A magnetic evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration: II. The signal amplitude in the distal segment in relation to functional recovery

Motor and sensory function in a healthy nerve is strongly related to the number of neuronal units connecting to the distal target organs. In the regenerating nerve the amplitudes of magnetically recorded nerve compound action currents (NCACs) seem to relate to the number of functional neuronal units...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Muscle & nerve 1998-06, Vol.21 (6), p.750-755
Hauptverfasser: Kuypers, Paul D.L., van Egeraat, Jan M., van Briemen, Lourens J., Godschalk, Moshe, Hovius, Steven E.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 755
container_issue 6
container_start_page 750
container_title Muscle & nerve
container_volume 21
creator Kuypers, Paul D.L.
van Egeraat, Jan M.
van Briemen, Lourens J.
Godschalk, Moshe
Hovius, Steven E.R.
description Motor and sensory function in a healthy nerve is strongly related to the number of neuronal units connecting to the distal target organs. In the regenerating nerve the amplitudes of magnetically recorded nerve compound action currents (NCACs) seem to relate to the number of functional neuronal units with larger diameters regenerating across the lesion. The goal of this experiment was to compare the signal amplitudes recorded from the distal segment of a reconstructed nerve to functional recovery. To this end, the peroneal nerves of 30 rabbits were unilaterally transected and reconstructed. After 6, 8, 12, 20, and 36 weeks of regeneration time the functional recovery was studied based on the toe‐spread test, and the nerve regeneration based on the magnetically recorded NCACs. The results demonstrate that the signal amplitudes recorded magnetically from the reconstructed nerves increase in the first 12 weeks from 0% to 21% of the amplitudes recorded from the control nerves and from 21% to 25% in the following 23 weeks. The functional recovery increases from absent to good between the 8th and the 20th week after the reconstruction. A statistically significant relation was demonstrated between the signal amplitude and the functional recovery (P < 0.001). It is concluded that the magnetic recording technique can be used to evaluate the quality of a peripheral nerve reconstruction and seems to be able to predict, shortly after the reconstruction, the eventual functional recovery. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 21:750–755, 1998.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199806)21:6<750::AID-MUS6>3.0.CO;2-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79861510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79861510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4276-c3dabd3e19a40995e1c03b28aee59c5f89c1f0b36d5d332900220aa36b7822453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1v0zAUhiMEGmXwE5BygdB2keKPxLHLhFQV2CJtVGKdhnZz5DonXSAfxU4K_Qn8a5y1KhcgceXjc16_fnWeIDijZEwJYW9OrrNZdkqJSqM4UfKEKiWJOGV0Is7ShEwm0-x9dHVzLd7xMRnP5m9ZJB4Fo8ODx8GI0FhGgqsvT4Nnzn0lhFAp0qPgSCUy4UyOgl_TsNarBrvShLjRVa-7sm3CtgjXaMv1PVpdhQ3aDYYWV-irB8EkzLJxuLjH0JWrxkt0va7Krs8xLJuw8_28dJ3vO1zV2HRD12K1M-_asOgbM9ReYdG0G7Tb58GTQlcOX-zP4-Dm44fF7CK6nJ9ns-llZGKWisjwXC9zjlTpmCiVIDWEL5nUiIkySSGVoQVZcpEnOedM-U0yojUXy1QyFif8OHi9813b9nuProO6dAarSjfY9g5SJQVNKPHCxU5obOucxQLWtqy13QIlMBACGAjBsHAYFg47QsAoCPCEADwhGAgBBwKzOTAQ3vbl_v9-WWN-MN0j8fNX-7l2RleF1Y0p3UHGuJSCxH_S_Sgr3P4V7T_J_hHs4e5to52tx4c_D7bafgOR8jSB20_ncHtxdcc-izuQ_DfGTskt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79861510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A magnetic evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration: II. The signal amplitude in the distal segment in relation to functional recovery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kuypers, Paul D.L. ; van Egeraat, Jan M. ; van Briemen, Lourens J. ; Godschalk, Moshe ; Hovius, Steven E.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuypers, Paul D.L. ; van Egeraat, Jan M. ; van Briemen, Lourens J. ; Godschalk, Moshe ; Hovius, Steven E.R.</creatorcontrib><description>Motor and sensory function in a healthy nerve is strongly related to the number of neuronal units connecting to the distal target organs. In the regenerating nerve the amplitudes of magnetically recorded nerve compound action currents (NCACs) seem to relate to the number of functional neuronal units with larger diameters regenerating across the lesion. The goal of this experiment was to compare the signal amplitudes recorded from the distal segment of a reconstructed nerve to functional recovery. To this end, the peroneal nerves of 30 rabbits were unilaterally transected and reconstructed. After 6, 8, 12, 20, and 36 weeks of regeneration time the functional recovery was studied based on the toe‐spread test, and the nerve regeneration based on the magnetically recorded NCACs. The results demonstrate that the signal amplitudes recorded magnetically from the reconstructed nerves increase in the first 12 weeks from 0% to 21% of the amplitudes recorded from the control nerves and from 21% to 25% in the following 23 weeks. The functional recovery increases from absent to good between the 8th and the 20th week after the reconstruction. A statistically significant relation was demonstrated between the signal amplitude and the functional recovery (P &lt; 0.001). It is concluded that the magnetic recording technique can be used to evaluate the quality of a peripheral nerve reconstruction and seems to be able to predict, shortly after the reconstruction, the eventual functional recovery. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 21:750–755, 1998.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-639X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199806)21:6&lt;750::AID-MUS6&gt;3.0.CO;2-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9585328</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MUNEDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Development. Senescence. Regeneration. Transplantation ; distal segment ; Electrophysiology ; evaluation of nerve reconstruction ; functional recovery ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; magnetic recording ; Nerve Fibers, Myelinated - physiology ; Nerve Regeneration ; Neural Conduction ; Peripheral Nerves - physiology ; Peroneal Nerve - physiology ; Peroneal Nerve - surgery ; Rabbits ; Time Factors ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Muscle &amp; nerve, 1998-06, Vol.21 (6), p.750-755</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4276-c3dabd3e19a40995e1c03b28aee59c5f89c1f0b36d5d332900220aa36b7822453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-4598%28199806%2921%3A6%3C750%3A%3AAID-MUS6%3E3.0.CO%3B2-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-4598%28199806%2921%3A6%3C750%3A%3AAID-MUS6%3E3.0.CO%3B2-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2388604$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9585328$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuypers, Paul D.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Egeraat, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Briemen, Lourens J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godschalk, Moshe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovius, Steven E.R.</creatorcontrib><title>A magnetic evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration: II. The signal amplitude in the distal segment in relation to functional recovery</title><title>Muscle &amp; nerve</title><addtitle>Muscle Nerve</addtitle><description>Motor and sensory function in a healthy nerve is strongly related to the number of neuronal units connecting to the distal target organs. In the regenerating nerve the amplitudes of magnetically recorded nerve compound action currents (NCACs) seem to relate to the number of functional neuronal units with larger diameters regenerating across the lesion. The goal of this experiment was to compare the signal amplitudes recorded from the distal segment of a reconstructed nerve to functional recovery. To this end, the peroneal nerves of 30 rabbits were unilaterally transected and reconstructed. After 6, 8, 12, 20, and 36 weeks of regeneration time the functional recovery was studied based on the toe‐spread test, and the nerve regeneration based on the magnetically recorded NCACs. The results demonstrate that the signal amplitudes recorded magnetically from the reconstructed nerves increase in the first 12 weeks from 0% to 21% of the amplitudes recorded from the control nerves and from 21% to 25% in the following 23 weeks. The functional recovery increases from absent to good between the 8th and the 20th week after the reconstruction. A statistically significant relation was demonstrated between the signal amplitude and the functional recovery (P &lt; 0.001). It is concluded that the magnetic recording technique can be used to evaluate the quality of a peripheral nerve reconstruction and seems to be able to predict, shortly after the reconstruction, the eventual functional recovery. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 21:750–755, 1998.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Development. Senescence. Regeneration. Transplantation</subject><subject>distal segment</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>evaluation of nerve reconstruction</subject><subject>functional recovery</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>magnetic recording</subject><subject>Nerve Fibers, Myelinated - physiology</subject><subject>Nerve Regeneration</subject><subject>Neural Conduction</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerves - physiology</subject><subject>Peroneal Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>Peroneal Nerve - surgery</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0148-639X</issn><issn>1097-4598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1v0zAUhiMEGmXwE5BygdB2keKPxLHLhFQV2CJtVGKdhnZz5DonXSAfxU4K_Qn8a5y1KhcgceXjc16_fnWeIDijZEwJYW9OrrNZdkqJSqM4UfKEKiWJOGV0Is7ShEwm0-x9dHVzLd7xMRnP5m9ZJB4Fo8ODx8GI0FhGgqsvT4Nnzn0lhFAp0qPgSCUy4UyOgl_TsNarBrvShLjRVa-7sm3CtgjXaMv1PVpdhQ3aDYYWV-irB8EkzLJxuLjH0JWrxkt0va7Krs8xLJuw8_28dJ3vO1zV2HRD12K1M-_asOgbM9ReYdG0G7Tb58GTQlcOX-zP4-Dm44fF7CK6nJ9ns-llZGKWisjwXC9zjlTpmCiVIDWEL5nUiIkySSGVoQVZcpEnOedM-U0yojUXy1QyFif8OHi9813b9nuProO6dAarSjfY9g5SJQVNKPHCxU5obOucxQLWtqy13QIlMBACGAjBsHAYFg47QsAoCPCEADwhGAgBBwKzOTAQ3vbl_v9-WWN-MN0j8fNX-7l2RleF1Y0p3UHGuJSCxH_S_Sgr3P4V7T_J_hHs4e5to52tx4c_D7bafgOR8jSB20_ncHtxdcc-izuQ_DfGTskt</recordid><startdate>199806</startdate><enddate>199806</enddate><creator>Kuypers, Paul D.L.</creator><creator>van Egeraat, Jan M.</creator><creator>van Briemen, Lourens J.</creator><creator>Godschalk, Moshe</creator><creator>Hovius, Steven E.R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199806</creationdate><title>A magnetic evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration: II. The signal amplitude in the distal segment in relation to functional recovery</title><author>Kuypers, Paul D.L. ; van Egeraat, Jan M. ; van Briemen, Lourens J. ; Godschalk, Moshe ; Hovius, Steven E.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4276-c3dabd3e19a40995e1c03b28aee59c5f89c1f0b36d5d332900220aa36b7822453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Development. Senescence. Regeneration. Transplantation</topic><topic>distal segment</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>evaluation of nerve reconstruction</topic><topic>functional recovery</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>magnetic recording</topic><topic>Nerve Fibers, Myelinated - physiology</topic><topic>Nerve Regeneration</topic><topic>Neural Conduction</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerves - physiology</topic><topic>Peroneal Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>Peroneal Nerve - surgery</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuypers, Paul D.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Egeraat, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Briemen, Lourens J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godschalk, Moshe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovius, Steven E.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Muscle &amp; nerve</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuypers, Paul D.L.</au><au>van Egeraat, Jan M.</au><au>van Briemen, Lourens J.</au><au>Godschalk, Moshe</au><au>Hovius, Steven E.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A magnetic evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration: II. The signal amplitude in the distal segment in relation to functional recovery</atitle><jtitle>Muscle &amp; nerve</jtitle><addtitle>Muscle Nerve</addtitle><date>1998-06</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>750</spage><epage>755</epage><pages>750-755</pages><issn>0148-639X</issn><eissn>1097-4598</eissn><coden>MUNEDE</coden><abstract>Motor and sensory function in a healthy nerve is strongly related to the number of neuronal units connecting to the distal target organs. In the regenerating nerve the amplitudes of magnetically recorded nerve compound action currents (NCACs) seem to relate to the number of functional neuronal units with larger diameters regenerating across the lesion. The goal of this experiment was to compare the signal amplitudes recorded from the distal segment of a reconstructed nerve to functional recovery. To this end, the peroneal nerves of 30 rabbits were unilaterally transected and reconstructed. After 6, 8, 12, 20, and 36 weeks of regeneration time the functional recovery was studied based on the toe‐spread test, and the nerve regeneration based on the magnetically recorded NCACs. The results demonstrate that the signal amplitudes recorded magnetically from the reconstructed nerves increase in the first 12 weeks from 0% to 21% of the amplitudes recorded from the control nerves and from 21% to 25% in the following 23 weeks. The functional recovery increases from absent to good between the 8th and the 20th week after the reconstruction. A statistically significant relation was demonstrated between the signal amplitude and the functional recovery (P &lt; 0.001). It is concluded that the magnetic recording technique can be used to evaluate the quality of a peripheral nerve reconstruction and seems to be able to predict, shortly after the reconstruction, the eventual functional recovery. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 21:750–755, 1998.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>9585328</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199806)21:6&lt;750::AID-MUS6&gt;3.0.CO;2-6</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-639X
ispartof Muscle & nerve, 1998-06, Vol.21 (6), p.750-755
issn 0148-639X
1097-4598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79861510
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Development. Senescence. Regeneration. Transplantation
distal segment
Electrophysiology
evaluation of nerve reconstruction
functional recovery
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
magnetic recording
Nerve Fibers, Myelinated - physiology
Nerve Regeneration
Neural Conduction
Peripheral Nerves - physiology
Peroneal Nerve - physiology
Peroneal Nerve - surgery
Rabbits
Time Factors
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title A magnetic evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration: II. The signal amplitude in the distal segment in relation to functional recovery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T11%3A56%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20magnetic%20evaluation%20of%20peripheral%20nerve%20regeneration:%20II.%20The%20signal%20amplitude%20in%20the%20distal%20segment%20in%20relation%20to%20functional%20recovery&rft.jtitle=Muscle%20&%20nerve&rft.au=Kuypers,%20Paul%20D.L.&rft.date=1998-06&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=750&rft.epage=755&rft.pages=750-755&rft.issn=0148-639X&rft.eissn=1097-4598&rft.coden=MUNEDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199806)21:6%3C750::AID-MUS6%3E3.0.CO;2-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79861510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79861510&rft_id=info:pmid/9585328&rfr_iscdi=true