Different Endoscopic Surgical Strategies in the Management of Inverted Papilloma of the Sinonasal Tract: Experience with 47 Patients

Objective: To demonstrate the potentials and limitations of three different endoscopic procedures employed for treatment of inverted papilloma (IP) of the sinonasal tract. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients treated at two University hospitals. Methods: From January 1992 to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2004-02, Vol.114 (2), p.193-200
Hauptverfasser: Tomenzoli, Davide, Castelnuovo, Paolo, Pagella, Fabio, Berlucchi, Marco, Pianta, Luca, Delù, Giovanni, Maroldi, Roberto, Nicolai, Piero
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 200
container_issue 2
container_start_page 193
container_title The Laryngoscope
container_volume 114
creator Tomenzoli, Davide
Castelnuovo, Paolo
Pagella, Fabio
Berlucchi, Marco
Pianta, Luca
Delù, Giovanni
Maroldi, Roberto
Nicolai, Piero
description Objective: To demonstrate the potentials and limitations of three different endoscopic procedures employed for treatment of inverted papilloma (IP) of the sinonasal tract. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients treated at two University hospitals. Methods: From January 1992 to June 2000, 47 patients with IP underwent endoscopic resection. Preoperative workup included multiple biopsies of the lesion and imaging evaluation by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Massive skull base erosion, intradural or intraorbital extension, extensive involvement of the frontal sinus, abundant scar tissue caused by previous surgery, or the concomitant presence of squamous cell carcinoma were considered absolute contraindications for a purely endoscopic approach. Three types of resection were used: ethmoidectomy with wide antrostomy and sphenoidotomy (type 1) for IPs confined to the middle meatus, medial maxillectomy with ethmoidectomy and sphenoidotomy (type 2) for IPs partially invading the maxillary sinus, and a Sturmann‐Canfield operation (type 3) for IPs involving the mucosa of the alveolar recess or of the anterolateral corner of the maxillary sinus. All patients were followed by periodic endoscopic evaluations. Results: Type 1, 2, and 3 resections were performed in 26, 15, and 6 patients, respectively. No recurrences were observed after a mean follow‐up of 55 (range 30–132) months. One patient, who underwent a type 2 resection, developed a stenosis of the lacrimal pathways requiring endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Conclusions: Our experience confirms that endoscopic surgery is an effective and safe method of treatment for most IPs. The availability of different endoscopic techniques allows the entity of the dissection to be modulated in relation to the extent of disease. Strict application of selection criteria, meticulous use of subperiosteal dissection in the involved areas, and regular follow‐up evaluation are key elements for success.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00005537-200402000-00003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80144601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80144601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4403-66195eca7aa7c00a2dc875544d3250f021cbfa11736878e52bed515544d2947a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEokPhFZA3sAtcx3acsKs6Q1tpgMIUASvL49xMDYmT2h7a7nlwnM7QbvHClo6-c3x_soxQeEOhlm8hHSGYzAsADumCfJLYo2xGBaM5r2vxOJsBFCyvRPH9IHsWwk8AKpmAp9kB5VIIWlWz7M_cti16dJEsXDMEM4zWkNXWb6zRHVlFryNuLAZiHYmXSD5opzfYT4ahJWfuN_qIDTnXo-26odeTOnEr6wanQ8q48NrEd2RxM6K36AySaxsvCZfJFJMQw_PsSau7gC_272H29f3i4vg0X346OTs-WuaGc2B5WdJaoNFSa2kAdNGYKvXBecMKAS0U1KxbTVOTZSUrFMUaG0HvgKLmUrPD7PUud_TD1RZDVL0NBrtOOxy2QVVAOS-BJrDagcYPIXhs1ehtr_2toqCmDah_G1D3G7iTWLK-3P-xXffYPBj3I0_Aqz2gQxpx67UzNjxwgosaWJ24-Y67th3e_ncBann05UfqmdJJnerJdzE2RLy5j9H-lyolk0J9-3iiTj-vzotSzBVnfwHUFa-t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80144601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different Endoscopic Surgical Strategies in the Management of Inverted Papilloma of the Sinonasal Tract: Experience with 47 Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Tomenzoli, Davide ; Castelnuovo, Paolo ; Pagella, Fabio ; Berlucchi, Marco ; Pianta, Luca ; Delù, Giovanni ; Maroldi, Roberto ; Nicolai, Piero</creator><creatorcontrib>Tomenzoli, Davide ; Castelnuovo, Paolo ; Pagella, Fabio ; Berlucchi, Marco ; Pianta, Luca ; Delù, Giovanni ; Maroldi, Roberto ; Nicolai, Piero</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To demonstrate the potentials and limitations of three different endoscopic procedures employed for treatment of inverted papilloma (IP) of the sinonasal tract. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients treated at two University hospitals. Methods: From January 1992 to June 2000, 47 patients with IP underwent endoscopic resection. Preoperative workup included multiple biopsies of the lesion and imaging evaluation by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Massive skull base erosion, intradural or intraorbital extension, extensive involvement of the frontal sinus, abundant scar tissue caused by previous surgery, or the concomitant presence of squamous cell carcinoma were considered absolute contraindications for a purely endoscopic approach. Three types of resection were used: ethmoidectomy with wide antrostomy and sphenoidotomy (type 1) for IPs confined to the middle meatus, medial maxillectomy with ethmoidectomy and sphenoidotomy (type 2) for IPs partially invading the maxillary sinus, and a Sturmann‐Canfield operation (type 3) for IPs involving the mucosa of the alveolar recess or of the anterolateral corner of the maxillary sinus. All patients were followed by periodic endoscopic evaluations. Results: Type 1, 2, and 3 resections were performed in 26, 15, and 6 patients, respectively. No recurrences were observed after a mean follow‐up of 55 (range 30–132) months. One patient, who underwent a type 2 resection, developed a stenosis of the lacrimal pathways requiring endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Conclusions: Our experience confirms that endoscopic surgery is an effective and safe method of treatment for most IPs. The availability of different endoscopic techniques allows the entity of the dissection to be modulated in relation to the extent of disease. Strict application of selection criteria, meticulous use of subperiosteal dissection in the involved areas, and regular follow‐up evaluation are key elements for success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200402000-00003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14755188</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LARYA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; endoscopic sinus surgery ; Endoscopy ; Ethmoid Sinus - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Inverted papilloma ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Maxillary Sinus - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nose - surgery ; nose and paranasal sinuses ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Papilloma, Inverted - surgery ; Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - surgery ; Sphenoid Sinus - surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2004-02, Vol.114 (2), p.193-200</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 The Triological Society</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4403-66195eca7aa7c00a2dc875544d3250f021cbfa11736878e52bed515544d2947a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4403-66195eca7aa7c00a2dc875544d3250f021cbfa11736878e52bed515544d2947a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1097%2F00005537-200402000-00003$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1097%2F00005537-200402000-00003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15459039$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14755188$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tomenzoli, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelnuovo, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagella, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berlucchi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pianta, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delù, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maroldi, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolai, Piero</creatorcontrib><title>Different Endoscopic Surgical Strategies in the Management of Inverted Papilloma of the Sinonasal Tract: Experience with 47 Patients</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objective: To demonstrate the potentials and limitations of three different endoscopic procedures employed for treatment of inverted papilloma (IP) of the sinonasal tract. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients treated at two University hospitals. Methods: From January 1992 to June 2000, 47 patients with IP underwent endoscopic resection. Preoperative workup included multiple biopsies of the lesion and imaging evaluation by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Massive skull base erosion, intradural or intraorbital extension, extensive involvement of the frontal sinus, abundant scar tissue caused by previous surgery, or the concomitant presence of squamous cell carcinoma were considered absolute contraindications for a purely endoscopic approach. Three types of resection were used: ethmoidectomy with wide antrostomy and sphenoidotomy (type 1) for IPs confined to the middle meatus, medial maxillectomy with ethmoidectomy and sphenoidotomy (type 2) for IPs partially invading the maxillary sinus, and a Sturmann‐Canfield operation (type 3) for IPs involving the mucosa of the alveolar recess or of the anterolateral corner of the maxillary sinus. All patients were followed by periodic endoscopic evaluations. Results: Type 1, 2, and 3 resections were performed in 26, 15, and 6 patients, respectively. No recurrences were observed after a mean follow‐up of 55 (range 30–132) months. One patient, who underwent a type 2 resection, developed a stenosis of the lacrimal pathways requiring endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Conclusions: Our experience confirms that endoscopic surgery is an effective and safe method of treatment for most IPs. The availability of different endoscopic techniques allows the entity of the dissection to be modulated in relation to the extent of disease. Strict application of selection criteria, meticulous use of subperiosteal dissection in the involved areas, and regular follow‐up evaluation are key elements for success.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>endoscopic sinus surgery</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Ethmoid Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inverted papilloma</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nose - surgery</subject><subject>nose and paranasal sinuses</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Papilloma, Inverted - surgery</subject><subject>Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Sphenoid Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEokPhFZA3sAtcx3acsKs6Q1tpgMIUASvL49xMDYmT2h7a7nlwnM7QbvHClo6-c3x_soxQeEOhlm8hHSGYzAsADumCfJLYo2xGBaM5r2vxOJsBFCyvRPH9IHsWwk8AKpmAp9kB5VIIWlWz7M_cti16dJEsXDMEM4zWkNXWb6zRHVlFryNuLAZiHYmXSD5opzfYT4ahJWfuN_qIDTnXo-26odeTOnEr6wanQ8q48NrEd2RxM6K36AySaxsvCZfJFJMQw_PsSau7gC_272H29f3i4vg0X346OTs-WuaGc2B5WdJaoNFSa2kAdNGYKvXBecMKAS0U1KxbTVOTZSUrFMUaG0HvgKLmUrPD7PUud_TD1RZDVL0NBrtOOxy2QVVAOS-BJrDagcYPIXhs1ehtr_2toqCmDah_G1D3G7iTWLK-3P-xXffYPBj3I0_Aqz2gQxpx67UzNjxwgosaWJ24-Y67th3e_ncBann05UfqmdJJnerJdzE2RLy5j9H-lyolk0J9-3iiTj-vzotSzBVnfwHUFa-t</recordid><startdate>200402</startdate><enddate>200402</enddate><creator>Tomenzoli, Davide</creator><creator>Castelnuovo, Paolo</creator><creator>Pagella, Fabio</creator><creator>Berlucchi, Marco</creator><creator>Pianta, Luca</creator><creator>Delù, Giovanni</creator><creator>Maroldi, Roberto</creator><creator>Nicolai, Piero</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200402</creationdate><title>Different Endoscopic Surgical Strategies in the Management of Inverted Papilloma of the Sinonasal Tract: Experience with 47 Patients</title><author>Tomenzoli, Davide ; Castelnuovo, Paolo ; Pagella, Fabio ; Berlucchi, Marco ; Pianta, Luca ; Delù, Giovanni ; Maroldi, Roberto ; Nicolai, Piero</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4403-66195eca7aa7c00a2dc875544d3250f021cbfa11736878e52bed515544d2947a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>endoscopic sinus surgery</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Ethmoid Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inverted papilloma</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nose - surgery</topic><topic>nose and paranasal sinuses</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Papilloma, Inverted - surgery</topic><topic>Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Sphenoid Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tomenzoli, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelnuovo, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagella, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berlucchi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pianta, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delù, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maroldi, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolai, Piero</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tomenzoli, Davide</au><au>Castelnuovo, Paolo</au><au>Pagella, Fabio</au><au>Berlucchi, Marco</au><au>Pianta, Luca</au><au>Delù, Giovanni</au><au>Maroldi, Roberto</au><au>Nicolai, Piero</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different Endoscopic Surgical Strategies in the Management of Inverted Papilloma of the Sinonasal Tract: Experience with 47 Patients</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2004-02</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>193-200</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><coden>LARYA8</coden><abstract>Objective: To demonstrate the potentials and limitations of three different endoscopic procedures employed for treatment of inverted papilloma (IP) of the sinonasal tract. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients treated at two University hospitals. Methods: From January 1992 to June 2000, 47 patients with IP underwent endoscopic resection. Preoperative workup included multiple biopsies of the lesion and imaging evaluation by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Massive skull base erosion, intradural or intraorbital extension, extensive involvement of the frontal sinus, abundant scar tissue caused by previous surgery, or the concomitant presence of squamous cell carcinoma were considered absolute contraindications for a purely endoscopic approach. Three types of resection were used: ethmoidectomy with wide antrostomy and sphenoidotomy (type 1) for IPs confined to the middle meatus, medial maxillectomy with ethmoidectomy and sphenoidotomy (type 2) for IPs partially invading the maxillary sinus, and a Sturmann‐Canfield operation (type 3) for IPs involving the mucosa of the alveolar recess or of the anterolateral corner of the maxillary sinus. All patients were followed by periodic endoscopic evaluations. Results: Type 1, 2, and 3 resections were performed in 26, 15, and 6 patients, respectively. No recurrences were observed after a mean follow‐up of 55 (range 30–132) months. One patient, who underwent a type 2 resection, developed a stenosis of the lacrimal pathways requiring endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Conclusions: Our experience confirms that endoscopic surgery is an effective and safe method of treatment for most IPs. The availability of different endoscopic techniques allows the entity of the dissection to be modulated in relation to the extent of disease. Strict application of selection criteria, meticulous use of subperiosteal dissection in the involved areas, and regular follow‐up evaluation are key elements for success.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>14755188</pmid><doi>10.1097/00005537-200402000-00003</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-852X
ispartof The Laryngoscope, 2004-02, Vol.114 (2), p.193-200
issn 0023-852X
1531-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80144601
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
endoscopic sinus surgery
Endoscopy
Ethmoid Sinus - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Inverted papilloma
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Maxillary Sinus - surgery
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nose - surgery
nose and paranasal sinuses
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Papilloma, Inverted - surgery
Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - surgery
Sphenoid Sinus - surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Different Endoscopic Surgical Strategies in the Management of Inverted Papilloma of the Sinonasal Tract: Experience with 47 Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T15%3A59%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20Endoscopic%20Surgical%20Strategies%20in%20the%20Management%20of%20Inverted%20Papilloma%20of%20the%20Sinonasal%20Tract:%20Experience%20with%2047%20Patients&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Tomenzoli,%20Davide&rft.date=2004-02&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=193-200&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft.coden=LARYA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00005537-200402000-00003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80144601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80144601&rft_id=info:pmid/14755188&rfr_iscdi=true