Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry
In order to investigate the influence of fat on bone in dual-energy absorptiometry measurements, we evaluated a special phantom on the three scanners: Lunar DP3, Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000. The phantom employed hydroxyapatite blocks of various thicknesses to simulate bone, water to simulate musc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bone and mineral 1990-04, Vol.9 (1), p.71-81 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 81 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 71 |
container_title | Bone and mineral |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Hangartner, Thomas N. Johnston, C. Conrad |
description | In order to investigate the influence of fat on bone in dual-energy absorptiometry measurements, we evaluated a special phantom on the three scanners: Lunar DP3, Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000. The phantom employed hydroxyapatite blocks of various thicknesses to simulate bone, water to simulate muscle and lucite to simulate fat. The lucite plates were arranged in one and two layers in three different configurations: over the whole measurement area, over the hydroxyapatite piocks only and at both sides of the hydroxyapatite blocks.
For all scanners, no influence of fat could be demonstrated if it was homogeneously distributed over the whole measurement area. However, changes in area bone-density were observed if fat was distributed inhomogeneously over the measurement area. Fat over only the bone area reduced the measured bone values by 0.051 g/cm
2 per cm fat layer. Fat over only the soft-tissue area increased the measured bone values by the same amount. These results apply to the Lunar DPX scanner. The results for the Lunar DP-3 scanner are similar; those for the Hologic QDR-1000 show a slightly smaller fat dependence of 0.044 g/cm
2 per cm fat layer. The fat influences are not dependent on the amount of bone and only minimally on the soft-tissue thickness.
A change of 50% in the fat content of the bone marrow will change the measured area bone-density of an averaged sized vertebra by 5–6% depending on scanner model. Inhomogeneous fat distribution in soft tissue, resulting in a difference of 2 cm fat layer between soft-tissue area and bone area, will influence the measured area bone-density by 9–10%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0169-6009(90)90101-K |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79769571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>016960099090101K</els_id><sourcerecordid>79769571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-cd4051b9f0fadd39ecb264c4c63ce61efd6876721dca4f4b86cfdc3653fd4bfb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkbFOwzAQQD2ASin8AUgZEIIhYCeOEy9IqCpQtRILzJZjn8EoiYudgPr3JDTqCINl6e7d6e4dQmcE3xBM2G3_eMww5lccX3Pcx-LVAZruw0foOIQPjJOC0mSCJkma5ozjKVosG1N10CiInImMbCPXRKVrIKpBhs5DDU0bom_bvke6k1UMDfi3bSTL4Pymta6G1m9P0KGRVYDT8Z-h14fFy_wpXj8_Luf361hRytpYaYozUnKDjdQ65aDKhFFFFUsVMAJGsyJneUK0ktTQsmDKaJWyLDWalqZMZ-hy13fj3WcHoRW1DQqqSjbguiBy3m-V5eRfkDCcZAmlPUh3oPIuBA9GbLytpd8KgsWgVgwOxeBQcCx-1YpVX3Y-9u_KGvS-aPTa5y_GvAxKVsbLRtmwx1hRME6THrvbYdBL-7LgRVB2OIa2HlQrtLN_z_EDr6GYKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16025244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hangartner, Thomas N. ; Johnston, C. Conrad</creator><creatorcontrib>Hangartner, Thomas N. ; Johnston, C. Conrad</creatorcontrib><description>In order to investigate the influence of fat on bone in dual-energy absorptiometry measurements, we evaluated a special phantom on the three scanners: Lunar DP3, Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000. The phantom employed hydroxyapatite blocks of various thicknesses to simulate bone, water to simulate muscle and lucite to simulate fat. The lucite plates were arranged in one and two layers in three different configurations: over the whole measurement area, over the hydroxyapatite piocks only and at both sides of the hydroxyapatite blocks.
For all scanners, no influence of fat could be demonstrated if it was homogeneously distributed over the whole measurement area. However, changes in area bone-density were observed if fat was distributed inhomogeneously over the measurement area. Fat over only the bone area reduced the measured bone values by 0.051 g/cm
2 per cm fat layer. Fat over only the soft-tissue area increased the measured bone values by the same amount. These results apply to the Lunar DPX scanner. The results for the Lunar DP-3 scanner are similar; those for the Hologic QDR-1000 show a slightly smaller fat dependence of 0.044 g/cm
2 per cm fat layer. The fat influences are not dependent on the amount of bone and only minimally on the soft-tissue thickness.
A change of 50% in the fat content of the bone marrow will change the measured area bone-density of an averaged sized vertebra by 5–6% depending on scanner model. Inhomogeneous fat distribution in soft tissue, resulting in a difference of 2 cm fat layer between soft-tissue area and bone area, will influence the measured area bone-density by 9–10%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-6009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0169-6009(90)90101-K</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2337690</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BOMIET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation ; Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Density ; Bone Marrow - anatomy & histology ; Bone measurement ; Connective Tissue - anatomy & histology ; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry ; Dual-photon absorptiometry ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Fat influence ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Models, Anatomic ; Osteoporosis ; Skeleton and joints ; Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><ispartof>Bone and mineral, 1990-04, Vol.9 (1), p.71-81</ispartof><rights>1990 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (Biomedical Division)</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-cd4051b9f0fadd39ecb264c4c63ce61efd6876721dca4f4b86cfdc3653fd4bfb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-cd4051b9f0fadd39ecb264c4c63ce61efd6876721dca4f4b86cfdc3653fd4bfb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6886942$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2337690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hangartner, Thomas N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, C. Conrad</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry</title><title>Bone and mineral</title><addtitle>Bone Miner</addtitle><description>In order to investigate the influence of fat on bone in dual-energy absorptiometry measurements, we evaluated a special phantom on the three scanners: Lunar DP3, Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000. The phantom employed hydroxyapatite blocks of various thicknesses to simulate bone, water to simulate muscle and lucite to simulate fat. The lucite plates were arranged in one and two layers in three different configurations: over the whole measurement area, over the hydroxyapatite piocks only and at both sides of the hydroxyapatite blocks.
For all scanners, no influence of fat could be demonstrated if it was homogeneously distributed over the whole measurement area. However, changes in area bone-density were observed if fat was distributed inhomogeneously over the measurement area. Fat over only the bone area reduced the measured bone values by 0.051 g/cm
2 per cm fat layer. Fat over only the soft-tissue area increased the measured bone values by the same amount. These results apply to the Lunar DPX scanner. The results for the Lunar DP-3 scanner are similar; those for the Hologic QDR-1000 show a slightly smaller fat dependence of 0.044 g/cm
2 per cm fat layer. The fat influences are not dependent on the amount of bone and only minimally on the soft-tissue thickness.
A change of 50% in the fat content of the bone marrow will change the measured area bone-density of an averaged sized vertebra by 5–6% depending on scanner model. Inhomogeneous fat distribution in soft tissue, resulting in a difference of 2 cm fat layer between soft-tissue area and bone area, will influence the measured area bone-density by 9–10%.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone Marrow - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Bone measurement</subject><subject>Connective Tissue - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry</subject><subject>Dual-photon absorptiometry</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Fat influence</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Skeleton and joints</subject><subject>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><issn>0169-6009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkbFOwzAQQD2ASin8AUgZEIIhYCeOEy9IqCpQtRILzJZjn8EoiYudgPr3JDTqCINl6e7d6e4dQmcE3xBM2G3_eMww5lccX3Pcx-LVAZruw0foOIQPjJOC0mSCJkma5ozjKVosG1N10CiInImMbCPXRKVrIKpBhs5DDU0bom_bvke6k1UMDfi3bSTL4Pymta6G1m9P0KGRVYDT8Z-h14fFy_wpXj8_Luf361hRytpYaYozUnKDjdQ65aDKhFFFFUsVMAJGsyJneUK0ktTQsmDKaJWyLDWalqZMZ-hy13fj3WcHoRW1DQqqSjbguiBy3m-V5eRfkDCcZAmlPUh3oPIuBA9GbLytpd8KgsWgVgwOxeBQcCx-1YpVX3Y-9u_KGvS-aPTa5y_GvAxKVsbLRtmwx1hRME6THrvbYdBL-7LgRVB2OIa2HlQrtLN_z_EDr6GYKA</recordid><startdate>19900401</startdate><enddate>19900401</enddate><creator>Hangartner, Thomas N.</creator><creator>Johnston, C. Conrad</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900401</creationdate><title>Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry</title><author>Hangartner, Thomas N. ; Johnston, C. Conrad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-cd4051b9f0fadd39ecb264c4c63ce61efd6876721dca4f4b86cfdc3653fd4bfb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone Marrow - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Bone measurement</topic><topic>Connective Tissue - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry</topic><topic>Dual-photon absorptiometry</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Fat influence</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Skeleton and joints</topic><topic>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hangartner, Thomas N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, C. Conrad</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bone and mineral</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hangartner, Thomas N.</au><au>Johnston, C. Conrad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry</atitle><jtitle>Bone and mineral</jtitle><addtitle>Bone Miner</addtitle><date>1990-04-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>71-81</pages><issn>0169-6009</issn><coden>BOMIET</coden><abstract>In order to investigate the influence of fat on bone in dual-energy absorptiometry measurements, we evaluated a special phantom on the three scanners: Lunar DP3, Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000. The phantom employed hydroxyapatite blocks of various thicknesses to simulate bone, water to simulate muscle and lucite to simulate fat. The lucite plates were arranged in one and two layers in three different configurations: over the whole measurement area, over the hydroxyapatite piocks only and at both sides of the hydroxyapatite blocks.
For all scanners, no influence of fat could be demonstrated if it was homogeneously distributed over the whole measurement area. However, changes in area bone-density were observed if fat was distributed inhomogeneously over the measurement area. Fat over only the bone area reduced the measured bone values by 0.051 g/cm
2 per cm fat layer. Fat over only the soft-tissue area increased the measured bone values by the same amount. These results apply to the Lunar DPX scanner. The results for the Lunar DP-3 scanner are similar; those for the Hologic QDR-1000 show a slightly smaller fat dependence of 0.044 g/cm
2 per cm fat layer. The fat influences are not dependent on the amount of bone and only minimally on the soft-tissue thickness.
A change of 50% in the fat content of the bone marrow will change the measured area bone-density of an averaged sized vertebra by 5–6% depending on scanner model. Inhomogeneous fat distribution in soft tissue, resulting in a difference of 2 cm fat layer between soft-tissue area and bone area, will influence the measured area bone-density by 9–10%.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2337690</pmid><doi>10.1016/0169-6009(90)90101-K</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-6009 |
ispartof | Bone and mineral, 1990-04, Vol.9 (1), p.71-81 |
issn | 0169-6009 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79769571 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology Biological and medical sciences Bone Density Bone Marrow - anatomy & histology Bone measurement Connective Tissue - anatomy & histology Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Dual-photon absorptiometry Evaluation Studies as Topic Fat influence Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Models, Anatomic Osteoporosis Skeleton and joints Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system |
title | Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A10%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20fat%20on%20bone%20measurements%20with%20dual-energy%20absorptiometry&rft.jtitle=Bone%20and%20mineral&rft.au=Hangartner,%20Thomas%20N.&rft.date=1990-04-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=71-81&rft.issn=0169-6009&rft.coden=BOMIET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0169-6009(90)90101-K&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79769571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16025244&rft_id=info:pmid/2337690&rft_els_id=016960099090101K&rfr_iscdi=true |