Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm
Morphologic assessment of spermatozoa is an integral component in the analysis of semen. Whether a technician rapidly screening semen quality at a commercial stud, a veterinarian performing breeding soundness examinations, a clinician at a reference andrology laboratory providing auditing or diagnos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Theriogenology 2004-02, Vol.61 (4), p.691-703 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 703 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 691 |
container_title | Theriogenology |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Kuster, C.E Singer, R.S Althouse, G.C |
description | Morphologic assessment of spermatozoa is an integral component in the analysis of semen. Whether a technician rapidly screening semen quality at a commercial stud, a veterinarian performing breeding soundness examinations, a clinician at a reference andrology laboratory providing auditing or diagnostic services, or a researcher evaluating morphology as a part of a fertility study, it is important to make an informed decision regarding the number of spermatozoa to include in the morphology assessment. Application of basic statistical principles such as the nature of proportions, level of confidence in an observed value, and the interaction of sample size with precision, can and should be used in the decision process. This paper outlines in detail the application of these statistical principles in relation to the morphologic assessment of spermatozoa. Guidelines on how these principles can be utilized in practical situations are discussed. Additionally, methodologies for comparison of results within and between laboratories (an area easily prone to misinterpretation) are reviewed. It is hoped that through the use of these fundamental statistical principles, this paper will bring clarity and delineation to the science of quantifying the morphology of spermatozoa. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00240-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80075063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0093691X03002401</els_id><sourcerecordid>80075063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-55a78ee6e119b85ebd781377fa7b19449515af67c5127e9cfd79263a29e951ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1E1S5tfwKQE4JD2pk4tuMTqsqnVKmHUomb5XUmW6MkDp4sEv31ZLsrOHKawzzvO6NHiJcIFwioL-8ArCy1xe9vQb4DqGoo8ZlYYWNsKSuJz8XqL3IiXjD_AACpNR6LE6y1bUA1K3H1gWbKQxzjuCnYD1NPBcdHKrqUi_mBiiHl6SH1aROD7wvPTMwDjXORuoKnJXomjjrfM50f5qm4__Tx2_WX8ub289frq5syyEbNpVLeNESaEO26UbRuTYPSmM6bNdq6tgqV77QJCitDNnStsZWWvrK0rHwrT8Wbfe-U088t8eyGyIH63o-UtuwaAKNAywVUezDkxJypc1OOg8-_HYLbuXNP7txOjAPpntw5XHKvDge264Haf6mDrAV4vQc6n5zf5Mju_q4ClEudsbXanX6_J2gR8StSdhwijYHamCnMrk3xP0_8AYZgh4k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80075063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kuster, C.E ; Singer, R.S ; Althouse, G.C</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuster, C.E ; Singer, R.S ; Althouse, G.C</creatorcontrib><description>Morphologic assessment of spermatozoa is an integral component in the analysis of semen. Whether a technician rapidly screening semen quality at a commercial stud, a veterinarian performing breeding soundness examinations, a clinician at a reference andrology laboratory providing auditing or diagnostic services, or a researcher evaluating morphology as a part of a fertility study, it is important to make an informed decision regarding the number of spermatozoa to include in the morphology assessment. Application of basic statistical principles such as the nature of proportions, level of confidence in an observed value, and the interaction of sample size with precision, can and should be used in the decision process. This paper outlines in detail the application of these statistical principles in relation to the morphologic assessment of spermatozoa. Guidelines on how these principles can be utilized in practical situations are discussed. Additionally, methodologies for comparison of results within and between laboratories (an area easily prone to misinterpretation) are reviewed. It is hoped that through the use of these fundamental statistical principles, this paper will bring clarity and delineation to the science of quantifying the morphology of spermatozoa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-691X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00240-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14698058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Comparisons ; Confidence Intervals ; experimental design ; Laboratories ; Male ; Morphology ; Sample Size ; Semen - physiology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sperm Count ; Spermatozoa ; Spermatozoa - abnormalities ; Spermatozoa - cytology ; Statistics</subject><ispartof>Theriogenology, 2004-02, Vol.61 (4), p.691-703</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-55a78ee6e119b85ebd781377fa7b19449515af67c5127e9cfd79263a29e951ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-55a78ee6e119b85ebd781377fa7b19449515af67c5127e9cfd79263a29e951ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X03002401$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14698058$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuster, C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, R.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althouse, G.C</creatorcontrib><title>Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm</title><title>Theriogenology</title><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><description>Morphologic assessment of spermatozoa is an integral component in the analysis of semen. Whether a technician rapidly screening semen quality at a commercial stud, a veterinarian performing breeding soundness examinations, a clinician at a reference andrology laboratory providing auditing or diagnostic services, or a researcher evaluating morphology as a part of a fertility study, it is important to make an informed decision regarding the number of spermatozoa to include in the morphology assessment. Application of basic statistical principles such as the nature of proportions, level of confidence in an observed value, and the interaction of sample size with precision, can and should be used in the decision process. This paper outlines in detail the application of these statistical principles in relation to the morphologic assessment of spermatozoa. Guidelines on how these principles can be utilized in practical situations are discussed. Additionally, methodologies for comparison of results within and between laboratories (an area easily prone to misinterpretation) are reviewed. It is hoped that through the use of these fundamental statistical principles, this paper will bring clarity and delineation to the science of quantifying the morphology of spermatozoa.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Comparisons</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>experimental design</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Semen - physiology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sperm Count</subject><subject>Spermatozoa</subject><subject>Spermatozoa - abnormalities</subject><subject>Spermatozoa - cytology</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><issn>0093-691X</issn><issn>1879-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1E1S5tfwKQE4JD2pk4tuMTqsqnVKmHUomb5XUmW6MkDp4sEv31ZLsrOHKawzzvO6NHiJcIFwioL-8ArCy1xe9vQb4DqGoo8ZlYYWNsKSuJz8XqL3IiXjD_AACpNR6LE6y1bUA1K3H1gWbKQxzjuCnYD1NPBcdHKrqUi_mBiiHl6SH1aROD7wvPTMwDjXORuoKnJXomjjrfM50f5qm4__Tx2_WX8ub289frq5syyEbNpVLeNESaEO26UbRuTYPSmM6bNdq6tgqV77QJCitDNnStsZWWvrK0rHwrT8Wbfe-U088t8eyGyIH63o-UtuwaAKNAywVUezDkxJypc1OOg8-_HYLbuXNP7txOjAPpntw5XHKvDge264Haf6mDrAV4vQc6n5zf5Mju_q4ClEudsbXanX6_J2gR8StSdhwijYHamCnMrk3xP0_8AYZgh4k</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>Kuster, C.E</creator><creator>Singer, R.S</creator><creator>Althouse, G.C</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm</title><author>Kuster, C.E ; Singer, R.S ; Althouse, G.C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-55a78ee6e119b85ebd781377fa7b19449515af67c5127e9cfd79263a29e951ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Comparisons</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>experimental design</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Semen - physiology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sperm Count</topic><topic>Spermatozoa</topic><topic>Spermatozoa - abnormalities</topic><topic>Spermatozoa - cytology</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuster, C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, R.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althouse, G.C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuster, C.E</au><au>Singer, R.S</au><au>Althouse, G.C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm</atitle><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>703</epage><pages>691-703</pages><issn>0093-691X</issn><eissn>1879-3231</eissn><abstract>Morphologic assessment of spermatozoa is an integral component in the analysis of semen. Whether a technician rapidly screening semen quality at a commercial stud, a veterinarian performing breeding soundness examinations, a clinician at a reference andrology laboratory providing auditing or diagnostic services, or a researcher evaluating morphology as a part of a fertility study, it is important to make an informed decision regarding the number of spermatozoa to include in the morphology assessment. Application of basic statistical principles such as the nature of proportions, level of confidence in an observed value, and the interaction of sample size with precision, can and should be used in the decision process. This paper outlines in detail the application of these statistical principles in relation to the morphologic assessment of spermatozoa. Guidelines on how these principles can be utilized in practical situations are discussed. Additionally, methodologies for comparison of results within and between laboratories (an area easily prone to misinterpretation) are reviewed. It is hoped that through the use of these fundamental statistical principles, this paper will bring clarity and delineation to the science of quantifying the morphology of spermatozoa.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>14698058</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00240-1</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0093-691X |
ispartof | Theriogenology, 2004-02, Vol.61 (4), p.691-703 |
issn | 0093-691X 1879-3231 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80075063 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Animals Comparisons Confidence Intervals experimental design Laboratories Male Morphology Sample Size Semen - physiology Sensitivity and Specificity Sperm Count Spermatozoa Spermatozoa - abnormalities Spermatozoa - cytology Statistics |
title | Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T19%3A48%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20sample%20size%20for%20the%20morphological%20assessment%20of%20sperm&rft.jtitle=Theriogenology&rft.au=Kuster,%20C.E&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=703&rft.pages=691-703&rft.issn=0093-691X&rft.eissn=1879-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00240-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80075063%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80075063&rft_id=info:pmid/14698058&rft_els_id=S0093691X03002401&rfr_iscdi=true |