Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals
The Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals (CASIG), a measure that assesses the treatment outcomes of individuals with serious and persistent mental illness, has previously shown adequate psychometric properties with an American sample. Since it assesses quite specific skills and needs,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Schizophrenia research 2004, Vol.66 (1), p.59-70 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 70 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Schizophrenia research |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Lecomte, Tania Wallace, Charles J Caron, Jean Perreault, Michel Lecomte, Jocelin |
description | The Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals (CASIG), a measure that assesses the treatment outcomes of individuals with serious and persistent mental illness, has previously shown adequate psychometric properties with an American sample. Since it assesses quite specific skills and needs, it is necessary to assess its cultural relevance and psychometric characteristics before using it in a different country. Hence, the purposes of this study were to (1) adapt CASIG to the culture of a Canadian setting and translate its items and directions into French, (2) determine the psychometric characteristics of the adapted English and French versions of CASIG, and (3) identify its latent constructs via an exploratory factor analysis.
The CASIG self-report (CASIG-SR) measure was administered to 224 consumers living in the community, and the CASIG informant (CASIG-I) measure to 31 clinicians answering for 172 consumers. The participating consumers also completed the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-32 (BASIS-32), the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), and the Camberwell Assessment of Needs (CAN). The informants also completed the clinician version of the CAN.
The CASIG-SR and the CASIG-I had adequate internal consistency, test–retest, and interrater reliabilities. Correlations of the consumers' and informants' results with the BASIS-32, SF-36, and CAN provided evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, as did contrasts between higher and lower functioning community consumers. The factor analysis also supports the construct validity of the assessment. The results confirm the psychometric adequacy of the adapted and translated CASIG in Canada. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00496-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80073490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0920996402004966</els_id><sourcerecordid>80073490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-791f1b03f889bb88b0f17b62aa3f1b66aa9372f819a942fe763c2b9832a9c3553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMoWquPoOxF0cPqJNnNbk4ixVah4EE9h2w20ch2t2ZSwbc3tUWPnmaYfDP5-Qg5oXBFgYrrJ5AMcilFcQHsEqCQIhc7ZETLiuesBLlLRr_IATlEfAcAWkK1Tw5oISTnJR-R-XQV4psN2afufKujH_pscFkaZZPO2z5mt4gWcbFu08NTDLZ_jW-YPfTRBosRM9232WzQHR6RPZeKPd7WMXmZ3j1P7vP54-xhcjvPTcHrmFeSOtoAd3Utm6auG3C0agTTmqe5EFpLXjFXU6llwZytBDeskTVnWhpelnxMzjd3l2H4WKUMauHR2K7TvR1WqGqAihcSElhuQBMGxGCdWga_0OFLUVBrjepHo1o7UsDUj0Yl0t7p9oNVs7Dt39bWWwLOtoBGozsXdG88_nFlIYtN0psNZ5OOT2-DQpOsGtv6YE1U7eD_ifINP9yOTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80073490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lecomte, Tania ; Wallace, Charles J ; Caron, Jean ; Perreault, Michel ; Lecomte, Jocelin</creator><creatorcontrib>Lecomte, Tania ; Wallace, Charles J ; Caron, Jean ; Perreault, Michel ; Lecomte, Jocelin</creatorcontrib><description>The Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals (CASIG), a measure that assesses the treatment outcomes of individuals with serious and persistent mental illness, has previously shown adequate psychometric properties with an American sample. Since it assesses quite specific skills and needs, it is necessary to assess its cultural relevance and psychometric characteristics before using it in a different country. Hence, the purposes of this study were to (1) adapt CASIG to the culture of a Canadian setting and translate its items and directions into French, (2) determine the psychometric characteristics of the adapted English and French versions of CASIG, and (3) identify its latent constructs via an exploratory factor analysis.
The CASIG self-report (CASIG-SR) measure was administered to 224 consumers living in the community, and the CASIG informant (CASIG-I) measure to 31 clinicians answering for 172 consumers. The participating consumers also completed the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-32 (BASIS-32), the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), and the Camberwell Assessment of Needs (CAN). The informants also completed the clinician version of the CAN.
The CASIG-SR and the CASIG-I had adequate internal consistency, test–retest, and interrater reliabilities. Correlations of the consumers' and informants' results with the BASIS-32, SF-36, and CAN provided evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, as did contrasts between higher and lower functioning community consumers. The factor analysis also supports the construct validity of the assessment. The results confirm the psychometric adequacy of the adapted and translated CASIG in Canada.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-9964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00496-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14693353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living - psychology ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Canada ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Female ; Functional assessment ; Goals ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Motivation ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Compliance - psychology ; Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Psychotic Disorders - rehabilitation ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Schizophrenia - epidemiology ; Schizophrenia - rehabilitation ; Serious mental illness ; Social Adjustment ; Techniques and methods ; Treatment planning</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia research, 2004, Vol.66 (1), p.59-70</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-791f1b03f889bb88b0f17b62aa3f1b66aa9372f819a942fe763c2b9832a9c3553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-791f1b03f889bb88b0f17b62aa3f1b66aa9372f819a942fe763c2b9832a9c3553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996402004966$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15494355$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14693353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lecomte, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Charles J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caron, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perreault, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecomte, Jocelin</creatorcontrib><title>Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals</title><title>Schizophrenia research</title><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><description>The Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals (CASIG), a measure that assesses the treatment outcomes of individuals with serious and persistent mental illness, has previously shown adequate psychometric properties with an American sample. Since it assesses quite specific skills and needs, it is necessary to assess its cultural relevance and psychometric characteristics before using it in a different country. Hence, the purposes of this study were to (1) adapt CASIG to the culture of a Canadian setting and translate its items and directions into French, (2) determine the psychometric characteristics of the adapted English and French versions of CASIG, and (3) identify its latent constructs via an exploratory factor analysis.
The CASIG self-report (CASIG-SR) measure was administered to 224 consumers living in the community, and the CASIG informant (CASIG-I) measure to 31 clinicians answering for 172 consumers. The participating consumers also completed the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-32 (BASIS-32), the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), and the Camberwell Assessment of Needs (CAN). The informants also completed the clinician version of the CAN.
The CASIG-SR and the CASIG-I had adequate internal consistency, test–retest, and interrater reliabilities. Correlations of the consumers' and informants' results with the BASIS-32, SF-36, and CAN provided evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, as did contrasts between higher and lower functioning community consumers. The factor analysis also supports the construct validity of the assessment. The results confirm the psychometric adequacy of the adapted and translated CASIG in Canada.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living - psychology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional assessment</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - psychology</subject><subject>Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Serious mental illness</subject><subject>Social Adjustment</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Treatment planning</subject><issn>0920-9964</issn><issn>1573-2509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMoWquPoOxF0cPqJNnNbk4ixVah4EE9h2w20ch2t2ZSwbc3tUWPnmaYfDP5-Qg5oXBFgYrrJ5AMcilFcQHsEqCQIhc7ZETLiuesBLlLRr_IATlEfAcAWkK1Tw5oISTnJR-R-XQV4psN2afufKujH_pscFkaZZPO2z5mt4gWcbFu08NTDLZ_jW-YPfTRBosRM9232WzQHR6RPZeKPd7WMXmZ3j1P7vP54-xhcjvPTcHrmFeSOtoAd3Utm6auG3C0agTTmqe5EFpLXjFXU6llwZytBDeskTVnWhpelnxMzjd3l2H4WKUMauHR2K7TvR1WqGqAihcSElhuQBMGxGCdWga_0OFLUVBrjepHo1o7UsDUj0Yl0t7p9oNVs7Dt39bWWwLOtoBGozsXdG88_nFlIYtN0psNZ5OOT2-DQpOsGtv6YE1U7eD_ifINP9yOTQ</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Lecomte, Tania</creator><creator>Wallace, Charles J</creator><creator>Caron, Jean</creator><creator>Perreault, Michel</creator><creator>Lecomte, Jocelin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals</title><author>Lecomte, Tania ; Wallace, Charles J ; Caron, Jean ; Perreault, Michel ; Lecomte, Jocelin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-791f1b03f889bb88b0f17b62aa3f1b66aa9372f819a942fe763c2b9832a9c3553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living - psychology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional assessment</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - psychology</topic><topic>Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Serious mental illness</topic><topic>Social Adjustment</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Treatment planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lecomte, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Charles J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caron, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perreault, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecomte, Jocelin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lecomte, Tania</au><au>Wallace, Charles J</au><au>Caron, Jean</au><au>Perreault, Michel</au><au>Lecomte, Jocelin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia research</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Res</addtitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>59-70</pages><issn>0920-9964</issn><eissn>1573-2509</eissn><abstract>The Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals (CASIG), a measure that assesses the treatment outcomes of individuals with serious and persistent mental illness, has previously shown adequate psychometric properties with an American sample. Since it assesses quite specific skills and needs, it is necessary to assess its cultural relevance and psychometric characteristics before using it in a different country. Hence, the purposes of this study were to (1) adapt CASIG to the culture of a Canadian setting and translate its items and directions into French, (2) determine the psychometric characteristics of the adapted English and French versions of CASIG, and (3) identify its latent constructs via an exploratory factor analysis.
The CASIG self-report (CASIG-SR) measure was administered to 224 consumers living in the community, and the CASIG informant (CASIG-I) measure to 31 clinicians answering for 172 consumers. The participating consumers also completed the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-32 (BASIS-32), the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), and the Camberwell Assessment of Needs (CAN). The informants also completed the clinician version of the CAN.
The CASIG-SR and the CASIG-I had adequate internal consistency, test–retest, and interrater reliabilities. Correlations of the consumers' and informants' results with the BASIS-32, SF-36, and CAN provided evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, as did contrasts between higher and lower functioning community consumers. The factor analysis also supports the construct validity of the assessment. The results confirm the psychometric adequacy of the adapted and translated CASIG in Canada.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>14693353</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00496-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0920-9964 |
ispartof | Schizophrenia research, 2004, Vol.66 (1), p.59-70 |
issn | 0920-9964 1573-2509 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80073490 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Activities of Daily Living - psychology Adult Biological and medical sciences Canada Cross-Cultural Comparison Female Functional assessment Goals Humans Language Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Motivation Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data Patient Compliance - psychology Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology Psychotic Disorders - psychology Psychotic Disorders - rehabilitation Quality of Life - psychology Reproducibility of Results Schizophrenia - epidemiology Schizophrenia - rehabilitation Serious mental illness Social Adjustment Techniques and methods Treatment planning |
title | Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T15%3A17%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Further%20validation%20of%20the%20Client%20Assessment%20of%20Strengths%20Interests%20and%20Goals&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20research&rft.au=Lecomte,%20Tania&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=59-70&rft.issn=0920-9964&rft.eissn=1573-2509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00496-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80073490%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80073490&rft_id=info:pmid/14693353&rft_els_id=S0920996402004966&rfr_iscdi=true |