A critical comparison of osteoplastic and alloplastic augmentation genioplasty
This retrospective study was undertaken in order to compare the objective and subjective outcomes of the osteoplastic and alloplastic genioplasties. Of the 76 patients that underwent augmentation or advancement genioplasty, 34 were subjects of osteoplastic genioplasty and 42 received implants. Twent...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Aesthetic plastic surgery 1990-12, Vol.14 (3), p.199-206 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 206 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 199 |
| container_title | Aesthetic plastic surgery |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | GUYURON, B RASZEWSKI, R. L |
| description | This retrospective study was undertaken in order to compare the objective and subjective outcomes of the osteoplastic and alloplastic genioplasties. Of the 76 patients that underwent augmentation or advancement genioplasty, 34 were subjects of osteoplastic genioplasty and 42 received implants. Twenty seven of 34 patients who underwent osteotomy and 32 of 42 patients whose chins were augmented with an implant responded to the questionnaires. The results revealed that both groups were highly satisfied, with a slightly higher satisfaction rate for those who underwent osteotomy. The morbidity was the same for both procedures. However, the soft tissue response was more predictable for the osteoplastic genioplasty. The cervicomental angle improved more with the osteoplastic genioplasty. Based on our experience and conclusions from this study, we recommend the osteoplastic genioplasty for every patient. However, for patients in the older age group, particularly those with a small degree of microgenia, alloplastic genioplastic can be justified. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF01578350 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79993818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79993818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-dd63af162cbd66d763f846ea3af82ba498b2bb6c826d7a6dbeea3eb70ce908c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1LwzAYh4Moc04v3oVe9CBU89Hm46jDqTD0ouCtvEnTEWmbmbSH_fdGVtwpvHkefocHoUuC7wjG4v5xhUkpJCvxEZqTgtG8pAU5RnPMeJFTwr9O0VmM3xgTKkQxQzPKlJIlmaO3h8wENzgDbWZ8t4Xgou8z32Q-DtZvW4gJZtDXGbTt4R43ne0HGFySN7Z3e7I7RycNtNFeTO8Cfa6ePpYv-fr9-XX5sM4NI3TI65ozaAinRtec14KzRhbcQvqUVEOhpKZacyNpgsBrbROzWmBjFZZGsAW62e9ug_8ZbRyqzkVj2xZ668dYCaUUk0Qm8XYvmuBjDLaptsF1EHYVwdVfvOoQL8lX0-qoO1v_q1OtxK8nDjEFawL0xsXDoioFpVywXz0SeF8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79993818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A critical comparison of osteoplastic and alloplastic augmentation genioplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>GUYURON, B ; RASZEWSKI, R. L</creator><creatorcontrib>GUYURON, B ; RASZEWSKI, R. L</creatorcontrib><description>This retrospective study was undertaken in order to compare the objective and subjective outcomes of the osteoplastic and alloplastic genioplasties. Of the 76 patients that underwent augmentation or advancement genioplasty, 34 were subjects of osteoplastic genioplasty and 42 received implants. Twenty seven of 34 patients who underwent osteotomy and 32 of 42 patients whose chins were augmented with an implant responded to the questionnaires. The results revealed that both groups were highly satisfied, with a slightly higher satisfaction rate for those who underwent osteotomy. The morbidity was the same for both procedures. However, the soft tissue response was more predictable for the osteoplastic genioplasty. The cervicomental angle improved more with the osteoplastic genioplasty. Based on our experience and conclusions from this study, we recommend the osteoplastic genioplasty for every patient. However, for patients in the older age group, particularly those with a small degree of microgenia, alloplastic genioplastic can be justified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-216X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01578350</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2399851</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APSUDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chin - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Osteotomy ; Prostheses and Implants ; Retrospective Studies ; Self Concept ; Skin plastic surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery, Plastic - methods ; Surgery, Plastic - psychology</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic plastic surgery, 1990-12, Vol.14 (3), p.199-206</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-dd63af162cbd66d763f846ea3af82ba498b2bb6c826d7a6dbeea3eb70ce908c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-dd63af162cbd66d763f846ea3af82ba498b2bb6c826d7a6dbeea3eb70ce908c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19572267$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2399851$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GUYURON, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RASZEWSKI, R. L</creatorcontrib><title>A critical comparison of osteoplastic and alloplastic augmentation genioplasty</title><title>Aesthetic plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><description>This retrospective study was undertaken in order to compare the objective and subjective outcomes of the osteoplastic and alloplastic genioplasties. Of the 76 patients that underwent augmentation or advancement genioplasty, 34 were subjects of osteoplastic genioplasty and 42 received implants. Twenty seven of 34 patients who underwent osteotomy and 32 of 42 patients whose chins were augmented with an implant responded to the questionnaires. The results revealed that both groups were highly satisfied, with a slightly higher satisfaction rate for those who underwent osteotomy. The morbidity was the same for both procedures. However, the soft tissue response was more predictable for the osteoplastic genioplasty. The cervicomental angle improved more with the osteoplastic genioplasty. Based on our experience and conclusions from this study, we recommend the osteoplastic genioplasty for every patient. However, for patients in the older age group, particularly those with a small degree of microgenia, alloplastic genioplastic can be justified.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chin - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteotomy</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Skin plastic surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery, Plastic - methods</subject><subject>Surgery, Plastic - psychology</subject><issn>0364-216X</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1LwzAYh4Moc04v3oVe9CBU89Hm46jDqTD0ouCtvEnTEWmbmbSH_fdGVtwpvHkefocHoUuC7wjG4v5xhUkpJCvxEZqTgtG8pAU5RnPMeJFTwr9O0VmM3xgTKkQxQzPKlJIlmaO3h8wENzgDbWZ8t4Xgou8z32Q-DtZvW4gJZtDXGbTt4R43ne0HGFySN7Z3e7I7RycNtNFeTO8Cfa6ePpYv-fr9-XX5sM4NI3TI65ozaAinRtec14KzRhbcQvqUVEOhpKZacyNpgsBrbROzWmBjFZZGsAW62e9ug_8ZbRyqzkVj2xZ668dYCaUUk0Qm8XYvmuBjDLaptsF1EHYVwdVfvOoQL8lX0-qoO1v_q1OtxK8nDjEFawL0xsXDoioFpVywXz0SeF8</recordid><startdate>199012</startdate><enddate>199012</enddate><creator>GUYURON, B</creator><creator>RASZEWSKI, R. L</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199012</creationdate><title>A critical comparison of osteoplastic and alloplastic augmentation genioplasty</title><author>GUYURON, B ; RASZEWSKI, R. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-dd63af162cbd66d763f846ea3af82ba498b2bb6c826d7a6dbeea3eb70ce908c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chin - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteotomy</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Skin plastic surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery, Plastic - methods</topic><topic>Surgery, Plastic - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GUYURON, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RASZEWSKI, R. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GUYURON, B</au><au>RASZEWSKI, R. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A critical comparison of osteoplastic and alloplastic augmentation genioplasty</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><date>1990-12</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>199-206</pages><issn>0364-216X</issn><eissn>1432-5241</eissn><coden>APSUDM</coden><abstract>This retrospective study was undertaken in order to compare the objective and subjective outcomes of the osteoplastic and alloplastic genioplasties. Of the 76 patients that underwent augmentation or advancement genioplasty, 34 were subjects of osteoplastic genioplasty and 42 received implants. Twenty seven of 34 patients who underwent osteotomy and 32 of 42 patients whose chins were augmented with an implant responded to the questionnaires. The results revealed that both groups were highly satisfied, with a slightly higher satisfaction rate for those who underwent osteotomy. The morbidity was the same for both procedures. However, the soft tissue response was more predictable for the osteoplastic genioplasty. The cervicomental angle improved more with the osteoplastic genioplasty. Based on our experience and conclusions from this study, we recommend the osteoplastic genioplasty for every patient. However, for patients in the older age group, particularly those with a small degree of microgenia, alloplastic genioplastic can be justified.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>2399851</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF01578350</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0364-216X |
| ispartof | Aesthetic plastic surgery, 1990-12, Vol.14 (3), p.199-206 |
| issn | 0364-216X 1432-5241 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79993818 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Biological and medical sciences Chin - surgery Female Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Osteotomy Prostheses and Implants Retrospective Studies Self Concept Skin plastic surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery, Plastic - methods Surgery, Plastic - psychology |
| title | A critical comparison of osteoplastic and alloplastic augmentation genioplasty |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A05%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20critical%20comparison%20of%20osteoplastic%20and%20alloplastic%20augmentation%20genioplasty&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=GUYURON,%20B&rft.date=1990-12&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=199-206&rft.issn=0364-216X&rft.eissn=1432-5241&rft.coden=APSUDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01578350&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79993818%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79993818&rft_id=info:pmid/2399851&rfr_iscdi=true |