Therapists' Conceptualization and Characterization of the Clinical Concept of Spinal Stiffness
The clinical concept of spinal stiffness provides one basis for applying spinal manipulation. Because the terms used to describe the perceptual results of manual spinal stiffness testing are poorly defined, the nature and number of attributes contained in the concept remain unclear. This study attem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical therapy 1998-03, Vol.78 (3), p.289-300 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 300 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 289 |
container_title | Physical therapy |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Maher, C G Simmonds, M Adams, R |
description | The clinical concept of spinal stiffness provides one basis for applying spinal manipulation. Because the terms used to describe the perceptual results of manual spinal stiffness testing are poorly defined, the nature and number of attributes contained in the concept remain unclear. This study attempted to clarify the concept of spinal stiffness by examining the relationships among 31 published spinal stiffness descriptors using cluster analysis.
Each stiffness descriptor was printed on a magnetized rubber strip. Physical therapists in Houston (Tex) and Sydney (New South Wales, Australia) judged the similarity of the stiffness descriptors by arranging them on a board. The squared Euclidean distance between words was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed using Ward's method.
Cluster analysis reduced the 31 stiffness descriptors to three superclusters (limited mobility, increased mobility, and viscoelasticity) in both the Houston and Sydney data.
In a step toward improving the reliability of spinal stiffness judgments, this study has identified the fundamental characteristics of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness. Research is now needed to clearly define these characteristics and then develop protocols that will allow physical therapists to reliably rate these attributes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ptj/78.3.289 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79744932</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A20415231</galeid><sourcerecordid>A20415231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-1446fec2329ed480295ba49b6b28a448513bae7dfaae1717f299cd787e5e4e933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1v1DAQxS0EKkvhxhUp4gCHkq2_so6PVQQUqVIPLVcsxxlvvHKcEDsq8Nfj1W4rgVY-WHrzmyfP8yD0luA1wZJdTml3Keo1W9NaPkMrUrG63AjKn6MVxoyUElP2Er2KcYcxJoLLM3QmK4ql4Cv0476HWU8upvixaMZgYEqL9u6PTm4MhQ5d0fR61ibB_CiOtkg9FI13wRntH9v2-t3kQlbukrM2QIyv0QurfYQ3x_scff_y-b65Lm9uv35rrm5Kw6VMJeF8Y8FQRiV0vMZUVq3mst20tNac1xVhrQbRWa2BCCIsldJ0ohZQAQfJ2Dn6cPCd5vHnAjGpwUUD3usA4xKVyMNyyWgG3_8H7sZlzm-OilJGaL3hmwx9OkBb7UG5YMeUE9hCyFH5MYB1Wb6imJMq92S8PIHn08HgzCn-X_uMJPiVzOg9bEHlYJrbU7iZxxhnsGqa3aDn34pgtd8AlTdAiVoxlTcg4--OEy7tAN0TfPzyXL841Hu37R_cDCoO2vtM073RIY0nt7-tELpr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223128646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Therapists' Conceptualization and Characterization of the Clinical Concept of Spinal Stiffness</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Maher, C G ; Simmonds, M ; Adams, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Maher, C G ; Simmonds, M ; Adams, R</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical concept of spinal stiffness provides one basis for applying spinal manipulation. Because the terms used to describe the perceptual results of manual spinal stiffness testing are poorly defined, the nature and number of attributes contained in the concept remain unclear. This study attempted to clarify the concept of spinal stiffness by examining the relationships among 31 published spinal stiffness descriptors using cluster analysis.
Each stiffness descriptor was printed on a magnetized rubber strip. Physical therapists in Houston (Tex) and Sydney (New South Wales, Australia) judged the similarity of the stiffness descriptors by arranging them on a board. The squared Euclidean distance between words was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed using Ward's method.
Cluster analysis reduced the 31 stiffness descriptors to three superclusters (limited mobility, increased mobility, and viscoelasticity) in both the Houston and Sydney data.
In a step toward improving the reliability of spinal stiffness judgments, this study has identified the fundamental characteristics of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness. Research is now needed to clearly define these characteristics and then develop protocols that will allow physical therapists to reliably rate these attributes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-6724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ptj/78.3.289</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9520974</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physical Therapy Association</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Anatomy ; Classification ; Cluster Analysis ; Humans ; Movement ; Physical therapy ; Physical Therapy Modalities ; Physiological aspects ; Spine ; Spine - physiopathology ; Stretch (Physiology) ; Stretching (Physiology) ; Study and teaching ; Terminology as Topic ; Therapeutics, Physiological</subject><ispartof>Physical therapy, 1998-03, Vol.78 (3), p.289-300</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1998 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1998 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright American Physical Therapy Association Mar 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-1446fec2329ed480295ba49b6b28a448513bae7dfaae1717f299cd787e5e4e933</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9520974$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maher, C G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmonds, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, R</creatorcontrib><title>Therapists' Conceptualization and Characterization of the Clinical Concept of Spinal Stiffness</title><title>Physical therapy</title><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><description>The clinical concept of spinal stiffness provides one basis for applying spinal manipulation. Because the terms used to describe the perceptual results of manual spinal stiffness testing are poorly defined, the nature and number of attributes contained in the concept remain unclear. This study attempted to clarify the concept of spinal stiffness by examining the relationships among 31 published spinal stiffness descriptors using cluster analysis.
Each stiffness descriptor was printed on a magnetized rubber strip. Physical therapists in Houston (Tex) and Sydney (New South Wales, Australia) judged the similarity of the stiffness descriptors by arranging them on a board. The squared Euclidean distance between words was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed using Ward's method.
Cluster analysis reduced the 31 stiffness descriptors to three superclusters (limited mobility, increased mobility, and viscoelasticity) in both the Houston and Sydney data.
In a step toward improving the reliability of spinal stiffness judgments, this study has identified the fundamental characteristics of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness. Research is now needed to clearly define these characteristics and then develop protocols that will allow physical therapists to reliably rate these attributes.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Spine - physiopathology</subject><subject>Stretch (Physiology)</subject><subject>Stretching (Physiology)</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><subject>Therapeutics, Physiological</subject><issn>0031-9023</issn><issn>1538-6724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1v1DAQxS0EKkvhxhUp4gCHkq2_so6PVQQUqVIPLVcsxxlvvHKcEDsq8Nfj1W4rgVY-WHrzmyfP8yD0luA1wZJdTml3Keo1W9NaPkMrUrG63AjKn6MVxoyUElP2Er2KcYcxJoLLM3QmK4ql4Cv0476HWU8upvixaMZgYEqL9u6PTm4MhQ5d0fR61ibB_CiOtkg9FI13wRntH9v2-t3kQlbukrM2QIyv0QurfYQ3x_scff_y-b65Lm9uv35rrm5Kw6VMJeF8Y8FQRiV0vMZUVq3mst20tNac1xVhrQbRWa2BCCIsldJ0ohZQAQfJ2Dn6cPCd5vHnAjGpwUUD3usA4xKVyMNyyWgG3_8H7sZlzm-OilJGaL3hmwx9OkBb7UG5YMeUE9hCyFH5MYB1Wb6imJMq92S8PIHn08HgzCn-X_uMJPiVzOg9bEHlYJrbU7iZxxhnsGqa3aDn34pgtd8AlTdAiVoxlTcg4--OEy7tAN0TfPzyXL841Hu37R_cDCoO2vtM073RIY0nt7-tELpr</recordid><startdate>19980301</startdate><enddate>19980301</enddate><creator>Maher, C G</creator><creator>Simmonds, M</creator><creator>Adams, R</creator><general>American Physical Therapy Association</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980301</creationdate><title>Therapists' Conceptualization and Characterization of the Clinical Concept of Spinal Stiffness</title><author>Maher, C G ; Simmonds, M ; Adams, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-1446fec2329ed480295ba49b6b28a448513bae7dfaae1717f299cd787e5e4e933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Spine - physiopathology</topic><topic>Stretch (Physiology)</topic><topic>Stretching (Physiology)</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><topic>Therapeutics, Physiological</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maher, C G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmonds, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maher, C G</au><au>Simmonds, M</au><au>Adams, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Therapists' Conceptualization and Characterization of the Clinical Concept of Spinal Stiffness</atitle><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><date>1998-03-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>289-300</pages><issn>0031-9023</issn><eissn>1538-6724</eissn><abstract>The clinical concept of spinal stiffness provides one basis for applying spinal manipulation. Because the terms used to describe the perceptual results of manual spinal stiffness testing are poorly defined, the nature and number of attributes contained in the concept remain unclear. This study attempted to clarify the concept of spinal stiffness by examining the relationships among 31 published spinal stiffness descriptors using cluster analysis.
Each stiffness descriptor was printed on a magnetized rubber strip. Physical therapists in Houston (Tex) and Sydney (New South Wales, Australia) judged the similarity of the stiffness descriptors by arranging them on a board. The squared Euclidean distance between words was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed using Ward's method.
Cluster analysis reduced the 31 stiffness descriptors to three superclusters (limited mobility, increased mobility, and viscoelasticity) in both the Houston and Sydney data.
In a step toward improving the reliability of spinal stiffness judgments, this study has identified the fundamental characteristics of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness. Research is now needed to clearly define these characteristics and then develop protocols that will allow physical therapists to reliably rate these attributes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physical Therapy Association</pub><pmid>9520974</pmid><doi>10.1093/ptj/78.3.289</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9023 |
ispartof | Physical therapy, 1998-03, Vol.78 (3), p.289-300 |
issn | 0031-9023 1538-6724 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79744932 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Analysis Anatomy Classification Cluster Analysis Humans Movement Physical therapy Physical Therapy Modalities Physiological aspects Spine Spine - physiopathology Stretch (Physiology) Stretching (Physiology) Study and teaching Terminology as Topic Therapeutics, Physiological |
title | Therapists' Conceptualization and Characterization of the Clinical Concept of Spinal Stiffness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T22%3A25%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Therapists'%20Conceptualization%20and%20Characterization%20of%20the%20Clinical%20Concept%20of%20Spinal%20Stiffness&rft.jtitle=Physical%20therapy&rft.au=Maher,%20C%20G&rft.date=1998-03-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=289-300&rft.issn=0031-9023&rft.eissn=1538-6724&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ptj/78.3.289&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA20415231%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223128646&rft_id=info:pmid/9520974&rft_galeid=A20415231&rfr_iscdi=true |