Application of the Syva EMIT and Abbott TDx amphetamine immunoassays to the detection of 3,4-methylene-dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylene-dioxyethamphetamine (MDEA) in urine
MDMA and MDEA are hallucinogenic analogs of amphetamine. The need for laboratory monitoring of these substances has developed as a result of their increased recreational use. Since the Abbott TDx and Syva EMIT-d.a.u. immunoassays are commonly used tests for urine monitoring of drugs-of-abuse, the am...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of analytical toxicology 1990-05, Vol.14 (3), p.149-153 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 153 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 149 |
container_title | Journal of analytical toxicology |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | KUNSMAN, G. W MANNO, J. E COCKERHAM, K. R MANNO, B. R |
description | MDMA and MDEA are hallucinogenic analogs of amphetamine. The need for laboratory monitoring of these substances has developed as a result of their increased recreational use. Since the Abbott TDx and Syva EMIT-d.a.u. immunoassays are commonly used tests for urine monitoring of drugs-of-abuse, the amphetamine assay of each manufacturer was assessed to determine the degree of cross-reactivity with MDMA and MDEA. Cross-reactivity was evaluated using a series of MDMA- and MDEA-spiked urine samples. Testing was performed over a two-day period with 3 runs/day and each sample run in duplicate. The Syva EMIT d.a.u. amphetamine assay was positive only at the highest concentration standard (10.0 micrograms/mL) for both MDMA and MDEA. Consequently, no further testing was performed with this assay. Calibration curves were generated for the TDx runs and percent cross-reactivity determinations were made. Precision for the TDx data was evaluated based on within-day and between-day coefficients of variation (CV). CVs for MDMA runs were below 6% for within-day and below 5% for between-day runs. Values of CV for MDEA were below 16% for both within-day and between runs; CVs were less than 2.5% for positive values. Cross-reactivity for MDMA ranged from 18% (10.00 micrograms/mL) to 118% (0.15 microgram/mL). Cross-reactivity for the MDEA standards ranged from 12% (10.00 micrograms/mL) to 47% (0.15 micrograms/mL). The presence of MDMA and/or MDEA in samples resulting in a negative EMIT-d.a.u. test and a positive TDx test was confirmed by GC/MS analysis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jat/14.3.149 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79897133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15783885</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p199t-8e99cb3b5f4e4bbbb076bf0332a751ae5ed9b6bdaf586faf6b00629307f5d9203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVoSTcft14LujSkUG8kS5as45JsmkCWHrI9LyN7xCr4q5Yc1v9Z_7w66RYCCWQuw-P95s3hEfKZszlnRlw8QLzgci7mXJoDMuNGZkkqmfhAZoxLlUit2CdyFMIDY1zlShySQ2600FLPyJ9F11W-gOjbhraOxi3S-_ER6HJ1u6bQlHRhbRsjXV_tKNTdFiPUvkHq63poWggBxkBj-3xYYsTif5L4LpMa43assMGk9O1ufJIvM85XV6vFt-cvb9Cv4eUE-4YO_aRPyEcHVcDT_T4mv66X68ub5O7nj9vLxV3ScWNikqMxhRU2cxKlnYZpZR0TIgWdccAMS2OVLcFluXLglGVMpUYw7bLSpEwck7N_uV3f_h4wxE3tQ4FVBQ22Q9hokxvNhXgX5JnORZ5nE_hlDw62xnLT9b6GftzsO5n8r3sfQgGV66EpfHiBpTmbOhV_AeotnK4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15783885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of the Syva EMIT and Abbott TDx amphetamine immunoassays to the detection of 3,4-methylene-dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylene-dioxyethamphetamine (MDEA) in urine</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>KUNSMAN, G. W ; MANNO, J. E ; COCKERHAM, K. R ; MANNO, B. R</creator><creatorcontrib>KUNSMAN, G. W ; MANNO, J. E ; COCKERHAM, K. R ; MANNO, B. R</creatorcontrib><description>MDMA and MDEA are hallucinogenic analogs of amphetamine. The need for laboratory monitoring of these substances has developed as a result of their increased recreational use. Since the Abbott TDx and Syva EMIT-d.a.u. immunoassays are commonly used tests for urine monitoring of drugs-of-abuse, the amphetamine assay of each manufacturer was assessed to determine the degree of cross-reactivity with MDMA and MDEA. Cross-reactivity was evaluated using a series of MDMA- and MDEA-spiked urine samples. Testing was performed over a two-day period with 3 runs/day and each sample run in duplicate. The Syva EMIT d.a.u. amphetamine assay was positive only at the highest concentration standard (10.0 micrograms/mL) for both MDMA and MDEA. Consequently, no further testing was performed with this assay. Calibration curves were generated for the TDx runs and percent cross-reactivity determinations were made. Precision for the TDx data was evaluated based on within-day and between-day coefficients of variation (CV). CVs for MDMA runs were below 6% for within-day and below 5% for between-day runs. Values of CV for MDEA were below 16% for both within-day and between runs; CVs were less than 2.5% for positive values. Cross-reactivity for MDMA ranged from 18% (10.00 micrograms/mL) to 118% (0.15 microgram/mL). Cross-reactivity for the MDEA standards ranged from 12% (10.00 micrograms/mL) to 47% (0.15 micrograms/mL). The presence of MDMA and/or MDEA in samples resulting in a negative EMIT-d.a.u. test and a positive TDx test was confirmed by GC/MS analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-4760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-2403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jat/14.3.149</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1973747</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JATOD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Niles, IL: Preston</publisher><subject>3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine - analogs & derivatives ; 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine - urine ; Amphetamines - urine ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemistry Techniques, Analytical ; Cross Reactions ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug addictions ; False Negative Reactions ; Fluorescence Polarization - methods ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ; Humans ; Immunoenzyme Techniques ; Medical sciences ; N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine ; Reproducibility of Results ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Journal of analytical toxicology, 1990-05, Vol.14 (3), p.149-153</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19280476$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1973747$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KUNSMAN, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANNO, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COCKERHAM, K. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANNO, B. R</creatorcontrib><title>Application of the Syva EMIT and Abbott TDx amphetamine immunoassays to the detection of 3,4-methylene-dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylene-dioxyethamphetamine (MDEA) in urine</title><title>Journal of analytical toxicology</title><addtitle>J Anal Toxicol</addtitle><description>MDMA and MDEA are hallucinogenic analogs of amphetamine. The need for laboratory monitoring of these substances has developed as a result of their increased recreational use. Since the Abbott TDx and Syva EMIT-d.a.u. immunoassays are commonly used tests for urine monitoring of drugs-of-abuse, the amphetamine assay of each manufacturer was assessed to determine the degree of cross-reactivity with MDMA and MDEA. Cross-reactivity was evaluated using a series of MDMA- and MDEA-spiked urine samples. Testing was performed over a two-day period with 3 runs/day and each sample run in duplicate. The Syva EMIT d.a.u. amphetamine assay was positive only at the highest concentration standard (10.0 micrograms/mL) for both MDMA and MDEA. Consequently, no further testing was performed with this assay. Calibration curves were generated for the TDx runs and percent cross-reactivity determinations were made. Precision for the TDx data was evaluated based on within-day and between-day coefficients of variation (CV). CVs for MDMA runs were below 6% for within-day and below 5% for between-day runs. Values of CV for MDEA were below 16% for both within-day and between runs; CVs were less than 2.5% for positive values. Cross-reactivity for MDMA ranged from 18% (10.00 micrograms/mL) to 118% (0.15 microgram/mL). Cross-reactivity for the MDEA standards ranged from 12% (10.00 micrograms/mL) to 47% (0.15 micrograms/mL). The presence of MDMA and/or MDEA in samples resulting in a negative EMIT-d.a.u. test and a positive TDx test was confirmed by GC/MS analysis.</description><subject>3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine - urine</subject><subject>Amphetamines - urine</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemistry Techniques, Analytical</subject><subject>Cross Reactions</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug addictions</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>Fluorescence Polarization - methods</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoenzyme Techniques</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0146-4760</issn><issn>1945-2403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVoSTcft14LujSkUG8kS5as45JsmkCWHrI9LyN7xCr4q5Yc1v9Z_7w66RYCCWQuw-P95s3hEfKZszlnRlw8QLzgci7mXJoDMuNGZkkqmfhAZoxLlUit2CdyFMIDY1zlShySQ2600FLPyJ9F11W-gOjbhraOxi3S-_ER6HJ1u6bQlHRhbRsjXV_tKNTdFiPUvkHq63poWggBxkBj-3xYYsTif5L4LpMa43assMGk9O1ufJIvM85XV6vFt-cvb9Cv4eUE-4YO_aRPyEcHVcDT_T4mv66X68ub5O7nj9vLxV3ScWNikqMxhRU2cxKlnYZpZR0TIgWdccAMS2OVLcFluXLglGVMpUYw7bLSpEwck7N_uV3f_h4wxE3tQ4FVBQ22Q9hokxvNhXgX5JnORZ5nE_hlDw62xnLT9b6GftzsO5n8r3sfQgGV66EpfHiBpTmbOhV_AeotnK4</recordid><startdate>19900501</startdate><enddate>19900501</enddate><creator>KUNSMAN, G. W</creator><creator>MANNO, J. E</creator><creator>COCKERHAM, K. R</creator><creator>MANNO, B. R</creator><general>Preston</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900501</creationdate><title>Application of the Syva EMIT and Abbott TDx amphetamine immunoassays to the detection of 3,4-methylene-dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylene-dioxyethamphetamine (MDEA) in urine</title><author>KUNSMAN, G. W ; MANNO, J. E ; COCKERHAM, K. R ; MANNO, B. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p199t-8e99cb3b5f4e4bbbb076bf0332a751ae5ed9b6bdaf586faf6b00629307f5d9203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine - urine</topic><topic>Amphetamines - urine</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemistry Techniques, Analytical</topic><topic>Cross Reactions</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug addictions</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>Fluorescence Polarization - methods</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoenzyme Techniques</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KUNSMAN, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANNO, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COCKERHAM, K. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANNO, B. R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of analytical toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KUNSMAN, G. W</au><au>MANNO, J. E</au><au>COCKERHAM, K. R</au><au>MANNO, B. R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of the Syva EMIT and Abbott TDx amphetamine immunoassays to the detection of 3,4-methylene-dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylene-dioxyethamphetamine (MDEA) in urine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of analytical toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anal Toxicol</addtitle><date>1990-05-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>149-153</pages><issn>0146-4760</issn><eissn>1945-2403</eissn><coden>JATOD3</coden><abstract>MDMA and MDEA are hallucinogenic analogs of amphetamine. The need for laboratory monitoring of these substances has developed as a result of their increased recreational use. Since the Abbott TDx and Syva EMIT-d.a.u. immunoassays are commonly used tests for urine monitoring of drugs-of-abuse, the amphetamine assay of each manufacturer was assessed to determine the degree of cross-reactivity with MDMA and MDEA. Cross-reactivity was evaluated using a series of MDMA- and MDEA-spiked urine samples. Testing was performed over a two-day period with 3 runs/day and each sample run in duplicate. The Syva EMIT d.a.u. amphetamine assay was positive only at the highest concentration standard (10.0 micrograms/mL) for both MDMA and MDEA. Consequently, no further testing was performed with this assay. Calibration curves were generated for the TDx runs and percent cross-reactivity determinations were made. Precision for the TDx data was evaluated based on within-day and between-day coefficients of variation (CV). CVs for MDMA runs were below 6% for within-day and below 5% for between-day runs. Values of CV for MDEA were below 16% for both within-day and between runs; CVs were less than 2.5% for positive values. Cross-reactivity for MDMA ranged from 18% (10.00 micrograms/mL) to 118% (0.15 microgram/mL). Cross-reactivity for the MDEA standards ranged from 12% (10.00 micrograms/mL) to 47% (0.15 micrograms/mL). The presence of MDMA and/or MDEA in samples resulting in a negative EMIT-d.a.u. test and a positive TDx test was confirmed by GC/MS analysis.</abstract><cop>Niles, IL</cop><pub>Preston</pub><pmid>1973747</pmid><doi>10.1093/jat/14.3.149</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-4760 |
ispartof | Journal of analytical toxicology, 1990-05, Vol.14 (3), p.149-153 |
issn | 0146-4760 1945-2403 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79897133 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive legacy; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine - analogs & derivatives 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine - urine Amphetamines - urine Biological and medical sciences Chemistry Techniques, Analytical Cross Reactions Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Drug addictions False Negative Reactions Fluorescence Polarization - methods Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Humans Immunoenzyme Techniques Medical sciences N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine Reproducibility of Results Toxicology |
title | Application of the Syva EMIT and Abbott TDx amphetamine immunoassays to the detection of 3,4-methylene-dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylene-dioxyethamphetamine (MDEA) in urine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A12%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20the%20Syva%20EMIT%20and%20Abbott%20TDx%20amphetamine%20immunoassays%20to%20the%20detection%20of%203,4-methylene-dioxymethamphetamine%20(MDMA)%20and%203,4-methylene-dioxyethamphetamine%20(MDEA)%20in%20urine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20analytical%20toxicology&rft.au=KUNSMAN,%20G.%20W&rft.date=1990-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=149-153&rft.issn=0146-4760&rft.eissn=1945-2403&rft.coden=JATOD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jat/14.3.149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E15783885%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15783885&rft_id=info:pmid/1973747&rfr_iscdi=true |