Paramedian Versus Midline Incision for the Insertion of Permanent Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: A Randomized Clinical Trial
A randomized trial was conducted to examine the influence of the site of catheter insertion on the mechanical complications associated with the use of peritoneal dialysis catheters (pericatheter leakage/herniation and tip migration). 37 patients requiring a dialysis catheter for future CAPD were ran...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology 1990-01, Vol.24 (2), p.151-154 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 154 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 151 |
| container_title | Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Ejlersen, Ellen Steven, Kenneth Løkkegaard, Hans |
| description | A randomized trial was conducted to examine the influence of the site of catheter insertion on the mechanical complications associated with the use of peritoneal dialysis catheters (pericatheter leakage/herniation and tip migration). 37 patients requiring a dialysis catheter for future CAPD were randomized to insertion by either a midline (prior standard approach) or a lateral incision (new approach). Thirteen catheters (6 midline, 7 lateral) failed for mechanical reasons-mainly irreversible tip migration. The one year estimated catheter survival without mechanical failure was found to be similar in the two groups: midline (59%) and lateral (51 %), (0.4 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3109/00365599009180383 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79838398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79838398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d2b6f0e6215a15b377ec69c3fcf70d4f2bdbf06d1f89fe1ddc5f807ff4ae9ef03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMo4zj6AC6EbnRXPUnatAE3Ml5B0YW6LWkuGEmbMekg8_amzKgLcZMTzn_h8CF0iOGUYuBnAJSVJecAHNdAa7qFppiVOCfAym00HfV8NOyivRjfAYAwzCZoQjAnRcGmqHkSQXRaWdFnrzrEZcwerHK219ldL220vs-MD9nwNi6iDsO48SZ70qETve6H8WcH32vhsksr3CramM1FCgypbx_tGOGiPtjMGXq5vnqe3-b3jzd384v7XFKKh1yRlhnQjOBS4LKlVaUl45IaaSpQhSGtag0whU3NjcZKydLUUBlTCM21ATpDJ-veRfAfSx2HprNRaufSjX4Zm4rXCU96ZgivjTL4GIM2zSLYToRVg6EZoTZ_oKbM0aZ82SZWP4kNxaQfb3QRpXAmiBHdbzEvCGFlkXzna5_tE9NOfPrgVDOIlfPhO0T_P-MLS0STeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79838398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paramedian Versus Midline Incision for the Insertion of Permanent Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><source>Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><creator>Ejlersen, Ellen ; Steven, Kenneth ; Løkkegaard, Hans</creator><creatorcontrib>Ejlersen, Ellen ; Steven, Kenneth ; Løkkegaard, Hans</creatorcontrib><description>A randomized trial was conducted to examine the influence of the site of catheter insertion on the mechanical complications associated with the use of peritoneal dialysis catheters (pericatheter leakage/herniation and tip migration). 37 patients requiring a dialysis catheter for future CAPD were randomized to insertion by either a midline (prior standard approach) or a lateral incision (new approach). Thirteen catheters (6 midline, 7 lateral) failed for mechanical reasons-mainly irreversible tip migration. The one year estimated catheter survival without mechanical failure was found to be similar in the two groups: midline (59%) and lateral (51 %), (0.4<p<0.5).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-5599</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2065</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/00365599009180383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2192446</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SJUNAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basingstoke: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; CAPD ; Catheterization - methods ; Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management ; Equipment Failure ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; mechanical complications ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; paramedian insertion ; peritoneal catheters ; Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory - adverse effects ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology, 1990-01, Vol.24 (2), p.151-154</ispartof><rights>1990 Informa UK Ltd 1990</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d2b6f0e6215a15b377ec69c3fcf70d4f2bdbf06d1f89fe1ddc5f807ff4ae9ef03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/00365599009180383$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/00365599009180383$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,59647,59753,60436,60542</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19422654$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2192446$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ejlersen, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steven, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Løkkegaard, Hans</creatorcontrib><title>Paramedian Versus Midline Incision for the Insertion of Permanent Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title>Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology</title><addtitle>Scand J Urol Nephrol</addtitle><description>A randomized trial was conducted to examine the influence of the site of catheter insertion on the mechanical complications associated with the use of peritoneal dialysis catheters (pericatheter leakage/herniation and tip migration). 37 patients requiring a dialysis catheter for future CAPD were randomized to insertion by either a midline (prior standard approach) or a lateral incision (new approach). Thirteen catheters (6 midline, 7 lateral) failed for mechanical reasons-mainly irreversible tip migration. The one year estimated catheter survival without mechanical failure was found to be similar in the two groups: midline (59%) and lateral (51 %), (0.4<p<0.5).</description><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>CAPD</subject><subject>Catheterization - methods</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>mechanical complications</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>paramedian insertion</subject><subject>peritoneal catheters</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory - adverse effects</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><issn>0036-5599</issn><issn>1651-2065</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMo4zj6AC6EbnRXPUnatAE3Ml5B0YW6LWkuGEmbMekg8_amzKgLcZMTzn_h8CF0iOGUYuBnAJSVJecAHNdAa7qFppiVOCfAym00HfV8NOyivRjfAYAwzCZoQjAnRcGmqHkSQXRaWdFnrzrEZcwerHK219ldL220vs-MD9nwNi6iDsO48SZ70qETve6H8WcH32vhsksr3CramM1FCgypbx_tGOGiPtjMGXq5vnqe3-b3jzd384v7XFKKh1yRlhnQjOBS4LKlVaUl45IaaSpQhSGtag0whU3NjcZKydLUUBlTCM21ATpDJ-veRfAfSx2HprNRaufSjX4Zm4rXCU96ZgivjTL4GIM2zSLYToRVg6EZoTZ_oKbM0aZ82SZWP4kNxaQfb3QRpXAmiBHdbzEvCGFlkXzna5_tE9NOfPrgVDOIlfPhO0T_P-MLS0STeA</recordid><startdate>19900101</startdate><enddate>19900101</enddate><creator>Ejlersen, Ellen</creator><creator>Steven, Kenneth</creator><creator>Løkkegaard, Hans</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor and Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900101</creationdate><title>Paramedian Versus Midline Incision for the Insertion of Permanent Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters</title><author>Ejlersen, Ellen ; Steven, Kenneth ; Løkkegaard, Hans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d2b6f0e6215a15b377ec69c3fcf70d4f2bdbf06d1f89fe1ddc5f807ff4ae9ef03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>CAPD</topic><topic>Catheterization - methods</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>mechanical complications</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>paramedian insertion</topic><topic>peritoneal catheters</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory - adverse effects</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ejlersen, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steven, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Løkkegaard, Hans</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ejlersen, Ellen</au><au>Steven, Kenneth</au><au>Løkkegaard, Hans</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paramedian Versus Midline Incision for the Insertion of Permanent Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: A Randomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Urol Nephrol</addtitle><date>1990-01-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>154</epage><pages>151-154</pages><issn>0036-5599</issn><eissn>1651-2065</eissn><coden>SJUNAS</coden><abstract>A randomized trial was conducted to examine the influence of the site of catheter insertion on the mechanical complications associated with the use of peritoneal dialysis catheters (pericatheter leakage/herniation and tip migration). 37 patients requiring a dialysis catheter for future CAPD were randomized to insertion by either a midline (prior standard approach) or a lateral incision (new approach). Thirteen catheters (6 midline, 7 lateral) failed for mechanical reasons-mainly irreversible tip migration. The one year estimated catheter survival without mechanical failure was found to be similar in the two groups: midline (59%) and lateral (51 %), (0.4<p<0.5).</abstract><cop>Basingstoke</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>2192446</pmid><doi>10.3109/00365599009180383</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0036-5599 |
| ispartof | Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology, 1990-01, Vol.24 (2), p.151-154 |
| issn | 0036-5599 1651-2065 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79838398 |
| source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles); Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN |
| subjects | Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences CAPD Catheterization - methods Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management Equipment Failure Humans Intensive care medicine Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy mechanical complications Medical sciences Middle Aged paramedian insertion peritoneal catheters Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory - adverse effects Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic |
| title | Paramedian Versus Midline Incision for the Insertion of Permanent Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A01%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paramedian%20Versus%20Midline%20Incision%20for%20the%20Insertion%20of%20Permanent%20Peritoneal%20Dialysis%20Catheters:%20A%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20urology%20and%20nephrology&rft.au=Ejlersen,%20Ellen&rft.date=1990-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=154&rft.pages=151-154&rft.issn=0036-5599&rft.eissn=1651-2065&rft.coden=SJUNAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/00365599009180383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E79838398%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79838398&rft_id=info:pmid/2192446&rfr_iscdi=true |