Is there age bias in the treatment of localized prostate carcinoma?

BACKGROUND Treatment recommendations for localized prostate carcinoma are based on the patient's remaining life expectancy (RLE), which is influenced by age, comorbidity, and tumor grade. Previous studies have evaluated the influence of age and comorbidity, but to the authors' knowledge no...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2004-01, Vol.100 (1), p.72-81
Hauptverfasser: Alibhai, Shabbir M. H., Krahn, Murray D., Cohen, Marsha M., Fleshner, Neil E., Tomlinson, George A., Naglie, Gary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND Treatment recommendations for localized prostate carcinoma are based on the patient's remaining life expectancy (RLE), which is influenced by age, comorbidity, and tumor grade. Previous studies have evaluated the influence of age and comorbidity, but to the authors' knowledge not RLE, on actual treatment decisions. METHODS An age‐stratified random sample of 347 patients was generated from a cohort of all patients with newly diagnosed prostate carcinoma in the Ontario Cancer Registry between May 1, 1995 and April 30, 1996 (n = 5192). Chart review was performed to obtain detailed tumor, comorbidity, and treatment information. RLE was estimated from a published model derived from a cohort of 451 men with untreated prostate carcinoma who were followed for 15 years. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate predictors of treatment, such as radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy (RT), or potentially curative therapy (RP or RT), in relation to patient age, comorbidity, tumor characteristics, and RLE. RESULTS RP was provided within 6 months of diagnosis to 58.7%, 32.1%, 2.6%, and 0% of patients of ages < 60 years, 60–69 years, 70–79 years, and 80+ years, respectively. The results for RT were 6.4%, 30.9%, 23.4%, and 3.3%, respectively. Increasing comorbidity decreased rates of RP but did not affect use of RT. After controlling for comorbidity and tumor characteristics, older men were found to be treated with RP less often than younger men with similar RLE, whereas RLE did not appear to influence receipt of RT. CONCLUSIONS Although different mechanisms may account for these results, an age bias may be present among urologists and radiation oncologists treating men with localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2004;100:72–81. © 2003 American Cancer Society. The authors evaluated the relation between remaining life expectancy and other variables that predicted receipt of radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Older men underwent radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy less often than younger men with similar disease stage, tumor grade, prostate‐specific antigen level, comorbidity, and remaining life expectancy.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.11884