Repositioning Accuracy: Comparison of a Noninvasive Head Holder with Thermoplastic Mask for Fractionated Radiotherapy and a Case Report

Purpose: To compare accuracy, clinical feasibility, and subjective patient impression between a noninvasive head holder (Vogele Bale Hohner [VBH]; Wellhoefer Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) developed at the University of Innsbruck and the thermoplastic mask fixation system for use in fractionate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 1998-05, Vol.41 (2), p.475-483
Hauptverfasser: Sweeney, Reinhart, Bale, Reto, Vogele, Michael, Nevinny-Stickel, Meinhart, Bluhm, Anja, Auer, Thomas, Hessenberger, Gerhart, Lukas, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 483
container_issue 2
container_start_page 475
container_title International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
container_volume 41
creator Sweeney, Reinhart
Bale, Reto
Vogele, Michael
Nevinny-Stickel, Meinhart
Bluhm, Anja
Auer, Thomas
Hessenberger, Gerhart
Lukas, Peter
description Purpose: To compare accuracy, clinical feasibility, and subjective patient impression between a noninvasive head holder (Vogele Bale Hohner [VBH]; Wellhoefer Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) developed at the University of Innsbruck and the thermoplastic mask fixation system for use in fractionated external radiotherapy. We present a case report of an actual patient fixated in the VBH head holder during radiation therapy. Materials and Methods: The VBH head holder consists of an individualized vacuum dental cast connected to a head plate via two hydraulic arms allowing noninvasive, reproducible head fixation of even uncooperative patients. Accuracy was tested and compared with that of the thermoplastic mask using the Phillips EasyGuide navigation system on five volunteers. Specific external registration points served as landmarks and their positions were compared after each repositioning. System and operator inaccuracy were also taken into account. The times taken for production and repositioning of the respective fixation devices were compared, and subjective impressions were noted. Results: Mean VBH head holder repositioning accuracy was 1.02 mm while that of the thermoplastic mask was 3.05 mm. 69% of mask repositionings showed a deviation > 2 mm and 41% > 3 mm (as opposed to 8% and 1% respectively for the VBH head holder) Those points located farthest away from the respective plane of fixation showed the largest deviations. Both production and repositioning times were similar between the systems; depending upon the patient, the VBH head holder was generally better tolerated than the mask system. Conclusion: Due to its significantly better repositioning accuracy compared to that of the thermoplastic mask, the VBH head holder is especially suited for external radiation requiring precise repositioning due to critical tissues in immediate surrounding of the area to be irradiated.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00064-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79900559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360301698000649</els_id><sourcerecordid>79900559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-3de90ea45c6584035bc4743f2fb2e48905b5003f416ee5c84f31446861c38ba03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQhy0EKkvhESr5gFA5hNrrP7G5oGrVskgtSKVI3KyJM6GGJA52dtE-Aa9N0l3tlZNHmm8-j35DyBln7zjj-uIrE5oVYirPrXnLGNOysE_IgpvSFkKp70_J4og8Jy9y_jlBnJfyhJxYzUqhywX5e4dDzGEMsQ_9D3rp_SaB372nq9gNkEKOPY0NBfp5BraQwxbpGqGm69jWmOifMD7Q-wdMXRxayGPw9BbyL9rERK8n1WyGEWt6B3WI4wTCsKPQ15NzBRnpvEAaX5JnDbQZXx3eU_Lt-up-tS5uvnz8tLq8KbyUYixEjZYhSOW1MpIJVXlZStEsm2qJ0limKsWYaCTXiMob2QgupTaae2EqYOKUvNl7hxR_bzCPrgvZY9tCj3GTXWktY0rZCVR70KeYc8LGDSl0kHaOMzcfwD0ewM3pOmvc4wHcPHd2-GBTdVgfpw6JT_3Xhz5kD22ToPchH7GlmERm1nzYYziFsQ2YXPYBe491SOhHV8fwn0X-AZU_ou4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79900559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repositioning Accuracy: Comparison of a Noninvasive Head Holder with Thermoplastic Mask for Fractionated Radiotherapy and a Case Report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sweeney, Reinhart ; Bale, Reto ; Vogele, Michael ; Nevinny-Stickel, Meinhart ; Bluhm, Anja ; Auer, Thomas ; Hessenberger, Gerhart ; Lukas, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, Reinhart ; Bale, Reto ; Vogele, Michael ; Nevinny-Stickel, Meinhart ; Bluhm, Anja ; Auer, Thomas ; Hessenberger, Gerhart ; Lukas, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To compare accuracy, clinical feasibility, and subjective patient impression between a noninvasive head holder (Vogele Bale Hohner [VBH]; Wellhoefer Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) developed at the University of Innsbruck and the thermoplastic mask fixation system for use in fractionated external radiotherapy. We present a case report of an actual patient fixated in the VBH head holder during radiation therapy. Materials and Methods: The VBH head holder consists of an individualized vacuum dental cast connected to a head plate via two hydraulic arms allowing noninvasive, reproducible head fixation of even uncooperative patients. Accuracy was tested and compared with that of the thermoplastic mask using the Phillips EasyGuide navigation system on five volunteers. Specific external registration points served as landmarks and their positions were compared after each repositioning. System and operator inaccuracy were also taken into account. The times taken for production and repositioning of the respective fixation devices were compared, and subjective impressions were noted. Results: Mean VBH head holder repositioning accuracy was 1.02 mm while that of the thermoplastic mask was 3.05 mm. 69% of mask repositionings showed a deviation &gt; 2 mm and 41% &gt; 3 mm (as opposed to 8% and 1% respectively for the VBH head holder) Those points located farthest away from the respective plane of fixation showed the largest deviations. Both production and repositioning times were similar between the systems; depending upon the patient, the VBH head holder was generally better tolerated than the mask system. Conclusion: Due to its significantly better repositioning accuracy compared to that of the thermoplastic mask, the VBH head holder is especially suited for external radiation requiring precise repositioning due to critical tissues in immediate surrounding of the area to be irradiated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00064-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9607367</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOBPD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic - radiotherapy ; Dental Impression Materials ; Dental Impression Technique ; Dose Fractionation, Radiation ; Equipment Design ; Fractionated radiotherapy ; Head ; Head fixation ; Humans ; Immobilization ; Male ; Mask ; Medical sciences ; Mouth Protectors ; Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Patient fixation ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sphenoid Sinus ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation ; VBH head holder</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 1998-05, Vol.41 (2), p.475-483</ispartof><rights>1998 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-3de90ea45c6584035bc4743f2fb2e48905b5003f416ee5c84f31446861c38ba03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-3de90ea45c6584035bc4743f2fb2e48905b5003f416ee5c84f31446861c38ba03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00064-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2300089$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9607367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, Reinhart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bale, Reto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogele, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevinny-Stickel, Meinhart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bluhm, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hessenberger, Gerhart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukas, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Repositioning Accuracy: Comparison of a Noninvasive Head Holder with Thermoplastic Mask for Fractionated Radiotherapy and a Case Report</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: To compare accuracy, clinical feasibility, and subjective patient impression between a noninvasive head holder (Vogele Bale Hohner [VBH]; Wellhoefer Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) developed at the University of Innsbruck and the thermoplastic mask fixation system for use in fractionated external radiotherapy. We present a case report of an actual patient fixated in the VBH head holder during radiation therapy. Materials and Methods: The VBH head holder consists of an individualized vacuum dental cast connected to a head plate via two hydraulic arms allowing noninvasive, reproducible head fixation of even uncooperative patients. Accuracy was tested and compared with that of the thermoplastic mask using the Phillips EasyGuide navigation system on five volunteers. Specific external registration points served as landmarks and their positions were compared after each repositioning. System and operator inaccuracy were also taken into account. The times taken for production and repositioning of the respective fixation devices were compared, and subjective impressions were noted. Results: Mean VBH head holder repositioning accuracy was 1.02 mm while that of the thermoplastic mask was 3.05 mm. 69% of mask repositionings showed a deviation &gt; 2 mm and 41% &gt; 3 mm (as opposed to 8% and 1% respectively for the VBH head holder) Those points located farthest away from the respective plane of fixation showed the largest deviations. Both production and repositioning times were similar between the systems; depending upon the patient, the VBH head holder was generally better tolerated than the mask system. Conclusion: Due to its significantly better repositioning accuracy compared to that of the thermoplastic mask, the VBH head holder is especially suited for external radiation requiring precise repositioning due to critical tissues in immediate surrounding of the area to be irradiated.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Dental Impression Materials</subject><subject>Dental Impression Technique</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Fractionated radiotherapy</subject><subject>Head</subject><subject>Head fixation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immobilization</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mask</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mouth Protectors</subject><subject>Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Patient fixation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sphenoid Sinus</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</subject><subject>VBH head holder</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQhy0EKkvhESr5gFA5hNrrP7G5oGrVskgtSKVI3KyJM6GGJA52dtE-Aa9N0l3tlZNHmm8-j35DyBln7zjj-uIrE5oVYirPrXnLGNOysE_IgpvSFkKp70_J4og8Jy9y_jlBnJfyhJxYzUqhywX5e4dDzGEMsQ_9D3rp_SaB372nq9gNkEKOPY0NBfp5BraQwxbpGqGm69jWmOifMD7Q-wdMXRxayGPw9BbyL9rERK8n1WyGEWt6B3WI4wTCsKPQ15NzBRnpvEAaX5JnDbQZXx3eU_Lt-up-tS5uvnz8tLq8KbyUYixEjZYhSOW1MpIJVXlZStEsm2qJ0limKsWYaCTXiMob2QgupTaae2EqYOKUvNl7hxR_bzCPrgvZY9tCj3GTXWktY0rZCVR70KeYc8LGDSl0kHaOMzcfwD0ewM3pOmvc4wHcPHd2-GBTdVgfpw6JT_3Xhz5kD22ToPchH7GlmERm1nzYYziFsQ2YXPYBe491SOhHV8fwn0X-AZU_ou4</recordid><startdate>19980501</startdate><enddate>19980501</enddate><creator>Sweeney, Reinhart</creator><creator>Bale, Reto</creator><creator>Vogele, Michael</creator><creator>Nevinny-Stickel, Meinhart</creator><creator>Bluhm, Anja</creator><creator>Auer, Thomas</creator><creator>Hessenberger, Gerhart</creator><creator>Lukas, Peter</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980501</creationdate><title>Repositioning Accuracy: Comparison of a Noninvasive Head Holder with Thermoplastic Mask for Fractionated Radiotherapy and a Case Report</title><author>Sweeney, Reinhart ; Bale, Reto ; Vogele, Michael ; Nevinny-Stickel, Meinhart ; Bluhm, Anja ; Auer, Thomas ; Hessenberger, Gerhart ; Lukas, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-3de90ea45c6584035bc4743f2fb2e48905b5003f416ee5c84f31446861c38ba03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Dental Impression Materials</topic><topic>Dental Impression Technique</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Fractionated radiotherapy</topic><topic>Head</topic><topic>Head fixation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immobilization</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mask</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mouth Protectors</topic><topic>Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Patient fixation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sphenoid Sinus</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</topic><topic>VBH head holder</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, Reinhart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bale, Reto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogele, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevinny-Stickel, Meinhart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bluhm, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hessenberger, Gerhart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukas, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sweeney, Reinhart</au><au>Bale, Reto</au><au>Vogele, Michael</au><au>Nevinny-Stickel, Meinhart</au><au>Bluhm, Anja</au><au>Auer, Thomas</au><au>Hessenberger, Gerhart</au><au>Lukas, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repositioning Accuracy: Comparison of a Noninvasive Head Holder with Thermoplastic Mask for Fractionated Radiotherapy and a Case Report</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>1998-05-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>475</spage><epage>483</epage><pages>475-483</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><coden>IOBPD3</coden><abstract>Purpose: To compare accuracy, clinical feasibility, and subjective patient impression between a noninvasive head holder (Vogele Bale Hohner [VBH]; Wellhoefer Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) developed at the University of Innsbruck and the thermoplastic mask fixation system for use in fractionated external radiotherapy. We present a case report of an actual patient fixated in the VBH head holder during radiation therapy. Materials and Methods: The VBH head holder consists of an individualized vacuum dental cast connected to a head plate via two hydraulic arms allowing noninvasive, reproducible head fixation of even uncooperative patients. Accuracy was tested and compared with that of the thermoplastic mask using the Phillips EasyGuide navigation system on five volunteers. Specific external registration points served as landmarks and their positions were compared after each repositioning. System and operator inaccuracy were also taken into account. The times taken for production and repositioning of the respective fixation devices were compared, and subjective impressions were noted. Results: Mean VBH head holder repositioning accuracy was 1.02 mm while that of the thermoplastic mask was 3.05 mm. 69% of mask repositionings showed a deviation &gt; 2 mm and 41% &gt; 3 mm (as opposed to 8% and 1% respectively for the VBH head holder) Those points located farthest away from the respective plane of fixation showed the largest deviations. Both production and repositioning times were similar between the systems; depending upon the patient, the VBH head holder was generally better tolerated than the mask system. Conclusion: Due to its significantly better repositioning accuracy compared to that of the thermoplastic mask, the VBH head holder is especially suited for external radiation requiring precise repositioning due to critical tissues in immediate surrounding of the area to be irradiated.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9607367</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00064-9</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-3016
ispartof International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 1998-05, Vol.41 (2), p.475-483
issn 0360-3016
1879-355X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79900559
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic - radiotherapy
Dental Impression Materials
Dental Impression Technique
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Equipment Design
Fractionated radiotherapy
Head
Head fixation
Humans
Immobilization
Male
Mask
Medical sciences
Mouth Protectors
Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Patient fixation
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Reproducibility of Results
Sphenoid Sinus
Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation
VBH head holder
title Repositioning Accuracy: Comparison of a Noninvasive Head Holder with Thermoplastic Mask for Fractionated Radiotherapy and a Case Report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A28%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repositioning%20Accuracy:%20Comparison%20of%20a%20Noninvasive%20Head%20Holder%20with%20Thermoplastic%20Mask%20for%20Fractionated%20Radiotherapy%20and%20a%20Case%20Report&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Sweeney,%20Reinhart&rft.date=1998-05-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=475&rft.epage=483&rft.pages=475-483&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.coden=IOBPD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00064-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79900559%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79900559&rft_id=info:pmid/9607367&rft_els_id=S0360301698000649&rfr_iscdi=true