Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm

Morphologic assessment of spermatozoa is an integral component in the analysis of semen. Whether a technician rapidly screening semen quality at a commercial stud, a veterinarian performing breeding soundness examinations, a clinician at a reference andrology laboratory providing auditing or diagnos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Theriogenology 2004-02, Vol.61 (4), p.691-703
Hauptverfasser: Kuster, C.E, Singer, R.S, Althouse, G.C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 703
container_issue 4
container_start_page 691
container_title Theriogenology
container_volume 61
creator Kuster, C.E
Singer, R.S
Althouse, G.C
description Morphologic assessment of spermatozoa is an integral component in the analysis of semen. Whether a technician rapidly screening semen quality at a commercial stud, a veterinarian performing breeding soundness examinations, a clinician at a reference andrology laboratory providing auditing or diagnostic services, or a researcher evaluating morphology as a part of a fertility study, it is important to make an informed decision regarding the number of spermatozoa to include in the morphology assessment. Application of basic statistical principles such as the nature of proportions, level of confidence in an observed value, and the interaction of sample size with precision, can and should be used in the decision process. This paper outlines in detail the application of these statistical principles in relation to the morphologic assessment of spermatozoa. Guidelines on how these principles can be utilized in practical situations are discussed. Additionally, methodologies for comparison of results within and between laboratories (an area easily prone to misinterpretation) are reviewed. It is hoped that through the use of these fundamental statistical principles, this paper will bring clarity and delineation to the science of quantifying the morphology of spermatozoa.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00240-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80075063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0093691X03002401</els_id><sourcerecordid>80075063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-55a78ee6e119b85ebd781377fa7b19449515af67c5127e9cfd79263a29e951ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1E1S5tfwKQE4JD2pk4tuMTqsqnVKmHUomb5XUmW6MkDp4sEv31ZLsrOHKawzzvO6NHiJcIFwioL-8ArCy1xe9vQb4DqGoo8ZlYYWNsKSuJz8XqL3IiXjD_AACpNR6LE6y1bUA1K3H1gWbKQxzjuCnYD1NPBcdHKrqUi_mBiiHl6SH1aROD7wvPTMwDjXORuoKnJXomjjrfM50f5qm4__Tx2_WX8ub289frq5syyEbNpVLeNESaEO26UbRuTYPSmM6bNdq6tgqV77QJCitDNnStsZWWvrK0rHwrT8Wbfe-U088t8eyGyIH63o-UtuwaAKNAywVUezDkxJypc1OOg8-_HYLbuXNP7txOjAPpntw5XHKvDge264Haf6mDrAV4vQc6n5zf5Mju_q4ClEudsbXanX6_J2gR8StSdhwijYHamCnMrk3xP0_8AYZgh4k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80075063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kuster, C.E ; Singer, R.S ; Althouse, G.C</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuster, C.E ; Singer, R.S ; Althouse, G.C</creatorcontrib><description>Morphologic assessment of spermatozoa is an integral component in the analysis of semen. Whether a technician rapidly screening semen quality at a commercial stud, a veterinarian performing breeding soundness examinations, a clinician at a reference andrology laboratory providing auditing or diagnostic services, or a researcher evaluating morphology as a part of a fertility study, it is important to make an informed decision regarding the number of spermatozoa to include in the morphology assessment. Application of basic statistical principles such as the nature of proportions, level of confidence in an observed value, and the interaction of sample size with precision, can and should be used in the decision process. This paper outlines in detail the application of these statistical principles in relation to the morphologic assessment of spermatozoa. Guidelines on how these principles can be utilized in practical situations are discussed. Additionally, methodologies for comparison of results within and between laboratories (an area easily prone to misinterpretation) are reviewed. It is hoped that through the use of these fundamental statistical principles, this paper will bring clarity and delineation to the science of quantifying the morphology of spermatozoa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-691X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00240-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14698058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Comparisons ; Confidence Intervals ; experimental design ; Laboratories ; Male ; Morphology ; Sample Size ; Semen - physiology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sperm Count ; Spermatozoa ; Spermatozoa - abnormalities ; Spermatozoa - cytology ; Statistics</subject><ispartof>Theriogenology, 2004-02, Vol.61 (4), p.691-703</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-55a78ee6e119b85ebd781377fa7b19449515af67c5127e9cfd79263a29e951ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-55a78ee6e119b85ebd781377fa7b19449515af67c5127e9cfd79263a29e951ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X03002401$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14698058$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuster, C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, R.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althouse, G.C</creatorcontrib><title>Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm</title><title>Theriogenology</title><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><description>Morphologic assessment of spermatozoa is an integral component in the analysis of semen. Whether a technician rapidly screening semen quality at a commercial stud, a veterinarian performing breeding soundness examinations, a clinician at a reference andrology laboratory providing auditing or diagnostic services, or a researcher evaluating morphology as a part of a fertility study, it is important to make an informed decision regarding the number of spermatozoa to include in the morphology assessment. Application of basic statistical principles such as the nature of proportions, level of confidence in an observed value, and the interaction of sample size with precision, can and should be used in the decision process. This paper outlines in detail the application of these statistical principles in relation to the morphologic assessment of spermatozoa. Guidelines on how these principles can be utilized in practical situations are discussed. Additionally, methodologies for comparison of results within and between laboratories (an area easily prone to misinterpretation) are reviewed. It is hoped that through the use of these fundamental statistical principles, this paper will bring clarity and delineation to the science of quantifying the morphology of spermatozoa.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Comparisons</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>experimental design</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Semen - physiology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sperm Count</subject><subject>Spermatozoa</subject><subject>Spermatozoa - abnormalities</subject><subject>Spermatozoa - cytology</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><issn>0093-691X</issn><issn>1879-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1E1S5tfwKQE4JD2pk4tuMTqsqnVKmHUomb5XUmW6MkDp4sEv31ZLsrOHKawzzvO6NHiJcIFwioL-8ArCy1xe9vQb4DqGoo8ZlYYWNsKSuJz8XqL3IiXjD_AACpNR6LE6y1bUA1K3H1gWbKQxzjuCnYD1NPBcdHKrqUi_mBiiHl6SH1aROD7wvPTMwDjXORuoKnJXomjjrfM50f5qm4__Tx2_WX8ub289frq5syyEbNpVLeNESaEO26UbRuTYPSmM6bNdq6tgqV77QJCitDNnStsZWWvrK0rHwrT8Wbfe-U088t8eyGyIH63o-UtuwaAKNAywVUezDkxJypc1OOg8-_HYLbuXNP7txOjAPpntw5XHKvDge264Haf6mDrAV4vQc6n5zf5Mju_q4ClEudsbXanX6_J2gR8StSdhwijYHamCnMrk3xP0_8AYZgh4k</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>Kuster, C.E</creator><creator>Singer, R.S</creator><creator>Althouse, G.C</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm</title><author>Kuster, C.E ; Singer, R.S ; Althouse, G.C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-55a78ee6e119b85ebd781377fa7b19449515af67c5127e9cfd79263a29e951ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Comparisons</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>experimental design</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Semen - physiology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sperm Count</topic><topic>Spermatozoa</topic><topic>Spermatozoa - abnormalities</topic><topic>Spermatozoa - cytology</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuster, C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, R.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althouse, G.C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuster, C.E</au><au>Singer, R.S</au><au>Althouse, G.C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm</atitle><jtitle>Theriogenology</jtitle><addtitle>Theriogenology</addtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>703</epage><pages>691-703</pages><issn>0093-691X</issn><eissn>1879-3231</eissn><abstract>Morphologic assessment of spermatozoa is an integral component in the analysis of semen. Whether a technician rapidly screening semen quality at a commercial stud, a veterinarian performing breeding soundness examinations, a clinician at a reference andrology laboratory providing auditing or diagnostic services, or a researcher evaluating morphology as a part of a fertility study, it is important to make an informed decision regarding the number of spermatozoa to include in the morphology assessment. Application of basic statistical principles such as the nature of proportions, level of confidence in an observed value, and the interaction of sample size with precision, can and should be used in the decision process. This paper outlines in detail the application of these statistical principles in relation to the morphologic assessment of spermatozoa. Guidelines on how these principles can be utilized in practical situations are discussed. Additionally, methodologies for comparison of results within and between laboratories (an area easily prone to misinterpretation) are reviewed. It is hoped that through the use of these fundamental statistical principles, this paper will bring clarity and delineation to the science of quantifying the morphology of spermatozoa.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>14698058</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00240-1</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-691X
ispartof Theriogenology, 2004-02, Vol.61 (4), p.691-703
issn 0093-691X
1879-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80075063
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animals
Comparisons
Confidence Intervals
experimental design
Laboratories
Male
Morphology
Sample Size
Semen - physiology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sperm Count
Spermatozoa
Spermatozoa - abnormalities
Spermatozoa - cytology
Statistics
title Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T19%3A48%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20sample%20size%20for%20the%20morphological%20assessment%20of%20sperm&rft.jtitle=Theriogenology&rft.au=Kuster,%20C.E&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=703&rft.pages=691-703&rft.issn=0093-691X&rft.eissn=1879-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00240-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80075063%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80075063&rft_id=info:pmid/14698058&rft_els_id=S0093691X03002401&rfr_iscdi=true