Category Number Impacts Rule-Based but Not Information-Integration Category Learning: Further Evidence for Dissociable Category-Learning Systems
Category number effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning were investigated. Category number affected accuracy and the distribution of best-fitting models in the rule-based task but had no effect on accuracy and little effect on the distribution of best-fitting models in th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2004-01, Vol.30 (1), p.227-245 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 245 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 227 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Maddox, W. Todd Filoteo, J. Vincent Hejl, Kelli D Ing, A. David |
description | Category number effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning were investigated. Category number affected accuracy and the distribution of best-fitting models in the rule-based task but had no effect on accuracy and little effect on the distribution of best-fitting models in the information-integration task. In the 2 category conditions, rule-based learning was better than information-integration learning, whereas in the 4 category conditions, unidimensional and conjunctive rule-based learning was worse than information-integration learning. Rule-based strategies were used in the 2-category/rule-based condition, but about half of the observers used rule-based strategies in the 4-category unidimensional and conjunctive rule-based conditions. Information-integration strategies were used in the 4-category/information-integration condition and by the end of training were used in the 2-category/information-integration condition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.227 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80118912</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ689139</ericid><sourcerecordid>614443873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-5fa083c318cb65f044612381221846d9f32c3b47d78d4fd104b47be2b32e8d0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9LwzAQx4MoOqf_gIgUUd86k1zWpo86pk7GBJnPIU2TUekvkxbcf2_qxgY-mJfk7j7fL5c7hC4IHhEM8T2mMQ9jSGAEPjOiND5AA5JAEhLKx4dosANO0Klzn7g_wI_RCWExRICTAVpOZKtXtV0Hi65MtQ1mZSNV64L3rtDho3Q6C9KuDRZ1G8wqU9tStnldhbPKy-zvO9hZzLW0VV6tztCRkYXT59t7iD6epsvJSzh_e55NHuahZABtODYSc1BAuEqjscGMRYQCJ5QSzqIsMUAVpCzOYp4xkxHMfJBqmgLVPMMGhuhu49vY-qvTrhVl7pQuClnpunOCY0J44j2H6PoP-Fl3tvK9iYgwxoDH8B9ECYMo8aiH6AZStnbOaiMam5fSrgXBot-K6Icu-qEL8Bnht-JFV1vnLi11tpds1-CB2y0gnZKFsbJSudtzY0ZZxInnLjectrnalaevkf8l9DY3m7JspGjcWknb5qrQTnwX5b6dH6XkqAY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614443873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Category Number Impacts Rule-Based but Not Information-Integration Category Learning: Further Evidence for Dissociable Category-Learning Systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Maddox, W. Todd ; Filoteo, J. Vincent ; Hejl, Kelli D ; Ing, A. David</creator><creatorcontrib>Maddox, W. Todd ; Filoteo, J. Vincent ; Hejl, Kelli D ; Ing, A. David</creatorcontrib><description>Category number effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning were investigated. Category number affected accuracy and the distribution of best-fitting models in the rule-based task but had no effect on accuracy and little effect on the distribution of best-fitting models in the information-integration task. In the 2 category conditions, rule-based learning was better than information-integration learning, whereas in the 4 category conditions, unidimensional and conjunctive rule-based learning was worse than information-integration learning. Rule-based strategies were used in the 2-category/rule-based condition, but about half of the observers used rule-based strategies in the 4-category unidimensional and conjunctive rule-based conditions. Information-integration strategies were used in the 4-category/information-integration condition and by the end of training were used in the 2-category/information-integration condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.227</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14736309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Association ; Biological and medical sciences ; Classification ; Classification (Cognitive Process) ; Cognitive Processes ; Cognitive style ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning ; Learning Strategies ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Psychological Studies ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2004-01, Vol.30 (1), p.227-245</ispartof><rights>2004 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2004</rights><rights>2004, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-5fa083c318cb65f044612381221846d9f32c3b47d78d4fd104b47be2b32e8d0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-5fa083c318cb65f044612381221846d9f32c3b47d78d4fd104b47be2b32e8d0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27901,27902,27903</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ689139$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15424681$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14736309$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maddox, W. Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filoteo, J. Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hejl, Kelli D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ing, A. David</creatorcontrib><title>Category Number Impacts Rule-Based but Not Information-Integration Category Learning: Further Evidence for Dissociable Category-Learning Systems</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Category number effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning were investigated. Category number affected accuracy and the distribution of best-fitting models in the rule-based task but had no effect on accuracy and little effect on the distribution of best-fitting models in the information-integration task. In the 2 category conditions, rule-based learning was better than information-integration learning, whereas in the 4 category conditions, unidimensional and conjunctive rule-based learning was worse than information-integration learning. Rule-based strategies were used in the 2-category/rule-based condition, but about half of the observers used rule-based strategies in the 4-category unidimensional and conjunctive rule-based conditions. Information-integration strategies were used in the 4-category/information-integration condition and by the end of training were used in the 2-category/information-integration condition.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Association</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classification (Cognitive Process)</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Psychological Studies</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9LwzAQx4MoOqf_gIgUUd86k1zWpo86pk7GBJnPIU2TUekvkxbcf2_qxgY-mJfk7j7fL5c7hC4IHhEM8T2mMQ9jSGAEPjOiND5AA5JAEhLKx4dosANO0Klzn7g_wI_RCWExRICTAVpOZKtXtV0Hi65MtQ1mZSNV64L3rtDho3Q6C9KuDRZ1G8wqU9tStnldhbPKy-zvO9hZzLW0VV6tztCRkYXT59t7iD6epsvJSzh_e55NHuahZABtODYSc1BAuEqjscGMRYQCJ5QSzqIsMUAVpCzOYp4xkxHMfJBqmgLVPMMGhuhu49vY-qvTrhVl7pQuClnpunOCY0J44j2H6PoP-Fl3tvK9iYgwxoDH8B9ECYMo8aiH6AZStnbOaiMam5fSrgXBot-K6Icu-qEL8Bnht-JFV1vnLi11tpds1-CB2y0gnZKFsbJSudtzY0ZZxInnLjectrnalaevkf8l9DY3m7JspGjcWknb5qrQTnwX5b6dH6XkqAY</recordid><startdate>200401</startdate><enddate>200401</enddate><creator>Maddox, W. Todd</creator><creator>Filoteo, J. Vincent</creator><creator>Hejl, Kelli D</creator><creator>Ing, A. David</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200401</creationdate><title>Category Number Impacts Rule-Based but Not Information-Integration Category Learning</title><author>Maddox, W. Todd ; Filoteo, J. Vincent ; Hejl, Kelli D ; Ing, A. David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-5fa083c318cb65f044612381221846d9f32c3b47d78d4fd104b47be2b32e8d0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Association</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classification (Cognitive Process)</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Psychological Studies</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maddox, W. Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filoteo, J. Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hejl, Kelli D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ing, A. David</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maddox, W. Todd</au><au>Filoteo, J. Vincent</au><au>Hejl, Kelli D</au><au>Ing, A. David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ689139</ericid><atitle>Category Number Impacts Rule-Based but Not Information-Integration Category Learning: Further Evidence for Dissociable Category-Learning Systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2004-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>245</epage><pages>227-245</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Category number effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning were investigated. Category number affected accuracy and the distribution of best-fitting models in the rule-based task but had no effect on accuracy and little effect on the distribution of best-fitting models in the information-integration task. In the 2 category conditions, rule-based learning was better than information-integration learning, whereas in the 4 category conditions, unidimensional and conjunctive rule-based learning was worse than information-integration learning. Rule-based strategies were used in the 2-category/rule-based condition, but about half of the observers used rule-based strategies in the 4-category unidimensional and conjunctive rule-based conditions. Information-integration strategies were used in the 4-category/information-integration condition and by the end of training were used in the 2-category/information-integration condition.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>14736309</pmid><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.227</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2004-01, Vol.30 (1), p.227-245 |
issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80118912 |
source | MEDLINE; Business Source Complete; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adult Association Biological and medical sciences Classification Classification (Cognitive Process) Cognitive Processes Cognitive style Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Learning Learning Strategies Learning. Memory Male Psychological Studies Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology |
title | Category Number Impacts Rule-Based but Not Information-Integration Category Learning: Further Evidence for Dissociable Category-Learning Systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A11%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Category%20Number%20Impacts%20Rule-Based%20but%20Not%20Information-Integration%20Category%20Learning:%20Further%20Evidence%20for%20Dissociable%20Category-Learning%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Maddox,%20W.%20Todd&rft.date=2004-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=245&rft.pages=227-245&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.227&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614443873%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614443873&rft_id=info:pmid/14736309&rft_ericid=EJ689139&rfr_iscdi=true |