Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects

The aim of this study was to determine whether detection thresholds for amplitude modulated signals on a single electrode were influenced by a masking modulation on a second electrode in cochlear implant users. Data were collected from four post-linguistically deafened subjects using the Cochlear Li...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998-07, Vol.104 (1), p.442-452
Hauptverfasser: Richardson, L M, Busby, P A, Clark, G M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 452
container_issue 1
container_start_page 442
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 104
creator Richardson, L M
Busby, P A
Clark, G M
description The aim of this study was to determine whether detection thresholds for amplitude modulated signals on a single electrode were influenced by a masking modulation on a second electrode in cochlear implant users. Data were collected from four post-linguistically deafened subjects using the Cochlear Limited prosthesis. Investigated were the effects of the spatial separation between test and masker electrodes, 0 to 5 electrodes (0 to 3.75 mm), and the amount of masking modulation: 24%, 48%, 72%, and 96% above detection thresholds. Initially, modulation detection thresholds for stimulation on a single electrode without masking modulation were obtained for a set of six electrodes in the middle of the array. Modulation detection thresholds on a fixed test electrode were then obtained with unmodulated and modulated masking on a second electrode, which was one of the six electrodes in the initial study. In both studies, thresholds were measured for modulated pulse duration at the modulation frequencies of 10-200 Hz. In the first study, the shape of the detection thresholds as a function of modulation frequency, the temporal modulation transfer function, generally resembled a low-pass filter for two subjects. For the other two subjects, the functions were relatively flat across modulation frequencies. In the second study, unmodulated masking resulted in a small elevation in detection thresholds across electrodes. Modulation detection interference (MDI), the difference between thresholds for the modulated maskers and the unmodulated masker, was greater for larger amounts of masking modulation than for smaller amounts of masking modulation. For three of the four subjects, MDI was higher for smaller spatial separations between the two electrodes than for larger spatial separations suggesting that a portion of MDI may be due to overlap of neural excitation distributions produced by stimulation on two electrodes in close proximity on the array.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.423248
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80013344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80013344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-d9e07b01f6707ce0ae37cdb8f812139f2de68f518b6f8624fcf18d97b4ceabe23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMo4zgK_gGhK3HTMa-m6UaQwReMuNF1yOMGO_Rl0i7890ZbXN174OPccw9ClwRvCaHklmw5ZZTLI7QmBcW5LCg_RmuMMcl5JcQpOovxkGQhWbVCq0qUuGBije5eezc1eqz7LnMwgv3b6m6E4CFAZyGJzPb2swEdsrodGt2NWZzMIbHxHJ143US4WOYGfTw-vO-e8_3b08vufp9bWsoxdxXg0mDi09nSAtbASuuM9DKFZ5WnDoT0BZFGeCko99YT6arScAvaAGUbdD37DqH_miCOqq2jhSaFgX6KSqZHGeM8gTczaEMfYwCvhlC3OnwrgtVvVYqouaqEXi2ek2nB_YNLN-wHjw1jrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80013344</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Richardson, L M ; Busby, P A ; Clark, G M</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, L M ; Busby, P A ; Clark, G M</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to determine whether detection thresholds for amplitude modulated signals on a single electrode were influenced by a masking modulation on a second electrode in cochlear implant users. Data were collected from four post-linguistically deafened subjects using the Cochlear Limited prosthesis. Investigated were the effects of the spatial separation between test and masker electrodes, 0 to 5 electrodes (0 to 3.75 mm), and the amount of masking modulation: 24%, 48%, 72%, and 96% above detection thresholds. Initially, modulation detection thresholds for stimulation on a single electrode without masking modulation were obtained for a set of six electrodes in the middle of the array. Modulation detection thresholds on a fixed test electrode were then obtained with unmodulated and modulated masking on a second electrode, which was one of the six electrodes in the initial study. In both studies, thresholds were measured for modulated pulse duration at the modulation frequencies of 10-200 Hz. In the first study, the shape of the detection thresholds as a function of modulation frequency, the temporal modulation transfer function, generally resembled a low-pass filter for two subjects. For the other two subjects, the functions were relatively flat across modulation frequencies. In the second study, unmodulated masking resulted in a small elevation in detection thresholds across electrodes. Modulation detection interference (MDI), the difference between thresholds for the modulated maskers and the unmodulated masker, was greater for larger amounts of masking modulation than for smaller amounts of masking modulation. For three of the four subjects, MDI was higher for smaller spatial separations between the two electrodes than for larger spatial separations suggesting that a portion of MDI may be due to overlap of neural excitation distributions produced by stimulation on two electrodes in close proximity on the array.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.423248</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9670536</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Auditory Threshold ; Cochlear Implantation ; Deafness - surgery ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Perceptual Masking ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998-07, Vol.104 (1), p.442-452</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-d9e07b01f6707ce0ae37cdb8f812139f2de68f518b6f8624fcf18d97b4ceabe23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-d9e07b01f6707ce0ae37cdb8f812139f2de68f518b6f8624fcf18d97b4ceabe23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9670536$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busby, P A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, G M</creatorcontrib><title>Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to determine whether detection thresholds for amplitude modulated signals on a single electrode were influenced by a masking modulation on a second electrode in cochlear implant users. Data were collected from four post-linguistically deafened subjects using the Cochlear Limited prosthesis. Investigated were the effects of the spatial separation between test and masker electrodes, 0 to 5 electrodes (0 to 3.75 mm), and the amount of masking modulation: 24%, 48%, 72%, and 96% above detection thresholds. Initially, modulation detection thresholds for stimulation on a single electrode without masking modulation were obtained for a set of six electrodes in the middle of the array. Modulation detection thresholds on a fixed test electrode were then obtained with unmodulated and modulated masking on a second electrode, which was one of the six electrodes in the initial study. In both studies, thresholds were measured for modulated pulse duration at the modulation frequencies of 10-200 Hz. In the first study, the shape of the detection thresholds as a function of modulation frequency, the temporal modulation transfer function, generally resembled a low-pass filter for two subjects. For the other two subjects, the functions were relatively flat across modulation frequencies. In the second study, unmodulated masking resulted in a small elevation in detection thresholds across electrodes. Modulation detection interference (MDI), the difference between thresholds for the modulated maskers and the unmodulated masker, was greater for larger amounts of masking modulation than for smaller amounts of masking modulation. For three of the four subjects, MDI was higher for smaller spatial separations between the two electrodes than for larger spatial separations suggesting that a portion of MDI may be due to overlap of neural excitation distributions produced by stimulation on two electrodes in close proximity on the array.</description><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation</subject><subject>Deafness - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMo4zgK_gGhK3HTMa-m6UaQwReMuNF1yOMGO_Rl0i7890ZbXN174OPccw9ClwRvCaHklmw5ZZTLI7QmBcW5LCg_RmuMMcl5JcQpOovxkGQhWbVCq0qUuGBije5eezc1eqz7LnMwgv3b6m6E4CFAZyGJzPb2swEdsrodGt2NWZzMIbHxHJ143US4WOYGfTw-vO-e8_3b08vufp9bWsoxdxXg0mDi09nSAtbASuuM9DKFZ5WnDoT0BZFGeCko99YT6arScAvaAGUbdD37DqH_miCOqq2jhSaFgX6KSqZHGeM8gTczaEMfYwCvhlC3OnwrgtVvVYqouaqEXi2ek2nB_YNLN-wHjw1jrQ</recordid><startdate>19980701</startdate><enddate>19980701</enddate><creator>Richardson, L M</creator><creator>Busby, P A</creator><creator>Clark, G M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980701</creationdate><title>Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects</title><author>Richardson, L M ; Busby, P A ; Clark, G M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-d9e07b01f6707ce0ae37cdb8f812139f2de68f518b6f8624fcf18d97b4ceabe23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation</topic><topic>Deafness - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busby, P A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, G M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, L M</au><au>Busby, P A</au><au>Clark, G M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>1998-07-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>442</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>442-452</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to determine whether detection thresholds for amplitude modulated signals on a single electrode were influenced by a masking modulation on a second electrode in cochlear implant users. Data were collected from four post-linguistically deafened subjects using the Cochlear Limited prosthesis. Investigated were the effects of the spatial separation between test and masker electrodes, 0 to 5 electrodes (0 to 3.75 mm), and the amount of masking modulation: 24%, 48%, 72%, and 96% above detection thresholds. Initially, modulation detection thresholds for stimulation on a single electrode without masking modulation were obtained for a set of six electrodes in the middle of the array. Modulation detection thresholds on a fixed test electrode were then obtained with unmodulated and modulated masking on a second electrode, which was one of the six electrodes in the initial study. In both studies, thresholds were measured for modulated pulse duration at the modulation frequencies of 10-200 Hz. In the first study, the shape of the detection thresholds as a function of modulation frequency, the temporal modulation transfer function, generally resembled a low-pass filter for two subjects. For the other two subjects, the functions were relatively flat across modulation frequencies. In the second study, unmodulated masking resulted in a small elevation in detection thresholds across electrodes. Modulation detection interference (MDI), the difference between thresholds for the modulated maskers and the unmodulated masker, was greater for larger amounts of masking modulation than for smaller amounts of masking modulation. For three of the four subjects, MDI was higher for smaller spatial separations between the two electrodes than for larger spatial separations suggesting that a portion of MDI may be due to overlap of neural excitation distributions produced by stimulation on two electrodes in close proximity on the array.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>9670536</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.423248</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998-07, Vol.104 (1), p.442-452
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80013344
source MEDLINE; AIP Acoustical Society of America
subjects Auditory Threshold
Cochlear Implantation
Deafness - surgery
Humans
Middle Aged
Perceptual Masking
Time Factors
title Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T07%3A04%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modulation%20detection%20interference%20in%20cochlear%20implant%20subjects&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Richardson,%20L%20M&rft.date=1998-07-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=442&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=442-452&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.423248&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80013344%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80013344&rft_id=info:pmid/9670536&rfr_iscdi=true