Economic aspects of cervical cancer screening
The results of a cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands are reported, emphasizing the analysis of the costs of screening and consequent diagnosis and treatment. Many organized screening policies are evaluated, differing in age-range and interval between screens....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 1990, Vol.30 (10), p.1081-1087 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1087 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1081 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Koopmanschap, Marc A. Lubbe, Koos Th.N. van Oortmarssen, Gerrit J. van Agt, Heleen M.A. van Ballegooijen, Marjolein Habbema, J.Dik F. |
description | The results of a cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands are reported, emphasizing the analysis of the costs of screening and consequent diagnosis and treatment. Many organized screening policies are evaluated, differing in age-range and interval between screens. The cost estimates are based on organization charts, file studies and tariffs. The costs of screening itself are by far the most important cost component. Screening increases the costs of diagnosis. Costs for primary treatment only rise for large screening policies. Screening causes savings in costs of terminal treatment, but these are small compared with the costs of screening.
The costs per life-year gained for the most efficient policies amount to DFL 24,000 for the policy with 7 invitations per woman in a lifetime and rise considerably in case of more than 10 invitations. Cervical cancer screening appears to be less cost-effective than breast cancer screening, but compared with other services the results are comparatively good.
Implementing one of the efficient organized screening policies and discouraging spontaneous screening beyond that schedule leads to considerable savings. Moreover, many organized policies which are not efficient are still superior to spontaneous screening. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90294-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79845448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0277953690902943</els_id><sourcerecordid>57572805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-53c793ed9c444d00510573dd1e0f8eb2d07c78563e7be1f8c2a818fe4c59e7623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQtRBVSQv_AKQVQqg9LIy_1vYFCVVtQSriAmfL8c6Cq-w62Emk_ntmm5ADBzjYftK8N-N5j7GXHN5x4N17EMa0TsvuwsGlA-FUK5-wBbdGtloq85QtjpRn7KzWewDgYOUpOxWcK1CwYO11zFMeU2xCXWPc1CYPTcSySzGsmhgmwk2NBXFK04_n7GQIq4ovDu85-35z_e3qU3v39fbz1ce7NuoONjQ9Giexd1Ep1QNoDtrIvucIg8Wl6MFEY3Un0SyRDzaKYLkdUEXt0HRCnrO3-77rkn9tsW78mGrE1SpMmLfVG2eVVsr-l6iNNsKCJuLrv4j3eVsmWsILCcoIso9Iak-KJddacPDrksZQHjwHP3vuZ0P9bKh34B8995JkX_aygmThUYOINccRe7_zMkig64EOd26GaYYzWD8Cy2mANf7nZqR-rw5_3S5n-Z-Gh9Co_uZQD5VSGgqllOqRpjquwczefNjTkJLaJSy-xoQUaJ8KJe37nP6912_MkbPc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230472294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic aspects of cervical cancer screening</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Koopmanschap, Marc A. ; Lubbe, Koos Th.N. ; van Oortmarssen, Gerrit J. ; van Agt, Heleen M.A. ; van Ballegooijen, Marjolein ; Habbema, J.Dik F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Koopmanschap, Marc A. ; Lubbe, Koos Th.N. ; van Oortmarssen, Gerrit J. ; van Agt, Heleen M.A. ; van Ballegooijen, Marjolein ; Habbema, J.Dik F.</creatorcontrib><description>The results of a cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands are reported, emphasizing the analysis of the costs of screening and consequent diagnosis and treatment. Many organized screening policies are evaluated, differing in age-range and interval between screens. The cost estimates are based on organization charts, file studies and tariffs. The costs of screening itself are by far the most important cost component. Screening increases the costs of diagnosis. Costs for primary treatment only rise for large screening policies. Screening causes savings in costs of terminal treatment, but these are small compared with the costs of screening.
The costs per life-year gained for the most efficient policies amount to DFL 24,000 for the policy with 7 invitations per woman in a lifetime and rise considerably in case of more than 10 invitations. Cervical cancer screening appears to be less cost-effective than breast cancer screening, but compared with other services the results are comparatively good.
Implementing one of the efficient organized screening policies and discouraging spontaneous screening beyond that schedule leads to considerable savings. Moreover, many organized policies which are not efficient are still superior to spontaneous screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90294-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2114040</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSMDEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer ; Cervical cancer ; Cost control ; Cost effectiveness ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics & numerical data ; costs ; economic evaluation ; economic evaluation costs cost-effectiveness cervical cancer mass screening ; Female ; Humans ; mass screening ; Mass Screening - economics ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; National Health Programs - economics ; Netherlands ; Prospective Studies ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Reproductive system ; Screening ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - economics ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Women</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 1990, Vol.30 (10), p.1081-1087</ispartof><rights>1990</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-53c793ed9c444d00510573dd1e0f8eb2d07c78563e7be1f8c2a818fe4c59e7623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-53c793ed9c444d00510573dd1e0f8eb2d07c78563e7be1f8c2a818fe4c59e7623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(90)90294-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,3994,4010,27904,27905,27906,30981,33755,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4615078$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2114040$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeesocmed/v_3a30_3ay_3a1990_3ai_3a10_3ap_3a1081-1087.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koopmanschap, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubbe, Koos Th.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oortmarssen, Gerrit J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Agt, Heleen M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ballegooijen, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habbema, J.Dik F.</creatorcontrib><title>Economic aspects of cervical cancer screening</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>The results of a cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands are reported, emphasizing the analysis of the costs of screening and consequent diagnosis and treatment. Many organized screening policies are evaluated, differing in age-range and interval between screens. The cost estimates are based on organization charts, file studies and tariffs. The costs of screening itself are by far the most important cost component. Screening increases the costs of diagnosis. Costs for primary treatment only rise for large screening policies. Screening causes savings in costs of terminal treatment, but these are small compared with the costs of screening.
The costs per life-year gained for the most efficient policies amount to DFL 24,000 for the policy with 7 invitations per woman in a lifetime and rise considerably in case of more than 10 invitations. Cervical cancer screening appears to be less cost-effective than breast cancer screening, but compared with other services the results are comparatively good.
Implementing one of the efficient organized screening policies and discouraging spontaneous screening beyond that schedule leads to considerable savings. Moreover, many organized policies which are not efficient are still superior to spontaneous screening.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>costs</subject><subject>economic evaluation</subject><subject>economic evaluation costs cost-effectiveness cervical cancer mass screening</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>mass screening</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>National Health Programs - economics</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Reproductive system</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQtRBVSQv_AKQVQqg9LIy_1vYFCVVtQSriAmfL8c6Cq-w62Emk_ntmm5ADBzjYftK8N-N5j7GXHN5x4N17EMa0TsvuwsGlA-FUK5-wBbdGtloq85QtjpRn7KzWewDgYOUpOxWcK1CwYO11zFMeU2xCXWPc1CYPTcSySzGsmhgmwk2NBXFK04_n7GQIq4ovDu85-35z_e3qU3v39fbz1ce7NuoONjQ9Giexd1Ep1QNoDtrIvucIg8Wl6MFEY3Un0SyRDzaKYLkdUEXt0HRCnrO3-77rkn9tsW78mGrE1SpMmLfVG2eVVsr-l6iNNsKCJuLrv4j3eVsmWsILCcoIso9Iak-KJddacPDrksZQHjwHP3vuZ0P9bKh34B8995JkX_aygmThUYOINccRe7_zMkig64EOd26GaYYzWD8Cy2mANf7nZqR-rw5_3S5n-Z-Gh9Co_uZQD5VSGgqllOqRpjquwczefNjTkJLaJSy-xoQUaJ8KJe37nP6912_MkbPc</recordid><startdate>1990</startdate><enddate>1990</enddate><creator>Koopmanschap, Marc A.</creator><creator>Lubbe, Koos Th.N.</creator><creator>van Oortmarssen, Gerrit J.</creator><creator>van Agt, Heleen M.A.</creator><creator>van Ballegooijen, Marjolein</creator><creator>Habbema, J.Dik F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1990</creationdate><title>Economic aspects of cervical cancer screening</title><author>Koopmanschap, Marc A. ; Lubbe, Koos Th.N. ; van Oortmarssen, Gerrit J. ; van Agt, Heleen M.A. ; van Ballegooijen, Marjolein ; Habbema, J.Dik F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-53c793ed9c444d00510573dd1e0f8eb2d07c78563e7be1f8c2a818fe4c59e7623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>costs</topic><topic>economic evaluation</topic><topic>economic evaluation costs cost-effectiveness cervical cancer mass screening</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>mass screening</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>National Health Programs - economics</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Reproductive system</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koopmanschap, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubbe, Koos Th.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oortmarssen, Gerrit J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Agt, Heleen M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ballegooijen, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habbema, J.Dik F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koopmanschap, Marc A.</au><au>Lubbe, Koos Th.N.</au><au>van Oortmarssen, Gerrit J.</au><au>van Agt, Heleen M.A.</au><au>van Ballegooijen, Marjolein</au><au>Habbema, J.Dik F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic aspects of cervical cancer screening</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>1990</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1081</spage><epage>1087</epage><pages>1081-1087</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSMDEP</coden><abstract>The results of a cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands are reported, emphasizing the analysis of the costs of screening and consequent diagnosis and treatment. Many organized screening policies are evaluated, differing in age-range and interval between screens. The cost estimates are based on organization charts, file studies and tariffs. The costs of screening itself are by far the most important cost component. Screening increases the costs of diagnosis. Costs for primary treatment only rise for large screening policies. Screening causes savings in costs of terminal treatment, but these are small compared with the costs of screening.
The costs per life-year gained for the most efficient policies amount to DFL 24,000 for the policy with 7 invitations per woman in a lifetime and rise considerably in case of more than 10 invitations. Cervical cancer screening appears to be less cost-effective than breast cancer screening, but compared with other services the results are comparatively good.
Implementing one of the efficient organized screening policies and discouraging spontaneous screening beyond that schedule leads to considerable savings. Moreover, many organized policies which are not efficient are still superior to spontaneous screening.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>2114040</pmid><doi>10.1016/0277-9536(90)90294-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 1990, Vol.30 (10), p.1081-1087 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79845448 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Cancer Cervical cancer Cost control Cost effectiveness Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics & numerical data costs economic evaluation economic evaluation costs cost-effectiveness cervical cancer mass screening Female Humans mass screening Mass Screening - economics Medical sciences Middle Aged National Health Programs - economics Netherlands Prospective Studies Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Reproductive system Screening Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - economics Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control Women |
title | Economic aspects of cervical cancer screening |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T15%3A29%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20aspects%20of%20cervical%20cancer%20screening&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Koopmanschap,%20Marc%20A.&rft.date=1990&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1081&rft.epage=1087&rft.pages=1081-1087&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSMDEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0277-9536(90)90294-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57572805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230472294&rft_id=info:pmid/2114040&rft_els_id=0277953690902943&rfr_iscdi=true |