Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry

In order to investigate the influence of fat on bone in dual-energy absorptiometry measurements, we evaluated a special phantom on the three scanners: Lunar DP3, Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000. The phantom employed hydroxyapatite blocks of various thicknesses to simulate bone, water to simulate musc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bone and mineral 1990-04, Vol.9 (1), p.71-81
Hauptverfasser: Hangartner, Thomas N., Johnston, C. Conrad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 81
container_issue 1
container_start_page 71
container_title Bone and mineral
container_volume 9
creator Hangartner, Thomas N.
Johnston, C. Conrad
description In order to investigate the influence of fat on bone in dual-energy absorptiometry measurements, we evaluated a special phantom on the three scanners: Lunar DP3, Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000. The phantom employed hydroxyapatite blocks of various thicknesses to simulate bone, water to simulate muscle and lucite to simulate fat. The lucite plates were arranged in one and two layers in three different configurations: over the whole measurement area, over the hydroxyapatite piocks only and at both sides of the hydroxyapatite blocks. For all scanners, no influence of fat could be demonstrated if it was homogeneously distributed over the whole measurement area. However, changes in area bone-density were observed if fat was distributed inhomogeneously over the measurement area. Fat over only the bone area reduced the measured bone values by 0.051 g/cm 2 per cm fat layer. Fat over only the soft-tissue area increased the measured bone values by the same amount. These results apply to the Lunar DPX scanner. The results for the Lunar DP-3 scanner are similar; those for the Hologic QDR-1000 show a slightly smaller fat dependence of 0.044 g/cm 2 per cm fat layer. The fat influences are not dependent on the amount of bone and only minimally on the soft-tissue thickness. A change of 50% in the fat content of the bone marrow will change the measured area bone-density of an averaged sized vertebra by 5–6% depending on scanner model. Inhomogeneous fat distribution in soft tissue, resulting in a difference of 2 cm fat layer between soft-tissue area and bone area, will influence the measured area bone-density by 9–10%.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0169-6009(90)90101-K
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79769571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>016960099090101K</els_id><sourcerecordid>79769571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-cd4051b9f0fadd39ecb264c4c63ce61efd6876721dca4f4b86cfdc3653fd4bfb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkbFOwzAQQD2ASin8AUgZEIIhYCeOEy9IqCpQtRILzJZjn8EoiYudgPr3JDTqCINl6e7d6e4dQmcE3xBM2G3_eMww5lccX3Pcx-LVAZruw0foOIQPjJOC0mSCJkma5ozjKVosG1N10CiInImMbCPXRKVrIKpBhs5DDU0bom_bvke6k1UMDfi3bSTL4Pymta6G1m9P0KGRVYDT8Z-h14fFy_wpXj8_Luf361hRytpYaYozUnKDjdQ65aDKhFFFFUsVMAJGsyJneUK0ktTQsmDKaJWyLDWalqZMZ-hy13fj3WcHoRW1DQqqSjbguiBy3m-V5eRfkDCcZAmlPUh3oPIuBA9GbLytpd8KgsWgVgwOxeBQcCx-1YpVX3Y-9u_KGvS-aPTa5y_GvAxKVsbLRtmwx1hRME6THrvbYdBL-7LgRVB2OIa2HlQrtLN_z_EDr6GYKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16025244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hangartner, Thomas N. ; Johnston, C. Conrad</creator><creatorcontrib>Hangartner, Thomas N. ; Johnston, C. Conrad</creatorcontrib><description>In order to investigate the influence of fat on bone in dual-energy absorptiometry measurements, we evaluated a special phantom on the three scanners: Lunar DP3, Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000. The phantom employed hydroxyapatite blocks of various thicknesses to simulate bone, water to simulate muscle and lucite to simulate fat. The lucite plates were arranged in one and two layers in three different configurations: over the whole measurement area, over the hydroxyapatite piocks only and at both sides of the hydroxyapatite blocks. For all scanners, no influence of fat could be demonstrated if it was homogeneously distributed over the whole measurement area. However, changes in area bone-density were observed if fat was distributed inhomogeneously over the measurement area. Fat over only the bone area reduced the measured bone values by 0.051 g/cm 2 per cm fat layer. Fat over only the soft-tissue area increased the measured bone values by the same amount. These results apply to the Lunar DPX scanner. The results for the Lunar DP-3 scanner are similar; those for the Hologic QDR-1000 show a slightly smaller fat dependence of 0.044 g/cm 2 per cm fat layer. The fat influences are not dependent on the amount of bone and only minimally on the soft-tissue thickness. A change of 50% in the fat content of the bone marrow will change the measured area bone-density of an averaged sized vertebra by 5–6% depending on scanner model. Inhomogeneous fat distribution in soft tissue, resulting in a difference of 2 cm fat layer between soft-tissue area and bone area, will influence the measured area bone-density by 9–10%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-6009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0169-6009(90)90101-K</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2337690</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BOMIET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation ; Adipose Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Density ; Bone Marrow - anatomy &amp; histology ; Bone measurement ; Connective Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology ; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry ; Dual-photon absorptiometry ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Fat influence ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Models, Anatomic ; Osteoporosis ; Skeleton and joints ; Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><ispartof>Bone and mineral, 1990-04, Vol.9 (1), p.71-81</ispartof><rights>1990 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (Biomedical Division)</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-cd4051b9f0fadd39ecb264c4c63ce61efd6876721dca4f4b86cfdc3653fd4bfb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-cd4051b9f0fadd39ecb264c4c63ce61efd6876721dca4f4b86cfdc3653fd4bfb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=6886942$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2337690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hangartner, Thomas N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, C. Conrad</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry</title><title>Bone and mineral</title><addtitle>Bone Miner</addtitle><description>In order to investigate the influence of fat on bone in dual-energy absorptiometry measurements, we evaluated a special phantom on the three scanners: Lunar DP3, Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000. The phantom employed hydroxyapatite blocks of various thicknesses to simulate bone, water to simulate muscle and lucite to simulate fat. The lucite plates were arranged in one and two layers in three different configurations: over the whole measurement area, over the hydroxyapatite piocks only and at both sides of the hydroxyapatite blocks. For all scanners, no influence of fat could be demonstrated if it was homogeneously distributed over the whole measurement area. However, changes in area bone-density were observed if fat was distributed inhomogeneously over the measurement area. Fat over only the bone area reduced the measured bone values by 0.051 g/cm 2 per cm fat layer. Fat over only the soft-tissue area increased the measured bone values by the same amount. These results apply to the Lunar DPX scanner. The results for the Lunar DP-3 scanner are similar; those for the Hologic QDR-1000 show a slightly smaller fat dependence of 0.044 g/cm 2 per cm fat layer. The fat influences are not dependent on the amount of bone and only minimally on the soft-tissue thickness. A change of 50% in the fat content of the bone marrow will change the measured area bone-density of an averaged sized vertebra by 5–6% depending on scanner model. Inhomogeneous fat distribution in soft tissue, resulting in a difference of 2 cm fat layer between soft-tissue area and bone area, will influence the measured area bone-density by 9–10%.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone Marrow - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Bone measurement</subject><subject>Connective Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry</subject><subject>Dual-photon absorptiometry</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Fat influence</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Skeleton and joints</subject><subject>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><issn>0169-6009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkbFOwzAQQD2ASin8AUgZEIIhYCeOEy9IqCpQtRILzJZjn8EoiYudgPr3JDTqCINl6e7d6e4dQmcE3xBM2G3_eMww5lccX3Pcx-LVAZruw0foOIQPjJOC0mSCJkma5ozjKVosG1N10CiInImMbCPXRKVrIKpBhs5DDU0bom_bvke6k1UMDfi3bSTL4Pymta6G1m9P0KGRVYDT8Z-h14fFy_wpXj8_Luf361hRytpYaYozUnKDjdQ65aDKhFFFFUsVMAJGsyJneUK0ktTQsmDKaJWyLDWalqZMZ-hy13fj3WcHoRW1DQqqSjbguiBy3m-V5eRfkDCcZAmlPUh3oPIuBA9GbLytpd8KgsWgVgwOxeBQcCx-1YpVX3Y-9u_KGvS-aPTa5y_GvAxKVsbLRtmwx1hRME6THrvbYdBL-7LgRVB2OIa2HlQrtLN_z_EDr6GYKA</recordid><startdate>19900401</startdate><enddate>19900401</enddate><creator>Hangartner, Thomas N.</creator><creator>Johnston, C. Conrad</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900401</creationdate><title>Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry</title><author>Hangartner, Thomas N. ; Johnston, C. Conrad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-cd4051b9f0fadd39ecb264c4c63ce61efd6876721dca4f4b86cfdc3653fd4bfb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone Marrow - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Bone measurement</topic><topic>Connective Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry</topic><topic>Dual-photon absorptiometry</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Fat influence</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Skeleton and joints</topic><topic>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hangartner, Thomas N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, C. Conrad</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bone and mineral</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hangartner, Thomas N.</au><au>Johnston, C. Conrad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry</atitle><jtitle>Bone and mineral</jtitle><addtitle>Bone Miner</addtitle><date>1990-04-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>71-81</pages><issn>0169-6009</issn><coden>BOMIET</coden><abstract>In order to investigate the influence of fat on bone in dual-energy absorptiometry measurements, we evaluated a special phantom on the three scanners: Lunar DP3, Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000. The phantom employed hydroxyapatite blocks of various thicknesses to simulate bone, water to simulate muscle and lucite to simulate fat. The lucite plates were arranged in one and two layers in three different configurations: over the whole measurement area, over the hydroxyapatite piocks only and at both sides of the hydroxyapatite blocks. For all scanners, no influence of fat could be demonstrated if it was homogeneously distributed over the whole measurement area. However, changes in area bone-density were observed if fat was distributed inhomogeneously over the measurement area. Fat over only the bone area reduced the measured bone values by 0.051 g/cm 2 per cm fat layer. Fat over only the soft-tissue area increased the measured bone values by the same amount. These results apply to the Lunar DPX scanner. The results for the Lunar DP-3 scanner are similar; those for the Hologic QDR-1000 show a slightly smaller fat dependence of 0.044 g/cm 2 per cm fat layer. The fat influences are not dependent on the amount of bone and only minimally on the soft-tissue thickness. A change of 50% in the fat content of the bone marrow will change the measured area bone-density of an averaged sized vertebra by 5–6% depending on scanner model. Inhomogeneous fat distribution in soft tissue, resulting in a difference of 2 cm fat layer between soft-tissue area and bone area, will influence the measured area bone-density by 9–10%.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2337690</pmid><doi>10.1016/0169-6009(90)90101-K</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-6009
ispartof Bone and mineral, 1990-04, Vol.9 (1), p.71-81
issn 0169-6009
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79769571
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation
Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Density
Bone Marrow - anatomy & histology
Bone measurement
Connective Tissue - anatomy & histology
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Dual-photon absorptiometry
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Fat influence
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Models, Anatomic
Osteoporosis
Skeleton and joints
Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system
title Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A10%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20fat%20on%20bone%20measurements%20with%20dual-energy%20absorptiometry&rft.jtitle=Bone%20and%20mineral&rft.au=Hangartner,%20Thomas%20N.&rft.date=1990-04-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=71-81&rft.issn=0169-6009&rft.coden=BOMIET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0169-6009(90)90101-K&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79769571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16025244&rft_id=info:pmid/2337690&rft_els_id=016960099090101K&rfr_iscdi=true