Comparison of Bioactive Glass Synthetic Bone Graft Particles and Open Debridement in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Defects. A Clinical Study
The purpose of this study was to compare the repair response of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. Fifty‐nine defects in 16 healthy adults were selected. Each patient had at least 2 sites with attachment loss of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of periodontology (1970) 1998-06, Vol.69 (6), p.698-709 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 709 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 698 |
container_title | Journal of periodontology (1970) |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Froum, Stuart J. Weinberg, Mea A. Tarnow, Dennis |
description | The purpose of this study was to compare the repair response of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. Fifty‐nine defects in 16 healthy adults were selected. Each patient had at least 2 sites with attachment loss of at least 6 mm with clinical and radiographie evidence of intrabony or furcation defects. One to 3 months after causerelated therapy (oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing), the following measurements were recorded prior to surgery: probing depths, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession. Each defect was surgically exposed and measurements made of the alveolar crest height and base of osseous defect. The test defects were implanted with bioactive glass. The other sites served as unimplanted controls. Flaps were sutured at or close to the presurgical level. Radiographs and soft tissue presurgical measurements were repeated at 6, 9, and 12 months. At 12 months all sites were surgically re‐entered to record osseous measurements. At the 12‐month evaluation, significantly greater mean probing depth reduction was noted in the bioactive glass group compared to the controls (4.26 mm versus 3.44 mm; P = 0.028). Clinical attachment level gain was significantly improved (P = 0.0004) in the bioactive glass sites (2.96 mm) compared to the control sites (1.54 mm). There was significantly less gingival recession in the bioactive glass sites (1.29 mm) compared to the control sites (1.87 mm). Defect fill was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (3.28 mm) compared to the control sites (1.45 mm). Defect depth reduction was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (4.36 mm) compared to the control sites (3.15 mm). In conclusion, bioactive glass showed significant improvement in clinical parameters compared to open flap debridement. J Periodontol 1998;69:698–709. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1902/jop.1998.69.6.698 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79991265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79991265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-5fad28ecbd7f02816af8c97e10620b172f3e6831c46a3c08e77953127a9445933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EKqHwACyQvGI3wT8Tj71sQ_9QpUa0rC3Hcy1czdiD7aHKY_DGOE3UbTf3Xp97z7fwQegzJUuqCPv2GKc6KLkUailqkW_QgqqWN1x05C1aEMJYw1vF3qMPOT_WJ205OUEnSgjCuVqgf-s4Tib5HAOODp_7aGzxfwFfDSZnfL8L5TcUb_F5DFVMxhW8MakqA2RsQo_vJgj4O2yT72GEULAPuHrwQwJTnoXKvZ5HE_AGko99DMUM1eHAlrzEZ3g9-OBt1e7L3O8-onfODBk-Hfsp-nV58bC-bm7vrm7WZ7eNbSmRzcqZnkmw275zhEkqjJNWdUCJYGRLO-Y4CMmpbYXhlkjoOrXilHVGte1KcX6Kvh64U4p_ZshFjz5bGAYTIM5Zd0opysSqHtLDoU0x5wROT8mPJu00JXofg64x6H0MWigtapHV8-UIn7cj9C-O47_XfXfYP_kBdq8D9Y_NxU-yJ_8HoSqVxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79991265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Bioactive Glass Synthetic Bone Graft Particles and Open Debridement in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Defects. A Clinical Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Froum, Stuart J. ; Weinberg, Mea A. ; Tarnow, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>Froum, Stuart J. ; Weinberg, Mea A. ; Tarnow, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the repair response of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. Fifty‐nine defects in 16 healthy adults were selected. Each patient had at least 2 sites with attachment loss of at least 6 mm with clinical and radiographie evidence of intrabony or furcation defects. One to 3 months after causerelated therapy (oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing), the following measurements were recorded prior to surgery: probing depths, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession. Each defect was surgically exposed and measurements made of the alveolar crest height and base of osseous defect. The test defects were implanted with bioactive glass. The other sites served as unimplanted controls. Flaps were sutured at or close to the presurgical level. Radiographs and soft tissue presurgical measurements were repeated at 6, 9, and 12 months. At 12 months all sites were surgically re‐entered to record osseous measurements. At the 12‐month evaluation, significantly greater mean probing depth reduction was noted in the bioactive glass group compared to the controls (4.26 mm versus 3.44 mm; P = 0.028). Clinical attachment level gain was significantly improved (P = 0.0004) in the bioactive glass sites (2.96 mm) compared to the control sites (1.54 mm). There was significantly less gingival recession in the bioactive glass sites (1.29 mm) compared to the control sites (1.87 mm). Defect fill was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (3.28 mm) compared to the control sites (1.45 mm). Defect depth reduction was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (4.36 mm) compared to the control sites (3.15 mm). In conclusion, bioactive glass showed significant improvement in clinical parameters compared to open flap debridement. J Periodontol 1998;69:698–709.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3492</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.6.698</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9660339</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging ; Alveolar Bone Loss - surgery ; Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging ; Alveolar Process - pathology ; bioactive ; Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use ; bone ; bone regeneration ; Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use ; Debridement ; Dental Plaque Index ; Dental Scaling ; Dentistry ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Furcation Defects - diagnostic imaging ; Furcation Defects - surgery ; Gingival Recession - surgery ; Glass ; Grafts ; Humans ; Male ; Oral Hygiene ; Patient Education as Topic ; Periodontal Attachment Loss - diagnostic imaging ; Periodontal Attachment Loss - surgery ; Periodontal Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Periodontal Diseases - surgery ; periodontal diseases/therapy ; Periodontal Index ; Periodontal Pocket - diagnostic imaging ; Periodontal Pocket - surgery ; Radiography ; Root Planing ; Surgical Flaps ; Tooth Mobility - pathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of periodontology (1970), 1998-06, Vol.69 (6), p.698-709</ispartof><rights>1998 American Academy of Periodontology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-5fad28ecbd7f02816af8c97e10620b172f3e6831c46a3c08e77953127a9445933</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1902%2Fjop.1998.69.6.698$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1902%2Fjop.1998.69.6.698$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9660339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Froum, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Mea A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarnow, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Bioactive Glass Synthetic Bone Graft Particles and Open Debridement in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Defects. A Clinical Study</title><title>Journal of periodontology (1970)</title><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the repair response of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. Fifty‐nine defects in 16 healthy adults were selected. Each patient had at least 2 sites with attachment loss of at least 6 mm with clinical and radiographie evidence of intrabony or furcation defects. One to 3 months after causerelated therapy (oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing), the following measurements were recorded prior to surgery: probing depths, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession. Each defect was surgically exposed and measurements made of the alveolar crest height and base of osseous defect. The test defects were implanted with bioactive glass. The other sites served as unimplanted controls. Flaps were sutured at or close to the presurgical level. Radiographs and soft tissue presurgical measurements were repeated at 6, 9, and 12 months. At 12 months all sites were surgically re‐entered to record osseous measurements. At the 12‐month evaluation, significantly greater mean probing depth reduction was noted in the bioactive glass group compared to the controls (4.26 mm versus 3.44 mm; P = 0.028). Clinical attachment level gain was significantly improved (P = 0.0004) in the bioactive glass sites (2.96 mm) compared to the control sites (1.54 mm). There was significantly less gingival recession in the bioactive glass sites (1.29 mm) compared to the control sites (1.87 mm). Defect fill was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (3.28 mm) compared to the control sites (1.45 mm). Defect depth reduction was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (4.36 mm) compared to the control sites (3.15 mm). In conclusion, bioactive glass showed significant improvement in clinical parameters compared to open flap debridement. J Periodontol 1998;69:698–709.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss - surgery</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - pathology</subject><subject>bioactive</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>bone regeneration</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Dental Plaque Index</subject><subject>Dental Scaling</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Furcation Defects - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Furcation Defects - surgery</subject><subject>Gingival Recession - surgery</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Grafts</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oral Hygiene</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Periodontal Attachment Loss - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Periodontal Attachment Loss - surgery</subject><subject>Periodontal Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Periodontal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>periodontal diseases/therapy</subject><subject>Periodontal Index</subject><subject>Periodontal Pocket - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Periodontal Pocket - surgery</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Root Planing</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Tooth Mobility - pathology</subject><issn>0022-3492</issn><issn>1943-3670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EKqHwACyQvGI3wT8Tj71sQ_9QpUa0rC3Hcy1czdiD7aHKY_DGOE3UbTf3Xp97z7fwQegzJUuqCPv2GKc6KLkUailqkW_QgqqWN1x05C1aEMJYw1vF3qMPOT_WJ205OUEnSgjCuVqgf-s4Tib5HAOODp_7aGzxfwFfDSZnfL8L5TcUb_F5DFVMxhW8MakqA2RsQo_vJgj4O2yT72GEULAPuHrwQwJTnoXKvZ5HE_AGko99DMUM1eHAlrzEZ3g9-OBt1e7L3O8-onfODBk-Hfsp-nV58bC-bm7vrm7WZ7eNbSmRzcqZnkmw275zhEkqjJNWdUCJYGRLO-Y4CMmpbYXhlkjoOrXilHVGte1KcX6Kvh64U4p_ZshFjz5bGAYTIM5Zd0opysSqHtLDoU0x5wROT8mPJu00JXofg64x6H0MWigtapHV8-UIn7cj9C-O47_XfXfYP_kBdq8D9Y_NxU-yJ_8HoSqVxw</recordid><startdate>199806</startdate><enddate>199806</enddate><creator>Froum, Stuart J.</creator><creator>Weinberg, Mea A.</creator><creator>Tarnow, Dennis</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199806</creationdate><title>Comparison of Bioactive Glass Synthetic Bone Graft Particles and Open Debridement in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Defects. A Clinical Study</title><author>Froum, Stuart J. ; Weinberg, Mea A. ; Tarnow, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-5fad28ecbd7f02816af8c97e10620b172f3e6831c46a3c08e77953127a9445933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Alveolar Bone Loss - surgery</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - pathology</topic><topic>bioactive</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>bone regeneration</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Dental Plaque Index</topic><topic>Dental Scaling</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Furcation Defects - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Furcation Defects - surgery</topic><topic>Gingival Recession - surgery</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Grafts</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oral Hygiene</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Periodontal Attachment Loss - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Periodontal Attachment Loss - surgery</topic><topic>Periodontal Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Periodontal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>periodontal diseases/therapy</topic><topic>Periodontal Index</topic><topic>Periodontal Pocket - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Periodontal Pocket - surgery</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Root Planing</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Tooth Mobility - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Froum, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Mea A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarnow, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Froum, Stuart J.</au><au>Weinberg, Mea A.</au><au>Tarnow, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Bioactive Glass Synthetic Bone Graft Particles and Open Debridement in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Defects. A Clinical Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><date>1998-06</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>698</spage><epage>709</epage><pages>698-709</pages><issn>0022-3492</issn><eissn>1943-3670</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to compare the repair response of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. Fifty‐nine defects in 16 healthy adults were selected. Each patient had at least 2 sites with attachment loss of at least 6 mm with clinical and radiographie evidence of intrabony or furcation defects. One to 3 months after causerelated therapy (oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing), the following measurements were recorded prior to surgery: probing depths, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession. Each defect was surgically exposed and measurements made of the alveolar crest height and base of osseous defect. The test defects were implanted with bioactive glass. The other sites served as unimplanted controls. Flaps were sutured at or close to the presurgical level. Radiographs and soft tissue presurgical measurements were repeated at 6, 9, and 12 months. At 12 months all sites were surgically re‐entered to record osseous measurements. At the 12‐month evaluation, significantly greater mean probing depth reduction was noted in the bioactive glass group compared to the controls (4.26 mm versus 3.44 mm; P = 0.028). Clinical attachment level gain was significantly improved (P = 0.0004) in the bioactive glass sites (2.96 mm) compared to the control sites (1.54 mm). There was significantly less gingival recession in the bioactive glass sites (1.29 mm) compared to the control sites (1.87 mm). Defect fill was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (3.28 mm) compared to the control sites (1.45 mm). Defect depth reduction was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (4.36 mm) compared to the control sites (3.15 mm). In conclusion, bioactive glass showed significant improvement in clinical parameters compared to open flap debridement. J Periodontol 1998;69:698–709.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>9660339</pmid><doi>10.1902/jop.1998.69.6.698</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3492 |
ispartof | Journal of periodontology (1970), 1998-06, Vol.69 (6), p.698-709 |
issn | 0022-3492 1943-3670 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79991265 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adult Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging Alveolar Bone Loss - surgery Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging Alveolar Process - pathology bioactive Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use bone bone regeneration Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use Debridement Dental Plaque Index Dental Scaling Dentistry Female Follow-Up Studies Furcation Defects - diagnostic imaging Furcation Defects - surgery Gingival Recession - surgery Glass Grafts Humans Male Oral Hygiene Patient Education as Topic Periodontal Attachment Loss - diagnostic imaging Periodontal Attachment Loss - surgery Periodontal Diseases - diagnostic imaging Periodontal Diseases - surgery periodontal diseases/therapy Periodontal Index Periodontal Pocket - diagnostic imaging Periodontal Pocket - surgery Radiography Root Planing Surgical Flaps Tooth Mobility - pathology |
title | Comparison of Bioactive Glass Synthetic Bone Graft Particles and Open Debridement in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Defects. A Clinical Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T09%3A46%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Bioactive%20Glass%20Synthetic%20Bone%20Graft%20Particles%20and%20Open%20Debridement%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Human%20Periodontal%20Defects.%20A%20Clinical%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20periodontology%20(1970)&rft.au=Froum,%20Stuart%20J.&rft.date=1998-06&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=698&rft.epage=709&rft.pages=698-709&rft.issn=0022-3492&rft.eissn=1943-3670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1902/jop.1998.69.6.698&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79991265%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79991265&rft_id=info:pmid/9660339&rfr_iscdi=true |