An evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay method for immunoreactive trypsin in dried blood spots

A novel monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for the measurement of the human cationic trypsinogen (NeoScreen, AGEN Biomedical Ltd., Acacia Ridge, Australia) in dried blood spots for the neonatal screening of cystic fibrosis was evaluated. The calibration standards provided as d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical biochemistry 1990-06, Vol.23 (3), p.213-219
Hauptverfasser: Cabrini, Giulio, Pederzini, Fabio, Perobelli, Laura, Mastella, Gianni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 219
container_issue 3
container_start_page 213
container_title Clinical biochemistry
container_volume 23
creator Cabrini, Giulio
Pederzini, Fabio
Perobelli, Laura
Mastella, Gianni
description A novel monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for the measurement of the human cationic trypsinogen (NeoScreen, AGEN Biomedical Ltd., Acacia Ridge, Australia) in dried blood spots for the neonatal screening of cystic fibrosis was evaluated. The calibration standards provided as dried blood spots by AGEN are highly unstable and must be replaced with user prepared materials. Reference values from control individuals were obtained by parametric methods. A preliminary comparison with a polyclonal antibody based RIA method (Trypsik, SORIN Biomedica, Saluggia, Italy) was performed. Regression analysis between the RIA and the EIA methods gave a coefficient of correlation of 0.58 for RIA values < 40 μg/L and of 0.77 for RIA values ≥ 40 μg/L. Average CV of the within-run imprecision for the EIA method was 19.6% and for the RIA method 28.8%. CVs of the between-run imprecision at low, intermediate and high values for the EIA method were 23.7%, 15.8%, 15.6% and for the RIA method 20.6%, 14.4%, 11.2%. The diagnostic accuracy analyzed by a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve of the RIA method gave a maximum accuracy of 190.9 while that of a simulated ROC curve for the EIA method was 193.0. We found that the precision and the diagnostic accuracy of the EIA method (AGEN) are equal to or better than those of one of the RIA methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0009-9120(90)90614-Z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79887669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>000991209090614Z</els_id><sourcerecordid>15657658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-193b961aa8212ca020865bd0424a1e1ae692827b8248340dd8d594aa1163ae053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFq3DAQQEVpSTZp_yAFnUp6cKuRbFm6BEJI00Kgl_YSKGJszRIV29pI9sLm66tllxxTGBhm5s1IPMYuQHwBAfqrEMJWFqS4tOKzFRrq6uENW4FpVSWtUm_Z6gU5ZWc5_y2lrI0-YScSbCsUrNif64nTFocF5xAnHtccS2N63o3EwzguU8ScccdHmh-j5-uYju1E2M9hS3xOu00OEy_hUyDPuyEWMm_inN-zd2scMn045nP2-9vtr5vv1f3Pux831_dVr4yZK7CqsxoQjQTZo5DC6KbzopY1AgGSttLItjPl96oW3hvf2BoRQCsk0ahz9ulwd5Pi00J5dmPIPQ0DThSX7FprTKu1_S8IjW5a3ZgC1gewTzHnRGu3SWHEtHMg3F6_27t1e7fO7qPodw9l7ePx_tKN5F-Wjr7L_Oowp2JjGyi53AeaevIhUT87H8PrD_wDkFiUNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15657658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay method for immunoreactive trypsin in dried blood spots</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Cabrini, Giulio ; Pederzini, Fabio ; Perobelli, Laura ; Mastella, Gianni</creator><creatorcontrib>Cabrini, Giulio ; Pederzini, Fabio ; Perobelli, Laura ; Mastella, Gianni</creatorcontrib><description>A novel monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for the measurement of the human cationic trypsinogen (NeoScreen, AGEN Biomedical Ltd., Acacia Ridge, Australia) in dried blood spots for the neonatal screening of cystic fibrosis was evaluated. The calibration standards provided as dried blood spots by AGEN are highly unstable and must be replaced with user prepared materials. Reference values from control individuals were obtained by parametric methods. A preliminary comparison with a polyclonal antibody based RIA method (Trypsik, SORIN Biomedica, Saluggia, Italy) was performed. Regression analysis between the RIA and the EIA methods gave a coefficient of correlation of 0.58 for RIA values &lt; 40 μg/L and of 0.77 for RIA values ≥ 40 μg/L. Average CV of the within-run imprecision for the EIA method was 19.6% and for the RIA method 28.8%. CVs of the between-run imprecision at low, intermediate and high values for the EIA method were 23.7%, 15.8%, 15.6% and for the RIA method 20.6%, 14.4%, 11.2%. The diagnostic accuracy analyzed by a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve of the RIA method gave a maximum accuracy of 190.9 while that of a simulated ROC curve for the EIA method was 193.0. We found that the precision and the diagnostic accuracy of the EIA method (AGEN) are equal to or better than those of one of the RIA methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2933</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0009-9120(90)90614-Z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2197031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Calibration ; cystic fibrosis ; Cystic Fibrosis - enzymology ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans ; Immunoenzyme Techniques ; immunoreactive trypsin ; neonatal screening ; Radioimmunoassay ; Reference Values ; Regression Analysis ; trypsin ; trypsinogen ; Trypsinogen - blood ; Trypsinogen - immunology</subject><ispartof>Clinical biochemistry, 1990-06, Vol.23 (3), p.213-219</ispartof><rights>1990 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-193b961aa8212ca020865bd0424a1e1ae692827b8248340dd8d594aa1163ae053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-193b961aa8212ca020865bd0424a1e1ae692827b8248340dd8d594aa1163ae053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-9120(90)90614-Z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2197031$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cabrini, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pederzini, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perobelli, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastella, Gianni</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay method for immunoreactive trypsin in dried blood spots</title><title>Clinical biochemistry</title><addtitle>Clin Biochem</addtitle><description>A novel monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for the measurement of the human cationic trypsinogen (NeoScreen, AGEN Biomedical Ltd., Acacia Ridge, Australia) in dried blood spots for the neonatal screening of cystic fibrosis was evaluated. The calibration standards provided as dried blood spots by AGEN are highly unstable and must be replaced with user prepared materials. Reference values from control individuals were obtained by parametric methods. A preliminary comparison with a polyclonal antibody based RIA method (Trypsik, SORIN Biomedica, Saluggia, Italy) was performed. Regression analysis between the RIA and the EIA methods gave a coefficient of correlation of 0.58 for RIA values &lt; 40 μg/L and of 0.77 for RIA values ≥ 40 μg/L. Average CV of the within-run imprecision for the EIA method was 19.6% and for the RIA method 28.8%. CVs of the between-run imprecision at low, intermediate and high values for the EIA method were 23.7%, 15.8%, 15.6% and for the RIA method 20.6%, 14.4%, 11.2%. The diagnostic accuracy analyzed by a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve of the RIA method gave a maximum accuracy of 190.9 while that of a simulated ROC curve for the EIA method was 193.0. We found that the precision and the diagnostic accuracy of the EIA method (AGEN) are equal to or better than those of one of the RIA methods.</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>cystic fibrosis</subject><subject>Cystic Fibrosis - enzymology</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoenzyme Techniques</subject><subject>immunoreactive trypsin</subject><subject>neonatal screening</subject><subject>Radioimmunoassay</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>trypsin</subject><subject>trypsinogen</subject><subject>Trypsinogen - blood</subject><subject>Trypsinogen - immunology</subject><issn>0009-9120</issn><issn>1873-2933</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFq3DAQQEVpSTZp_yAFnUp6cKuRbFm6BEJI00Kgl_YSKGJszRIV29pI9sLm66tllxxTGBhm5s1IPMYuQHwBAfqrEMJWFqS4tOKzFRrq6uENW4FpVSWtUm_Z6gU5ZWc5_y2lrI0-YScSbCsUrNif64nTFocF5xAnHtccS2N63o3EwzguU8ScccdHmh-j5-uYju1E2M9hS3xOu00OEy_hUyDPuyEWMm_inN-zd2scMn045nP2-9vtr5vv1f3Pux831_dVr4yZK7CqsxoQjQTZo5DC6KbzopY1AgGSttLItjPl96oW3hvf2BoRQCsk0ahz9ulwd5Pi00J5dmPIPQ0DThSX7FprTKu1_S8IjW5a3ZgC1gewTzHnRGu3SWHEtHMg3F6_27t1e7fO7qPodw9l7ePx_tKN5F-Wjr7L_Oowp2JjGyi53AeaevIhUT87H8PrD_wDkFiUNQ</recordid><startdate>19900601</startdate><enddate>19900601</enddate><creator>Cabrini, Giulio</creator><creator>Pederzini, Fabio</creator><creator>Perobelli, Laura</creator><creator>Mastella, Gianni</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M81</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900601</creationdate><title>An evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay method for immunoreactive trypsin in dried blood spots</title><author>Cabrini, Giulio ; Pederzini, Fabio ; Perobelli, Laura ; Mastella, Gianni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-193b961aa8212ca020865bd0424a1e1ae692827b8248340dd8d594aa1163ae053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>cystic fibrosis</topic><topic>Cystic Fibrosis - enzymology</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoenzyme Techniques</topic><topic>immunoreactive trypsin</topic><topic>neonatal screening</topic><topic>Radioimmunoassay</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>trypsin</topic><topic>trypsinogen</topic><topic>Trypsinogen - blood</topic><topic>Trypsinogen - immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cabrini, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pederzini, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perobelli, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mastella, Gianni</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 3</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical biochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cabrini, Giulio</au><au>Pederzini, Fabio</au><au>Perobelli, Laura</au><au>Mastella, Gianni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay method for immunoreactive trypsin in dried blood spots</atitle><jtitle>Clinical biochemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Biochem</addtitle><date>1990-06-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>219</epage><pages>213-219</pages><issn>0009-9120</issn><eissn>1873-2933</eissn><abstract>A novel monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for the measurement of the human cationic trypsinogen (NeoScreen, AGEN Biomedical Ltd., Acacia Ridge, Australia) in dried blood spots for the neonatal screening of cystic fibrosis was evaluated. The calibration standards provided as dried blood spots by AGEN are highly unstable and must be replaced with user prepared materials. Reference values from control individuals were obtained by parametric methods. A preliminary comparison with a polyclonal antibody based RIA method (Trypsik, SORIN Biomedica, Saluggia, Italy) was performed. Regression analysis between the RIA and the EIA methods gave a coefficient of correlation of 0.58 for RIA values &lt; 40 μg/L and of 0.77 for RIA values ≥ 40 μg/L. Average CV of the within-run imprecision for the EIA method was 19.6% and for the RIA method 28.8%. CVs of the between-run imprecision at low, intermediate and high values for the EIA method were 23.7%, 15.8%, 15.6% and for the RIA method 20.6%, 14.4%, 11.2%. The diagnostic accuracy analyzed by a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve of the RIA method gave a maximum accuracy of 190.9 while that of a simulated ROC curve for the EIA method was 193.0. We found that the precision and the diagnostic accuracy of the EIA method (AGEN) are equal to or better than those of one of the RIA methods.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2197031</pmid><doi>10.1016/0009-9120(90)90614-Z</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-9120
ispartof Clinical biochemistry, 1990-06, Vol.23 (3), p.213-219
issn 0009-9120
1873-2933
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79887669
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Calibration
cystic fibrosis
Cystic Fibrosis - enzymology
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
Immunoenzyme Techniques
immunoreactive trypsin
neonatal screening
Radioimmunoassay
Reference Values
Regression Analysis
trypsin
trypsinogen
Trypsinogen - blood
Trypsinogen - immunology
title An evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay method for immunoreactive trypsin in dried blood spots
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A33%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20an%20enzyme%20immunoassay%20method%20for%20immunoreactive%20trypsin%20in%20dried%20blood%20spots&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20biochemistry&rft.au=Cabrini,%20Giulio&rft.date=1990-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=219&rft.pages=213-219&rft.issn=0009-9120&rft.eissn=1873-2933&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0009-9120(90)90614-Z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15657658%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15657658&rft_id=info:pmid/2197031&rft_els_id=000991209090614Z&rfr_iscdi=true