Impact of Hospital Procedure Volume on Surgical Operation and Long-Term Outcomes in High-Risk Curatively Resected Rectal Cancer: Findings From the Intergroup 0114 Study

Prior studies have demonstrated superior outcomes after a curative surgical resection of rectal cancer at hospitals where the volume of such surgeries is high. However, because these studies often lack detailed information on tumor and treatment characteristics as well as cancer recurrence, the true...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2004-01, Vol.22 (1), p.166-174
Hauptverfasser: MEYERHARDT, Jeffrey A, TEPPER, Joel E, MACDONALD, John S, BENSON, Al B, FUCHS, Charles S, NIEDZWIECKI, Donna, HOLLIS, Donna R, SCHRAG, Deborah, AYANIAN, John Z, O'CONNELL, Michael J, WEEKS, Jane C, MAYER, Robert J, WILLETT, Christopher G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 174
container_issue 1
container_start_page 166
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 22
creator MEYERHARDT, Jeffrey A
TEPPER, Joel E
MACDONALD, John S
BENSON, Al B
FUCHS, Charles S
NIEDZWIECKI, Donna
HOLLIS, Donna R
SCHRAG, Deborah
AYANIAN, John Z
O'CONNELL, Michael J
WEEKS, Jane C
MAYER, Robert J
WILLETT, Christopher G
description Prior studies have demonstrated superior outcomes after a curative surgical resection of rectal cancer at hospitals where the volume of such surgeries is high. However, because these studies often lack detailed information on tumor and treatment characteristics as well as cancer recurrence, the true nature of this relation remains uncertain. We studied a nested cohort of 1,330 patients with stage II and stage III rectal cancer participating in a multicenter, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy trial. We analyzed differences in rates of sphincter-preserving operations, overall survival, and cancer recurrence by hospital surgical volume. We observed a significant difference in the rates of abdominoperineal resections across tertiles of hospital procedure volume (46.3% for patients resected at low-volume, 41.3% at medium-volume, and 31.8% at high-volume hospitals; P
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.172
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80082384</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80082384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-d4e61ba52856c9ce76f94a1b235042cf10b2c547af9f716966e5b65e002560d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkU-P0zAQxS0EYrsLZ27IF7ilazv-k3BDEaVFlYp2F8TNcpxJ6yWJg52A-o32Y-JqK1UaaUb2b95I7yH0jpIlZYTcfqt2y9T5MhVV7AVaUMFUppQQL9GCqJxltMh_XaHrGB8JobzIxWt0RbkiVKlygZ42_WjshH2L1z6ObjId_h68hWYOgH_6bu4B-wHfz2HvbPrcjRDM5NKTGRq89cM-e4DQ4908Wd9DxG7Aa7c_ZHcu_sbVfIL_QnfEdxDBTtCkwZ6uVGawED7hlRsaN-wjXgXf4-kAeDNMEPbBzyMmlHJ8P83N8Q161Zouwttzv0E_Vl8eqnW23X3dVJ-3mc1LPmUNB0lrI1ghpC0tKNmW3NCa5YJwZltKamYFV6YtW0VlKSWIWgoghAlJGpXfoI_PumPwf2aIk-5dtNB1ZgA_R10QUrC84Am8fQZt8DEGaPUYXG_CUVOiT-HoFI4-haNTpXDSxvuz9Fz30Fz4cxoJ-HAGTExetyFZ5OKFk0QVVJELd0hG_3MBdOxN1yVZph-tZ0zTBMv8PwVypMI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80082384</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Hospital Procedure Volume on Surgical Operation and Long-Term Outcomes in High-Risk Curatively Resected Rectal Cancer: Findings From the Intergroup 0114 Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>MEYERHARDT, Jeffrey A ; TEPPER, Joel E ; MACDONALD, John S ; BENSON, Al B ; FUCHS, Charles S ; NIEDZWIECKI, Donna ; HOLLIS, Donna R ; SCHRAG, Deborah ; AYANIAN, John Z ; O'CONNELL, Michael J ; WEEKS, Jane C ; MAYER, Robert J ; WILLETT, Christopher G</creator><creatorcontrib>MEYERHARDT, Jeffrey A ; TEPPER, Joel E ; MACDONALD, John S ; BENSON, Al B ; FUCHS, Charles S ; NIEDZWIECKI, Donna ; HOLLIS, Donna R ; SCHRAG, Deborah ; AYANIAN, John Z ; O'CONNELL, Michael J ; WEEKS, Jane C ; MAYER, Robert J ; WILLETT, Christopher G</creatorcontrib><description>Prior studies have demonstrated superior outcomes after a curative surgical resection of rectal cancer at hospitals where the volume of such surgeries is high. However, because these studies often lack detailed information on tumor and treatment characteristics as well as cancer recurrence, the true nature of this relation remains uncertain. We studied a nested cohort of 1,330 patients with stage II and stage III rectal cancer participating in a multicenter, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy trial. We analyzed differences in rates of sphincter-preserving operations, overall survival, and cancer recurrence by hospital surgical volume. We observed a significant difference in the rates of abdominoperineal resections across tertiles of hospital procedure volume (46.3% for patients resected at low-volume, 41.3% at medium-volume, and 31.8% at high-volume hospitals; P &lt;.0001), even after adjustment for tumor distance from the anal verge. However, this higher rate of sphincter-sparing operations at high-volume centers was not accompanied by any increase in recurrence rates. Hospital surgical volume did not predict overall, disease-free, recurrence-free, or local recurrence-free survival. However, among patients who did not complete the planned adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (270 patients), those who underwent surgery at low-volume hospitals had a significant increase in cancer recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.01 to 3.72; P =.04 for the trend) and a nonsignificant trend toward increased overall mortality (P =.08) and local recurrence (P =.10). In contrast, no significant volume-outcome relation was noted among patients who did complete postoperative therapy. Using prospectively recorded data, we found that hospital surgical volume had no significant effect on rectal cancer recurrence or survival when patients completed standard adjuvant therapy. Sphincter-preserving surgery was more commonly performed at high-volume centers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.172</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14701779</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, MD: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anal Canal - surgery ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Cohort Studies ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - standards ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Hospitals - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Prospective Studies ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2004-01, Vol.22 (1), p.166-174</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-d4e61ba52856c9ce76f94a1b235042cf10b2c547af9f716966e5b65e002560d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-d4e61ba52856c9ce76f94a1b235042cf10b2c547af9f716966e5b65e002560d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3715,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16078170$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14701779$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MEYERHARDT, Jeffrey A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TEPPER, Joel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACDONALD, John S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BENSON, Al B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUCHS, Charles S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIEDZWIECKI, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLLIS, Donna R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHRAG, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AYANIAN, John Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'CONNELL, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEEKS, Jane C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAYER, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLETT, Christopher G</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Hospital Procedure Volume on Surgical Operation and Long-Term Outcomes in High-Risk Curatively Resected Rectal Cancer: Findings From the Intergroup 0114 Study</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Prior studies have demonstrated superior outcomes after a curative surgical resection of rectal cancer at hospitals where the volume of such surgeries is high. However, because these studies often lack detailed information on tumor and treatment characteristics as well as cancer recurrence, the true nature of this relation remains uncertain. We studied a nested cohort of 1,330 patients with stage II and stage III rectal cancer participating in a multicenter, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy trial. We analyzed differences in rates of sphincter-preserving operations, overall survival, and cancer recurrence by hospital surgical volume. We observed a significant difference in the rates of abdominoperineal resections across tertiles of hospital procedure volume (46.3% for patients resected at low-volume, 41.3% at medium-volume, and 31.8% at high-volume hospitals; P &lt;.0001), even after adjustment for tumor distance from the anal verge. However, this higher rate of sphincter-sparing operations at high-volume centers was not accompanied by any increase in recurrence rates. Hospital surgical volume did not predict overall, disease-free, recurrence-free, or local recurrence-free survival. However, among patients who did not complete the planned adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (270 patients), those who underwent surgery at low-volume hospitals had a significant increase in cancer recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.01 to 3.72; P =.04 for the trend) and a nonsignificant trend toward increased overall mortality (P =.08) and local recurrence (P =.10). In contrast, no significant volume-outcome relation was noted among patients who did complete postoperative therapy. Using prospectively recorded data, we found that hospital surgical volume had no significant effect on rectal cancer recurrence or survival when patients completed standard adjuvant therapy. Sphincter-preserving surgery was more commonly performed at high-volume centers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anal Canal - surgery</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Hospitals - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkU-P0zAQxS0EYrsLZ27IF7ilazv-k3BDEaVFlYp2F8TNcpxJ6yWJg52A-o32Y-JqK1UaaUb2b95I7yH0jpIlZYTcfqt2y9T5MhVV7AVaUMFUppQQL9GCqJxltMh_XaHrGB8JobzIxWt0RbkiVKlygZ42_WjshH2L1z6ObjId_h68hWYOgH_6bu4B-wHfz2HvbPrcjRDM5NKTGRq89cM-e4DQ4908Wd9DxG7Aa7c_ZHcu_sbVfIL_QnfEdxDBTtCkwZ6uVGawED7hlRsaN-wjXgXf4-kAeDNMEPbBzyMmlHJ8P83N8Q161Zouwttzv0E_Vl8eqnW23X3dVJ-3mc1LPmUNB0lrI1ghpC0tKNmW3NCa5YJwZltKamYFV6YtW0VlKSWIWgoghAlJGpXfoI_PumPwf2aIk-5dtNB1ZgA_R10QUrC84Am8fQZt8DEGaPUYXG_CUVOiT-HoFI4-haNTpXDSxvuz9Fz30Fz4cxoJ-HAGTExetyFZ5OKFk0QVVJELd0hG_3MBdOxN1yVZph-tZ0zTBMv8PwVypMI</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>MEYERHARDT, Jeffrey A</creator><creator>TEPPER, Joel E</creator><creator>MACDONALD, John S</creator><creator>BENSON, Al B</creator><creator>FUCHS, Charles S</creator><creator>NIEDZWIECKI, Donna</creator><creator>HOLLIS, Donna R</creator><creator>SCHRAG, Deborah</creator><creator>AYANIAN, John Z</creator><creator>O'CONNELL, Michael J</creator><creator>WEEKS, Jane C</creator><creator>MAYER, Robert J</creator><creator>WILLETT, Christopher G</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Impact of Hospital Procedure Volume on Surgical Operation and Long-Term Outcomes in High-Risk Curatively Resected Rectal Cancer: Findings From the Intergroup 0114 Study</title><author>MEYERHARDT, Jeffrey A ; TEPPER, Joel E ; MACDONALD, John S ; BENSON, Al B ; FUCHS, Charles S ; NIEDZWIECKI, Donna ; HOLLIS, Donna R ; SCHRAG, Deborah ; AYANIAN, John Z ; O'CONNELL, Michael J ; WEEKS, Jane C ; MAYER, Robert J ; WILLETT, Christopher G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-d4e61ba52856c9ce76f94a1b235042cf10b2c547af9f716966e5b65e002560d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anal Canal - surgery</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Hospitals - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MEYERHARDT, Jeffrey A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TEPPER, Joel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACDONALD, John S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BENSON, Al B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUCHS, Charles S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIEDZWIECKI, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLLIS, Donna R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHRAG, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AYANIAN, John Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'CONNELL, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEEKS, Jane C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAYER, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLETT, Christopher G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MEYERHARDT, Jeffrey A</au><au>TEPPER, Joel E</au><au>MACDONALD, John S</au><au>BENSON, Al B</au><au>FUCHS, Charles S</au><au>NIEDZWIECKI, Donna</au><au>HOLLIS, Donna R</au><au>SCHRAG, Deborah</au><au>AYANIAN, John Z</au><au>O'CONNELL, Michael J</au><au>WEEKS, Jane C</au><au>MAYER, Robert J</au><au>WILLETT, Christopher G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Hospital Procedure Volume on Surgical Operation and Long-Term Outcomes in High-Risk Curatively Resected Rectal Cancer: Findings From the Intergroup 0114 Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>166-174</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Prior studies have demonstrated superior outcomes after a curative surgical resection of rectal cancer at hospitals where the volume of such surgeries is high. However, because these studies often lack detailed information on tumor and treatment characteristics as well as cancer recurrence, the true nature of this relation remains uncertain. We studied a nested cohort of 1,330 patients with stage II and stage III rectal cancer participating in a multicenter, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy trial. We analyzed differences in rates of sphincter-preserving operations, overall survival, and cancer recurrence by hospital surgical volume. We observed a significant difference in the rates of abdominoperineal resections across tertiles of hospital procedure volume (46.3% for patients resected at low-volume, 41.3% at medium-volume, and 31.8% at high-volume hospitals; P &lt;.0001), even after adjustment for tumor distance from the anal verge. However, this higher rate of sphincter-sparing operations at high-volume centers was not accompanied by any increase in recurrence rates. Hospital surgical volume did not predict overall, disease-free, recurrence-free, or local recurrence-free survival. However, among patients who did not complete the planned adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (270 patients), those who underwent surgery at low-volume hospitals had a significant increase in cancer recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.01 to 3.72; P =.04 for the trend) and a nonsignificant trend toward increased overall mortality (P =.08) and local recurrence (P =.10). In contrast, no significant volume-outcome relation was noted among patients who did complete postoperative therapy. Using prospectively recorded data, we found that hospital surgical volume had no significant effect on rectal cancer recurrence or survival when patients completed standard adjuvant therapy. Sphincter-preserving surgery was more commonly performed at high-volume centers.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>14701779</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2004.04.172</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2004-01, Vol.22 (1), p.166-174
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80082384
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anal Canal - surgery
Biological and medical sciences
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Cohort Studies
Combined Modality Therapy
Digestive System Surgical Procedures - standards
Digestive System Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Hospitals - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Prospective Studies
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
title Impact of Hospital Procedure Volume on Surgical Operation and Long-Term Outcomes in High-Risk Curatively Resected Rectal Cancer: Findings From the Intergroup 0114 Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T21%3A11%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Hospital%20Procedure%20Volume%20on%20Surgical%20Operation%20and%20Long-Term%20Outcomes%20in%20High-Risk%20Curatively%20Resected%20Rectal%20Cancer:%20Findings%20From%20the%20Intergroup%200114%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=MEYERHARDT,%20Jeffrey%20A&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=166-174&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2004.04.172&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80082384%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80082384&rft_id=info:pmid/14701779&rfr_iscdi=true