Attentional set in pure- versus mixed-lists in a dichotic listening paradigm
An experiment was designed to assess the contribution of attentional set to performance on a forced choice recognition task in dichotic listening. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: speech sounds composed of stop consonants, emotional nonspeech sounds, or a random combinatio...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Brain and cognition 1990-05, Vol.13 (1), p.30-45 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 45 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 30 |
| container_title | Brain and cognition |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Mathieson, C.M Sainsbury, R.S Fitzgerald, L.K |
| description | An experiment was designed to assess the contribution of attentional set to performance on a forced choice recognition task in dichotic listening. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: speech sounds composed of stop consonants, emotional nonspeech sounds, or a random combination of both. In the groups exposed to a single class of stimuli (pure-list), a REA (right ear advantage) emerged for the speech sounds, and a LE (left ear advantage) for the nonspeech sounds. Under mixed conditions using both classes of stimuli, no significant ear advantage was apparent, either globally or individually for the speech and nonspeech sounds. However, performance was more accurate for the left ear on nonspeech sounds and for the right ear for speech sounds, regardless of pure versus mixed placement. The results suggest that under divided attention conditions, attentional set influences the direction of the laterality effect. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0278-2626(90)90038-P |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79798609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>027826269090038P</els_id><sourcerecordid>79798609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-9b1e36ba297ddd53d73f8a53d6431ec14e27a2f548b7e11c9680abe28f9cd2f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQx4Mouj6-gUIvih6qk6QmzUUQ8QULetBzSJOpRvpYk1T029u6i948Dcz_McOPkH0KpxSoOAMmy5wJJo4VnCgAXuaPa2RGQUHOaCHXyezXskW2Y3wDAFUwtkk2GS-E4OWMzC9Twi75vjNNFjFlvssWQ8A8-8AQh5i1_hNd3viY4qSZzHn72idvs2mHne9esoUJxvmXdpds1KaJuLeaO-T55vrp6i6fP9zeX13Oc8uBpVxVFLmoDFPSOXfOneR1acYpCk7R0gKZNKw-L8pKIqVWiRJMhayslXWslnyHHC17F6F_HzAm3fposWlMh_0QtVRSlQLUaCyWRhv6GAPWehF8a8KXpqAniHoipCdCWoH-gagfx9jBqn-oWnS_oRW1UT9c6SZa09TBdNbHv-4RcgFqOn-x9OEI48Nj0NF67Cw6H9Am7Xr__yPfoFiOFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79798609</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attentional set in pure- versus mixed-lists in a dichotic listening paradigm</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mathieson, C.M ; Sainsbury, R.S ; Fitzgerald, L.K</creator><creatorcontrib>Mathieson, C.M ; Sainsbury, R.S ; Fitzgerald, L.K</creatorcontrib><description>An experiment was designed to assess the contribution of attentional set to performance on a forced choice recognition task in dichotic listening. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: speech sounds composed of stop consonants, emotional nonspeech sounds, or a random combination of both. In the groups exposed to a single class of stimuli (pure-list), a REA (right ear advantage) emerged for the speech sounds, and a LE (left ear advantage) for the nonspeech sounds. Under mixed conditions using both classes of stimuli, no significant ear advantage was apparent, either globally or individually for the speech and nonspeech sounds. However, performance was more accurate for the left ear on nonspeech sounds and for the right ear for speech sounds, regardless of pure versus mixed placement. The results suggest that under divided attention conditions, attentional set influences the direction of the laterality effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0278-2626(90)90038-P</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2346638</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRCOEI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention ; Audition ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dichotic Listening Tests ; Dominance, Cerebral ; Emotions ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Male ; Perception ; Phonetics ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Speech Perception</subject><ispartof>Brain and cognition, 1990-05, Vol.13 (1), p.30-45</ispartof><rights>1990</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-9b1e36ba297ddd53d73f8a53d6431ec14e27a2f548b7e11c9680abe28f9cd2f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-9b1e36ba297ddd53d73f8a53d6431ec14e27a2f548b7e11c9680abe28f9cd2f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027826269090038P$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19424099$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2346638$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mathieson, C.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sainsbury, R.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, L.K</creatorcontrib><title>Attentional set in pure- versus mixed-lists in a dichotic listening paradigm</title><title>Brain and cognition</title><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><description>An experiment was designed to assess the contribution of attentional set to performance on a forced choice recognition task in dichotic listening. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: speech sounds composed of stop consonants, emotional nonspeech sounds, or a random combination of both. In the groups exposed to a single class of stimuli (pure-list), a REA (right ear advantage) emerged for the speech sounds, and a LE (left ear advantage) for the nonspeech sounds. Under mixed conditions using both classes of stimuli, no significant ear advantage was apparent, either globally or individually for the speech and nonspeech sounds. However, performance was more accurate for the left ear on nonspeech sounds and for the right ear for speech sounds, regardless of pure versus mixed placement. The results suggest that under divided attention conditions, attentional set influences the direction of the laterality effect.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dichotic Listening Tests</subject><subject>Dominance, Cerebral</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hearing Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><issn>0278-2626</issn><issn>1090-2147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQx4Mouj6-gUIvih6qk6QmzUUQ8QULetBzSJOpRvpYk1T029u6i948Dcz_McOPkH0KpxSoOAMmy5wJJo4VnCgAXuaPa2RGQUHOaCHXyezXskW2Y3wDAFUwtkk2GS-E4OWMzC9Twi75vjNNFjFlvssWQ8A8-8AQh5i1_hNd3viY4qSZzHn72idvs2mHne9esoUJxvmXdpds1KaJuLeaO-T55vrp6i6fP9zeX13Oc8uBpVxVFLmoDFPSOXfOneR1acYpCk7R0gKZNKw-L8pKIqVWiRJMhayslXWslnyHHC17F6F_HzAm3fposWlMh_0QtVRSlQLUaCyWRhv6GAPWehF8a8KXpqAniHoipCdCWoH-gagfx9jBqn-oWnS_oRW1UT9c6SZa09TBdNbHv-4RcgFqOn-x9OEI48Nj0NF67Cw6H9Am7Xr__yPfoFiOFA</recordid><startdate>199005</startdate><enddate>199005</enddate><creator>Mathieson, C.M</creator><creator>Sainsbury, R.S</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, L.K</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199005</creationdate><title>Attentional set in pure- versus mixed-lists in a dichotic listening paradigm</title><author>Mathieson, C.M ; Sainsbury, R.S ; Fitzgerald, L.K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-9b1e36ba297ddd53d73f8a53d6431ec14e27a2f548b7e11c9680abe28f9cd2f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dichotic Listening Tests</topic><topic>Dominance, Cerebral</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hearing Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mathieson, C.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sainsbury, R.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, L.K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mathieson, C.M</au><au>Sainsbury, R.S</au><au>Fitzgerald, L.K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attentional set in pure- versus mixed-lists in a dichotic listening paradigm</atitle><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><date>1990-05</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>30-45</pages><issn>0278-2626</issn><eissn>1090-2147</eissn><coden>BRCOEI</coden><abstract>An experiment was designed to assess the contribution of attentional set to performance on a forced choice recognition task in dichotic listening. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: speech sounds composed of stop consonants, emotional nonspeech sounds, or a random combination of both. In the groups exposed to a single class of stimuli (pure-list), a REA (right ear advantage) emerged for the speech sounds, and a LE (left ear advantage) for the nonspeech sounds. Under mixed conditions using both classes of stimuli, no significant ear advantage was apparent, either globally or individually for the speech and nonspeech sounds. However, performance was more accurate for the left ear on nonspeech sounds and for the right ear for speech sounds, regardless of pure versus mixed placement. The results suggest that under divided attention conditions, attentional set influences the direction of the laterality effect.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2346638</pmid><doi>10.1016/0278-2626(90)90038-P</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0278-2626 |
| ispartof | Brain and cognition, 1990-05, Vol.13 (1), p.30-45 |
| issn | 0278-2626 1090-2147 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79798609 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adult Attention Audition Biological and medical sciences Dichotic Listening Tests Dominance, Cerebral Emotions Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hearing Tests Humans Male Perception Phonetics Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Speech Perception |
| title | Attentional set in pure- versus mixed-lists in a dichotic listening paradigm |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T10%3A55%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attentional%20set%20in%20pure-%20versus%20mixed-lists%20in%20a%20dichotic%20listening%20paradigm&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Mathieson,%20C.M&rft.date=1990-05&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=30-45&rft.issn=0278-2626&rft.eissn=1090-2147&rft.coden=BRCOEI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0278-2626(90)90038-P&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79798609%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79798609&rft_id=info:pmid/2346638&rft_els_id=027826269090038P&rfr_iscdi=true |