Percutaneous and open surgical repairs of Achilles tendon ruptures: A comparative study

A comparative study between percutaneous repair and open surgical repair of acute spontaneous Achilles ten don ruptures in young athletic patients is presented. Twenty-seven patients with acute Achilles ruptures were evaluated objectively and with subjective ques tionnaires. Fifteen of the patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sports medicine 1990-03, Vol.18 (2), p.188-195
Hauptverfasser: Bradley, James P., Tibone, James E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 195
container_issue 2
container_start_page 188
container_title The American journal of sports medicine
container_volume 18
creator Bradley, James P.
Tibone, James E.
description A comparative study between percutaneous repair and open surgical repair of acute spontaneous Achilles ten don ruptures in young athletic patients is presented. Twenty-seven patients with acute Achilles ruptures were evaluated objectively and with subjective ques tionnaires. Fifteen of the patients were treated by re construction with a gastrocsoleus fascial graft (fol lowup, 4.6 years) and 12 treated by percutaneous repair (followup, 1.8 years). Subjectively, both groups were very satisfied with the results of their treatment. Cybex II dynamometer measuring strength, power, and endurance revealed no statistical significant differences between groups, even in light of the shorter followup of the percutaneous group. The percutaneous repairs demonstrated signifi cantly more symmetry in injured/uninjured tendon size than did the open surgical repairs. Two reruptures occurred in the percutaneous group. No other compli cations were noted. After evaluation of both subjective and objective data we recommend percutaneous repair in the recreational athlete and in patients concerned with cosmesis. Open repair is recommended for all high-caliber athletes who cannot afford any chance of rerupture.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/036354659001800213
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79787463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A9036547</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_036354659001800213</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A9036547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-fe5068fae0627e5e85f7b2959e20aa2260010880969b08ba0ac767bb755c95d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9rGzEQxUVJcRynX6AQ2FMuYeORZP07uiZNAwb30JyFVp5116xXW2kXmm9fmTW9FJqTDvObpzfvEfKZwiOlSi2BSy5WUhgAqgEY5R_InArBSs6luCLzM1CeiWtyk9IRMqeknpEZo1oLqufky3eMfhxch2FMhev2ReixK9IYD413bRGxd01MRaiLtf_ZtC2mYsBuH7oijv0wRky35GPt2oSfLu-CvH59-rH5Vm53zy-b9bb0XKuhrFGA1LVDkEyhQC1qVTEjDDJwjjGZzYHWYKSpQFcOnFdSVZUSwhuxN3xB7ifdPoZfI6bBnprksW0n81YZpdVK8ndBBqAUZ-8rUq2oofQMPkzgwbVom86HbsDfgw85jwPafOZmZ9cmxy1WKtNson0MKUWsbR-bk4tvloI9F2f_LS4v3V28jNUJ939XLk3l-XKaJ5d_PIYxdjns_yn-AcoDni8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18719119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Percutaneous and open surgical repairs of Achilles tendon ruptures: A comparative study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bradley, James P. ; Tibone, James E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradley, James P. ; Tibone, James E.</creatorcontrib><description>A comparative study between percutaneous repair and open surgical repair of acute spontaneous Achilles ten don ruptures in young athletic patients is presented. Twenty-seven patients with acute Achilles ruptures were evaluated objectively and with subjective ques tionnaires. Fifteen of the patients were treated by re construction with a gastrocsoleus fascial graft (fol lowup, 4.6 years) and 12 treated by percutaneous repair (followup, 1.8 years). Subjectively, both groups were very satisfied with the results of their treatment. Cybex II dynamometer measuring strength, power, and endurance revealed no statistical significant differences between groups, even in light of the shorter followup of the percutaneous group. The percutaneous repairs demonstrated signifi cantly more symmetry in injured/uninjured tendon size than did the open surgical repairs. Two reruptures occurred in the percutaneous group. No other compli cations were noted. After evaluation of both subjective and objective data we recommend percutaneous repair in the recreational athlete and in patients concerned with cosmesis. Open repair is recommended for all high-caliber athletes who cannot afford any chance of rerupture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/036354659001800213</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2188518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Achilles tendon ; Achilles Tendon - injuries ; Achilles Tendon - surgery ; Adult ; Athletic Injuries - surgery ; Athletic Injuries - therapy ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Evaluation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Recurrence ; Rupture - surgery ; Surgery ; Surgical Flaps ; Surgical technology ; Suture Techniques</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 1990-03, Vol.18 (2), p.188-195</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-fe5068fae0627e5e85f7b2959e20aa2260010880969b08ba0ac767bb755c95d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/036354659001800213$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/036354659001800213$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2188518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradley, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibone, James E.</creatorcontrib><title>Percutaneous and open surgical repairs of Achilles tendon ruptures: A comparative study</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><description>A comparative study between percutaneous repair and open surgical repair of acute spontaneous Achilles ten don ruptures in young athletic patients is presented. Twenty-seven patients with acute Achilles ruptures were evaluated objectively and with subjective ques tionnaires. Fifteen of the patients were treated by re construction with a gastrocsoleus fascial graft (fol lowup, 4.6 years) and 12 treated by percutaneous repair (followup, 1.8 years). Subjectively, both groups were very satisfied with the results of their treatment. Cybex II dynamometer measuring strength, power, and endurance revealed no statistical significant differences between groups, even in light of the shorter followup of the percutaneous group. The percutaneous repairs demonstrated signifi cantly more symmetry in injured/uninjured tendon size than did the open surgical repairs. Two reruptures occurred in the percutaneous group. No other compli cations were noted. After evaluation of both subjective and objective data we recommend percutaneous repair in the recreational athlete and in patients concerned with cosmesis. Open repair is recommended for all high-caliber athletes who cannot afford any chance of rerupture.</description><subject>Achilles tendon</subject><subject>Achilles Tendon - injuries</subject><subject>Achilles Tendon - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Athletic Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Athletic Injuries - therapy</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Rupture - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Surgical technology</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9rGzEQxUVJcRynX6AQ2FMuYeORZP07uiZNAwb30JyFVp5116xXW2kXmm9fmTW9FJqTDvObpzfvEfKZwiOlSi2BSy5WUhgAqgEY5R_InArBSs6luCLzM1CeiWtyk9IRMqeknpEZo1oLqufky3eMfhxch2FMhev2ReixK9IYD413bRGxd01MRaiLtf_ZtC2mYsBuH7oijv0wRky35GPt2oSfLu-CvH59-rH5Vm53zy-b9bb0XKuhrFGA1LVDkEyhQC1qVTEjDDJwjjGZzYHWYKSpQFcOnFdSVZUSwhuxN3xB7ifdPoZfI6bBnprksW0n81YZpdVK8ndBBqAUZ-8rUq2oofQMPkzgwbVom86HbsDfgw85jwPafOZmZ9cmxy1WKtNson0MKUWsbR-bk4tvloI9F2f_LS4v3V28jNUJ939XLk3l-XKaJ5d_PIYxdjns_yn-AcoDni8</recordid><startdate>19900301</startdate><enddate>19900301</enddate><creator>Bradley, James P.</creator><creator>Tibone, James E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900301</creationdate><title>Percutaneous and open surgical repairs of Achilles tendon ruptures</title><author>Bradley, James P. ; Tibone, James E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-fe5068fae0627e5e85f7b2959e20aa2260010880969b08ba0ac767bb755c95d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Achilles tendon</topic><topic>Achilles Tendon - injuries</topic><topic>Achilles Tendon - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Athletic Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Athletic Injuries - therapy</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Rupture - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Surgical technology</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradley, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibone, James E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradley, James P.</au><au>Tibone, James E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Percutaneous and open surgical repairs of Achilles tendon ruptures: A comparative study</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><date>1990-03-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>188-195</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><abstract>A comparative study between percutaneous repair and open surgical repair of acute spontaneous Achilles ten don ruptures in young athletic patients is presented. Twenty-seven patients with acute Achilles ruptures were evaluated objectively and with subjective ques tionnaires. Fifteen of the patients were treated by re construction with a gastrocsoleus fascial graft (fol lowup, 4.6 years) and 12 treated by percutaneous repair (followup, 1.8 years). Subjectively, both groups were very satisfied with the results of their treatment. Cybex II dynamometer measuring strength, power, and endurance revealed no statistical significant differences between groups, even in light of the shorter followup of the percutaneous group. The percutaneous repairs demonstrated signifi cantly more symmetry in injured/uninjured tendon size than did the open surgical repairs. Two reruptures occurred in the percutaneous group. No other compli cations were noted. After evaluation of both subjective and objective data we recommend percutaneous repair in the recreational athlete and in patients concerned with cosmesis. Open repair is recommended for all high-caliber athletes who cannot afford any chance of rerupture.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>2188518</pmid><doi>10.1177/036354659001800213</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-5465
ispartof The American journal of sports medicine, 1990-03, Vol.18 (2), p.188-195
issn 0363-5465
1552-3365
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79787463
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Achilles tendon
Achilles Tendon - injuries
Achilles Tendon - surgery
Adult
Athletic Injuries - surgery
Athletic Injuries - therapy
Biomechanical Phenomena
Evaluation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Methods
Middle Aged
Recurrence
Rupture - surgery
Surgery
Surgical Flaps
Surgical technology
Suture Techniques
title Percutaneous and open surgical repairs of Achilles tendon ruptures: A comparative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T03%3A24%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Percutaneous%20and%20open%20surgical%20repairs%20of%20Achilles%20tendon%20ruptures:%20A%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Bradley,%20James%20P.&rft.date=1990-03-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=188-195&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/036354659001800213&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA9036547%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18719119&rft_id=info:pmid/2188518&rft_galeid=A9036547&rft_sage_id=10.1177_036354659001800213&rfr_iscdi=true