Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States and Canada: 1995 Results Generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry

Objective: To summarize the procedures and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) initiated in the United States and Canada in 1995. Design: Data were collected in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database program and cycle reporting forms and were submitted to the Americ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 1998-03, Vol.69 (3), p.389-398
Hauptverfasser: American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 398
container_issue 3
container_start_page 389
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 69
creator American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
description Objective: To summarize the procedures and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) initiated in the United States and Canada in 1995. Design: Data were collected in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database program and cycle reporting forms and were submitted to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Participant(s): Two hundred eighty-one programs submitted data on procedures performed in 1995. Data were collected after November 1996 so that outcome of all pregnancies established would be known. Main Outcome Measure(s): Procedural outcomes measured included clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, abortion, stillbirth, delivery, and congenital abnormality. Result(s): Programs reported initiating 59,142 cycles of ART treatment, including frozen embryo and donor oocyte cycles. Of these, 41,087 cycles initiated were IVF (with and without micromanipulation) with 22.5% deliveries per retrieval; 3,741 were cycles of gamete intrafallopian transfer with 27.0% deliveries per retrieval; 1,078 were cycles of zygote intrafallopian transfer with 27.9% deliveries per retrieval. In addition to these cycles initiated in 1995, 8,453 frozen embryo thaw procedures were reported, either as separate procedures or in combination with other ART procedures with 15.2% deliveries per transfer, 3,555 donor oocyte cycles were initiated with an overall success of 36.0% deliveries per transfer, 1,028 cryopreserved embryo thaw procedures from donated oocyte procedures with an overall success of 16.8% deliveries per transfer, and 200 ART treatment cycles in which a host uterus was used were initiated with an overall success of 34.9% deliveries per ET. As a result of all procedures, a total of 11,631 deliveries were reported, resulting in 16,520 neonates. Conclusion(s): In 1995, there were more programs reporting ART treatment and a significant (19.3%) increase in reported cycles. In comparable cycle types, overall average success rates (deliveries per transfer) exhibited a 0.6% increase or a 2.5% increase over the rates in the 1994 reported summaries.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00014-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79771788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028298000144</els_id><sourcerecordid>79771788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-4d031235f112b900d157798e6f04c31b6b41d5e3dc15ce39b7d597ed8122b9da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpSbdJf0JAh1KagxONbdlWL2VZ0jSQEsgmZyFL40TFllNJDuzf6y-rvLss7SknMcz3NI_3CDkFdg4Mqos1Y8Azljf5F9GcsTSVWfmGLIDzKuMVL96SxQF5Tz6E8CtBFdT5ETkSvICmKhfkzzIEGyIaeofPfjSTjvYF6T3qJzf24-OGWkfjE9IHZ2dqHVXEQJUzdKWcMuorBSF4Uoepj4FeoUOvZrLz47BVLgf0VitH16O2GDe0G_3_136isdo6vPiXeNXYHT4mwG9OyLtO9QE_7t9j8vD98n71I7u5vbpeLW8yzVkZs9KwAvKCdwB5KxgzwOtaNFh1rNQFtFVbguFYGA1cYyHa2nBRo2kgT7xRxTH5vPs32fk9YYhysEFj3yuH4xRkLeoa6qZJIN-B2o8heOzks7eD8hsJTM7dyW13ci5GikZuu5Nl0p3uD0ztgOag2peV9p_2exW06juvnLbhgOV5WUEzY992GKYwXix6GVKqTqeQPeoozWhfMfIXY3O48Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79771788</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States and Canada: 1995 Results Generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>American Society for Reproductive Medicine ; Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</creator><creatorcontrib>American Society for Reproductive Medicine ; Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To summarize the procedures and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) initiated in the United States and Canada in 1995. Design: Data were collected in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database program and cycle reporting forms and were submitted to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Participant(s): Two hundred eighty-one programs submitted data on procedures performed in 1995. Data were collected after November 1996 so that outcome of all pregnancies established would be known. Main Outcome Measure(s): Procedural outcomes measured included clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, abortion, stillbirth, delivery, and congenital abnormality. Result(s): Programs reported initiating 59,142 cycles of ART treatment, including frozen embryo and donor oocyte cycles. Of these, 41,087 cycles initiated were IVF (with and without micromanipulation) with 22.5% deliveries per retrieval; 3,741 were cycles of gamete intrafallopian transfer with 27.0% deliveries per retrieval; 1,078 were cycles of zygote intrafallopian transfer with 27.9% deliveries per retrieval. In addition to these cycles initiated in 1995, 8,453 frozen embryo thaw procedures were reported, either as separate procedures or in combination with other ART procedures with 15.2% deliveries per transfer, 3,555 donor oocyte cycles were initiated with an overall success of 36.0% deliveries per transfer, 1,028 cryopreserved embryo thaw procedures from donated oocyte procedures with an overall success of 16.8% deliveries per transfer, and 200 ART treatment cycles in which a host uterus was used were initiated with an overall success of 34.9% deliveries per ET. As a result of all procedures, a total of 11,631 deliveries were reported, resulting in 16,520 neonates. Conclusion(s): In 1995, there were more programs reporting ART treatment and a significant (19.3%) increase in reported cycles. In comparable cycle types, overall average success rates (deliveries per transfer) exhibited a 0.6% increase or a 2.5% increase over the rates in the 1994 reported summaries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00014-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9531864</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Assisted reproductive technology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Canada ; Cryopreservation ; cryopreserved embryos ; donor oocytes ; Embryo Transfer ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data ; gamete intrafallopian transfer ; Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; in vitro fertilization ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Oocyte Donation ; Pregnancy ; Registries ; Reproductive Techniques - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Societies, Medical ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; Treatment Outcome ; United States ; Zygote Intrafallopian Transfer</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 1998-03, Vol.69 (3), p.389-398</ispartof><rights>1998 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-4d031235f112b900d157798e6f04c31b6b41d5e3dc15ce39b7d597ed8122b9da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-4d031235f112b900d157798e6f04c31b6b41d5e3dc15ce39b7d597ed8122b9da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00014-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2246184$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9531864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</creatorcontrib><title>Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States and Canada: 1995 Results Generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective: To summarize the procedures and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) initiated in the United States and Canada in 1995. Design: Data were collected in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database program and cycle reporting forms and were submitted to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Participant(s): Two hundred eighty-one programs submitted data on procedures performed in 1995. Data were collected after November 1996 so that outcome of all pregnancies established would be known. Main Outcome Measure(s): Procedural outcomes measured included clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, abortion, stillbirth, delivery, and congenital abnormality. Result(s): Programs reported initiating 59,142 cycles of ART treatment, including frozen embryo and donor oocyte cycles. Of these, 41,087 cycles initiated were IVF (with and without micromanipulation) with 22.5% deliveries per retrieval; 3,741 were cycles of gamete intrafallopian transfer with 27.0% deliveries per retrieval; 1,078 were cycles of zygote intrafallopian transfer with 27.9% deliveries per retrieval. In addition to these cycles initiated in 1995, 8,453 frozen embryo thaw procedures were reported, either as separate procedures or in combination with other ART procedures with 15.2% deliveries per transfer, 3,555 donor oocyte cycles were initiated with an overall success of 36.0% deliveries per transfer, 1,028 cryopreserved embryo thaw procedures from donated oocyte procedures with an overall success of 16.8% deliveries per transfer, and 200 ART treatment cycles in which a host uterus was used were initiated with an overall success of 34.9% deliveries per ET. As a result of all procedures, a total of 11,631 deliveries were reported, resulting in 16,520 neonates. Conclusion(s): In 1995, there were more programs reporting ART treatment and a significant (19.3%) increase in reported cycles. In comparable cycle types, overall average success rates (deliveries per transfer) exhibited a 0.6% increase or a 2.5% increase over the rates in the 1994 reported summaries.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Assisted reproductive technology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>cryopreserved embryos</subject><subject>donor oocytes</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>gamete intrafallopian transfer</subject><subject>Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>in vitro fertilization</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oocyte Donation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Zygote Intrafallopian Transfer</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVpSbdJf0JAh1KagxONbdlWL2VZ0jSQEsgmZyFL40TFllNJDuzf6y-rvLss7SknMcz3NI_3CDkFdg4Mqos1Y8Azljf5F9GcsTSVWfmGLIDzKuMVL96SxQF5Tz6E8CtBFdT5ETkSvICmKhfkzzIEGyIaeofPfjSTjvYF6T3qJzf24-OGWkfjE9IHZ2dqHVXEQJUzdKWcMuorBSF4Uoepj4FeoUOvZrLz47BVLgf0VitH16O2GDe0G_3_136isdo6vPiXeNXYHT4mwG9OyLtO9QE_7t9j8vD98n71I7u5vbpeLW8yzVkZs9KwAvKCdwB5KxgzwOtaNFh1rNQFtFVbguFYGA1cYyHa2nBRo2kgT7xRxTH5vPs32fk9YYhysEFj3yuH4xRkLeoa6qZJIN-B2o8heOzks7eD8hsJTM7dyW13ci5GikZuu5Nl0p3uD0ztgOag2peV9p_2exW06juvnLbhgOV5WUEzY992GKYwXix6GVKqTqeQPeoozWhfMfIXY3O48Q</recordid><startdate>19980301</startdate><enddate>19980301</enddate><creator>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</creator><creator>Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980301</creationdate><title>Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States and Canada: 1995 Results Generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-4d031235f112b900d157798e6f04c31b6b41d5e3dc15ce39b7d597ed8122b9da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Assisted reproductive technology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>cryopreserved embryos</topic><topic>donor oocytes</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>gamete intrafallopian transfer</topic><topic>Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>in vitro fertilization</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oocyte Donation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Zygote Intrafallopian Transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><aucorp>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</aucorp><aucorp>Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States and Canada: 1995 Results Generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>1998-03-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>389</spage><epage>398</epage><pages>389-398</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective: To summarize the procedures and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) initiated in the United States and Canada in 1995. Design: Data were collected in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database program and cycle reporting forms and were submitted to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Participant(s): Two hundred eighty-one programs submitted data on procedures performed in 1995. Data were collected after November 1996 so that outcome of all pregnancies established would be known. Main Outcome Measure(s): Procedural outcomes measured included clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, abortion, stillbirth, delivery, and congenital abnormality. Result(s): Programs reported initiating 59,142 cycles of ART treatment, including frozen embryo and donor oocyte cycles. Of these, 41,087 cycles initiated were IVF (with and without micromanipulation) with 22.5% deliveries per retrieval; 3,741 were cycles of gamete intrafallopian transfer with 27.0% deliveries per retrieval; 1,078 were cycles of zygote intrafallopian transfer with 27.9% deliveries per retrieval. In addition to these cycles initiated in 1995, 8,453 frozen embryo thaw procedures were reported, either as separate procedures or in combination with other ART procedures with 15.2% deliveries per transfer, 3,555 donor oocyte cycles were initiated with an overall success of 36.0% deliveries per transfer, 1,028 cryopreserved embryo thaw procedures from donated oocyte procedures with an overall success of 16.8% deliveries per transfer, and 200 ART treatment cycles in which a host uterus was used were initiated with an overall success of 34.9% deliveries per ET. As a result of all procedures, a total of 11,631 deliveries were reported, resulting in 16,520 neonates. Conclusion(s): In 1995, there were more programs reporting ART treatment and a significant (19.3%) increase in reported cycles. In comparable cycle types, overall average success rates (deliveries per transfer) exhibited a 0.6% increase or a 2.5% increase over the rates in the 1994 reported summaries.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9531864</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00014-4</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 1998-03, Vol.69 (3), p.389-398
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79771788
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Assisted reproductive technology
Biological and medical sciences
Birth control
Canada
Cryopreservation
cryopreserved embryos
donor oocytes
Embryo Transfer
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - statistics & numerical data
gamete intrafallopian transfer
Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer - statistics & numerical data
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
in vitro fertilization
Male
Medical sciences
Oocyte Donation
Pregnancy
Registries
Reproductive Techniques - statistics & numerical data
Societies, Medical
Sterility. Assisted procreation
Treatment Outcome
United States
Zygote Intrafallopian Transfer
title Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States and Canada: 1995 Results Generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T17%3A57%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technology%20in%20the%20United%20States%20and%20Canada:%201995%20Results%20Generated%20from%20the%20American%20Society%20for%20Reproductive%20Medicine/Society%20for%20Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technology%20Registry&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.aucorp=American%20Society%20for%20Reproductive%20Medicine&rft.date=1998-03-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=389&rft.epage=398&rft.pages=389-398&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00014-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79771788%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79771788&rft_id=info:pmid/9531864&rft_els_id=S0015028298000144&rfr_iscdi=true