Evaluation of a brucella enzyme immunoassay test (ELISA) in comparison with bacteriological culture and agglutination

An ELISA test for IgG and IgM antibrucella antibodies was found to be effective in diagnosis of human brucellosis. Assays for IgG and IgM in 30 culture-positive cases gave significant ELISA values. By the standard agglutination test, 10% of these cases gave readings less than 1:160. These are consid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of infection 1998-03, Vol.36 (2), p.197-201
Hauptverfasser: GAB EL-RAB, M. O, KAMBAL, A. M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 201
container_issue 2
container_start_page 197
container_title The Journal of infection
container_volume 36
creator GAB EL-RAB, M. O
KAMBAL, A. M
description An ELISA test for IgG and IgM antibrucella antibodies was found to be effective in diagnosis of human brucellosis. Assays for IgG and IgM in 30 culture-positive cases gave significant ELISA values. By the standard agglutination test, 10% of these cases gave readings less than 1:160. These are considered insignificant, taking 1:160 as the accepted cut-off value. Moreover, in an extra 135 samples from suspected brucella cases, where only serology was requested (77.6% of all cases), 7.4% were found to have IgM brucella antibodies by ELISA. In all of these, the corresponding agglutination titres were less than 1:80 and hence reported as insignificant. We report the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies in samples from patients with both acute and chronic disease. In few patients with acute disease, only IgM was detected. These findings are discussed in comparison with earlier studies. Finally, the ELISA test, in addition to measuring antibody classes directly, also detects incomplete antibodies. By this, it can efficiently replace the 2 mercaptoethanol test (2ME) and the Coomb's antihuman-globulin test. This saves considerable laboratory cost and time.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0163-4453(98)80013-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79832503</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79832503</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p198t-1a4addcadf9c779ad818d4d66a919e8b2713bf6521045e22e2e698eae7f4ec3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCZW8QKhdBPxM7GVVFahUiUVhHU0cpxjlUeIYVL6eqETdsplZ3DMzdy5CU0ruKaHxw7YvPBJC8plWc0UI5RE_Q2MqOYtYItg5Gp-QS3Tl_QchRHMdj9BIy4TEUoxRWH1BGaBzTY2bAgPO2mBsWQK29c-hsthVVagb8B4OuLO-w7PVZr1dzLGrsWmqPbTO97PfrnvHGZjOtq4pm50zUGITyi60FkOdY9jtytC5-njqGl0UUHp7M_QJentcvS6fo83L03q52ER7qlUXURCQ5wbyQpsk0ZArqnKRxzFoqq3KWEJ5VsSSUSKkZcwyG2tlwSaFsIYDn6C7v737tvkMvfu0cv74Xm2b4NNEK84k4f-CNJZSCa56cDqAIatsnu5bV0F7SIdAe_120MH3ERQt1Mb5E8aoTiiR_BelhIdy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16558438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a brucella enzyme immunoassay test (ELISA) in comparison with bacteriological culture and agglutination</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>GAB EL-RAB, M. O ; KAMBAL, A. M</creator><creatorcontrib>GAB EL-RAB, M. O ; KAMBAL, A. M</creatorcontrib><description>An ELISA test for IgG and IgM antibrucella antibodies was found to be effective in diagnosis of human brucellosis. Assays for IgG and IgM in 30 culture-positive cases gave significant ELISA values. By the standard agglutination test, 10% of these cases gave readings less than 1:160. These are considered insignificant, taking 1:160 as the accepted cut-off value. Moreover, in an extra 135 samples from suspected brucella cases, where only serology was requested (77.6% of all cases), 7.4% were found to have IgM brucella antibodies by ELISA. In all of these, the corresponding agglutination titres were less than 1:80 and hence reported as insignificant. We report the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies in samples from patients with both acute and chronic disease. In few patients with acute disease, only IgM was detected. These findings are discussed in comparison with earlier studies. Finally, the ELISA test, in addition to measuring antibody classes directly, also detects incomplete antibodies. By this, it can efficiently replace the 2 mercaptoethanol test (2ME) and the Coomb's antihuman-globulin test. This saves considerable laboratory cost and time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-4453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2742</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0163-4453(98)80013-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9570654</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JINFD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Agglutination Tests - methods ; Animal bacterial diseases ; Antibodies, Bacterial - blood ; Bacterial diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood - metabolism ; Brucella ; Brucella - growth &amp; development ; Brucella - immunology ; Brucella - isolation &amp; purification ; Brucellosis - diagnosis ; Culture Media ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin G - blood ; Immunoglobulin M - blood ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences</subject><ispartof>The Journal of infection, 1998-03, Vol.36 (2), p.197-201</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2197105$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9570654$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GAB EL-RAB, M. O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAMBAL, A. M</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a brucella enzyme immunoassay test (ELISA) in comparison with bacteriological culture and agglutination</title><title>The Journal of infection</title><addtitle>J Infect</addtitle><description>An ELISA test for IgG and IgM antibrucella antibodies was found to be effective in diagnosis of human brucellosis. Assays for IgG and IgM in 30 culture-positive cases gave significant ELISA values. By the standard agglutination test, 10% of these cases gave readings less than 1:160. These are considered insignificant, taking 1:160 as the accepted cut-off value. Moreover, in an extra 135 samples from suspected brucella cases, where only serology was requested (77.6% of all cases), 7.4% were found to have IgM brucella antibodies by ELISA. In all of these, the corresponding agglutination titres were less than 1:80 and hence reported as insignificant. We report the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies in samples from patients with both acute and chronic disease. In few patients with acute disease, only IgM was detected. These findings are discussed in comparison with earlier studies. Finally, the ELISA test, in addition to measuring antibody classes directly, also detects incomplete antibodies. By this, it can efficiently replace the 2 mercaptoethanol test (2ME) and the Coomb's antihuman-globulin test. This saves considerable laboratory cost and time.</description><subject>Agglutination Tests - methods</subject><subject>Animal bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood - metabolism</subject><subject>Brucella</subject><subject>Brucella - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Brucella - immunology</subject><subject>Brucella - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Brucellosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - blood</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M - blood</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><issn>0163-4453</issn><issn>1532-2742</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCZW8QKhdBPxM7GVVFahUiUVhHU0cpxjlUeIYVL6eqETdsplZ3DMzdy5CU0ruKaHxw7YvPBJC8plWc0UI5RE_Q2MqOYtYItg5Gp-QS3Tl_QchRHMdj9BIy4TEUoxRWH1BGaBzTY2bAgPO2mBsWQK29c-hsthVVagb8B4OuLO-w7PVZr1dzLGrsWmqPbTO97PfrnvHGZjOtq4pm50zUGITyi60FkOdY9jtytC5-njqGl0UUHp7M_QJentcvS6fo83L03q52ER7qlUXURCQ5wbyQpsk0ZArqnKRxzFoqq3KWEJ5VsSSUSKkZcwyG2tlwSaFsIYDn6C7v737tvkMvfu0cv74Xm2b4NNEK84k4f-CNJZSCa56cDqAIatsnu5bV0F7SIdAe_120MH3ERQt1Mb5E8aoTiiR_BelhIdy</recordid><startdate>19980301</startdate><enddate>19980301</enddate><creator>GAB EL-RAB, M. O</creator><creator>KAMBAL, A. M</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980301</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a brucella enzyme immunoassay test (ELISA) in comparison with bacteriological culture and agglutination</title><author>GAB EL-RAB, M. O ; KAMBAL, A. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p198t-1a4addcadf9c779ad818d4d66a919e8b2713bf6521045e22e2e698eae7f4ec3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Agglutination Tests - methods</topic><topic>Animal bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood - metabolism</topic><topic>Brucella</topic><topic>Brucella - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Brucella - immunology</topic><topic>Brucella - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Brucellosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - blood</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M - blood</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GAB EL-RAB, M. O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAMBAL, A. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GAB EL-RAB, M. O</au><au>KAMBAL, A. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a brucella enzyme immunoassay test (ELISA) in comparison with bacteriological culture and agglutination</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Infect</addtitle><date>1998-03-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>201</epage><pages>197-201</pages><issn>0163-4453</issn><eissn>1532-2742</eissn><coden>JINFD2</coden><abstract>An ELISA test for IgG and IgM antibrucella antibodies was found to be effective in diagnosis of human brucellosis. Assays for IgG and IgM in 30 culture-positive cases gave significant ELISA values. By the standard agglutination test, 10% of these cases gave readings less than 1:160. These are considered insignificant, taking 1:160 as the accepted cut-off value. Moreover, in an extra 135 samples from suspected brucella cases, where only serology was requested (77.6% of all cases), 7.4% were found to have IgM brucella antibodies by ELISA. In all of these, the corresponding agglutination titres were less than 1:80 and hence reported as insignificant. We report the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies in samples from patients with both acute and chronic disease. In few patients with acute disease, only IgM was detected. These findings are discussed in comparison with earlier studies. Finally, the ELISA test, in addition to measuring antibody classes directly, also detects incomplete antibodies. By this, it can efficiently replace the 2 mercaptoethanol test (2ME) and the Coomb's antihuman-globulin test. This saves considerable laboratory cost and time.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>9570654</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0163-4453(98)80013-3</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-4453
ispartof The Journal of infection, 1998-03, Vol.36 (2), p.197-201
issn 0163-4453
1532-2742
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79832503
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Agglutination Tests - methods
Animal bacterial diseases
Antibodies, Bacterial - blood
Bacterial diseases
Biological and medical sciences
Blood - metabolism
Brucella
Brucella - growth & development
Brucella - immunology
Brucella - isolation & purification
Brucellosis - diagnosis
Culture Media
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
Immunoglobulin G - blood
Immunoglobulin M - blood
Infectious diseases
Medical sciences
title Evaluation of a brucella enzyme immunoassay test (ELISA) in comparison with bacteriological culture and agglutination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A05%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20brucella%20enzyme%20immunoassay%20test%20(ELISA)%20in%20comparison%20with%20bacteriological%20culture%20and%20agglutination&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20infection&rft.au=GAB%20EL-RAB,%20M.%20O&rft.date=1998-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=201&rft.pages=197-201&rft.issn=0163-4453&rft.eissn=1532-2742&rft.coden=JINFD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0163-4453(98)80013-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E79832503%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16558438&rft_id=info:pmid/9570654&rfr_iscdi=true