Comparison of Bioactive Glass Synthetic Bone Graft Particles and Open Debridement in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Defects. A Clinical Study

The purpose of this study was to compare the repair response of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. Fifty‐nine defects in 16 healthy adults were selected. Each patient had at least 2 sites with attachment loss of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of periodontology (1970) 1998-06, Vol.69 (6), p.698-709
Hauptverfasser: Froum, Stuart J., Weinberg, Mea A., Tarnow, Dennis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 709
container_issue 6
container_start_page 698
container_title Journal of periodontology (1970)
container_volume 69
creator Froum, Stuart J.
Weinberg, Mea A.
Tarnow, Dennis
description The purpose of this study was to compare the repair response of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. Fifty‐nine defects in 16 healthy adults were selected. Each patient had at least 2 sites with attachment loss of at least 6 mm with clinical and radiographie evidence of intrabony or furcation defects. One to 3 months after causerelated therapy (oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing), the following measurements were recorded prior to surgery: probing depths, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession. Each defect was surgically exposed and measurements made of the alveolar crest height and base of osseous defect. The test defects were implanted with bioactive glass. The other sites served as unimplanted controls. Flaps were sutured at or close to the presurgical level. Radiographs and soft tissue presurgical measurements were repeated at 6, 9, and 12 months. At 12 months all sites were surgically re‐entered to record osseous measurements. At the 12‐month evaluation, significantly greater mean probing depth reduction was noted in the bioactive glass group compared to the controls (4.26 mm versus 3.44 mm; P = 0.028). Clinical attachment level gain was significantly improved (P = 0.0004) in the bioactive glass sites (2.96 mm) compared to the control sites (1.54 mm). There was significantly less gingival recession in the bioactive glass sites (1.29 mm) compared to the control sites (1.87 mm). Defect fill was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (3.28 mm) compared to the control sites (1.45 mm). Defect depth reduction was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (4.36 mm) compared to the control sites (3.15 mm). In conclusion, bioactive glass showed significant improvement in clinical parameters compared to open flap debridement. J Periodontol 1998;69:698–709.
doi_str_mv 10.1902/jop.1998.69.6.698
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79991265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79991265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-5fad28ecbd7f02816af8c97e10620b172f3e6831c46a3c08e77953127a9445933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EKqHwACyQvGI3wT8Tj71sQ_9QpUa0rC3Hcy1czdiD7aHKY_DGOE3UbTf3Xp97z7fwQegzJUuqCPv2GKc6KLkUailqkW_QgqqWN1x05C1aEMJYw1vF3qMPOT_WJ205OUEnSgjCuVqgf-s4Tib5HAOODp_7aGzxfwFfDSZnfL8L5TcUb_F5DFVMxhW8MakqA2RsQo_vJgj4O2yT72GEULAPuHrwQwJTnoXKvZ5HE_AGko99DMUM1eHAlrzEZ3g9-OBt1e7L3O8-onfODBk-Hfsp-nV58bC-bm7vrm7WZ7eNbSmRzcqZnkmw275zhEkqjJNWdUCJYGRLO-Y4CMmpbYXhlkjoOrXilHVGte1KcX6Kvh64U4p_ZshFjz5bGAYTIM5Zd0opysSqHtLDoU0x5wROT8mPJu00JXofg64x6H0MWigtapHV8-UIn7cj9C-O47_XfXfYP_kBdq8D9Y_NxU-yJ_8HoSqVxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79991265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Bioactive Glass Synthetic Bone Graft Particles and Open Debridement in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Defects. A Clinical Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Froum, Stuart J. ; Weinberg, Mea A. ; Tarnow, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>Froum, Stuart J. ; Weinberg, Mea A. ; Tarnow, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the repair response of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. Fifty‐nine defects in 16 healthy adults were selected. Each patient had at least 2 sites with attachment loss of at least 6 mm with clinical and radiographie evidence of intrabony or furcation defects. One to 3 months after causerelated therapy (oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing), the following measurements were recorded prior to surgery: probing depths, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession. Each defect was surgically exposed and measurements made of the alveolar crest height and base of osseous defect. The test defects were implanted with bioactive glass. The other sites served as unimplanted controls. Flaps were sutured at or close to the presurgical level. Radiographs and soft tissue presurgical measurements were repeated at 6, 9, and 12 months. At 12 months all sites were surgically re‐entered to record osseous measurements. At the 12‐month evaluation, significantly greater mean probing depth reduction was noted in the bioactive glass group compared to the controls (4.26 mm versus 3.44 mm; P = 0.028). Clinical attachment level gain was significantly improved (P = 0.0004) in the bioactive glass sites (2.96 mm) compared to the control sites (1.54 mm). There was significantly less gingival recession in the bioactive glass sites (1.29 mm) compared to the control sites (1.87 mm). Defect fill was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (3.28 mm) compared to the control sites (1.45 mm). Defect depth reduction was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (4.36 mm) compared to the control sites (3.15 mm). In conclusion, bioactive glass showed significant improvement in clinical parameters compared to open flap debridement. J Periodontol 1998;69:698–709.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3492</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.6.698</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9660339</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging ; Alveolar Bone Loss - surgery ; Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging ; Alveolar Process - pathology ; bioactive ; Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use ; bone ; bone regeneration ; Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use ; Debridement ; Dental Plaque Index ; Dental Scaling ; Dentistry ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Furcation Defects - diagnostic imaging ; Furcation Defects - surgery ; Gingival Recession - surgery ; Glass ; Grafts ; Humans ; Male ; Oral Hygiene ; Patient Education as Topic ; Periodontal Attachment Loss - diagnostic imaging ; Periodontal Attachment Loss - surgery ; Periodontal Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Periodontal Diseases - surgery ; periodontal diseases/therapy ; Periodontal Index ; Periodontal Pocket - diagnostic imaging ; Periodontal Pocket - surgery ; Radiography ; Root Planing ; Surgical Flaps ; Tooth Mobility - pathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of periodontology (1970), 1998-06, Vol.69 (6), p.698-709</ispartof><rights>1998 American Academy of Periodontology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-5fad28ecbd7f02816af8c97e10620b172f3e6831c46a3c08e77953127a9445933</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1902%2Fjop.1998.69.6.698$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1902%2Fjop.1998.69.6.698$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9660339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Froum, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Mea A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarnow, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Bioactive Glass Synthetic Bone Graft Particles and Open Debridement in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Defects. A Clinical Study</title><title>Journal of periodontology (1970)</title><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the repair response of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. Fifty‐nine defects in 16 healthy adults were selected. Each patient had at least 2 sites with attachment loss of at least 6 mm with clinical and radiographie evidence of intrabony or furcation defects. One to 3 months after causerelated therapy (oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing), the following measurements were recorded prior to surgery: probing depths, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession. Each defect was surgically exposed and measurements made of the alveolar crest height and base of osseous defect. The test defects were implanted with bioactive glass. The other sites served as unimplanted controls. Flaps were sutured at or close to the presurgical level. Radiographs and soft tissue presurgical measurements were repeated at 6, 9, and 12 months. At 12 months all sites were surgically re‐entered to record osseous measurements. At the 12‐month evaluation, significantly greater mean probing depth reduction was noted in the bioactive glass group compared to the controls (4.26 mm versus 3.44 mm; P = 0.028). Clinical attachment level gain was significantly improved (P = 0.0004) in the bioactive glass sites (2.96 mm) compared to the control sites (1.54 mm). There was significantly less gingival recession in the bioactive glass sites (1.29 mm) compared to the control sites (1.87 mm). Defect fill was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (3.28 mm) compared to the control sites (1.45 mm). Defect depth reduction was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (4.36 mm) compared to the control sites (3.15 mm). In conclusion, bioactive glass showed significant improvement in clinical parameters compared to open flap debridement. J Periodontol 1998;69:698–709.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss - surgery</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - pathology</subject><subject>bioactive</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>bone regeneration</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Dental Plaque Index</subject><subject>Dental Scaling</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Furcation Defects - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Furcation Defects - surgery</subject><subject>Gingival Recession - surgery</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Grafts</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oral Hygiene</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Periodontal Attachment Loss - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Periodontal Attachment Loss - surgery</subject><subject>Periodontal Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Periodontal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>periodontal diseases/therapy</subject><subject>Periodontal Index</subject><subject>Periodontal Pocket - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Periodontal Pocket - surgery</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Root Planing</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Tooth Mobility - pathology</subject><issn>0022-3492</issn><issn>1943-3670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EKqHwACyQvGI3wT8Tj71sQ_9QpUa0rC3Hcy1czdiD7aHKY_DGOE3UbTf3Xp97z7fwQegzJUuqCPv2GKc6KLkUailqkW_QgqqWN1x05C1aEMJYw1vF3qMPOT_WJ205OUEnSgjCuVqgf-s4Tib5HAOODp_7aGzxfwFfDSZnfL8L5TcUb_F5DFVMxhW8MakqA2RsQo_vJgj4O2yT72GEULAPuHrwQwJTnoXKvZ5HE_AGko99DMUM1eHAlrzEZ3g9-OBt1e7L3O8-onfODBk-Hfsp-nV58bC-bm7vrm7WZ7eNbSmRzcqZnkmw275zhEkqjJNWdUCJYGRLO-Y4CMmpbYXhlkjoOrXilHVGte1KcX6Kvh64U4p_ZshFjz5bGAYTIM5Zd0opysSqHtLDoU0x5wROT8mPJu00JXofg64x6H0MWigtapHV8-UIn7cj9C-O47_XfXfYP_kBdq8D9Y_NxU-yJ_8HoSqVxw</recordid><startdate>199806</startdate><enddate>199806</enddate><creator>Froum, Stuart J.</creator><creator>Weinberg, Mea A.</creator><creator>Tarnow, Dennis</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199806</creationdate><title>Comparison of Bioactive Glass Synthetic Bone Graft Particles and Open Debridement in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Defects. A Clinical Study</title><author>Froum, Stuart J. ; Weinberg, Mea A. ; Tarnow, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-5fad28ecbd7f02816af8c97e10620b172f3e6831c46a3c08e77953127a9445933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Alveolar Bone Loss - surgery</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - pathology</topic><topic>bioactive</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>bone regeneration</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Dental Plaque Index</topic><topic>Dental Scaling</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Furcation Defects - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Furcation Defects - surgery</topic><topic>Gingival Recession - surgery</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Grafts</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oral Hygiene</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Periodontal Attachment Loss - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Periodontal Attachment Loss - surgery</topic><topic>Periodontal Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Periodontal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>periodontal diseases/therapy</topic><topic>Periodontal Index</topic><topic>Periodontal Pocket - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Periodontal Pocket - surgery</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Root Planing</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Tooth Mobility - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Froum, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Mea A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarnow, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Froum, Stuart J.</au><au>Weinberg, Mea A.</au><au>Tarnow, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Bioactive Glass Synthetic Bone Graft Particles and Open Debridement in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Defects. A Clinical Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><date>1998-06</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>698</spage><epage>709</epage><pages>698-709</pages><issn>0022-3492</issn><eissn>1943-3670</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to compare the repair response of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. Fifty‐nine defects in 16 healthy adults were selected. Each patient had at least 2 sites with attachment loss of at least 6 mm with clinical and radiographie evidence of intrabony or furcation defects. One to 3 months after causerelated therapy (oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing), the following measurements were recorded prior to surgery: probing depths, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession. Each defect was surgically exposed and measurements made of the alveolar crest height and base of osseous defect. The test defects were implanted with bioactive glass. The other sites served as unimplanted controls. Flaps were sutured at or close to the presurgical level. Radiographs and soft tissue presurgical measurements were repeated at 6, 9, and 12 months. At 12 months all sites were surgically re‐entered to record osseous measurements. At the 12‐month evaluation, significantly greater mean probing depth reduction was noted in the bioactive glass group compared to the controls (4.26 mm versus 3.44 mm; P = 0.028). Clinical attachment level gain was significantly improved (P = 0.0004) in the bioactive glass sites (2.96 mm) compared to the control sites (1.54 mm). There was significantly less gingival recession in the bioactive glass sites (1.29 mm) compared to the control sites (1.87 mm). Defect fill was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (3.28 mm) compared to the control sites (1.45 mm). Defect depth reduction was significantly greater in the bioactive glass sites (4.36 mm) compared to the control sites (3.15 mm). In conclusion, bioactive glass showed significant improvement in clinical parameters compared to open flap debridement. J Periodontol 1998;69:698–709.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>9660339</pmid><doi>10.1902/jop.1998.69.6.698</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3492
ispartof Journal of periodontology (1970), 1998-06, Vol.69 (6), p.698-709
issn 0022-3492
1943-3670
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79991265
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging
Alveolar Bone Loss - surgery
Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging
Alveolar Process - pathology
bioactive
Biocompatible Materials - therapeutic use
bone
bone regeneration
Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use
Debridement
Dental Plaque Index
Dental Scaling
Dentistry
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Furcation Defects - diagnostic imaging
Furcation Defects - surgery
Gingival Recession - surgery
Glass
Grafts
Humans
Male
Oral Hygiene
Patient Education as Topic
Periodontal Attachment Loss - diagnostic imaging
Periodontal Attachment Loss - surgery
Periodontal Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Periodontal Diseases - surgery
periodontal diseases/therapy
Periodontal Index
Periodontal Pocket - diagnostic imaging
Periodontal Pocket - surgery
Radiography
Root Planing
Surgical Flaps
Tooth Mobility - pathology
title Comparison of Bioactive Glass Synthetic Bone Graft Particles and Open Debridement in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Defects. A Clinical Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T09%3A46%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Bioactive%20Glass%20Synthetic%20Bone%20Graft%20Particles%20and%20Open%20Debridement%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Human%20Periodontal%20Defects.%20A%20Clinical%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20periodontology%20(1970)&rft.au=Froum,%20Stuart%20J.&rft.date=1998-06&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=698&rft.epage=709&rft.pages=698-709&rft.issn=0022-3492&rft.eissn=1943-3670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1902/jop.1998.69.6.698&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79991265%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79991265&rft_id=info:pmid/9660339&rfr_iscdi=true