The effects of aftercare on chronic patients and frail elderly patients when discharged from hospital: a systematic review
The purpose of this systematic review was an assessment of the efficacy of aftercare in chronic patients and the frail elderly when discharged from hospital, as regards quality of life, compliance, costs, medical consumption and quality of care. In pursuit of this goal, 17 publications on the effect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of advanced nursing 1998-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1076-1086 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1086 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1076 |
container_title | Journal of advanced nursing |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Bours, Gerrie J.J.W. Ketelaars, Corry A.J. Frederiks, Carla M.A. Abu-Saad, Huda Huyer Wouters, Emiel F.M. |
description | The purpose of this systematic review was an assessment of the efficacy of aftercare in chronic patients and the frail elderly when discharged from hospital, as regards quality of life, compliance, costs, medical consumption and quality of care. In pursuit of this goal, 17 publications on the effects of aftercare after discharge from hospital were examined. A systematic assessment of methodological quality by two blinded independent reviewers resulted in a consensus score (0–100 points), based on four categories: the study population, description of the interventions, measurement of the outcome and the analysis and presentation of the data. Only three of the 17 studies scored more than 50 points, indicating that most of the studies were of poor methodological quality. The most prevalent methodological problems were that co‐interventions were not avoided, a placebo group was lacking, the assessment was not blinded and the analysis was not made on the basis of the intention‐to‐treat principle. The majority of the studies did not report clear beneficial effects in favour of the intervention group. The positive effects reported were limited to costs and quality of care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00647.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79959597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57382952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4647-65e6699551ffc03e2c5d871a9b58bf20265739815ada3767b324c4bfadb162073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EKkPhEZC8glWCL7GdIDZtRVtKVSQoYmk5zjHxkMtgZ5gZnh6HGQ07QF7Y0n85x_oQwpTklBTy1TKnXIqMyaLMaVWVOSGyUPn2AVochYdoQTipMlYQ9hg9iXFJCOWMsRN0UkmuOFcL9PO-BQzOgZ0iHh02boJgTQA8Dti2YRy8xSszeRiSwQwNdsH4DkPXQOh2f6RNCwNufLStCV9hto09bse48pPpXmOD4y5O0Ce7xQF-eNg8RY-c6SI8O9yn6PPl2_uL6-z2w9W7i7PbzBbpT5kUIGVVCUGds4QDs6IpFTVVLcraMcKkULwqqTCN4UqqmrPCFrUzTU0lI4qfohf73lUYv68hTrpPa0LXmQHGddQqlaczG1_-3SgLwlXJ6T8r00YlqwRLxnJvtGGMMYDTq-B7E3aaEj2T1Es9A9MzMD2T1L9J6m2KPj_MWNc9NMfgAV3S3-z1je9g99-9-ubsLj1SPNvHfcKyPcZN-Kal4kroL3dX-vrT-8uP5-pGF_wXfBi8YA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57382952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of aftercare on chronic patients and frail elderly patients when discharged from hospital: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Bours, Gerrie J.J.W. ; Ketelaars, Corry A.J. ; Frederiks, Carla M.A. ; Abu-Saad, Huda Huyer ; Wouters, Emiel F.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bours, Gerrie J.J.W. ; Ketelaars, Corry A.J. ; Frederiks, Carla M.A. ; Abu-Saad, Huda Huyer ; Wouters, Emiel F.M.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this systematic review was an assessment of the efficacy of aftercare in chronic patients and the frail elderly when discharged from hospital, as regards quality of life, compliance, costs, medical consumption and quality of care. In pursuit of this goal, 17 publications on the effects of aftercare after discharge from hospital were examined. A systematic assessment of methodological quality by two blinded independent reviewers resulted in a consensus score (0–100 points), based on four categories: the study population, description of the interventions, measurement of the outcome and the analysis and presentation of the data. Only three of the 17 studies scored more than 50 points, indicating that most of the studies were of poor methodological quality. The most prevalent methodological problems were that co‐interventions were not avoided, a placebo group was lacking, the assessment was not blinded and the analysis was not made on the basis of the intention‐to‐treat principle. The majority of the studies did not report clear beneficial effects in favour of the intervention group. The positive effects reported were limited to costs and quality of care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-2402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00647.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9637337</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JANUDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>After care ; Aftercare - methods ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Chronic Disease - nursing ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Factors ; Frail Elderly ; Hospital discharged ; Humans ; Netherlands ; nursing aftercare ; Patient Discharge ; post-discharge ; Quality of Life ; Sick people ; systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of advanced nursing, 1998-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1076-1086</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4647-65e6699551ffc03e2c5d871a9b58bf20265739815ada3767b324c4bfadb162073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4647-65e6699551ffc03e2c5d871a9b58bf20265739815ada3767b324c4bfadb162073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2648.1998.00647.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2648.1998.00647.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,1417,27922,27924,27925,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9637337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bours, Gerrie J.J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketelaars, Corry A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederiks, Carla M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu-Saad, Huda Huyer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wouters, Emiel F.M.</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of aftercare on chronic patients and frail elderly patients when discharged from hospital: a systematic review</title><title>Journal of advanced nursing</title><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><description>The purpose of this systematic review was an assessment of the efficacy of aftercare in chronic patients and the frail elderly when discharged from hospital, as regards quality of life, compliance, costs, medical consumption and quality of care. In pursuit of this goal, 17 publications on the effects of aftercare after discharge from hospital were examined. A systematic assessment of methodological quality by two blinded independent reviewers resulted in a consensus score (0–100 points), based on four categories: the study population, description of the interventions, measurement of the outcome and the analysis and presentation of the data. Only three of the 17 studies scored more than 50 points, indicating that most of the studies were of poor methodological quality. The most prevalent methodological problems were that co‐interventions were not avoided, a placebo group was lacking, the assessment was not blinded and the analysis was not made on the basis of the intention‐to‐treat principle. The majority of the studies did not report clear beneficial effects in favour of the intervention group. The positive effects reported were limited to costs and quality of care.</description><subject>After care</subject><subject>Aftercare - methods</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - nursing</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Frail Elderly</subject><subject>Hospital discharged</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>nursing aftercare</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>post-discharge</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Sick people</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><issn>0309-2402</issn><issn>1365-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhi0EKkPhEZC8glWCL7GdIDZtRVtKVSQoYmk5zjHxkMtgZ5gZnh6HGQ07QF7Y0n85x_oQwpTklBTy1TKnXIqMyaLMaVWVOSGyUPn2AVochYdoQTipMlYQ9hg9iXFJCOWMsRN0UkmuOFcL9PO-BQzOgZ0iHh02boJgTQA8Dti2YRy8xSszeRiSwQwNdsH4DkPXQOh2f6RNCwNufLStCV9hto09bse48pPpXmOD4y5O0Ce7xQF-eNg8RY-c6SI8O9yn6PPl2_uL6-z2w9W7i7PbzBbpT5kUIGVVCUGds4QDs6IpFTVVLcraMcKkULwqqTCN4UqqmrPCFrUzTU0lI4qfohf73lUYv68hTrpPa0LXmQHGddQqlaczG1_-3SgLwlXJ6T8r00YlqwRLxnJvtGGMMYDTq-B7E3aaEj2T1Es9A9MzMD2T1L9J6m2KPj_MWNc9NMfgAV3S3-z1je9g99-9-ubsLj1SPNvHfcKyPcZN-Kal4kroL3dX-vrT-8uP5-pGF_wXfBi8YA</recordid><startdate>199805</startdate><enddate>199805</enddate><creator>Bours, Gerrie J.J.W.</creator><creator>Ketelaars, Corry A.J.</creator><creator>Frederiks, Carla M.A.</creator><creator>Abu-Saad, Huda Huyer</creator><creator>Wouters, Emiel F.M.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199805</creationdate><title>The effects of aftercare on chronic patients and frail elderly patients when discharged from hospital: a systematic review</title><author>Bours, Gerrie J.J.W. ; Ketelaars, Corry A.J. ; Frederiks, Carla M.A. ; Abu-Saad, Huda Huyer ; Wouters, Emiel F.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4647-65e6699551ffc03e2c5d871a9b58bf20265739815ada3767b324c4bfadb162073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>After care</topic><topic>Aftercare - methods</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - nursing</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Frail Elderly</topic><topic>Hospital discharged</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>nursing aftercare</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>post-discharge</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Sick people</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bours, Gerrie J.J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketelaars, Corry A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederiks, Carla M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu-Saad, Huda Huyer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wouters, Emiel F.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bours, Gerrie J.J.W.</au><au>Ketelaars, Corry A.J.</au><au>Frederiks, Carla M.A.</au><au>Abu-Saad, Huda Huyer</au><au>Wouters, Emiel F.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of aftercare on chronic patients and frail elderly patients when discharged from hospital: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><date>1998-05</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1076</spage><epage>1086</epage><pages>1076-1086</pages><issn>0309-2402</issn><eissn>1365-2648</eissn><coden>JANUDP</coden><abstract>The purpose of this systematic review was an assessment of the efficacy of aftercare in chronic patients and the frail elderly when discharged from hospital, as regards quality of life, compliance, costs, medical consumption and quality of care. In pursuit of this goal, 17 publications on the effects of aftercare after discharge from hospital were examined. A systematic assessment of methodological quality by two blinded independent reviewers resulted in a consensus score (0–100 points), based on four categories: the study population, description of the interventions, measurement of the outcome and the analysis and presentation of the data. Only three of the 17 studies scored more than 50 points, indicating that most of the studies were of poor methodological quality. The most prevalent methodological problems were that co‐interventions were not avoided, a placebo group was lacking, the assessment was not blinded and the analysis was not made on the basis of the intention‐to‐treat principle. The majority of the studies did not report clear beneficial effects in favour of the intervention group. The positive effects reported were limited to costs and quality of care.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>9637337</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00647.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-2402 |
ispartof | Journal of advanced nursing, 1998-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1076-1086 |
issn | 0309-2402 1365-2648 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79959597 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | After care Aftercare - methods Aged Aged, 80 and over Chronic Disease - nursing Clinical Trials as Topic Factors Frail Elderly Hospital discharged Humans Netherlands nursing aftercare Patient Discharge post-discharge Quality of Life Sick people systematic review |
title | The effects of aftercare on chronic patients and frail elderly patients when discharged from hospital: a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A38%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20aftercare%20on%20chronic%20patients%20and%20frail%20elderly%20patients%20when%20discharged%20from%20hospital:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advanced%20nursing&rft.au=Bours,%20Gerrie%20J.J.W.&rft.date=1998-05&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1076&rft.epage=1086&rft.pages=1076-1086&rft.issn=0309-2402&rft.eissn=1365-2648&rft.coden=JANUDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00647.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57382952%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57382952&rft_id=info:pmid/9637337&rfr_iscdi=true |