Does epidural analgesia cause dystocia?

To analyze the effects of epidural analgesia for labor when dystocia occurs. Retrospective cohort study. Academic health center. 641 low risk, nulliparous women in spontaneous labor. 406 (63%) women received epidurals analgesia and 253 (37%) did not. Sixty women (9.4%) required an abdominal delivery...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical anesthesia 1998-02, Vol.10 (1), p.58-65
Hauptverfasser: Thompson, T T, Thorp, Jr, J M, Mayer, D, Kuller, J A, Bowes, Jr, W A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue 1
container_start_page 58
container_title Journal of clinical anesthesia
container_volume 10
creator Thompson, T T
Thorp, Jr, J M
Mayer, D
Kuller, J A
Bowes, Jr, W A
description To analyze the effects of epidural analgesia for labor when dystocia occurs. Retrospective cohort study. Academic health center. 641 low risk, nulliparous women in spontaneous labor. 406 (63%) women received epidurals analgesia and 253 (37%) did not. Sixty women (9.4%) required an abdominal delivery for dystocia. Women receiving epidural analgesia were more likely to be white, receive care from an attending physician, need labor augmentation, and deliver a heavier infant. Multivariate analysis identified five variables predictive of dystocia and abdominal delivery: pitocin augmentation odds ratio (O.R.) = 3.9 (2.0 to 7.6), duration of labor more than 20 hours O.R. = 2.4 (1.3 to 4.4), high epidural dose O.R. = 2.2 (1.2 to 4.1), birthweight over 4,000 grams O.R. = 2.0 (1.0 to 4.2), and early placement of epidural O.R. = 1. 9 (1.0 to 3.5). Repeating the regression after excluding the 20 women who developed abnormal labor prior to epidural placement (18 of 20 women had protracted dilatation) demonstrated that pitocin augmentation O.R. = 4.0 (1.8 to 4.), high epidural dose O.R. = 3.0 (1.9 to 6.2), duration of labor greater than 20 hours O.R. = 2.7 (1.3 to 5.7), and birthweight over 4,000 grams O.R. = 2.1 (0. 9 to 4.8) were associated with dystocia. Epidural analgesia appears to be a marker of abnormal labor rather than a cause of dystocia. High concentration anesthetics and epinephrine should be avoided, as they may influence labor. Randomized, controlled trials of this technique will be difficult to do; our work should reassure patients and their clinicians that epidural analgesia does not adversely affect labor.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00222-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79760611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79760611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-d802baffd140ce6887495f6deef618652aed27fda1af22e5f62f240c33f1f1ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1Pg0AQxfegqbX6JzTh5McBnVnYBU7G1M-kiQf1vBnYWYOBgiwc-t9LW9LTJG_em8n7CbFEuENAff8JmZJhiincZMktgJQyVCdifpTPxLn3vwAQK4kzMRt1ncUwF9dPDfuA29IOHVUBbaj6YV9SUNDgObBb3zdFSQ8X4tRR5flymgvx_fL8tXoL1x-v76vHdVhEEPehTUHm5JzFGArWaZrEmXLaMjuNqVaS2MrEWUJyUvK4kk6O1ihy6DCnaCGuDnfbrvkb2PemLn3BVUUbbgZvkizRoBFHozoYi67xvmNn2q6sqdsaBLODYvZQzK69yRKzh2LUmFtOD4a8ZntMTUSif3PEXpM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79760611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does epidural analgesia cause dystocia?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Thompson, T T ; Thorp, Jr, J M ; Mayer, D ; Kuller, J A ; Bowes, Jr, W A</creator><creatorcontrib>Thompson, T T ; Thorp, Jr, J M ; Mayer, D ; Kuller, J A ; Bowes, Jr, W A</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze the effects of epidural analgesia for labor when dystocia occurs. Retrospective cohort study. Academic health center. 641 low risk, nulliparous women in spontaneous labor. 406 (63%) women received epidurals analgesia and 253 (37%) did not. Sixty women (9.4%) required an abdominal delivery for dystocia. Women receiving epidural analgesia were more likely to be white, receive care from an attending physician, need labor augmentation, and deliver a heavier infant. Multivariate analysis identified five variables predictive of dystocia and abdominal delivery: pitocin augmentation odds ratio (O.R.) = 3.9 (2.0 to 7.6), duration of labor more than 20 hours O.R. = 2.4 (1.3 to 4.4), high epidural dose O.R. = 2.2 (1.2 to 4.1), birthweight over 4,000 grams O.R. = 2.0 (1.0 to 4.2), and early placement of epidural O.R. = 1. 9 (1.0 to 3.5). Repeating the regression after excluding the 20 women who developed abnormal labor prior to epidural placement (18 of 20 women had protracted dilatation) demonstrated that pitocin augmentation O.R. = 4.0 (1.8 to 4.), high epidural dose O.R. = 3.0 (1.9 to 6.2), duration of labor greater than 20 hours O.R. = 2.7 (1.3 to 5.7), and birthweight over 4,000 grams O.R. = 2.1 (0. 9 to 4.8) were associated with dystocia. Epidural analgesia appears to be a marker of abnormal labor rather than a cause of dystocia. High concentration anesthetics and epinephrine should be avoided, as they may influence labor. Randomized, controlled trials of this technique will be difficult to do; our work should reassure patients and their clinicians that epidural analgesia does not adversely affect labor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8180</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00222-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9526940</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesia, Epidural ; Analgesia, Obstetrical ; Cesarean Section ; Cohort Studies ; Delivery, Obstetric ; Dystocia - chemically induced ; Dystocia - physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Multivariate Analysis ; Pregnancy ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical anesthesia, 1998-02, Vol.10 (1), p.58-65</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-d802baffd140ce6887495f6deef618652aed27fda1af22e5f62f240c33f1f1ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-d802baffd140ce6887495f6deef618652aed27fda1af22e5f62f240c33f1f1ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9526940$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thompson, T T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorp, Jr, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuller, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowes, Jr, W A</creatorcontrib><title>Does epidural analgesia cause dystocia?</title><title>Journal of clinical anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><description>To analyze the effects of epidural analgesia for labor when dystocia occurs. Retrospective cohort study. Academic health center. 641 low risk, nulliparous women in spontaneous labor. 406 (63%) women received epidurals analgesia and 253 (37%) did not. Sixty women (9.4%) required an abdominal delivery for dystocia. Women receiving epidural analgesia were more likely to be white, receive care from an attending physician, need labor augmentation, and deliver a heavier infant. Multivariate analysis identified five variables predictive of dystocia and abdominal delivery: pitocin augmentation odds ratio (O.R.) = 3.9 (2.0 to 7.6), duration of labor more than 20 hours O.R. = 2.4 (1.3 to 4.4), high epidural dose O.R. = 2.2 (1.2 to 4.1), birthweight over 4,000 grams O.R. = 2.0 (1.0 to 4.2), and early placement of epidural O.R. = 1. 9 (1.0 to 3.5). Repeating the regression after excluding the 20 women who developed abnormal labor prior to epidural placement (18 of 20 women had protracted dilatation) demonstrated that pitocin augmentation O.R. = 4.0 (1.8 to 4.), high epidural dose O.R. = 3.0 (1.9 to 6.2), duration of labor greater than 20 hours O.R. = 2.7 (1.3 to 5.7), and birthweight over 4,000 grams O.R. = 2.1 (0. 9 to 4.8) were associated with dystocia. Epidural analgesia appears to be a marker of abnormal labor rather than a cause of dystocia. High concentration anesthetics and epinephrine should be avoided, as they may influence labor. Randomized, controlled trials of this technique will be difficult to do; our work should reassure patients and their clinicians that epidural analgesia does not adversely affect labor.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesia, Epidural</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric</subject><subject>Dystocia - chemically induced</subject><subject>Dystocia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0952-8180</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1Pg0AQxfegqbX6JzTh5McBnVnYBU7G1M-kiQf1vBnYWYOBgiwc-t9LW9LTJG_em8n7CbFEuENAff8JmZJhiincZMktgJQyVCdifpTPxLn3vwAQK4kzMRt1ncUwF9dPDfuA29IOHVUBbaj6YV9SUNDgObBb3zdFSQ8X4tRR5flymgvx_fL8tXoL1x-v76vHdVhEEPehTUHm5JzFGArWaZrEmXLaMjuNqVaS2MrEWUJyUvK4kk6O1ihy6DCnaCGuDnfbrvkb2PemLn3BVUUbbgZvkizRoBFHozoYi67xvmNn2q6sqdsaBLODYvZQzK69yRKzh2LUmFtOD4a8ZntMTUSif3PEXpM</recordid><startdate>199802</startdate><enddate>199802</enddate><creator>Thompson, T T</creator><creator>Thorp, Jr, J M</creator><creator>Mayer, D</creator><creator>Kuller, J A</creator><creator>Bowes, Jr, W A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199802</creationdate><title>Does epidural analgesia cause dystocia?</title><author>Thompson, T T ; Thorp, Jr, J M ; Mayer, D ; Kuller, J A ; Bowes, Jr, W A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-d802baffd140ce6887495f6deef618652aed27fda1af22e5f62f240c33f1f1ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesia, Epidural</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric</topic><topic>Dystocia - chemically induced</topic><topic>Dystocia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thompson, T T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorp, Jr, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuller, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowes, Jr, W A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thompson, T T</au><au>Thorp, Jr, J M</au><au>Mayer, D</au><au>Kuller, J A</au><au>Bowes, Jr, W A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does epidural analgesia cause dystocia?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><date>1998-02</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>58-65</pages><issn>0952-8180</issn><abstract>To analyze the effects of epidural analgesia for labor when dystocia occurs. Retrospective cohort study. Academic health center. 641 low risk, nulliparous women in spontaneous labor. 406 (63%) women received epidurals analgesia and 253 (37%) did not. Sixty women (9.4%) required an abdominal delivery for dystocia. Women receiving epidural analgesia were more likely to be white, receive care from an attending physician, need labor augmentation, and deliver a heavier infant. Multivariate analysis identified five variables predictive of dystocia and abdominal delivery: pitocin augmentation odds ratio (O.R.) = 3.9 (2.0 to 7.6), duration of labor more than 20 hours O.R. = 2.4 (1.3 to 4.4), high epidural dose O.R. = 2.2 (1.2 to 4.1), birthweight over 4,000 grams O.R. = 2.0 (1.0 to 4.2), and early placement of epidural O.R. = 1. 9 (1.0 to 3.5). Repeating the regression after excluding the 20 women who developed abnormal labor prior to epidural placement (18 of 20 women had protracted dilatation) demonstrated that pitocin augmentation O.R. = 4.0 (1.8 to 4.), high epidural dose O.R. = 3.0 (1.9 to 6.2), duration of labor greater than 20 hours O.R. = 2.7 (1.3 to 5.7), and birthweight over 4,000 grams O.R. = 2.1 (0. 9 to 4.8) were associated with dystocia. Epidural analgesia appears to be a marker of abnormal labor rather than a cause of dystocia. High concentration anesthetics and epinephrine should be avoided, as they may influence labor. Randomized, controlled trials of this technique will be difficult to do; our work should reassure patients and their clinicians that epidural analgesia does not adversely affect labor.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>9526940</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00222-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-8180
ispartof Journal of clinical anesthesia, 1998-02, Vol.10 (1), p.58-65
issn 0952-8180
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79760611
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Analgesia, Epidural
Analgesia, Obstetrical
Cesarean Section
Cohort Studies
Delivery, Obstetric
Dystocia - chemically induced
Dystocia - physiopathology
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Multivariate Analysis
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
title Does epidural analgesia cause dystocia?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A55%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20epidural%20analgesia%20cause%20dystocia?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20anesthesia&rft.au=Thompson,%20T%20T&rft.date=1998-02&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=58-65&rft.issn=0952-8180&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00222-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79760611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79760611&rft_id=info:pmid/9526940&rfr_iscdi=true