Therapists' Conceptualization and Characterization of the Clinical Concept of Spinal Stiffness

The clinical concept of spinal stiffness provides one basis for applying spinal manipulation. Because the terms used to describe the perceptual results of manual spinal stiffness testing are poorly defined, the nature and number of attributes contained in the concept remain unclear. This study attem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical therapy 1998-03, Vol.78 (3), p.289-300
Hauptverfasser: Maher, C G, Simmonds, M, Adams, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 300
container_issue 3
container_start_page 289
container_title Physical therapy
container_volume 78
creator Maher, C G
Simmonds, M
Adams, R
description The clinical concept of spinal stiffness provides one basis for applying spinal manipulation. Because the terms used to describe the perceptual results of manual spinal stiffness testing are poorly defined, the nature and number of attributes contained in the concept remain unclear. This study attempted to clarify the concept of spinal stiffness by examining the relationships among 31 published spinal stiffness descriptors using cluster analysis. Each stiffness descriptor was printed on a magnetized rubber strip. Physical therapists in Houston (Tex) and Sydney (New South Wales, Australia) judged the similarity of the stiffness descriptors by arranging them on a board. The squared Euclidean distance between words was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed using Ward's method. Cluster analysis reduced the 31 stiffness descriptors to three superclusters (limited mobility, increased mobility, and viscoelasticity) in both the Houston and Sydney data. In a step toward improving the reliability of spinal stiffness judgments, this study has identified the fundamental characteristics of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness. Research is now needed to clearly define these characteristics and then develop protocols that will allow physical therapists to reliably rate these attributes.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ptj/78.3.289
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79744932</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A20415231</galeid><sourcerecordid>A20415231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-1446fec2329ed480295ba49b6b28a448513bae7dfaae1717f299cd787e5e4e933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1v1DAQxS0EKkvhxhUp4gCHkq2_so6PVQQUqVIPLVcsxxlvvHKcEDsq8Nfj1W4rgVY-WHrzmyfP8yD0luA1wZJdTml3Keo1W9NaPkMrUrG63AjKn6MVxoyUElP2Er2KcYcxJoLLM3QmK4ql4Cv0476HWU8upvixaMZgYEqL9u6PTm4MhQ5d0fR61ibB_CiOtkg9FI13wRntH9v2-t3kQlbukrM2QIyv0QurfYQ3x_scff_y-b65Lm9uv35rrm5Kw6VMJeF8Y8FQRiV0vMZUVq3mst20tNac1xVhrQbRWa2BCCIsldJ0ohZQAQfJ2Dn6cPCd5vHnAjGpwUUD3usA4xKVyMNyyWgG3_8H7sZlzm-OilJGaL3hmwx9OkBb7UG5YMeUE9hCyFH5MYB1Wb6imJMq92S8PIHn08HgzCn-X_uMJPiVzOg9bEHlYJrbU7iZxxhnsGqa3aDn34pgtd8AlTdAiVoxlTcg4--OEy7tAN0TfPzyXL841Hu37R_cDCoO2vtM073RIY0nt7-tELpr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223128646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Therapists' Conceptualization and Characterization of the Clinical Concept of Spinal Stiffness</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Maher, C G ; Simmonds, M ; Adams, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Maher, C G ; Simmonds, M ; Adams, R</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical concept of spinal stiffness provides one basis for applying spinal manipulation. Because the terms used to describe the perceptual results of manual spinal stiffness testing are poorly defined, the nature and number of attributes contained in the concept remain unclear. This study attempted to clarify the concept of spinal stiffness by examining the relationships among 31 published spinal stiffness descriptors using cluster analysis. Each stiffness descriptor was printed on a magnetized rubber strip. Physical therapists in Houston (Tex) and Sydney (New South Wales, Australia) judged the similarity of the stiffness descriptors by arranging them on a board. The squared Euclidean distance between words was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed using Ward's method. Cluster analysis reduced the 31 stiffness descriptors to three superclusters (limited mobility, increased mobility, and viscoelasticity) in both the Houston and Sydney data. In a step toward improving the reliability of spinal stiffness judgments, this study has identified the fundamental characteristics of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness. Research is now needed to clearly define these characteristics and then develop protocols that will allow physical therapists to reliably rate these attributes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-6724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ptj/78.3.289</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9520974</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physical Therapy Association</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Anatomy ; Classification ; Cluster Analysis ; Humans ; Movement ; Physical therapy ; Physical Therapy Modalities ; Physiological aspects ; Spine ; Spine - physiopathology ; Stretch (Physiology) ; Stretching (Physiology) ; Study and teaching ; Terminology as Topic ; Therapeutics, Physiological</subject><ispartof>Physical therapy, 1998-03, Vol.78 (3), p.289-300</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1998 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1998 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright American Physical Therapy Association Mar 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-1446fec2329ed480295ba49b6b28a448513bae7dfaae1717f299cd787e5e4e933</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9520974$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maher, C G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmonds, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, R</creatorcontrib><title>Therapists' Conceptualization and Characterization of the Clinical Concept of Spinal Stiffness</title><title>Physical therapy</title><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><description>The clinical concept of spinal stiffness provides one basis for applying spinal manipulation. Because the terms used to describe the perceptual results of manual spinal stiffness testing are poorly defined, the nature and number of attributes contained in the concept remain unclear. This study attempted to clarify the concept of spinal stiffness by examining the relationships among 31 published spinal stiffness descriptors using cluster analysis. Each stiffness descriptor was printed on a magnetized rubber strip. Physical therapists in Houston (Tex) and Sydney (New South Wales, Australia) judged the similarity of the stiffness descriptors by arranging them on a board. The squared Euclidean distance between words was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed using Ward's method. Cluster analysis reduced the 31 stiffness descriptors to three superclusters (limited mobility, increased mobility, and viscoelasticity) in both the Houston and Sydney data. In a step toward improving the reliability of spinal stiffness judgments, this study has identified the fundamental characteristics of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness. Research is now needed to clearly define these characteristics and then develop protocols that will allow physical therapists to reliably rate these attributes.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Spine - physiopathology</subject><subject>Stretch (Physiology)</subject><subject>Stretching (Physiology)</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><subject>Therapeutics, Physiological</subject><issn>0031-9023</issn><issn>1538-6724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1v1DAQxS0EKkvhxhUp4gCHkq2_so6PVQQUqVIPLVcsxxlvvHKcEDsq8Nfj1W4rgVY-WHrzmyfP8yD0luA1wZJdTml3Keo1W9NaPkMrUrG63AjKn6MVxoyUElP2Er2KcYcxJoLLM3QmK4ql4Cv0476HWU8upvixaMZgYEqL9u6PTm4MhQ5d0fR61ibB_CiOtkg9FI13wRntH9v2-t3kQlbukrM2QIyv0QurfYQ3x_scff_y-b65Lm9uv35rrm5Kw6VMJeF8Y8FQRiV0vMZUVq3mst20tNac1xVhrQbRWa2BCCIsldJ0ohZQAQfJ2Dn6cPCd5vHnAjGpwUUD3usA4xKVyMNyyWgG3_8H7sZlzm-OilJGaL3hmwx9OkBb7UG5YMeUE9hCyFH5MYB1Wb6imJMq92S8PIHn08HgzCn-X_uMJPiVzOg9bEHlYJrbU7iZxxhnsGqa3aDn34pgtd8AlTdAiVoxlTcg4--OEy7tAN0TfPzyXL841Hu37R_cDCoO2vtM073RIY0nt7-tELpr</recordid><startdate>19980301</startdate><enddate>19980301</enddate><creator>Maher, C G</creator><creator>Simmonds, M</creator><creator>Adams, R</creator><general>American Physical Therapy Association</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980301</creationdate><title>Therapists' Conceptualization and Characterization of the Clinical Concept of Spinal Stiffness</title><author>Maher, C G ; Simmonds, M ; Adams, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-1446fec2329ed480295ba49b6b28a448513bae7dfaae1717f299cd787e5e4e933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Spine - physiopathology</topic><topic>Stretch (Physiology)</topic><topic>Stretching (Physiology)</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><topic>Therapeutics, Physiological</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maher, C G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmonds, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maher, C G</au><au>Simmonds, M</au><au>Adams, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Therapists' Conceptualization and Characterization of the Clinical Concept of Spinal Stiffness</atitle><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><date>1998-03-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>289-300</pages><issn>0031-9023</issn><eissn>1538-6724</eissn><abstract>The clinical concept of spinal stiffness provides one basis for applying spinal manipulation. Because the terms used to describe the perceptual results of manual spinal stiffness testing are poorly defined, the nature and number of attributes contained in the concept remain unclear. This study attempted to clarify the concept of spinal stiffness by examining the relationships among 31 published spinal stiffness descriptors using cluster analysis. Each stiffness descriptor was printed on a magnetized rubber strip. Physical therapists in Houston (Tex) and Sydney (New South Wales, Australia) judged the similarity of the stiffness descriptors by arranging them on a board. The squared Euclidean distance between words was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed using Ward's method. Cluster analysis reduced the 31 stiffness descriptors to three superclusters (limited mobility, increased mobility, and viscoelasticity) in both the Houston and Sydney data. In a step toward improving the reliability of spinal stiffness judgments, this study has identified the fundamental characteristics of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness. Research is now needed to clearly define these characteristics and then develop protocols that will allow physical therapists to reliably rate these attributes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physical Therapy Association</pub><pmid>9520974</pmid><doi>10.1093/ptj/78.3.289</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9023
ispartof Physical therapy, 1998-03, Vol.78 (3), p.289-300
issn 0031-9023
1538-6724
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79744932
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Analysis
Anatomy
Classification
Cluster Analysis
Humans
Movement
Physical therapy
Physical Therapy Modalities
Physiological aspects
Spine
Spine - physiopathology
Stretch (Physiology)
Stretching (Physiology)
Study and teaching
Terminology as Topic
Therapeutics, Physiological
title Therapists' Conceptualization and Characterization of the Clinical Concept of Spinal Stiffness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T22%3A25%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Therapists'%20Conceptualization%20and%20Characterization%20of%20the%20Clinical%20Concept%20of%20Spinal%20Stiffness&rft.jtitle=Physical%20therapy&rft.au=Maher,%20C%20G&rft.date=1998-03-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=289-300&rft.issn=0031-9023&rft.eissn=1538-6724&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ptj/78.3.289&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA20415231%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223128646&rft_id=info:pmid/9520974&rft_galeid=A20415231&rfr_iscdi=true