Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata
Electronics miniaturization techniques have been used to fabricate substrata to study contact guidance of cells. Topographical guidance of three cell types (BHK, MDCK and chick embryo cerebral neurones) was examined on grooved substrata of varying dimensions (4â24 microns repeat, 0.2-1.9 microns d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Development (Cambridge) 1990-04, Vol.108 (4), p.635-644 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 644 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 635 |
container_title | Development (Cambridge) |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | CLARK, P CONNOLLY, P CURTIS, A. S. G DOW, J. A. T WILKINSON, C. D. W |
description | Electronics miniaturization techniques have been used to fabricate substrata to study contact guidance of cells. Topographical guidance of three cell types (BHK, MDCK and chick embryo cerebral neurones) was examined on grooved substrata of varying dimensions (4â24 microns repeat, 0.2-1.9 microns depth). Alignment to within 10 degrees of groove direction was used as our criterion for guidance. It was found that repeat spacing had a small effect (alignment is inversely proportional to spacing) but that groove depth proved to be much more important in determining cell alignment, which increased with depth. Measurements of cell alignment and examination by scanning electron microscopy showed that BHK cells and MDCK cells interacted differently with grooved substrata, and also that the response of MDCK cells depended on whether or not the cells were isolated or part of an epithelial cell island. Guidance by a multiple topographical cue is greater than could be predicted from cells' reactions to a single cue (Clark et al. Development 99: 439â448, 1987). Substratum topography is considered to be an important cue in many developmental processes. Cellular properties such as cytoskeletal organisation, cell adhesion and the interaction with other cells are discussed as being factors determining a cells susceptibility to topography. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1242/dev.108.4.635 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79950710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15684490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3395-c3e930f6ecfc7229e7bfc54efcd0cc168966f47eba0b9dfcd6ae75430bb3c8533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFPHCEUh0nTxq7aY49N5tB4ckYYGBi8NUbtJjZe9EyAeezSsMsIM2v635fNbow3L0De-_J-jw-h7wQ3pGXt1QC7huC-YQ2n3Se0IEyIWpJWfkYLLDtcEynJV3Sa81-MMeVCnKCTlvaipXKB7p_iGFdJj2tvdahs3E4phiq6ykIIlYG13vk4p-tquWyqP3OY_BigWqUYdzBUeTZ5SnrS5-iL0yHDt-N9hp7vbp9uftcPj_fLm18PtaVUduUESbHjYJ0VbStBGGc7Bs4O2FrCe8m5YwKMxkYOpco1iI5RbAy1fUfpGbo4zB1TfJkhT2rj835VvYU4ZyVk-bIg-EOQdLxnTO7B-gDaFHNO4NSY_Eanf4pgtTesiuHy7hVTxXDhfxwHz2YDwxt9VFr6P499nYtSl_TW-vyGcUkkY6Jglwds7VfrV59AGR9DXPk85X0ihDi-S_0PIreUFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15684490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Company of Biologists</source><creator>CLARK, P ; CONNOLLY, P ; CURTIS, A. S. G ; DOW, J. A. T ; WILKINSON, C. D. W</creator><creatorcontrib>CLARK, P ; CONNOLLY, P ; CURTIS, A. S. G ; DOW, J. A. T ; WILKINSON, C. D. W</creatorcontrib><description>Electronics miniaturization techniques have been used to fabricate substrata to study contact guidance of cells. Topographical guidance of three cell types (BHK, MDCK and chick embryo cerebral neurones) was examined on grooved substrata of varying dimensions (4â24 microns repeat, 0.2-1.9 microns depth). Alignment to within 10 degrees of groove direction was used as our criterion for guidance. It was found that repeat spacing had a small effect (alignment is inversely proportional to spacing) but that groove depth proved to be much more important in determining cell alignment, which increased with depth. Measurements of cell alignment and examination by scanning electron microscopy showed that BHK cells and MDCK cells interacted differently with grooved substrata, and also that the response of MDCK cells depended on whether or not the cells were isolated or part of an epithelial cell island. Guidance by a multiple topographical cue is greater than could be predicted from cells' reactions to a single cue (Clark et al. Development 99: 439â448, 1987). Substratum topography is considered to be an important cue in many developmental processes. Cellular properties such as cytoskeletal organisation, cell adhesion and the interaction with other cells are discussed as being factors determining a cells susceptibility to topography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-1991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-9129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1242/dev.108.4.635</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2387239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: The Company of Biologists Limited</publisher><subject>Animal cells ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - cytology ; Brain - ultrastructure ; Cell Communication ; Cell cultures. Hybridization. Fusion ; Cell Movement ; Cells, Cultured ; Chick Embryo ; Epithelial Cells ; Epithelium - ultrastructure ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Neurons - cytology ; Neurons - ultrastructure</subject><ispartof>Development (Cambridge), 1990-04, Vol.108 (4), p.635-644</ispartof><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3395-c3e930f6ecfc7229e7bfc54efcd0cc168966f47eba0b9dfcd6ae75430bb3c8533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3395-c3e930f6ecfc7229e7bfc54efcd0cc168966f47eba0b9dfcd6ae75430bb3c8533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3666,27906,27907</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6919447$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2387239$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CLARK, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONNOLLY, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CURTIS, A. S. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOW, J. A. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILKINSON, C. D. W</creatorcontrib><title>Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata</title><title>Development (Cambridge)</title><addtitle>Development</addtitle><description>Electronics miniaturization techniques have been used to fabricate substrata to study contact guidance of cells. Topographical guidance of three cell types (BHK, MDCK and chick embryo cerebral neurones) was examined on grooved substrata of varying dimensions (4â24 microns repeat, 0.2-1.9 microns depth). Alignment to within 10 degrees of groove direction was used as our criterion for guidance. It was found that repeat spacing had a small effect (alignment is inversely proportional to spacing) but that groove depth proved to be much more important in determining cell alignment, which increased with depth. Measurements of cell alignment and examination by scanning electron microscopy showed that BHK cells and MDCK cells interacted differently with grooved substrata, and also that the response of MDCK cells depended on whether or not the cells were isolated or part of an epithelial cell island. Guidance by a multiple topographical cue is greater than could be predicted from cells' reactions to a single cue (Clark et al. Development 99: 439â448, 1987). Substratum topography is considered to be an important cue in many developmental processes. Cellular properties such as cytoskeletal organisation, cell adhesion and the interaction with other cells are discussed as being factors determining a cells susceptibility to topography.</description><subject>Animal cells</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - cytology</subject><subject>Brain - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Cell Communication</subject><subject>Cell cultures. Hybridization. Fusion</subject><subject>Cell Movement</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Chick Embryo</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells</subject><subject>Epithelium - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Neurons - cytology</subject><subject>Neurons - ultrastructure</subject><issn>0950-1991</issn><issn>1477-9129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFPHCEUh0nTxq7aY49N5tB4ckYYGBi8NUbtJjZe9EyAeezSsMsIM2v635fNbow3L0De-_J-jw-h7wQ3pGXt1QC7huC-YQ2n3Se0IEyIWpJWfkYLLDtcEynJV3Sa81-MMeVCnKCTlvaipXKB7p_iGFdJj2tvdahs3E4phiq6ykIIlYG13vk4p-tquWyqP3OY_BigWqUYdzBUeTZ5SnrS5-iL0yHDt-N9hp7vbp9uftcPj_fLm18PtaVUduUESbHjYJ0VbStBGGc7Bs4O2FrCe8m5YwKMxkYOpco1iI5RbAy1fUfpGbo4zB1TfJkhT2rj835VvYU4ZyVk-bIg-EOQdLxnTO7B-gDaFHNO4NSY_Eanf4pgtTesiuHy7hVTxXDhfxwHz2YDwxt9VFr6P499nYtSl_TW-vyGcUkkY6Jglwds7VfrV59AGR9DXPk85X0ihDi-S_0PIreUFQ</recordid><startdate>199004</startdate><enddate>199004</enddate><creator>CLARK, P</creator><creator>CONNOLLY, P</creator><creator>CURTIS, A. S. G</creator><creator>DOW, J. A. T</creator><creator>WILKINSON, C. D. W</creator><general>The Company of Biologists Limited</general><general>Company of Biologists</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199004</creationdate><title>Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata</title><author>CLARK, P ; CONNOLLY, P ; CURTIS, A. S. G ; DOW, J. A. T ; WILKINSON, C. D. W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3395-c3e930f6ecfc7229e7bfc54efcd0cc168966f47eba0b9dfcd6ae75430bb3c8533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Animal cells</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - cytology</topic><topic>Brain - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Cell Communication</topic><topic>Cell cultures. Hybridization. Fusion</topic><topic>Cell Movement</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Chick Embryo</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells</topic><topic>Epithelium - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Neurons - cytology</topic><topic>Neurons - ultrastructure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CLARK, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONNOLLY, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CURTIS, A. S. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOW, J. A. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILKINSON, C. D. W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Development (Cambridge)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CLARK, P</au><au>CONNOLLY, P</au><au>CURTIS, A. S. G</au><au>DOW, J. A. T</au><au>WILKINSON, C. D. W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata</atitle><jtitle>Development (Cambridge)</jtitle><addtitle>Development</addtitle><date>1990-04</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>644</epage><pages>635-644</pages><issn>0950-1991</issn><eissn>1477-9129</eissn><abstract>Electronics miniaturization techniques have been used to fabricate substrata to study contact guidance of cells. Topographical guidance of three cell types (BHK, MDCK and chick embryo cerebral neurones) was examined on grooved substrata of varying dimensions (4â24 microns repeat, 0.2-1.9 microns depth). Alignment to within 10 degrees of groove direction was used as our criterion for guidance. It was found that repeat spacing had a small effect (alignment is inversely proportional to spacing) but that groove depth proved to be much more important in determining cell alignment, which increased with depth. Measurements of cell alignment and examination by scanning electron microscopy showed that BHK cells and MDCK cells interacted differently with grooved substrata, and also that the response of MDCK cells depended on whether or not the cells were isolated or part of an epithelial cell island. Guidance by a multiple topographical cue is greater than could be predicted from cells' reactions to a single cue (Clark et al. Development 99: 439â448, 1987). Substratum topography is considered to be an important cue in many developmental processes. Cellular properties such as cytoskeletal organisation, cell adhesion and the interaction with other cells are discussed as being factors determining a cells susceptibility to topography.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>The Company of Biologists Limited</pub><pmid>2387239</pmid><doi>10.1242/dev.108.4.635</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-1991 |
ispartof | Development (Cambridge), 1990-04, Vol.108 (4), p.635-644 |
issn | 0950-1991 1477-9129 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79950710 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Company of Biologists |
subjects | Animal cells Animals Biological and medical sciences Brain - cytology Brain - ultrastructure Cell Communication Cell cultures. Hybridization. Fusion Cell Movement Cells, Cultured Chick Embryo Epithelial Cells Epithelium - ultrastructure Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Molecular and cellular biology Neurons - cytology Neurons - ultrastructure |
title | Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A08%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Topographical%20control%20of%20cell%20behaviour:%20II.%20Multiple%20grooved%20substrata&rft.jtitle=Development%20(Cambridge)&rft.au=CLARK,%20P&rft.date=1990-04&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=644&rft.pages=635-644&rft.issn=0950-1991&rft.eissn=1477-9129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1242/dev.108.4.635&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15684490%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15684490&rft_id=info:pmid/2387239&rfr_iscdi=true |