methods, mixed methodology, dominantly naturalistic study approach to health services research in which she explored the process and organizational consequences of new artifact adoption in surgery. She describes the way whereby a collective case study involving five Australian hospitals yielded quantitative and qualitative data that were analyzed using inductive and/or deductive reasoning. She goes beyond the theoretical rationale for employing a mixed methods, mixed methodology approach to present a summative conceptual model of the research process and describe the structural aspects of the dissertation in which the research was reported that should benefit researchers contemplating the value of such an approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1049732303260610 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80148548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1049732303260610</sage_id><sourcerecordid>80148548</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-95b51b56eb831094a485811c8dbecddabb295b758f5f44dd9e3c3e6754bc5c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMotlbvnmTx4MnVfCd7lFKt0KJo70uSnbZbtt2a7Ir996a0UBHE03w98w4zg9AlwXeEKHVPMM8UowwzKrEk-Ah1iRA0VUKo4-jHcrqtd9BZCAuMscKMnaIO4UpqLkkXDcblFxTJGJp5XYTb5GdYV_VskwzBVM08eQf_WToIyRsEMN7Nk3KVvHrjmpg9RydTUwW42NsemjwOJv1hOnp5eu4_jFLHMtKkmbCCWCHBakZwxg3XQhPidGHBFYWxlkZECT0VU86LIgPmGEgluHXCSdZDNzvZta8_WghNviyDg6oyK6jbkGtMoiLX_4JCEcUV24LXv8BF3fpV3CGnFFNJGcURwjvI-ToED9N87cul8Zuc4Hz7h_z3H2LL1V63tUsoDg37w0cg3QHBzOAw9E_Bb8rxjaE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220262320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mixed Methods, Mixed Methodology Health Services Research in Practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Johnstone, P. Lynne</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnstone, P. Lynne</creatorcontrib><description>Mixed methods, mixed methodology research is a little documented but increasingly accepted approach employed to investigate organizational phenomena. The author presents a synthesis of literature that informed the decision to adopt a mixed methods, mixed methodology, dominantly naturalistic study approach to health services research in which she explored the process and organizational consequences of new artifact adoption in surgery. She describes the way whereby a collective case study involving five Australian hospitals yielded quantitative and qualitative data that were analyzed using inductive and/or deductive reasoning. She goes beyond the theoretical rationale for employing a mixed methods, mixed methodology approach to present a summative conceptual model of the research process and describe the structural aspects of the dissertation in which the research was reported that should benefit researchers contemplating the value of such an approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1049732303260610</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14768461</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QHREEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Australia ; Data Collection - methods ; Health services ; Health Services Research ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Methodology ; Methods ; Nursing Methodology Research ; Qualitative research ; Quantitative research ; Research Design ; Technological change</subject><ispartof>Qualitative health research, 2004-02, Vol.14 (2), p.259-271</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-95b51b56eb831094a485811c8dbecddabb295b758f5f44dd9e3c3e6754bc5c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-95b51b56eb831094a485811c8dbecddabb295b758f5f44dd9e3c3e6754bc5c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049732303260610$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732303260610$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,31000,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14768461$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnstone, P. Lynne</creatorcontrib><title>Mixed Methods, Mixed Methodology Health Services Research in Practice</title><title>Qualitative health research</title><addtitle>Qual Health Res</addtitle><description>Mixed methods, mixed methodology research is a little documented but increasingly accepted approach employed to investigate organizational phenomena. The author presents a synthesis of literature that informed the decision to adopt a mixed methods, mixed methodology, dominantly naturalistic study approach to health services research in which she explored the process and organizational consequences of new artifact adoption in surgery. She describes the way whereby a collective case study involving five Australian hospitals yielded quantitative and qualitative data that were analyzed using inductive and/or deductive reasoning. She goes beyond the theoretical rationale for employing a mixed methods, mixed methodology approach to present a summative conceptual model of the research process and describe the structural aspects of the dissertation in which the research was reported that should benefit researchers contemplating the value of such an approach.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Data Collection - methods</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nursing Methodology Research</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quantitative research</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><issn>1049-7323</issn><issn>1552-7557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMotlbvnmTx4MnVfCd7lFKt0KJo70uSnbZbtt2a7Ir996a0UBHE03w98w4zg9AlwXeEKHVPMM8UowwzKrEk-Ah1iRA0VUKo4-jHcrqtd9BZCAuMscKMnaIO4UpqLkkXDcblFxTJGJp5XYTb5GdYV_VskwzBVM08eQf_WToIyRsEMN7Nk3KVvHrjmpg9RydTUwW42NsemjwOJv1hOnp5eu4_jFLHMtKkmbCCWCHBakZwxg3XQhPidGHBFYWxlkZECT0VU86LIgPmGEgluHXCSdZDNzvZta8_WghNviyDg6oyK6jbkGtMoiLX_4JCEcUV24LXv8BF3fpV3CGnFFNJGcURwjvI-ToED9N87cul8Zuc4Hz7h_z3H2LL1V63tUsoDg37w0cg3QHBzOAw9E_Bb8rxjaE</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>Johnstone, P. Lynne</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>Mixed Methods, Mixed Methodology Health Services Research in Practice</title><author>Johnstone, P. Lynne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-95b51b56eb831094a485811c8dbecddabb295b758f5f44dd9e3c3e6754bc5c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Data Collection - methods</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nursing Methodology Research</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quantitative research</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnstone, P. Lynne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Qualitative health research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnstone, P. Lynne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mixed Methods, Mixed Methodology Health Services Research in Practice</atitle><jtitle>Qualitative health research</jtitle><addtitle>Qual Health Res</addtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>259-271</pages><issn>1049-7323</issn><eissn>1552-7557</eissn><coden>QHREEM</coden><abstract>Mixed methods, mixed methodology research is a little documented but increasingly accepted approach employed to investigate organizational phenomena. The author presents a synthesis of literature that informed the decision to adopt a mixed methods, mixed methodology, dominantly naturalistic study approach to health services research in which she explored the process and organizational consequences of new artifact adoption in surgery. She describes the way whereby a collective case study involving five Australian hospitals yielded quantitative and qualitative data that were analyzed using inductive and/or deductive reasoning. She goes beyond the theoretical rationale for employing a mixed methods, mixed methodology approach to present a summative conceptual model of the research process and describe the structural aspects of the dissertation in which the research was reported that should benefit researchers contemplating the value of such an approach.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>14768461</pmid><doi>10.1177/1049732303260610</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-7323 |
ispartof | Qualitative health research, 2004-02, Vol.14 (2), p.259-271 |
issn | 1049-7323 1552-7557 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80148548 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Australia Data Collection - methods Health services Health Services Research Health technology assessment Humans Methodology Methods Nursing Methodology Research Qualitative research Quantitative research Research Design Technological change |
title | Mixed Methods, Mixed Methodology Health Services Research in Practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A45%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mixed%20Methods,%20Mixed%20Methodology%20Health%20Services%20Research%20in%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Qualitative%20health%20research&rft.au=Johnstone,%20P.%20Lynne&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=259-271&rft.issn=1049-7323&rft.eissn=1552-7557&rft.coden=QHREEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1049732303260610&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80148548%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220262320&rft_id=info:pmid/14768461&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1049732303260610&rfr_iscdi=true |