Paravertebral somatic nerve block for outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy: An expanded case report of 22 patients

Background and Objectives. Inguinal herniorrhaphy is a common outpatient surgical procedure. However, anesthetic techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy are still associated with numerous side effects. Paravertebral somatic nerve block (PSNB) has the potential advantage to offer unilateral abdominal w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 1998-05, Vol.23 (3), p.306-310
Hauptverfasser: Klein, Stephen M., Greengrass, Roy A., Weltz, Christina, Warner, David S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 310
container_issue 3
container_start_page 306
container_title Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
container_volume 23
creator Klein, Stephen M.
Greengrass, Roy A.
Weltz, Christina
Warner, David S.
description Background and Objectives. Inguinal herniorrhaphy is a common outpatient surgical procedure. However, anesthetic techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy are still associated with numerous side effects. Paravertebral somatic nerve block (PSNB) has the potential advantage to offer unilateral abdominal wall anesthesia and long-lasting pain relief with minimal side effects. We report our initial trial of PSNB for outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy. Methods. Twenty-two patients received a PSNB at T10 to L2 using 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:400,000 at each of the five levels. The onset of surgical anesthesia, duration of analgesia, side effects, and patient satisfaction with the technique were documented. Results. Surgical anesthesia occurred 15–30 minutes after injection. Two patients had a failed block. The mean ± SD time to onset of discomfort was 14 ± 11 hours. Time until first narcotic requirement was 22 ± 18 hours. Thirteen patients (n = 20) had no incisional discomfort 10 hours or longer after their blocks. Three patients had epidural spread. Most patients were very satisfied with their anesthetic technique. Conclusions. The results of our initial experience suggest that PSNB is a potentially safe and effective technique. In general, the block provided long-lasting pain relief in most patients with few side effects. A randomized study comparing paravertebral blocks with conventional anesthesia choices is suggested given the findings in this initial series of patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1098-7339(98)90059-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79914085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1098733998900591</els_id><sourcerecordid>79914085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-5a7c0071e5e4f8d5563a5a4ff71a03eda42910902d926e2a39cde94afcb674df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFrFTEUhYMotbb-hEJwIboYTSbJZOJGSmmrUKhQXYe85MaXOm8y3sw82n_ftO_pwo2rGzjfueGeQ8gJZx84493HG85M32ghzDvTvzeMKdPwZ-SQK9E2faf48_r-g7wkr0q5ZYz1WnYH5MB0XCgpD0n-5tBtAWdYoRtoyRs3J09HwC3Q1ZD9Lxoz0rzMUxVgnGkafy5prOwacEwZce2m9f0nejpSuJvcGCBQ7wpQhCnjTHOkbUv37nJMXkQ3FHi9n0fkx8X597MvzdX15dez06vGi17PjXLaM6Y5KJCxD0p1wiknY9TcMQHBydbU41gbTNtB64TxAYx00a86LUMUR-Ttbu-E-fcCZbabVDwMgxshL8VqY7hkvargm3_A27xgva_Ylimues1lhdQO8phLQYh2wrRxeG85s49t2Kc27GPUts6nNiyvvpP98mW1gfDXtY-_6p93OtQotgnQFl9j8hASgp9tyOk_PzwAOj6a8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205158714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paravertebral somatic nerve block for outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy: An expanded case report of 22 patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Klein, Stephen M. ; Greengrass, Roy A. ; Weltz, Christina ; Warner, David S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Klein, Stephen M. ; Greengrass, Roy A. ; Weltz, Christina ; Warner, David S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives. Inguinal herniorrhaphy is a common outpatient surgical procedure. However, anesthetic techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy are still associated with numerous side effects. Paravertebral somatic nerve block (PSNB) has the potential advantage to offer unilateral abdominal wall anesthesia and long-lasting pain relief with minimal side effects. We report our initial trial of PSNB for outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy. Methods. Twenty-two patients received a PSNB at T10 to L2 using 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:400,000 at each of the five levels. The onset of surgical anesthesia, duration of analgesia, side effects, and patient satisfaction with the technique were documented. Results. Surgical anesthesia occurred 15–30 minutes after injection. Two patients had a failed block. The mean ± SD time to onset of discomfort was 14 ± 11 hours. Time until first narcotic requirement was 22 ± 18 hours. Thirteen patients (n = 20) had no incisional discomfort 10 hours or longer after their blocks. Three patients had epidural spread. Most patients were very satisfied with their anesthetic technique. Conclusions. The results of our initial experience suggest that PSNB is a potentially safe and effective technique. In general, the block provided long-lasting pain relief in most patients with few side effects. A randomized study comparing paravertebral blocks with conventional anesthesia choices is suggested given the findings in this initial series of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-7339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8651</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1098-7339(98)90059-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9613544</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; ambulatory surgery ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures ; Hernia, Inguinal - surgery ; herniorrhaphy ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Nerve Block ; paravertebral ; Regional anesthesia</subject><ispartof>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 1998-05, Vol.23 (3), p.306-310</ispartof><rights>1998</rights><rights>Copyright Churchill Livingstone Inc., Medical Publishers May/Jun 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-5a7c0071e5e4f8d5563a5a4ff71a03eda42910902d926e2a39cde94afcb674df3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9613544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klein, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greengrass, Roy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weltz, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, David S.</creatorcontrib><title>Paravertebral somatic nerve block for outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy: An expanded case report of 22 patients</title><title>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</title><addtitle>Reg Anesth Pain Med</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives. Inguinal herniorrhaphy is a common outpatient surgical procedure. However, anesthetic techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy are still associated with numerous side effects. Paravertebral somatic nerve block (PSNB) has the potential advantage to offer unilateral abdominal wall anesthesia and long-lasting pain relief with minimal side effects. We report our initial trial of PSNB for outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy. Methods. Twenty-two patients received a PSNB at T10 to L2 using 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:400,000 at each of the five levels. The onset of surgical anesthesia, duration of analgesia, side effects, and patient satisfaction with the technique were documented. Results. Surgical anesthesia occurred 15–30 minutes after injection. Two patients had a failed block. The mean ± SD time to onset of discomfort was 14 ± 11 hours. Time until first narcotic requirement was 22 ± 18 hours. Thirteen patients (n = 20) had no incisional discomfort 10 hours or longer after their blocks. Three patients had epidural spread. Most patients were very satisfied with their anesthetic technique. Conclusions. The results of our initial experience suggest that PSNB is a potentially safe and effective technique. In general, the block provided long-lasting pain relief in most patients with few side effects. A randomized study comparing paravertebral blocks with conventional anesthesia choices is suggested given the findings in this initial series of patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>ambulatory surgery</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</subject><subject>herniorrhaphy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nerve Block</subject><subject>paravertebral</subject><subject>Regional anesthesia</subject><issn>1098-7339</issn><issn>1532-8651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFrFTEUhYMotbb-hEJwIboYTSbJZOJGSmmrUKhQXYe85MaXOm8y3sw82n_ftO_pwo2rGzjfueGeQ8gJZx84493HG85M32ghzDvTvzeMKdPwZ-SQK9E2faf48_r-g7wkr0q5ZYz1WnYH5MB0XCgpD0n-5tBtAWdYoRtoyRs3J09HwC3Q1ZD9Lxoz0rzMUxVgnGkafy5prOwacEwZce2m9f0nejpSuJvcGCBQ7wpQhCnjTHOkbUv37nJMXkQ3FHi9n0fkx8X597MvzdX15dez06vGi17PjXLaM6Y5KJCxD0p1wiknY9TcMQHBydbU41gbTNtB64TxAYx00a86LUMUR-Ttbu-E-fcCZbabVDwMgxshL8VqY7hkvargm3_A27xgva_Ylimues1lhdQO8phLQYh2wrRxeG85s49t2Kc27GPUts6nNiyvvpP98mW1gfDXtY-_6p93OtQotgnQFl9j8hASgp9tyOk_PzwAOj6a8w</recordid><startdate>19980501</startdate><enddate>19980501</enddate><creator>Klein, Stephen M.</creator><creator>Greengrass, Roy A.</creator><creator>Weltz, Christina</creator><creator>Warner, David S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980501</creationdate><title>Paravertebral somatic nerve block for outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy: An expanded case report of 22 patients</title><author>Klein, Stephen M. ; Greengrass, Roy A. ; Weltz, Christina ; Warner, David S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-5a7c0071e5e4f8d5563a5a4ff71a03eda42910902d926e2a39cde94afcb674df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>ambulatory surgery</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</topic><topic>herniorrhaphy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nerve Block</topic><topic>paravertebral</topic><topic>Regional anesthesia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klein, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greengrass, Roy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weltz, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, David S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klein, Stephen M.</au><au>Greengrass, Roy A.</au><au>Weltz, Christina</au><au>Warner, David S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paravertebral somatic nerve block for outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy: An expanded case report of 22 patients</atitle><jtitle>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Reg Anesth Pain Med</addtitle><date>1998-05-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>306</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>306-310</pages><issn>1098-7339</issn><eissn>1532-8651</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives. Inguinal herniorrhaphy is a common outpatient surgical procedure. However, anesthetic techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy are still associated with numerous side effects. Paravertebral somatic nerve block (PSNB) has the potential advantage to offer unilateral abdominal wall anesthesia and long-lasting pain relief with minimal side effects. We report our initial trial of PSNB for outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy. Methods. Twenty-two patients received a PSNB at T10 to L2 using 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:400,000 at each of the five levels. The onset of surgical anesthesia, duration of analgesia, side effects, and patient satisfaction with the technique were documented. Results. Surgical anesthesia occurred 15–30 minutes after injection. Two patients had a failed block. The mean ± SD time to onset of discomfort was 14 ± 11 hours. Time until first narcotic requirement was 22 ± 18 hours. Thirteen patients (n = 20) had no incisional discomfort 10 hours or longer after their blocks. Three patients had epidural spread. Most patients were very satisfied with their anesthetic technique. Conclusions. The results of our initial experience suggest that PSNB is a potentially safe and effective technique. In general, the block provided long-lasting pain relief in most patients with few side effects. A randomized study comparing paravertebral blocks with conventional anesthesia choices is suggested given the findings in this initial series of patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9613544</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1098-7339(98)90059-1</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-7339
ispartof Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 1998-05, Vol.23 (3), p.306-310
issn 1098-7339
1532-8651
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79914085
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
ambulatory surgery
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Hernia, Inguinal - surgery
herniorrhaphy
Humans
Middle Aged
Nerve Block
paravertebral
Regional anesthesia
title Paravertebral somatic nerve block for outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy: An expanded case report of 22 patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A20%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paravertebral%20somatic%20nerve%20block%20for%20outpatient%20inguinal%20herniorrhaphy:%20An%20expanded%20case%20report%20of%2022%20patients&rft.jtitle=Regional%20anesthesia%20and%20pain%20medicine&rft.au=Klein,%20Stephen%20M.&rft.date=1998-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=306&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=306-310&rft.issn=1098-7339&rft.eissn=1532-8651&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1098-7339(98)90059-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79914085%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205158714&rft_id=info:pmid/9613544&rft_els_id=S1098733998900591&rfr_iscdi=true