Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast Examinations

Mammography and clinical breast examination are the two principal means of screening for breast cancer. 1 The effectiveness of breast-cancer screening has been well documented in eight randomized, controlled trials, 2 but there has been less attention to its accuracy in community settings and to the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 1998-04, Vol.338 (16), p.1089-1096
Hauptverfasser: Elmore, Joann G, Barton, Mary B, Moceri, Victoria M, Polk, Sarah, Arena, Philip J, Fletcher, Suzanne W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1096
container_issue 16
container_start_page 1089
container_title The New England journal of medicine
container_volume 338
creator Elmore, Joann G
Barton, Mary B
Moceri, Victoria M
Polk, Sarah
Arena, Philip J
Fletcher, Suzanne W
description Mammography and clinical breast examination are the two principal means of screening for breast cancer. 1 The effectiveness of breast-cancer screening has been well documented in eight randomized, controlled trials, 2 but there has been less attention to its accuracy in community settings and to the consequences of a false positive result. A national review of community mammography facilities in the United States found that 1 of every 10 screening mammograms gave a false positive result. 3 Equivalent information for clinical breast examination is not available. If a woman undergoes annual screening beginning at the age of 40, she will have had 60 . . .
doi_str_mv 10.1056/NEJM199804163381601
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79775070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79775070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-96f551302728675b7a52e504d74f7c2543c84e986764e3e2b8c9b2310b11091f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtrFEEUhQsxxEn0F4hQSMgmdKz3Y2mGyYtERZOFq6a65naosas6VvWE-O-tMEMWIrmbuzjfOfdyEHpPyTElUn36sri8ptYaIqji3FBF6Cs0o5LzRgiiXqMZIcw0Qlv-Bu2VsiJ1qLC7aNdKIblUM3R7A6n5CS7j76H8wmOPT91QAH8bS5jCA-AfPgOkkO7wtYtxvMsuFuzSEs-HkIJ3Az7J4MqEF48uhuSmMKbyFu30TzHvtnsf3Z4ububnzdXXs4v556vGS22mxqpeSsoJ08woLTvtJANJxFKLXnsmBfdGgK2aEsCBdcbbjnFKOkqJpT3fR4eb3Ps8_l5DmdoYiodhcAnGdWm11VoSTSr48R9wNa5zqr-1jHErFNeqQnwD-TyWkqFv73OILv9pKWmfGm__03h1fdhGr7sIy2fPtuKqH2x1V2pdfXbJh_KMMUYMUaZiRxssxtImWMUXj_4F3SmRuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223946376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast Examinations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Elmore, Joann G ; Barton, Mary B ; Moceri, Victoria M ; Polk, Sarah ; Arena, Philip J ; Fletcher, Suzanne W</creator><creatorcontrib>Elmore, Joann G ; Barton, Mary B ; Moceri, Victoria M ; Polk, Sarah ; Arena, Philip J ; Fletcher, Suzanne W</creatorcontrib><description>Mammography and clinical breast examination are the two principal means of screening for breast cancer. 1 The effectiveness of breast-cancer screening has been well documented in eight randomized, controlled trials, 2 but there has been less attention to its accuracy in community settings and to the consequences of a false positive result. A national review of community mammography facilities in the United States found that 1 of every 10 screening mammograms gave a false positive result. 3 Equivalent information for clinical breast examination is not available. If a woman undergoes annual screening beginning at the age of 40, she will have had 60 . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199804163381601</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9545356</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEJMAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Bayes Theorem ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - psychology ; Cohort Studies ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Mammary gland diseases ; Mammography ; Mammography - economics ; Mammography - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Mass Screening - economics ; Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Physical Examination - economics ; Physical Examination - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 1998-04, Vol.338 (16), p.1089-1096</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1998 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-96f551302728675b7a52e504d74f7c2543c84e986764e3e2b8c9b2310b11091f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-96f551302728675b7a52e504d74f7c2543c84e986764e3e2b8c9b2310b11091f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJM199804163381601$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199804163381601$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2746,2747,26080,27901,27902,52357,54039</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2208068$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9545356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elmore, Joann G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Mary B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moceri, Victoria M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polk, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arena, Philip J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Suzanne W</creatorcontrib><title>Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast Examinations</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>Mammography and clinical breast examination are the two principal means of screening for breast cancer. 1 The effectiveness of breast-cancer screening has been well documented in eight randomized, controlled trials, 2 but there has been less attention to its accuracy in community settings and to the consequences of a false positive result. A national review of community mammography facilities in the United States found that 1 of every 10 screening mammograms gave a false positive result. 3 Equivalent information for clinical breast examination is not available. If a woman undergoes annual screening beginning at the age of 40, she will have had 60 . . .</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - economics</subject><subject>Mammography - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physical Examination - economics</subject><subject>Physical Examination - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtrFEEUhQsxxEn0F4hQSMgmdKz3Y2mGyYtERZOFq6a65naosas6VvWE-O-tMEMWIrmbuzjfOfdyEHpPyTElUn36sri8ptYaIqji3FBF6Cs0o5LzRgiiXqMZIcw0Qlv-Bu2VsiJ1qLC7aNdKIblUM3R7A6n5CS7j76H8wmOPT91QAH8bS5jCA-AfPgOkkO7wtYtxvMsuFuzSEs-HkIJ3Az7J4MqEF48uhuSmMKbyFu30TzHvtnsf3Z4ububnzdXXs4v556vGS22mxqpeSsoJ08woLTvtJANJxFKLXnsmBfdGgK2aEsCBdcbbjnFKOkqJpT3fR4eb3Ps8_l5DmdoYiodhcAnGdWm11VoSTSr48R9wNa5zqr-1jHErFNeqQnwD-TyWkqFv73OILv9pKWmfGm__03h1fdhGr7sIy2fPtuKqH2x1V2pdfXbJh_KMMUYMUaZiRxssxtImWMUXj_4F3SmRuA</recordid><startdate>19980416</startdate><enddate>19980416</enddate><creator>Elmore, Joann G</creator><creator>Barton, Mary B</creator><creator>Moceri, Victoria M</creator><creator>Polk, Sarah</creator><creator>Arena, Philip J</creator><creator>Fletcher, Suzanne W</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980416</creationdate><title>Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast Examinations</title><author>Elmore, Joann G ; Barton, Mary B ; Moceri, Victoria M ; Polk, Sarah ; Arena, Philip J ; Fletcher, Suzanne W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-96f551302728675b7a52e504d74f7c2543c84e986764e3e2b8c9b2310b11091f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - economics</topic><topic>Mammography - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physical Examination - economics</topic><topic>Physical Examination - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elmore, Joann G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Mary B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moceri, Victoria M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polk, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arena, Philip J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Suzanne W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elmore, Joann G</au><au>Barton, Mary B</au><au>Moceri, Victoria M</au><au>Polk, Sarah</au><au>Arena, Philip J</au><au>Fletcher, Suzanne W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast Examinations</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>1998-04-16</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>338</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>1089</spage><epage>1096</epage><pages>1089-1096</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><coden>NEJMAG</coden><abstract>Mammography and clinical breast examination are the two principal means of screening for breast cancer. 1 The effectiveness of breast-cancer screening has been well documented in eight randomized, controlled trials, 2 but there has been less attention to its accuracy in community settings and to the consequences of a false positive result. A national review of community mammography facilities in the United States found that 1 of every 10 screening mammograms gave a false positive result. 3 Equivalent information for clinical breast examination is not available. If a woman undergoes annual screening beginning at the age of 40, she will have had 60 . . .</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>9545356</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJM199804163381601</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-4793
ispartof The New England journal of medicine, 1998-04, Vol.338 (16), p.1089-1096
issn 0028-4793
1533-4406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79775070
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; New England Journal of Medicine
subjects Adult
Aged
Bayes Theorem
Biological and medical sciences
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - psychology
Cohort Studies
False Positive Reactions
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Mammary gland diseases
Mammography
Mammography - economics
Mammography - statistics & numerical data
Mass Screening - economics
Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Physical Examination - economics
Physical Examination - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Risk
Tumors
title Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast Examinations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A47%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ten-Year%20Risk%20of%20False%20Positive%20Screening%20Mammograms%20and%20Clinical%20Breast%20Examinations&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Elmore,%20Joann%20G&rft.date=1998-04-16&rft.volume=338&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=1089&rft.epage=1096&rft.pages=1089-1096&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft.coden=NEJMAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJM199804163381601&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79775070%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223946376&rft_id=info:pmid/9545356&rfr_iscdi=true