Bacteriology of burns
A retrospective study was undertaken at University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, to examine the bacterial isolates from the Burns unit and to determine the antibiograms of the isolates to commonly used antimicrobial agents. A total of 600 pus samples from as many...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Burns 1998-06, Vol.24 (4), p.347-349 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 349 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 347 |
| container_title | Burns |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Revathi, G. Puri, J. Jain, B.K. |
| description | A retrospective study was undertaken at University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, to examine the bacterial isolates from the Burns unit and to determine the antibiograms of the isolates to commonly used antimicrobial agents. A total of 600 pus samples from as many patients received, over a period of 5 years (June 1993–June 1997) yielded 920 isolates.
Pseudonomonas spp. was the most common (36%) followed by
Staphylococcus aureus (19%),
Klebsiella spp. (15.54%),
Proteus spp. (11.19%),
Enterococcus faecalis (8.5%),
Escherichia coli (5.10%),
Acinetobacter spp. (1.1%),
Salmonella senftenberg (0.8%) and other (3%).
Pseudomonas spp. was the most susceptible to ceftazidime (83% susceptible) and cefoperazone (82% susceptible), whereas the drugs most effective in other Gram-negative organisms were amikacin, netilmicin and ciproflox. Vancomycin was effective in 100% of Gram-positive organisms. The infection of burn wounds with multiple organisms, with the superadded problem of drug resistance, necessitate the institution of a drug policy by the hospitals for burn patients. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0305-4179(98)00009-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80041068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305417998000096</els_id><sourcerecordid>80041068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-c63c1540e81c2ba192d6a1fed3417b6e62a3ea3849cbce15adb8c4c1c0962d7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EKqUwMlbqgBAMAV-cuPaEoOJLqsQAzJZzuSCjNCl2gtT_nqSNunLLDe939-4eY1PgN8BB3r5zwdMogbm-0uqad6UjecDGoOY6goTrQzbeI8fsJITvHkoVH7GRlkrFnI_Z-YPFhryry_prM6uLWdb6Kpyyo8KWgc6GPmGfT48fi5do-fb8urhfRiiUbiKUAiFNOCnAOLOg41xaKCgXnWcmScZWkBUq0ZghQWrzTGGCgFzLOJ9bMWGXu71rX_-0FBqzcgGpLG1FdRuM4jwBLlUHpjsQfR2Cp8KsvVtZvzHATR-H2cZh-l-NVmYbh5Hd3HQwaLMV5fup4f9Ovxh0G9CWhbcVurDHYgFaCdFhdzuMujB-HXkT0FGFlDtP2Ji8dv8c8gerZ3oZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80041068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bacteriology of burns</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Revathi, G. ; Puri, J. ; Jain, B.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Revathi, G. ; Puri, J. ; Jain, B.K.</creatorcontrib><description>A retrospective study was undertaken at University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, to examine the bacterial isolates from the Burns unit and to determine the antibiograms of the isolates to commonly used antimicrobial agents. A total of 600 pus samples from as many patients received, over a period of 5 years (June 1993–June 1997) yielded 920 isolates.
Pseudonomonas spp. was the most common (36%) followed by
Staphylococcus aureus (19%),
Klebsiella spp. (15.54%),
Proteus spp. (11.19%),
Enterococcus faecalis (8.5%),
Escherichia coli (5.10%),
Acinetobacter spp. (1.1%),
Salmonella senftenberg (0.8%) and other (3%).
Pseudomonas spp. was the most susceptible to ceftazidime (83% susceptible) and cefoperazone (82% susceptible), whereas the drugs most effective in other Gram-negative organisms were amikacin, netilmicin and ciproflox. Vancomycin was effective in 100% of Gram-positive organisms. The infection of burn wounds with multiple organisms, with the superadded problem of drug resistance, necessitate the institution of a drug policy by the hospitals for burn patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0305-4179(98)00009-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9688200</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BURND8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Burn Units ; Burns ; Burns - microbiology ; Child, Preschool ; Cross Infection - drug therapy ; Cross Infection - epidemiology ; Cross Infection - microbiology ; Disease Outbreaks ; Drug Resistance, Microbial ; Drug Therapy, Combination - therapeutic use ; Gram-Negative Bacteria - drug effects ; Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - drug therapy ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - microbiology ; Gram-Positive Bacteria - drug effects ; Gram-Positive Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - epidemiology ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - microbiology ; Humans ; India - epidemiology ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Retrospective Studies ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; Tropical medicine ; Wound Infection - drug therapy ; Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Burns, 1998-06, Vol.24 (4), p.347-349</ispartof><rights>1998</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-c63c1540e81c2ba192d6a1fed3417b6e62a3ea3849cbce15adb8c4c1c0962d7a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-c63c1540e81c2ba192d6a1fed3417b6e62a3ea3849cbce15adb8c4c1c0962d7a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4179(98)00009-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2319833$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9688200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Revathi, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puri, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, B.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Bacteriology of burns</title><title>Burns</title><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><description>A retrospective study was undertaken at University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, to examine the bacterial isolates from the Burns unit and to determine the antibiograms of the isolates to commonly used antimicrobial agents. A total of 600 pus samples from as many patients received, over a period of 5 years (June 1993–June 1997) yielded 920 isolates.
Pseudonomonas spp. was the most common (36%) followed by
Staphylococcus aureus (19%),
Klebsiella spp. (15.54%),
Proteus spp. (11.19%),
Enterococcus faecalis (8.5%),
Escherichia coli (5.10%),
Acinetobacter spp. (1.1%),
Salmonella senftenberg (0.8%) and other (3%).
Pseudomonas spp. was the most susceptible to ceftazidime (83% susceptible) and cefoperazone (82% susceptible), whereas the drugs most effective in other Gram-negative organisms were amikacin, netilmicin and ciproflox. Vancomycin was effective in 100% of Gram-positive organisms. The infection of burn wounds with multiple organisms, with the superadded problem of drug resistance, necessitate the institution of a drug policy by the hospitals for burn patients.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Burn Units</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Burns - microbiology</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cross Infection - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cross Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Microbial</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><subject>Wound Infection - drug therapy</subject><subject>Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><issn>0305-4179</issn><issn>1879-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EKqUwMlbqgBAMAV-cuPaEoOJLqsQAzJZzuSCjNCl2gtT_nqSNunLLDe939-4eY1PgN8BB3r5zwdMogbm-0uqad6UjecDGoOY6goTrQzbeI8fsJITvHkoVH7GRlkrFnI_Z-YPFhryry_prM6uLWdb6Kpyyo8KWgc6GPmGfT48fi5do-fb8urhfRiiUbiKUAiFNOCnAOLOg41xaKCgXnWcmScZWkBUq0ZghQWrzTGGCgFzLOJ9bMWGXu71rX_-0FBqzcgGpLG1FdRuM4jwBLlUHpjsQfR2Cp8KsvVtZvzHATR-H2cZh-l-NVmYbh5Hd3HQwaLMV5fup4f9Ovxh0G9CWhbcVurDHYgFaCdFhdzuMujB-HXkT0FGFlDtP2Ji8dv8c8gerZ3oZ</recordid><startdate>19980601</startdate><enddate>19980601</enddate><creator>Revathi, G.</creator><creator>Puri, J.</creator><creator>Jain, B.K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980601</creationdate><title>Bacteriology of burns</title><author>Revathi, G. ; Puri, J. ; Jain, B.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-c63c1540e81c2ba192d6a1fed3417b6e62a3ea3849cbce15adb8c4c1c0962d7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Burn Units</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Burns - microbiology</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cross Infection - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cross Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Microbial</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><topic>Wound Infection - drug therapy</topic><topic>Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Wound Infection - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Revathi, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puri, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, B.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Burns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Revathi, G.</au><au>Puri, J.</au><au>Jain, B.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bacteriology of burns</atitle><jtitle>Burns</jtitle><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><date>1998-06-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>347-349</pages><issn>0305-4179</issn><eissn>1879-1409</eissn><coden>BURND8</coden><abstract>A retrospective study was undertaken at University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, to examine the bacterial isolates from the Burns unit and to determine the antibiograms of the isolates to commonly used antimicrobial agents. A total of 600 pus samples from as many patients received, over a period of 5 years (June 1993–June 1997) yielded 920 isolates.
Pseudonomonas spp. was the most common (36%) followed by
Staphylococcus aureus (19%),
Klebsiella spp. (15.54%),
Proteus spp. (11.19%),
Enterococcus faecalis (8.5%),
Escherichia coli (5.10%),
Acinetobacter spp. (1.1%),
Salmonella senftenberg (0.8%) and other (3%).
Pseudomonas spp. was the most susceptible to ceftazidime (83% susceptible) and cefoperazone (82% susceptible), whereas the drugs most effective in other Gram-negative organisms were amikacin, netilmicin and ciproflox. Vancomycin was effective in 100% of Gram-positive organisms. The infection of burn wounds with multiple organisms, with the superadded problem of drug resistance, necessitate the institution of a drug policy by the hospitals for burn patients.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>9688200</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0305-4179(98)00009-6</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-4179 |
| ispartof | Burns, 1998-06, Vol.24 (4), p.347-349 |
| issn | 0305-4179 1879-1409 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80041068 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Anti-Bacterial Agents Biological and medical sciences Burn Units Burns Burns - microbiology Child, Preschool Cross Infection - drug therapy Cross Infection - epidemiology Cross Infection - microbiology Disease Outbreaks Drug Resistance, Microbial Drug Therapy, Combination - therapeutic use Gram-Negative Bacteria - drug effects Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - drug therapy Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - microbiology Gram-Positive Bacteria - drug effects Gram-Positive Bacteria - isolation & purification Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - epidemiology Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - microbiology Humans India - epidemiology Medical sciences Microbial Sensitivity Tests Retrospective Studies Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents Tropical medicine Wound Infection - drug therapy Wound Infection - epidemiology Wound Infection - microbiology |
| title | Bacteriology of burns |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T09%3A32%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bacteriology%20of%20burns&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=Revathi,%20G.&rft.date=1998-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=347-349&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft.coden=BURND8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0305-4179(98)00009-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80041068%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80041068&rft_id=info:pmid/9688200&rft_els_id=S0305417998000096&rfr_iscdi=true |