A multi-centre evaluation of two chlorhexidine-containing formulations for surgical hand disinfection

A multi-centre evaluation of two chlorhexidine-containing formulations for surgical hand disinfection

Many experimental methods have been used to assess the efficacy of products intended for surgical hand disinfection. In this study, a modification of the Peterson glove juice method was used to compare two chlorhexidine-based surgical hand disinfectants, ‘Hibiscrub’ and an experimental formulation,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hospital infection 1990-08, Vol.16 (2), p.151-159
Hauptverfasser: Holloway, P.M., Platt, J.H., Reybrouck, G., Lilly, H.A., Mehtar, S., Drabu, Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
antiseptics testing procedures
Chlorhexidine
Chlorhexidine - analogs & derivatives
Chlorhexidine - therapeutic use
Colony Count, Microbial
Female
Hand Disinfection - methods
Hand Disinfection - standards
Humans
Male
surgical hand disinfection
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 159
container_issue 2
container_start_page 151
container_title The Journal of hospital infection
container_volume 16
creator Holloway, P.M.
Platt, J.H.
Reybrouck, G.
Lilly, H.A.
Mehtar, S.
Drabu, Y.
description Many experimental methods have been used to assess the efficacy of products intended for surgical hand disinfection. In this study, a modification of the Peterson glove juice method was used to compare two chlorhexidine-based surgical hand disinfectants, ‘Hibiscrub’ and an experimental formulation, F.6115. The study was performed by four independent laboratories and data merged for analysis. There was found to be no significant difference between the two formulations. The results illustrate that this modified Peterson glove juice method has the potential to form the basis of a standard method for testing surgical hand disinfectants which is both relevant to the practical situation and reproducible in different laboratories.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0195-6701(90)90059-W
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80035807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>019567019090059W</els_id><sourcerecordid>80035807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-ff8d5f398212a8a145f7ebe7cd4d0a210cf459cae97a2ed686a7bfb0697c7e053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1q3DAURkVpmEymfYMGtCrNwumVbVnWJhCG5gcC2bTMUmikqxkVj5RKdpK-feyZkO7SlZC-813BuYR8YXDOgDXfgUleNALYNwlnEoDLYvWBzBmvyqKUlfxI5m_IMTnJ-TcAjO98RmZMiqYRck7wku6GrveFwdAnpPiou0H3PgYaHe2fIjXbLqYtPnvrAxYmhl774MOGupjG6p7N04XmIW280R3d6mCp9dkHh2bKP5Ejp7uMn1_PBfl19ePn8qa4u7--XV7eFaaCqi-cay13lWxLVupWs5o7gWsUxtYWdMnAuJpLo1EKXaJt2kaLtVtDI4URCLxakK-HuQ8p_hkw92rns8Gu0wHjkFULUPEWxH9BxgWXdTWB9QE0Keac0KmH5Hc6_VUM1LQGNTlWk2MlQe3XoFZj7fR1_rDeof1XOngf84tDjqONR49JZeMxGLQ-jcqUjf79D14A-xeZsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15759437</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multi-centre evaluation of two chlorhexidine-containing formulations for surgical hand disinfection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Holloway, P.M. ; Platt, J.H. ; Reybrouck, G. ; Lilly, H.A. ; Mehtar, S. ; Drabu, Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Holloway, P.M. ; Platt, J.H. ; Reybrouck, G. ; Lilly, H.A. ; Mehtar, S. ; Drabu, Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Many experimental methods have been used to assess the efficacy of products intended for surgical hand disinfection. In this study, a modification of the Peterson glove juice method was used to compare two chlorhexidine-based surgical hand disinfectants, ‘Hibiscrub’ and an experimental formulation, F.6115. The study was performed by four independent laboratories and data merged for analysis. There was found to be no significant difference between the two formulations. The results illustrate that this modified Peterson glove juice method has the potential to form the basis of a standard method for testing surgical hand disinfectants which is both relevant to the practical situation and reproducible in different laboratories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0195-6701(90)90059-W</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1976679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>antiseptics testing procedures ; Chlorhexidine ; Chlorhexidine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Chlorhexidine - therapeutic use ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Female ; Hand Disinfection - methods ; Hand Disinfection - standards ; Humans ; Male ; surgical hand disinfection</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 1990-08, Vol.16 (2), p.151-159</ispartof><rights>1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-ff8d5f398212a8a145f7ebe7cd4d0a210cf459cae97a2ed686a7bfb0697c7e053</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(90)90059-W$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1976679$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holloway, P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platt, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reybrouck, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilly, H.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehtar, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drabu, Y.</creatorcontrib><title>A multi-centre evaluation of two chlorhexidine-containing formulations for surgical hand disinfection</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>Many experimental methods have been used to assess the efficacy of products intended for surgical hand disinfection. In this study, a modification of the Peterson glove juice method was used to compare two chlorhexidine-based surgical hand disinfectants, ‘Hibiscrub’ and an experimental formulation, F.6115. The study was performed by four independent laboratories and data merged for analysis. There was found to be no significant difference between the two formulations. The results illustrate that this modified Peterson glove juice method has the potential to form the basis of a standard method for testing surgical hand disinfectants which is both relevant to the practical situation and reproducible in different laboratories.</description><subject>antiseptics testing procedures</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hand Disinfection - methods</subject><subject>Hand Disinfection - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>surgical hand disinfection</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1q3DAURkVpmEymfYMGtCrNwumVbVnWJhCG5gcC2bTMUmikqxkVj5RKdpK-feyZkO7SlZC-813BuYR8YXDOgDXfgUleNALYNwlnEoDLYvWBzBmvyqKUlfxI5m_IMTnJ-TcAjO98RmZMiqYRck7wku6GrveFwdAnpPiou0H3PgYaHe2fIjXbLqYtPnvrAxYmhl774MOGupjG6p7N04XmIW280R3d6mCp9dkHh2bKP5Ejp7uMn1_PBfl19ePn8qa4u7--XV7eFaaCqi-cay13lWxLVupWs5o7gWsUxtYWdMnAuJpLo1EKXaJt2kaLtVtDI4URCLxakK-HuQ8p_hkw92rns8Gu0wHjkFULUPEWxH9BxgWXdTWB9QE0Keac0KmH5Hc6_VUM1LQGNTlWk2MlQe3XoFZj7fR1_rDeof1XOngf84tDjqONR49JZeMxGLQ-jcqUjf79D14A-xeZsg</recordid><startdate>199008</startdate><enddate>199008</enddate><creator>Holloway, P.M.</creator><creator>Platt, J.H.</creator><creator>Reybrouck, G.</creator><creator>Lilly, H.A.</creator><creator>Mehtar, S.</creator><creator>Drabu, Y.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199008</creationdate><title>A multi-centre evaluation of two chlorhexidine-containing formulations for surgical hand disinfection</title><author>Holloway, P.M. ; Platt, J.H. ; Reybrouck, G. ; Lilly, H.A. ; Mehtar, S. ; Drabu, Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-ff8d5f398212a8a145f7ebe7cd4d0a210cf459cae97a2ed686a7bfb0697c7e053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>antiseptics testing procedures</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hand Disinfection - methods</topic><topic>Hand Disinfection - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>surgical hand disinfection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holloway, P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platt, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reybrouck, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilly, H.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehtar, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drabu, Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holloway, P.M.</au><au>Platt, J.H.</au><au>Reybrouck, G.</au><au>Lilly, H.A.</au><au>Mehtar, S.</au><au>Drabu, Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multi-centre evaluation of two chlorhexidine-containing formulations for surgical hand disinfection</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>1990-08</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>151-159</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Many experimental methods have been used to assess the efficacy of products intended for surgical hand disinfection. In this study, a modification of the Peterson glove juice method was used to compare two chlorhexidine-based surgical hand disinfectants, ‘Hibiscrub’ and an experimental formulation, F.6115. The study was performed by four independent laboratories and data merged for analysis. There was found to be no significant difference between the two formulations. The results illustrate that this modified Peterson glove juice method has the potential to form the basis of a standard method for testing surgical hand disinfectants which is both relevant to the practical situation and reproducible in different laboratories.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>1976679</pmid><doi>10.1016/0195-6701(90)90059-W</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6701
ispartof The Journal of hospital infection, 1990-08, Vol.16 (2), p.151-159
issn 0195-6701
1532-2939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80035807
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects antiseptics testing procedures
Chlorhexidine
Chlorhexidine - analogs & derivatives
Chlorhexidine - therapeutic use
Colony Count, Microbial
Female
Hand Disinfection - methods
Hand Disinfection - standards
Humans
Male
surgical hand disinfection
title A multi-centre evaluation of two chlorhexidine-containing formulations for surgical hand disinfection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T12%3A08%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multi-centre%20evaluation%20of%20two%20chlorhexidine-containing%20formulations%20for%20surgical%20hand%20disinfection&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Holloway,%20P.M.&rft.date=1990-08&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=151-159&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0195-6701(90)90059-W&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80035807%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15759437&rft_id=info:pmid/1976679&rft_els_id=019567019090059W&rfr_iscdi=true