Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals

The Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals (CASIG), a measure that assesses the treatment outcomes of individuals with serious and persistent mental illness, has previously shown adequate psychometric properties with an American sample. Since it assesses quite specific skills and needs,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Schizophrenia research 2004, Vol.66 (1), p.59-70
Hauptverfasser: Lecomte, Tania, Wallace, Charles J, Caron, Jean, Perreault, Michel, Lecomte, Jocelin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 70
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title Schizophrenia research
container_volume 66
creator Lecomte, Tania
Wallace, Charles J
Caron, Jean
Perreault, Michel
Lecomte, Jocelin
description The Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals (CASIG), a measure that assesses the treatment outcomes of individuals with serious and persistent mental illness, has previously shown adequate psychometric properties with an American sample. Since it assesses quite specific skills and needs, it is necessary to assess its cultural relevance and psychometric characteristics before using it in a different country. Hence, the purposes of this study were to (1) adapt CASIG to the culture of a Canadian setting and translate its items and directions into French, (2) determine the psychometric characteristics of the adapted English and French versions of CASIG, and (3) identify its latent constructs via an exploratory factor analysis. The CASIG self-report (CASIG-SR) measure was administered to 224 consumers living in the community, and the CASIG informant (CASIG-I) measure to 31 clinicians answering for 172 consumers. The participating consumers also completed the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-32 (BASIS-32), the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), and the Camberwell Assessment of Needs (CAN). The informants also completed the clinician version of the CAN. The CASIG-SR and the CASIG-I had adequate internal consistency, test–retest, and interrater reliabilities. Correlations of the consumers' and informants' results with the BASIS-32, SF-36, and CAN provided evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, as did contrasts between higher and lower functioning community consumers. The factor analysis also supports the construct validity of the assessment. The results confirm the psychometric adequacy of the adapted and translated CASIG in Canada.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00496-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80073490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0920996402004966</els_id><sourcerecordid>80073490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-791f1b03f889bb88b0f17b62aa3f1b66aa9372f819a942fe763c2b9832a9c3553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMoWquPoOxF0cPqJNnNbk4ixVah4EE9h2w20ch2t2ZSwbc3tUWPnmaYfDP5-Qg5oXBFgYrrJ5AMcilFcQHsEqCQIhc7ZETLiuesBLlLRr_IATlEfAcAWkK1Tw5oISTnJR-R-XQV4psN2afufKujH_pscFkaZZPO2z5mt4gWcbFu08NTDLZ_jW-YPfTRBosRM9232WzQHR6RPZeKPd7WMXmZ3j1P7vP54-xhcjvPTcHrmFeSOtoAd3Utm6auG3C0agTTmqe5EFpLXjFXU6llwZytBDeskTVnWhpelnxMzjd3l2H4WKUMauHR2K7TvR1WqGqAihcSElhuQBMGxGCdWga_0OFLUVBrjepHo1o7UsDUj0Yl0t7p9oNVs7Dt39bWWwLOtoBGozsXdG88_nFlIYtN0psNZ5OOT2-DQpOsGtv6YE1U7eD_ifINP9yOTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80073490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lecomte, Tania ; Wallace, Charles J ; Caron, Jean ; Perreault, Michel ; Lecomte, Jocelin</creator><creatorcontrib>Lecomte, Tania ; Wallace, Charles J ; Caron, Jean ; Perreault, Michel ; Lecomte, Jocelin</creatorcontrib><description>The Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals (CASIG), a measure that assesses the treatment outcomes of individuals with serious and persistent mental illness, has previously shown adequate psychometric properties with an American sample. Since it assesses quite specific skills and needs, it is necessary to assess its cultural relevance and psychometric characteristics before using it in a different country. Hence, the purposes of this study were to (1) adapt CASIG to the culture of a Canadian setting and translate its items and directions into French, (2) determine the psychometric characteristics of the adapted English and French versions of CASIG, and (3) identify its latent constructs via an exploratory factor analysis. The CASIG self-report (CASIG-SR) measure was administered to 224 consumers living in the community, and the CASIG informant (CASIG-I) measure to 31 clinicians answering for 172 consumers. The participating consumers also completed the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-32 (BASIS-32), the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), and the Camberwell Assessment of Needs (CAN). The informants also completed the clinician version of the CAN. The CASIG-SR and the CASIG-I had adequate internal consistency, test–retest, and interrater reliabilities. Correlations of the consumers' and informants' results with the BASIS-32, SF-36, and CAN provided evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, as did contrasts between higher and lower functioning community consumers. The factor analysis also supports the construct validity of the assessment. The results confirm the psychometric adequacy of the adapted and translated CASIG in Canada.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-9964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00496-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14693353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living - psychology ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Canada ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Female ; Functional assessment ; Goals ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Motivation ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patient Compliance - psychology ; Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Psychotic Disorders - rehabilitation ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Schizophrenia - epidemiology ; Schizophrenia - rehabilitation ; Serious mental illness ; Social Adjustment ; Techniques and methods ; Treatment planning</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia research, 2004, Vol.66 (1), p.59-70</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-791f1b03f889bb88b0f17b62aa3f1b66aa9372f819a942fe763c2b9832a9c3553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-791f1b03f889bb88b0f17b62aa3f1b66aa9372f819a942fe763c2b9832a9c3553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996402004966$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15494355$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14693353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lecomte, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Charles J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caron, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perreault, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecomte, Jocelin</creatorcontrib><title>Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals</title><title>Schizophrenia research</title><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><description>The Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals (CASIG), a measure that assesses the treatment outcomes of individuals with serious and persistent mental illness, has previously shown adequate psychometric properties with an American sample. Since it assesses quite specific skills and needs, it is necessary to assess its cultural relevance and psychometric characteristics before using it in a different country. Hence, the purposes of this study were to (1) adapt CASIG to the culture of a Canadian setting and translate its items and directions into French, (2) determine the psychometric characteristics of the adapted English and French versions of CASIG, and (3) identify its latent constructs via an exploratory factor analysis. The CASIG self-report (CASIG-SR) measure was administered to 224 consumers living in the community, and the CASIG informant (CASIG-I) measure to 31 clinicians answering for 172 consumers. The participating consumers also completed the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-32 (BASIS-32), the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), and the Camberwell Assessment of Needs (CAN). The informants also completed the clinician version of the CAN. The CASIG-SR and the CASIG-I had adequate internal consistency, test–retest, and interrater reliabilities. Correlations of the consumers' and informants' results with the BASIS-32, SF-36, and CAN provided evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, as did contrasts between higher and lower functioning community consumers. The factor analysis also supports the construct validity of the assessment. The results confirm the psychometric adequacy of the adapted and translated CASIG in Canada.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living - psychology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional assessment</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - psychology</subject><subject>Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Serious mental illness</subject><subject>Social Adjustment</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Treatment planning</subject><issn>0920-9964</issn><issn>1573-2509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMoWquPoOxF0cPqJNnNbk4ixVah4EE9h2w20ch2t2ZSwbc3tUWPnmaYfDP5-Qg5oXBFgYrrJ5AMcilFcQHsEqCQIhc7ZETLiuesBLlLRr_IATlEfAcAWkK1Tw5oISTnJR-R-XQV4psN2afufKujH_pscFkaZZPO2z5mt4gWcbFu08NTDLZ_jW-YPfTRBosRM9232WzQHR6RPZeKPd7WMXmZ3j1P7vP54-xhcjvPTcHrmFeSOtoAd3Utm6auG3C0agTTmqe5EFpLXjFXU6llwZytBDeskTVnWhpelnxMzjd3l2H4WKUMauHR2K7TvR1WqGqAihcSElhuQBMGxGCdWga_0OFLUVBrjepHo1o7UsDUj0Yl0t7p9oNVs7Dt39bWWwLOtoBGozsXdG88_nFlIYtN0psNZ5OOT2-DQpOsGtv6YE1U7eD_ifINP9yOTQ</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Lecomte, Tania</creator><creator>Wallace, Charles J</creator><creator>Caron, Jean</creator><creator>Perreault, Michel</creator><creator>Lecomte, Jocelin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals</title><author>Lecomte, Tania ; Wallace, Charles J ; Caron, Jean ; Perreault, Michel ; Lecomte, Jocelin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-791f1b03f889bb88b0f17b62aa3f1b66aa9372f819a942fe763c2b9832a9c3553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living - psychology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional assessment</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - psychology</topic><topic>Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Serious mental illness</topic><topic>Social Adjustment</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Treatment planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lecomte, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Charles J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caron, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perreault, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecomte, Jocelin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lecomte, Tania</au><au>Wallace, Charles J</au><au>Caron, Jean</au><au>Perreault, Michel</au><au>Lecomte, Jocelin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>59-70</pages><issn>0920-9964</issn><eissn>1573-2509</eissn><abstract>The Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals (CASIG), a measure that assesses the treatment outcomes of individuals with serious and persistent mental illness, has previously shown adequate psychometric properties with an American sample. Since it assesses quite specific skills and needs, it is necessary to assess its cultural relevance and psychometric characteristics before using it in a different country. Hence, the purposes of this study were to (1) adapt CASIG to the culture of a Canadian setting and translate its items and directions into French, (2) determine the psychometric characteristics of the adapted English and French versions of CASIG, and (3) identify its latent constructs via an exploratory factor analysis. The CASIG self-report (CASIG-SR) measure was administered to 224 consumers living in the community, and the CASIG informant (CASIG-I) measure to 31 clinicians answering for 172 consumers. The participating consumers also completed the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-32 (BASIS-32), the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), and the Camberwell Assessment of Needs (CAN). The informants also completed the clinician version of the CAN. The CASIG-SR and the CASIG-I had adequate internal consistency, test–retest, and interrater reliabilities. Correlations of the consumers' and informants' results with the BASIS-32, SF-36, and CAN provided evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, as did contrasts between higher and lower functioning community consumers. The factor analysis also supports the construct validity of the assessment. The results confirm the psychometric adequacy of the adapted and translated CASIG in Canada.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>14693353</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00496-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0920-9964
ispartof Schizophrenia research, 2004, Vol.66 (1), p.59-70
issn 0920-9964
1573-2509
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80073490
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Activities of Daily Living - psychology
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Canada
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Female
Functional assessment
Goals
Humans
Language
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Motivation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data
Patient Compliance - psychology
Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data
Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology
Psychotic Disorders - psychology
Psychotic Disorders - rehabilitation
Quality of Life - psychology
Reproducibility of Results
Schizophrenia - epidemiology
Schizophrenia - rehabilitation
Serious mental illness
Social Adjustment
Techniques and methods
Treatment planning
title Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T15%3A17%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Further%20validation%20of%20the%20Client%20Assessment%20of%20Strengths%20Interests%20and%20Goals&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20research&rft.au=Lecomte,%20Tania&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=59-70&rft.issn=0920-9964&rft.eissn=1573-2509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00496-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80073490%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80073490&rft_id=info:pmid/14693353&rft_els_id=S0920996402004966&rfr_iscdi=true