A Comparison of Vasopressin and Epinephrine for Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Epinephrine is recommended for use in the resuscitation of patients with cardiac arrest. In this clinical trial, vasopressin, as compared with epinephrine, improved the rates of survival to hospital admission and discharge, but only among patients with asystolic cardiac arrest. There was no advantag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2004-01, Vol.350 (2), p.105-113
Hauptverfasser: Wenzel, Volker, Krismer, Anette C, Arntz, H. Richard, Sitter, Helmut, Stadlbauer, Karl H, Lindner, Karl H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113
container_issue 2
container_start_page 105
container_title The New England journal of medicine
container_volume 350
creator Wenzel, Volker
Krismer, Anette C
Arntz, H. Richard
Sitter, Helmut
Stadlbauer, Karl H
Lindner, Karl H
description Epinephrine is recommended for use in the resuscitation of patients with cardiac arrest. In this clinical trial, vasopressin, as compared with epinephrine, improved the rates of survival to hospital admission and discharge, but only among patients with asystolic cardiac arrest. There was no advantage to vasopressin therapy in patients with ventricular fibrillation or pulseless electrical activity. As compared with epinephrine, improved the rates of survival to hospital admission. There are more than 600,000 sudden deaths in North America and Europe each year. More than half of these deaths occur before 65 years of age, which underscores the need for optimal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) strategies in order to improve patients' chances of survival. Epinephrine has been used during CPR for more than 100 years 1 but has become controversial because it is associated with increased myocardial oxygen consumption, ventricular arrhythmias, and myocardial dysfunction during the period after resuscitation. 2 Since it was found that endogenous vasopressin levels in successfully resuscitated patients were significantly higher than levels in patients who died, it . . .
doi_str_mv 10.1056/NEJMoa025431
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80087481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>523456001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-f5b3be0a9141ea29a3ae2139cd888acaa2ec2bc94e668477699db6347f6603533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0Etr3DAUBWBRUprJtLusgwhJV3UjWbJsLYdh8iJpILTdFXMty0SDLTm69qL_PiozkBKihbTQx5XOIeSYs--cFerix-b2PgDLCyn4B7LghRCZlEwdkAVjeZXJUotDcoS4ZWlxqT-RQy5LzjXTC_JnRddhGCE6DJ6Gjv4GDGO0iM5T8C3djM7b8SmmnXYh0od5ykKXXQcc3QQ9XUNsXRjnfgge4l_6aHFGk64mF_xn8rGDHu2X_bkkvy43P9fX2d3D1c16dZeZQskp64pGNJaB5pJbyDUIsDkX2rRVVYEByK3JG6OlVaqSZam0bhslZNkpxUQKvCRfd3PHGJ5ni1M9ODS278HbMGNdMVaVsuIJnr6B2zBHn_5W57nQslRKJ_Rth0wMiNF29RjdkMLVnNX_Oq__7zzxk_3MuRls-4r3JSdwvgeABvougjcOX10hE0oxluRs54YBa2-3w_vvvQBqLZSW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223947669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Vasopressin and Epinephrine for Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Wenzel, Volker ; Krismer, Anette C ; Arntz, H. Richard ; Sitter, Helmut ; Stadlbauer, Karl H ; Lindner, Karl H</creator><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Volker ; Krismer, Anette C ; Arntz, H. Richard ; Sitter, Helmut ; Stadlbauer, Karl H ; Lindner, Karl H ; European Resuscitation Council Vasopressor during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Epinephrine is recommended for use in the resuscitation of patients with cardiac arrest. In this clinical trial, vasopressin, as compared with epinephrine, improved the rates of survival to hospital admission and discharge, but only among patients with asystolic cardiac arrest. There was no advantage to vasopressin therapy in patients with ventricular fibrillation or pulseless electrical activity. As compared with epinephrine, improved the rates of survival to hospital admission. There are more than 600,000 sudden deaths in North America and Europe each year. More than half of these deaths occur before 65 years of age, which underscores the need for optimal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) strategies in order to improve patients' chances of survival. Epinephrine has been used during CPR for more than 100 years 1 but has become controversial because it is associated with increased myocardial oxygen consumption, ventricular arrhythmias, and myocardial dysfunction during the period after resuscitation. 2 Since it was found that endogenous vasopressin levels in successfully resuscitated patients were significantly higher than levels in patients who died, it . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa025431</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14711909</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEJMAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Clinical trials ; CPR ; Drug therapy ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Drugs ; Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care ; Emergency Medical Services ; Epinephrine - therapeutic use ; Female ; Heart Arrest - drug therapy ; Heart Arrest - mortality ; Heart attacks ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Male ; Medical procedures ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Survival Rate ; Sympathomimetics - therapeutic use ; Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use ; Vasopressins - therapeutic use ; Ventricular Fibrillation - drug therapy</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 2004-01, Vol.350 (2), p.105-113</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-f5b3be0a9141ea29a3ae2139cd888acaa2ec2bc94e668477699db6347f6603533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-f5b3be0a9141ea29a3ae2139cd888acaa2ec2bc94e668477699db6347f6603533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa025431$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa025431$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2746,2747,26080,27901,27902,52357,54039</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15409335$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14711909$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krismer, Anette C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arntz, H. Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitter, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadlbauer, Karl H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindner, Karl H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>European Resuscitation Council Vasopressor during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Vasopressin and Epinephrine for Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>Epinephrine is recommended for use in the resuscitation of patients with cardiac arrest. In this clinical trial, vasopressin, as compared with epinephrine, improved the rates of survival to hospital admission and discharge, but only among patients with asystolic cardiac arrest. There was no advantage to vasopressin therapy in patients with ventricular fibrillation or pulseless electrical activity. As compared with epinephrine, improved the rates of survival to hospital admission. There are more than 600,000 sudden deaths in North America and Europe each year. More than half of these deaths occur before 65 years of age, which underscores the need for optimal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) strategies in order to improve patients' chances of survival. Epinephrine has been used during CPR for more than 100 years 1 but has become controversial because it is associated with increased myocardial oxygen consumption, ventricular arrhythmias, and myocardial dysfunction during the period after resuscitation. 2 Since it was found that endogenous vasopressin levels in successfully resuscitated patients were significantly higher than levels in patients who died, it . . .</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>CPR</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services</subject><subject>Epinephrine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - drug therapy</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - mortality</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical procedures</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Sympathomimetics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Vasopressins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - drug therapy</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0Etr3DAUBWBRUprJtLusgwhJV3UjWbJsLYdh8iJpILTdFXMty0SDLTm69qL_PiozkBKihbTQx5XOIeSYs--cFerix-b2PgDLCyn4B7LghRCZlEwdkAVjeZXJUotDcoS4ZWlxqT-RQy5LzjXTC_JnRddhGCE6DJ6Gjv4GDGO0iM5T8C3djM7b8SmmnXYh0od5ykKXXQcc3QQ9XUNsXRjnfgge4l_6aHFGk64mF_xn8rGDHu2X_bkkvy43P9fX2d3D1c16dZeZQskp64pGNJaB5pJbyDUIsDkX2rRVVYEByK3JG6OlVaqSZam0bhslZNkpxUQKvCRfd3PHGJ5ni1M9ODS278HbMGNdMVaVsuIJnr6B2zBHn_5W57nQslRKJ_Rth0wMiNF29RjdkMLVnNX_Oq__7zzxk_3MuRls-4r3JSdwvgeABvougjcOX10hE0oxluRs54YBa2-3w_vvvQBqLZSW</recordid><startdate>20040108</startdate><enddate>20040108</enddate><creator>Wenzel, Volker</creator><creator>Krismer, Anette C</creator><creator>Arntz, H. Richard</creator><creator>Sitter, Helmut</creator><creator>Stadlbauer, Karl H</creator><creator>Lindner, Karl H</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040108</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Vasopressin and Epinephrine for Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</title><author>Wenzel, Volker ; Krismer, Anette C ; Arntz, H. Richard ; Sitter, Helmut ; Stadlbauer, Karl H ; Lindner, Karl H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-f5b3be0a9141ea29a3ae2139cd888acaa2ec2bc94e668477699db6347f6603533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>CPR</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services</topic><topic>Epinephrine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - drug therapy</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - mortality</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical procedures</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Sympathomimetics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Vasopressins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - drug therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krismer, Anette C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arntz, H. Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitter, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadlbauer, Karl H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindner, Karl H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>European Resuscitation Council Vasopressor during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wenzel, Volker</au><au>Krismer, Anette C</au><au>Arntz, H. Richard</au><au>Sitter, Helmut</au><au>Stadlbauer, Karl H</au><au>Lindner, Karl H</au><aucorp>European Resuscitation Council Vasopressor during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Vasopressin and Epinephrine for Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>2004-01-08</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>350</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>105-113</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><coden>NEJMAG</coden><abstract>Epinephrine is recommended for use in the resuscitation of patients with cardiac arrest. In this clinical trial, vasopressin, as compared with epinephrine, improved the rates of survival to hospital admission and discharge, but only among patients with asystolic cardiac arrest. There was no advantage to vasopressin therapy in patients with ventricular fibrillation or pulseless electrical activity. As compared with epinephrine, improved the rates of survival to hospital admission. There are more than 600,000 sudden deaths in North America and Europe each year. More than half of these deaths occur before 65 years of age, which underscores the need for optimal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) strategies in order to improve patients' chances of survival. Epinephrine has been used during CPR for more than 100 years 1 but has become controversial because it is associated with increased myocardial oxygen consumption, ventricular arrhythmias, and myocardial dysfunction during the period after resuscitation. 2 Since it was found that endogenous vasopressin levels in successfully resuscitated patients were significantly higher than levels in patients who died, it . . .</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>14711909</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJMoa025431</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-4793
ispartof The New England journal of medicine, 2004-01, Vol.350 (2), p.105-113
issn 0028-4793
1533-4406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80087481
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; New England Journal of Medicine
subjects Aged
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Clinical trials
CPR
Drug therapy
Drug Therapy, Combination
Drugs
Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care
Emergency Medical Services
Epinephrine - therapeutic use
Female
Heart Arrest - drug therapy
Heart Arrest - mortality
Heart attacks
Hospitalization
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Male
Medical procedures
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Survival Rate
Sympathomimetics - therapeutic use
Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use
Vasopressins - therapeutic use
Ventricular Fibrillation - drug therapy
title A Comparison of Vasopressin and Epinephrine for Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T18%3A25%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Vasopressin%20and%20Epinephrine%20for%20Out-of-Hospital%20Cardiopulmonary%20Resuscitation&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Wenzel,%20Volker&rft.aucorp=European%20Resuscitation%20Council%20Vasopressor%20during%20Cardiopulmonary%20Resuscitation%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2004-01-08&rft.volume=350&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=105-113&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft.coden=NEJMAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJMoa025431&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E523456001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223947669&rft_id=info:pmid/14711909&rfr_iscdi=true