Positive diagnostic values and histological detection ratios from the Rotterdam cervical cancer screening programme

Background In organized screening programmes for cervical cancer, pre-cancerous lesions are detected by cervical smears. However, during follow-up after a positive smear these pre-cancerous lesions are not always found. The purpose of the study is to analyse positive diagnostic values of smears of a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of epidemiology 1998-06, Vol.27 (3), p.377-381
Hauptverfasser: Kreuger, Fré AF, Beerman, Henk, Nijs, Huub GT, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 381
container_issue 3
container_start_page 377
container_title International journal of epidemiology
container_volume 27
creator Kreuger, Fré AF
Beerman, Henk
Nijs, Huub GT
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
description Background In organized screening programmes for cervical cancer, pre-cancerous lesions are detected by cervical smears. However, during follow-up after a positive smear these pre-cancerous lesions are not always found. The purpose of the study is to analyse positive diagnostic values of smears of at least mild dysplasia, made under the organized screening programmes in the Rotterdam area (1979–1991), and detection ratios of histologically confirmed CIN ≥ 3, among women participating in these screening programmes. Methods Positive diagnostic values and histological detection ratios, by age and history of previous smears, recorded during the national screening programme (1989–1991), were compared with those of the experimental cervical cancer screening project (1976–1984). Results The positive diagnostic value of a smear with at least severe dysplasia (histologically confirmed CIN 3) remains approximately 78%. For smears with mild and moderate dysplasia only lower limits of the diagnostic value could be determined. This was 9% for a smear with mild dysplasia obtained during the national screening programme and 25% and 35% for smears with moderate dysplasia taken during the experimental and national screening programmes respectively. Histological detection ratios for CIN ≥3 in the three rounds of the experimental screening project were 4.7, 2.9 and 1.9. In the first round of the national screening programme the ratio was 4.7, and about three times higher in younger compared to older women. Conclusions Immediate referral for colposcopy after a smear showing moderate dysplasia seems questionable. Whether the increased detection ratio among young women indicates a rise in the risk of cervical cancer is unclear.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ije/27.3.377
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80054805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32669031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-c2b5aa285b184b6b1277f67215f718a7df207c5fb45ec65115c424b657f0ae753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUuLFDEUhYMoYzu6cysEEVdWT56V1HJo1BFmUERlmE1IpW560lZVxiTd6L83bTe9cHUvnI_7OAehl5QsKen4RdjABVNLvuRKPUILKlrR8FbLx2hBOCGNVIo-Rc9y3hBChRDdGTrr2k5Txhcof4k5lLADPAS7nmMuweGdHbeQsZ0HfB9yiWNcB2dHPEABV0KccbK1ZOxTnHC5B_w1lgJpsBN2kHb_YGfn2uPsEsAc5jV-SHGd7DTBc_TE2zHDi2M9R98_vP-2umquP3_8tLq8bpygujSO9dJapmVPtejbnjKlfKsYlV5RbdXgGVFO-l5IcK2kVDrBKiiVJxaU5Ofo7WFu3fyrPlTMFLKDcbQzxG02mhApNNmDr_8DN3Gb5nqbYbSjTGrNKvTuALkUc07gzUMKk01_DCVmH4SpQRimDDc1iIq_Os7c9hMMJ_jofNXfHHWbq10-VbtCPmGMC0b4fmtzwGoO8Psk2_TTtIoraa5u70x3Q-9uV_yHueF_AcvnoTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219125882</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Positive diagnostic values and histological detection ratios from the Rotterdam cervical cancer screening programme</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kreuger, Fré AF ; Beerman, Henk ; Nijs, Huub GT ; van Ballegooijen, Marjolein</creator><creatorcontrib>Kreuger, Fré AF ; Beerman, Henk ; Nijs, Huub GT ; van Ballegooijen, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><description>Background In organized screening programmes for cervical cancer, pre-cancerous lesions are detected by cervical smears. However, during follow-up after a positive smear these pre-cancerous lesions are not always found. The purpose of the study is to analyse positive diagnostic values of smears of at least mild dysplasia, made under the organized screening programmes in the Rotterdam area (1979–1991), and detection ratios of histologically confirmed CIN ≥ 3, among women participating in these screening programmes. Methods Positive diagnostic values and histological detection ratios, by age and history of previous smears, recorded during the national screening programme (1989–1991), were compared with those of the experimental cervical cancer screening project (1976–1984). Results The positive diagnostic value of a smear with at least severe dysplasia (histologically confirmed CIN 3) remains approximately 78%. For smears with mild and moderate dysplasia only lower limits of the diagnostic value could be determined. This was 9% for a smear with mild dysplasia obtained during the national screening programme and 25% and 35% for smears with moderate dysplasia taken during the experimental and national screening programmes respectively. Histological detection ratios for CIN ≥3 in the three rounds of the experimental screening project were 4.7, 2.9 and 1.9. In the first round of the national screening programme the ratio was 4.7, and about three times higher in younger compared to older women. Conclusions Immediate referral for colposcopy after a smear showing moderate dysplasia seems questionable. Whether the increased detection ratio among young women indicates a rise in the risk of cervical cancer is unclear.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5771</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1464-3685</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3685</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ije/27.3.377</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9698123</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJEPBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis ; Carcinoma in Situ - pathology ; Cervical cancer ; Cervical cancer screening ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology ; Cervix Uteri - pathology ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; histological detection ratio ; Humans ; Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; positive diagnostic value ; Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis ; Precancerous Conditions - pathology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tumors ; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Vaginal Smears - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>International journal of epidemiology, 1998-06, Vol.27 (3), p.377-381</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Jun 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-c2b5aa285b184b6b1277f67215f718a7df207c5fb45ec65115c424b657f0ae753</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2342032$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9698123$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kreuger, Fré AF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beerman, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijs, Huub GT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ballegooijen, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><title>Positive diagnostic values and histological detection ratios from the Rotterdam cervical cancer screening programme</title><title>International journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Int J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Background In organized screening programmes for cervical cancer, pre-cancerous lesions are detected by cervical smears. However, during follow-up after a positive smear these pre-cancerous lesions are not always found. The purpose of the study is to analyse positive diagnostic values of smears of at least mild dysplasia, made under the organized screening programmes in the Rotterdam area (1979–1991), and detection ratios of histologically confirmed CIN ≥ 3, among women participating in these screening programmes. Methods Positive diagnostic values and histological detection ratios, by age and history of previous smears, recorded during the national screening programme (1989–1991), were compared with those of the experimental cervical cancer screening project (1976–1984). Results The positive diagnostic value of a smear with at least severe dysplasia (histologically confirmed CIN 3) remains approximately 78%. For smears with mild and moderate dysplasia only lower limits of the diagnostic value could be determined. This was 9% for a smear with mild dysplasia obtained during the national screening programme and 25% and 35% for smears with moderate dysplasia taken during the experimental and national screening programmes respectively. Histological detection ratios for CIN ≥3 in the three rounds of the experimental screening project were 4.7, 2.9 and 1.9. In the first round of the national screening programme the ratio was 4.7, and about three times higher in younger compared to older women. Conclusions Immediate referral for colposcopy after a smear showing moderate dysplasia seems questionable. Whether the increased detection ratio among young women indicates a rise in the risk of cervical cancer is unclear.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - pathology</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Cervical cancer screening</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Cervix Uteri - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>histological detection ratio</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>positive diagnostic value</subject><subject>Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis</subject><subject>Precancerous Conditions - pathology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0300-5771</issn><issn>1464-3685</issn><issn>1464-3685</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUuLFDEUhYMoYzu6cysEEVdWT56V1HJo1BFmUERlmE1IpW560lZVxiTd6L83bTe9cHUvnI_7OAehl5QsKen4RdjABVNLvuRKPUILKlrR8FbLx2hBOCGNVIo-Rc9y3hBChRDdGTrr2k5Txhcof4k5lLADPAS7nmMuweGdHbeQsZ0HfB9yiWNcB2dHPEABV0KccbK1ZOxTnHC5B_w1lgJpsBN2kHb_YGfn2uPsEsAc5jV-SHGd7DTBc_TE2zHDi2M9R98_vP-2umquP3_8tLq8bpygujSO9dJapmVPtejbnjKlfKsYlV5RbdXgGVFO-l5IcK2kVDrBKiiVJxaU5Ofo7WFu3fyrPlTMFLKDcbQzxG02mhApNNmDr_8DN3Gb5nqbYbSjTGrNKvTuALkUc07gzUMKk01_DCVmH4SpQRimDDc1iIq_Os7c9hMMJ_jofNXfHHWbq10-VbtCPmGMC0b4fmtzwGoO8Psk2_TTtIoraa5u70x3Q-9uV_yHueF_AcvnoTQ</recordid><startdate>19980601</startdate><enddate>19980601</enddate><creator>Kreuger, Fré AF</creator><creator>Beerman, Henk</creator><creator>Nijs, Huub GT</creator><creator>van Ballegooijen, Marjolein</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980601</creationdate><title>Positive diagnostic values and histological detection ratios from the Rotterdam cervical cancer screening programme</title><author>Kreuger, Fré AF ; Beerman, Henk ; Nijs, Huub GT ; van Ballegooijen, Marjolein</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-c2b5aa285b184b6b1277f67215f718a7df207c5fb45ec65115c424b657f0ae753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - pathology</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Cervical cancer screening</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Cervix Uteri - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>histological detection ratio</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>positive diagnostic value</topic><topic>Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis</topic><topic>Precancerous Conditions - pathology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kreuger, Fré AF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beerman, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijs, Huub GT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ballegooijen, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kreuger, Fré AF</au><au>Beerman, Henk</au><au>Nijs, Huub GT</au><au>van Ballegooijen, Marjolein</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Positive diagnostic values and histological detection ratios from the Rotterdam cervical cancer screening programme</atitle><jtitle>International journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1998-06-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>377</spage><epage>381</epage><pages>377-381</pages><issn>0300-5771</issn><issn>1464-3685</issn><eissn>1464-3685</eissn><coden>IJEPBF</coden><abstract>Background In organized screening programmes for cervical cancer, pre-cancerous lesions are detected by cervical smears. However, during follow-up after a positive smear these pre-cancerous lesions are not always found. The purpose of the study is to analyse positive diagnostic values of smears of at least mild dysplasia, made under the organized screening programmes in the Rotterdam area (1979–1991), and detection ratios of histologically confirmed CIN ≥ 3, among women participating in these screening programmes. Methods Positive diagnostic values and histological detection ratios, by age and history of previous smears, recorded during the national screening programme (1989–1991), were compared with those of the experimental cervical cancer screening project (1976–1984). Results The positive diagnostic value of a smear with at least severe dysplasia (histologically confirmed CIN 3) remains approximately 78%. For smears with mild and moderate dysplasia only lower limits of the diagnostic value could be determined. This was 9% for a smear with mild dysplasia obtained during the national screening programme and 25% and 35% for smears with moderate dysplasia taken during the experimental and national screening programmes respectively. Histological detection ratios for CIN ≥3 in the three rounds of the experimental screening project were 4.7, 2.9 and 1.9. In the first round of the national screening programme the ratio was 4.7, and about three times higher in younger compared to older women. Conclusions Immediate referral for colposcopy after a smear showing moderate dysplasia seems questionable. Whether the increased detection ratio among young women indicates a rise in the risk of cervical cancer is unclear.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>9698123</pmid><doi>10.1093/ije/27.3.377</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-5771
ispartof International journal of epidemiology, 1998-06, Vol.27 (3), p.377-381
issn 0300-5771
1464-3685
1464-3685
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80054805
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis
Carcinoma in Situ - pathology
Cervical cancer
Cervical cancer screening
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - diagnosis
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology
Cervix Uteri - pathology
Female
Female genital diseases
Follow-Up Studies
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
histological detection ratio
Humans
Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Netherlands - epidemiology
positive diagnostic value
Precancerous Conditions - diagnosis
Precancerous Conditions - pathology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tumors
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - diagnosis
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
Vaginal Smears - statistics & numerical data
title Positive diagnostic values and histological detection ratios from the Rotterdam cervical cancer screening programme
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T23%3A02%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positive%20diagnostic%20values%20and%20histological%20detection%20ratios%20from%20the%20Rotterdam%20cervical%20cancer%20screening%20programme&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=Kreuger,%20Fr%C3%A9%20AF&rft.date=1998-06-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=377&rft.epage=381&rft.pages=377-381&rft.issn=0300-5771&rft.eissn=1464-3685&rft.coden=IJEPBF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ije/27.3.377&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E32669031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219125882&rft_id=info:pmid/9698123&rfr_iscdi=true