Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata

Electronics miniaturization techniques have been used to fabricate substrata to study contact guidance of cells. Topographical guidance of three cell types (BHK, MDCK and chick embryo cerebral neurones) was examined on grooved substrata of varying dimensions (4–24 microns repeat, 0.2-1.9 microns d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Development (Cambridge) 1990-04, Vol.108 (4), p.635-644
Hauptverfasser: CLARK, P, CONNOLLY, P, CURTIS, A. S. G, DOW, J. A. T, WILKINSON, C. D. W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 644
container_issue 4
container_start_page 635
container_title Development (Cambridge)
container_volume 108
creator CLARK, P
CONNOLLY, P
CURTIS, A. S. G
DOW, J. A. T
WILKINSON, C. D. W
description Electronics miniaturization techniques have been used to fabricate substrata to study contact guidance of cells. Topographical guidance of three cell types (BHK, MDCK and chick embryo cerebral neurones) was examined on grooved substrata of varying dimensions (4–24 microns repeat, 0.2-1.9 microns depth). Alignment to within 10 degrees of groove direction was used as our criterion for guidance. It was found that repeat spacing had a small effect (alignment is inversely proportional to spacing) but that groove depth proved to be much more important in determining cell alignment, which increased with depth. Measurements of cell alignment and examination by scanning electron microscopy showed that BHK cells and MDCK cells interacted differently with grooved substrata, and also that the response of MDCK cells depended on whether or not the cells were isolated or part of an epithelial cell island. Guidance by a multiple topographical cue is greater than could be predicted from cells' reactions to a single cue (Clark et al. Development 99: 439–448, 1987). Substratum topography is considered to be an important cue in many developmental processes. Cellular properties such as cytoskeletal organisation, cell adhesion and the interaction with other cells are discussed as being factors determining a cells susceptibility to topography.
doi_str_mv 10.1242/dev.108.4.635
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79950710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15684490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3395-c3e930f6ecfc7229e7bfc54efcd0cc168966f47eba0b9dfcd6ae75430bb3c8533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFPHCEUh0nTxq7aY49N5tB4ckYYGBi8NUbtJjZe9EyAeezSsMsIM2v635fNbow3L0De-_J-jw-h7wQ3pGXt1QC7huC-YQ2n3Se0IEyIWpJWfkYLLDtcEynJV3Sa81-MMeVCnKCTlvaipXKB7p_iGFdJj2tvdahs3E4phiq6ykIIlYG13vk4p-tquWyqP3OY_BigWqUYdzBUeTZ5SnrS5-iL0yHDt-N9hp7vbp9uftcPj_fLm18PtaVUduUESbHjYJ0VbStBGGc7Bs4O2FrCe8m5YwKMxkYOpco1iI5RbAy1fUfpGbo4zB1TfJkhT2rj835VvYU4ZyVk-bIg-EOQdLxnTO7B-gDaFHNO4NSY_Eanf4pgtTesiuHy7hVTxXDhfxwHz2YDwxt9VFr6P499nYtSl_TW-vyGcUkkY6Jglwds7VfrV59AGR9DXPk85X0ihDi-S_0PIreUFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15684490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Company of Biologists</source><creator>CLARK, P ; CONNOLLY, P ; CURTIS, A. S. G ; DOW, J. A. T ; WILKINSON, C. D. W</creator><creatorcontrib>CLARK, P ; CONNOLLY, P ; CURTIS, A. S. G ; DOW, J. A. T ; WILKINSON, C. D. W</creatorcontrib><description>Electronics miniaturization techniques have been used to fabricate substrata to study contact guidance of cells. Topographical guidance of three cell types (BHK, MDCK and chick embryo cerebral neurones) was examined on grooved substrata of varying dimensions (4–24 microns repeat, 0.2-1.9 microns depth). Alignment to within 10 degrees of groove direction was used as our criterion for guidance. It was found that repeat spacing had a small effect (alignment is inversely proportional to spacing) but that groove depth proved to be much more important in determining cell alignment, which increased with depth. Measurements of cell alignment and examination by scanning electron microscopy showed that BHK cells and MDCK cells interacted differently with grooved substrata, and also that the response of MDCK cells depended on whether or not the cells were isolated or part of an epithelial cell island. Guidance by a multiple topographical cue is greater than could be predicted from cells' reactions to a single cue (Clark et al. Development 99: 439–448, 1987). Substratum topography is considered to be an important cue in many developmental processes. Cellular properties such as cytoskeletal organisation, cell adhesion and the interaction with other cells are discussed as being factors determining a cells susceptibility to topography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-1991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-9129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1242/dev.108.4.635</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2387239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: The Company of Biologists Limited</publisher><subject>Animal cells ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - cytology ; Brain - ultrastructure ; Cell Communication ; Cell cultures. Hybridization. Fusion ; Cell Movement ; Cells, Cultured ; Chick Embryo ; Epithelial Cells ; Epithelium - ultrastructure ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Neurons - cytology ; Neurons - ultrastructure</subject><ispartof>Development (Cambridge), 1990-04, Vol.108 (4), p.635-644</ispartof><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3395-c3e930f6ecfc7229e7bfc54efcd0cc168966f47eba0b9dfcd6ae75430bb3c8533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3395-c3e930f6ecfc7229e7bfc54efcd0cc168966f47eba0b9dfcd6ae75430bb3c8533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3666,27906,27907</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=6919447$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2387239$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CLARK, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONNOLLY, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CURTIS, A. S. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOW, J. A. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILKINSON, C. D. W</creatorcontrib><title>Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata</title><title>Development (Cambridge)</title><addtitle>Development</addtitle><description>Electronics miniaturization techniques have been used to fabricate substrata to study contact guidance of cells. Topographical guidance of three cell types (BHK, MDCK and chick embryo cerebral neurones) was examined on grooved substrata of varying dimensions (4–24 microns repeat, 0.2-1.9 microns depth). Alignment to within 10 degrees of groove direction was used as our criterion for guidance. It was found that repeat spacing had a small effect (alignment is inversely proportional to spacing) but that groove depth proved to be much more important in determining cell alignment, which increased with depth. Measurements of cell alignment and examination by scanning electron microscopy showed that BHK cells and MDCK cells interacted differently with grooved substrata, and also that the response of MDCK cells depended on whether or not the cells were isolated or part of an epithelial cell island. Guidance by a multiple topographical cue is greater than could be predicted from cells' reactions to a single cue (Clark et al. Development 99: 439–448, 1987). Substratum topography is considered to be an important cue in many developmental processes. Cellular properties such as cytoskeletal organisation, cell adhesion and the interaction with other cells are discussed as being factors determining a cells susceptibility to topography.</description><subject>Animal cells</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - cytology</subject><subject>Brain - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Cell Communication</subject><subject>Cell cultures. Hybridization. Fusion</subject><subject>Cell Movement</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Chick Embryo</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells</subject><subject>Epithelium - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Neurons - cytology</subject><subject>Neurons - ultrastructure</subject><issn>0950-1991</issn><issn>1477-9129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFPHCEUh0nTxq7aY49N5tB4ckYYGBi8NUbtJjZe9EyAeezSsMsIM2v635fNbow3L0De-_J-jw-h7wQ3pGXt1QC7huC-YQ2n3Se0IEyIWpJWfkYLLDtcEynJV3Sa81-MMeVCnKCTlvaipXKB7p_iGFdJj2tvdahs3E4phiq6ykIIlYG13vk4p-tquWyqP3OY_BigWqUYdzBUeTZ5SnrS5-iL0yHDt-N9hp7vbp9uftcPj_fLm18PtaVUduUESbHjYJ0VbStBGGc7Bs4O2FrCe8m5YwKMxkYOpco1iI5RbAy1fUfpGbo4zB1TfJkhT2rj835VvYU4ZyVk-bIg-EOQdLxnTO7B-gDaFHNO4NSY_Eanf4pgtTesiuHy7hVTxXDhfxwHz2YDwxt9VFr6P499nYtSl_TW-vyGcUkkY6Jglwds7VfrV59AGR9DXPk85X0ihDi-S_0PIreUFQ</recordid><startdate>199004</startdate><enddate>199004</enddate><creator>CLARK, P</creator><creator>CONNOLLY, P</creator><creator>CURTIS, A. S. G</creator><creator>DOW, J. A. T</creator><creator>WILKINSON, C. D. W</creator><general>The Company of Biologists Limited</general><general>Company of Biologists</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199004</creationdate><title>Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata</title><author>CLARK, P ; CONNOLLY, P ; CURTIS, A. S. G ; DOW, J. A. T ; WILKINSON, C. D. W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3395-c3e930f6ecfc7229e7bfc54efcd0cc168966f47eba0b9dfcd6ae75430bb3c8533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Animal cells</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - cytology</topic><topic>Brain - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Cell Communication</topic><topic>Cell cultures. Hybridization. Fusion</topic><topic>Cell Movement</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Chick Embryo</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells</topic><topic>Epithelium - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Neurons - cytology</topic><topic>Neurons - ultrastructure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CLARK, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONNOLLY, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CURTIS, A. S. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOW, J. A. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILKINSON, C. D. W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Development (Cambridge)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CLARK, P</au><au>CONNOLLY, P</au><au>CURTIS, A. S. G</au><au>DOW, J. A. T</au><au>WILKINSON, C. D. W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata</atitle><jtitle>Development (Cambridge)</jtitle><addtitle>Development</addtitle><date>1990-04</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>644</epage><pages>635-644</pages><issn>0950-1991</issn><eissn>1477-9129</eissn><abstract>Electronics miniaturization techniques have been used to fabricate substrata to study contact guidance of cells. Topographical guidance of three cell types (BHK, MDCK and chick embryo cerebral neurones) was examined on grooved substrata of varying dimensions (4–24 microns repeat, 0.2-1.9 microns depth). Alignment to within 10 degrees of groove direction was used as our criterion for guidance. It was found that repeat spacing had a small effect (alignment is inversely proportional to spacing) but that groove depth proved to be much more important in determining cell alignment, which increased with depth. Measurements of cell alignment and examination by scanning electron microscopy showed that BHK cells and MDCK cells interacted differently with grooved substrata, and also that the response of MDCK cells depended on whether or not the cells were isolated or part of an epithelial cell island. Guidance by a multiple topographical cue is greater than could be predicted from cells' reactions to a single cue (Clark et al. Development 99: 439–448, 1987). Substratum topography is considered to be an important cue in many developmental processes. Cellular properties such as cytoskeletal organisation, cell adhesion and the interaction with other cells are discussed as being factors determining a cells susceptibility to topography.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>The Company of Biologists Limited</pub><pmid>2387239</pmid><doi>10.1242/dev.108.4.635</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-1991
ispartof Development (Cambridge), 1990-04, Vol.108 (4), p.635-644
issn 0950-1991
1477-9129
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79950710
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Company of Biologists
subjects Animal cells
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Brain - cytology
Brain - ultrastructure
Cell Communication
Cell cultures. Hybridization. Fusion
Cell Movement
Cells, Cultured
Chick Embryo
Epithelial Cells
Epithelium - ultrastructure
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Molecular and cellular biology
Neurons - cytology
Neurons - ultrastructure
title Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A08%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Topographical%20control%20of%20cell%20behaviour:%20II.%20Multiple%20grooved%20substrata&rft.jtitle=Development%20(Cambridge)&rft.au=CLARK,%20P&rft.date=1990-04&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=644&rft.pages=635-644&rft.issn=0950-1991&rft.eissn=1477-9129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1242/dev.108.4.635&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15684490%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15684490&rft_id=info:pmid/2387239&rfr_iscdi=true