Surgery as salvage therapy in chemotherapy‐resistant nonseminomatous germ cell tumours

Objective  To review our experience of surgical staging for residual masses after chemotherapy in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT) and positive tumour markers. Patients and methods  Of 107 patients with metastatic NSGCTs treated surgically after chemotherapy from 1978 to 1995,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British Journal of Urology 1998-06, Vol.81 (6), p.884-888
Hauptverfasser: RAVI, R, ONG, J, OLIVER, R. T. D, BADENOCH, D. F, FOWLER, C. G, HENDRY, W. F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective  To review our experience of surgical staging for residual masses after chemotherapy in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT) and positive tumour markers. Patients and methods  Of 107 patients with metastatic NSGCTs treated surgically after chemotherapy from 1978 to 1995, 30 (median age 30.5 years, range 20–52) had positive tumour markers. These patients were reviewed and the outcome compared with 77 patients who had normal tumour marker values. Results  Of the 77 patients with negative markers undergoing surgical/pathological staging, 71 (92%) became continuously disease‐free, including 37 of 50 (74%) with viable NSGCT in excised specimens. Seventeen of 30 (57%) with raised marker levels undergoing similar surgery for chemotherapy‐resistant tumour became disease‐free, including 11 of 22 with viable NSGCT in the excised specimens. Conclusion  Although the outcome after surgery is better in patients with negative tumour markers, it is clear that surgery is curative for patients with localized chemotherapy‐resistant masses. There is a need for continued debate on the timing of salvage surgery and subsequent chemotherapy.
ISSN:0007-1331
1464-410X
DOI:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00346.x